StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Human Right to Humane Treatment - Term Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Human Right to Humane Treatment" analyzes the implementation of the right to humane treatment under The European Convention on Human Rights. In 1992, Amnesty International reported that incidents of inhuman and degrading punishment were reported in more than 70 countries…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.5% of users find it useful
Human Right to Humane Treatment
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Human Right to Humane Treatment"

Article 3 of the European Convention Introduction: In 1992, Amnesty International reported that incidents of inhuman and degrading punishment were reported in more than 70 countries.1 The respect for the human rights of an individual includes the “freedom from discriminatory or arbitrary treatment.”2 The implications of human rights within a legal framework is that an individual has certain rights, which will be the same for everyone, irrespective of age, gender, religion, nationality or sexual orientation. The European Convention on Human Rights has therefore set out certain provisions with the aim of securing to all citizens, the rights and freedoms guaranteed under the EC treaty. Under the Treaty, inhuman and degrading punishment would violate the rights of an individual, or even a child, to freedom from arbitrary treatment - such as excessive punishment or torture under imprisonment. There have been allegations of inhuman and degrading treatment in prisons and the provisions of the Geneva Convention have been found inadequate in this regard. However, Article 3 of the European Convention addresses all such violations of the right to freedom from discriminatory treatment. Article 3 has been primarily applied in respect to international victims of torture and cruel, arbitrary treatment while imprisoned. However corporal punishment of children is also emerging as an area where the provisions of Article 3 would apply. Such punishment would be equivalent to mental and physical torture which is deemed to be unacceptable under the Convention. Yet traditional belief has held that corporal punishment is an essential part of discipline and this conflict between punishment and freedom from torture has generated controversy within the European Union. Part I: The right of the individual to humane treatment is recognized under Article 3 of the European Convention of Human Rights, which states clearly that; No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment3. In view of the fact that “we live in a society in which violence is spreading like a plague”4 and incidents of terrorist violence and destruction are soaring, the provisions of Article 3 of the Convention help to protect individuals from violence. When the violence or torture is perpetrated on children through corporal punishment, there is a special cause of action that arises for the exercise of Article 3, since children are in a weaker position as compared to adults. Corporal punishment can sometimes be excessive and thereby constitute degrading treatment that harms the child physically, emotionally and mentally. Legal reforms have been undertaken in several countries to declare corporal punishment of children unlawful - a violation of the protection against torture and inhuman treatment guaranteed under Article 3. The European Commission and the Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg have received several applications to enforce the rights of children to protection against inhuman or degrading treatment through corporal punishment. In 1978, the practice of judicial birching of juveniles that was in practice in the Island of Man was deemed to be a breach of Article 3 that constituted cruel and inhuman punishment5. While this practice was acceptable in that particular geographical area, the Strasbourg Court deemed it unacceptably cruel to young people. In order to ensure compliance with the provisions of Article 3, several countries have deemed corporal punishment to be an unlawful practice on the grounds that it inflicts cruel and inhuman torture on children. In May 1996, courts in Italy ruled against corporal punishment and stated; “the use of violence for educational purposes can no longer be considered lawful.”6 In 2000, the Supreme Court of Israel invoked the provisions of Article 19 of the Convention of the Rights of the Child in justifying its position that corporal punishment constitutes a breach of Article 3, since it amounts to a “humiliation and derogation from their dignity.” The Court declared unequivocally; “The use of punishment which causes hurt and humiliation does not contribute to the child’s personality or education, but instead damages his or her human rights.”7 Where parents have challenged national ban of corporal punishment, the European Human Rights Court has rejected such applications. In the case of Seven Individuals v Sweden8, the Court rejected the appeal of parents against a ban on corporal punishment by stating, “The actual effects of the law are…..to discourage abuse and to prevent excesses which could properly be described as violence against children.” In September 2000, the Court refused to even hear an application from Christian schools to lift the ban on corporal punishment.9 Another significant decision of the European Court was in Campbell and Cosans v UK,10 where the students were suspended from the school for refusing to receive corporal punishment. The Court declared that the boys’ rights had been violated, since they had been denied their rights to education. The Court has deemed the children to be on par with adults and equally deserving of prevention from torture or inhuman treatment, since they are also individuals. Since no clearly defined limits have been set by individual countries to regulate corporal punishment, the Court at Strasbourg has deemed corporal punishment to be illegal and a violation of Article 3. It has also established several guidelines for judicial authorities in the member States, to determine when there will be a violation of the provisions of Article 3, ,as in the case of A v The United Kingdom.11 In this case, the unanimous decision of the Court was that the caning of a young boy by his stepfather constituted “inhuman or degrading punishment” and was a direct breach of Article 3. The Court deemed it the duty of higher authorities to ensure that measures are taken to “ensure that individuals within their jurisdiction are not subjected to torture or inhuman or degrading punishment, including such ill treatment administered by private individuals…” The Court ordered the UK Government to pay damages of 10,000 pounds to the boy, together with his legal costs. The European Court also ruled in favor of children who had been subjected to sexual abuse, holding the local authorities liable for failing to protect the children from such degrading treatment.12 These decisions of the European Court have recognized the rights of the child to receive fair and humane treatment, to have their freedom and their dignity respected, so that they are not made subject to the whims of their parents and/or teachers because of their position as weaker members in society. In countries such as the U.K, the decisions of the Court have established the need to bring about reforms in established systems in order to ensure that the rights of the child are not trampled upon. The most important contribution of the European Court has been in setting out clear guidelines for member States to determine if there has a been a violation of the rights of children under Article 3. Part II. The case of A v K was a landmark decision of the European Court in terms of the debate it invoked in the UK. The domestic law in the U.K. allows the defense of “reasonable chastisement” which was first established under common law in 1850 by the Chief Justice of England: “By the law of England, a parent may for the purposes of correcting what is evil in the child, inflict moderate and reasonable corporal punishment, always, however, with this condition, that it is moderate and reasonable”.14 However, no prescribed limits have been set out by the Courts in terms of what exactly constitutes “reasonable” chastisement, which would not fall under the category of inhuman and degrading treatment. A Government sponsored research survey carried out in the UK in the 1990s discovered that corporal punishment is common in the U.K. and over one third of the children in the survey had experienced “severe” punishment aimed to cause physical injury.15 The decision in A v UK however, challenged the traditional notions of “reasonable chastisement” as it existed in the U.K. The European Court held clearly that provisions in UK law were not sufficient to ensure protection of the child; the legal parameters of the “reasonable chastisement” clause were unclear because they did not provide any guidelines to the judges as to what factors they should consider in assessing whether the punishment amounts to inhuman or degrading treatment as prescribed under Article 3. In the case of A v UK, the father won his case in local courts on the grounds of “reasonable chastisement”; however the European Human Rights Court found that the caning in question amounted to inhuman and degrading treatment.16 In the matter of corporal punishment, the best guidelines as to what could constitute reasonable punishment, may be found in the case of R v Terry,17 where it was held that the punishment should be “moderate and reasonable” and the standard for judging this would be in relation to “the age, physique and mentality of the child” and in carrying out the punishment “a reasonable means or instrument” was to be used, one which is not “totally unrelated to usual disciplinary practices.” Thus, reasonable punishment would not employ the use of iron rods or studded belts designed to inflict harm and injury, which would constitute inhuman and degrading punishment. Moreover, the case of R v Terry also held that a child too young to understand correction should not be subjected to it. Subsequent cases in the UK reflect the input of the European Court and its judgment in A v UK, as for example the case of R v H18, which further refined the definition of “reasonable chastisement”. The judgment in this case identified the factors that had been pointed to as guidelines by the Court at Strasbourg, such as “the nature and context of the treatment; its duration; its physical and mental effects and, in some instances, the sex, age and state of health of the victim” and clarified it further, by stating that another factor which should also play a role in the decision, is the reasons that are given by the Defendant for administering such treatment. Subsequent to the decision of the European Court in A v UK, the Government recognized the need for reform and redefining of the parameters of “reasonable chastisement” to include provisions against inhuman and degrading treatment under Article 3 of the European Convention. With the introduction of the Human Rights Act of 1998 in the UK, the provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights have also been incorporated into UK law. Section 3 of the Human Rights Act of 199813 states that UK Parliament legislation must be read and given effect to in a manner that will be compatible with European Convention guarantees of fundamental rights. The burden of judicial interpretation that rests upon the English Courts is meant to ensure that the goals set out in the Treaty and the freedoms guaranteed under the Convention are applied within the U.K., to the greatest extent possible. Individuals in the U.K. are also free to directly approach the European Courts in the event there is a violation of their rights under the Convention. Since the incorporation of the Human Rights Act of 1998, there have been further cases that have come up before the Courts in 2000 and 2001 where parents have been acquitted after assault on their children20. The latest reform measures undertaken by Government to protect the rights of children is the Children and Adoption Act of 2005 which provides for adoption, if necessary, where parents are guilty of unreasonable and excessive assault that would constitute abuse and/or inhuman and degrading punishment under Article 3 and therefore a breach on the fundamental rights of the child. Conclusion: On the basis of the above, it may be noted that the provisions of Article 3 are extremely important in the context of increasing levels of violence in society today. While there are several aspects that would constitute a breach of the provisions of Article 3, including unfair and derogatory treatment in jails, the question of corporal punishment for children and the limits that must be set upon it are an important aspect of the protection afforded under Article 3. Children would be viewed as individuals under the Human Rights Act and not subject to their parents, therefore deserving the protection to the fundamental rights of the individual that are granted by the European Convention. While the practice of corporal punishment is common in the U.K., the recent incorporation of the European Convention into the Human Rights Act via article 3 of the 1998 Act in the U.K. mandates equitable treatment for children. The reform measures undertaken under the Children and Adoption Bill of 2005 may be helpful, since they focus upon the well being of the child, thereby giving legal force to the provisions of Article 3 of the European Convention in respect to children. Bibliography * Amnesty International report, 1992 * A v UK (1998) 2 FLR 959 * A v The United Kingdom (100/1997/884/1096) [Online] Available at: http://hudoc/echr.coe.int/hudoc/, application no: 25599/94 * Application No: 55211/00, Philip Williamson and Others v UK. * Campbell and Cosans v UK1982), 4 EHRR 293 * Cambria, Cass, sez. VI, 18 Marzo 1996 [Supreme Court of Cassation, 6th Penal Section, March 18 1996], Foro It II 1996, 407 (Italy). * European Convention of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. [Online] Available at: http://www.pfc.org.uk/legal/echrtext.htm; accessed 1/15/2006 * Feldman, David. Civil liberties and human rights in England and Wales. Oxford University Press, 2000, pp 4 * Foster, Steve, Human Rights and Civil Liberties, Longman (2003) * Human Rights Act of 1998 [Online] Available at: http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1998/80042--a.htm#3 * Israel Supreme Court, Criminal Appeal 4596/98 Plonit v A.G. 54(1)P.D. * Nobles, Gavin and Smith, Marjorie, Physical punishment of children in two-parent families. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, pp 271-281. * R v Terry (1955) VLR 114 * R V H (Reasonable chastisement) Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, judgment of 25 April 2001,The Times 17 May 2001 * Report of the Committee on the Rights of the Child. Violence against children in the family and in schools , pp 3. [Online] Available at: http://www.crin.org/docs/resources/treaties/crc.28/Childrenareunbeatable.pdf; accessed 1/18/2006 * Seven Individuals v Sweden, European Commission of Human Rights, Admissibility Decision, 13 May 1982. * Tyrer v UK 2 EHRR 1 (25/4/1978) #28 Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Human Right to Humane Treatment Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words, n.d.)
Human Right to Humane Treatment Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words. https://studentshare.org/law/1535812-human-rights-and-civil-liberties-choose-one-of-the-rights-listed-below-explain-how-the-european-convention-on-human-rights-seeks-to-uphold-that-right-highli
(Human Right to Humane Treatment Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words)
Human Right to Humane Treatment Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words. https://studentshare.org/law/1535812-human-rights-and-civil-liberties-choose-one-of-the-rights-listed-below-explain-how-the-european-convention-on-human-rights-seeks-to-uphold-that-right-highli.
“Human Right to Humane Treatment Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words”. https://studentshare.org/law/1535812-human-rights-and-civil-liberties-choose-one-of-the-rights-listed-below-explain-how-the-european-convention-on-human-rights-seeks-to-uphold-that-right-highli.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Human Right to Humane Treatment

The Issue of Human Rights That Prevails around Equality and Diversity

Many humans across the globe are denied the right to freedom, equal opportunities, food, shelter, education, and a proper place in society.... They may also be denied the right to express their opinion, travel the world, or practice their own religion.... To be beautiful is to be different and according to the Human Rights law of many progressive countries, everyone has a right to be who they are and deserve just as much as any other person as long as they are not harming any other individual unfairly to attain that benefit (Donelly, pg....
14 Pages (3500 words) Essay

Animal Experimentation

In addition, animal testing should be conducted for the discoveries it has advanced towards treatment of most of the world's known diseases and conditions.... Concerning this, animal testing has helped saved lives by using animals in experiments to test how humans are likely to respond to certain treatment measures and conditions.... As a result, it saves a lot of time that would have been spent in testing the drugs and treatment conventionally and getting approval....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Overview of the Winterbourne View Case

In this case, it was revealed by a television investigation that patients who suffered from learning disabilities… The investigation revealed that the hospital's patients underwent such inhumane treatment as being, repeatedly, assaulted and harshly being restrained under the Other forms of abuse included being forced to take cold showers, left alone in near zero temperatures outside the hospital facilities and mouthwash being poured into their eyes.... In England, the Mental Health Act of 1983 (substantively amended in 2007) is the main legislation that governs the admission, assessment and treatment of patients with mental health illnesses in England and Wales (Dow, 2008)....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Human and Animal Interrelationships

Most animal right activists believe that animals have a right to humane treatment.... This paper will provide a discussion based on two perspectives that focus on the need for fair treatment of farm animals' moment before they are slaughtered.... This essay stresses that animal welfare groups believe that humans have the duty to ensure the fair treatment of animals.... The paper finds the ethicist and philosophical perspective on animal treatment as valid and substantiated....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Should Animals be used in Medical Research

This essay stresses that in their strong defense proponents of this perspective argue that various measures are in place to ensure animals used in research are handled in the most humane way possible.... In this regard, human volunteers, as well as computer techniques, can be used in place of animals to minimize any likely harm they may be exposed to.... This way, the human species will stay healthy to protect the animals....
7 Pages (1750 words) Term Paper

The Issue of Animal Rights In the Modern World

Animals, in turn, have a moral right to protection of their life and the creation of decent conditions for its existence.... hellip; According to the report every day more and more people realise that there should be no discrimination in the human world.... Anyone who says that the racial differences between human beings are the reasons for discrimination is wrong.... If human society wants to be called a fair society, it is necessary to strive for a just equality....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Human Rights Training for Prison

The prison conditions and treatment to prisoners should ideally make the prisoners feel that they are in a home away from home in spite of the harsh conditions of their imprisonment.... For Irish prisons, standards set by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading treatment or Punishment Declaration of Human Rights Commission rules apply in addition to consistent Irish laws.... The CPT standards revised in 2006 relating to imprisonment consistent with the European Convention for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading treatment or Punishment shall be the constant guide for the prison officer in discharge of his duties in order to ensure that he complies with human rights principles in respect of prisoners....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Domestic Animals and the Right to Dignified Lives

The most likely and most appealing view is that despite the justification of various animal activists like Francione (2004), it may be too idealistic to expect total abolition of domestication of animals – only education and awareness shall ensure more humane treatment of animals, in the long run.... This essay "Domestic Animals and the right to Dignified Lives" discusses the ways in which human beings hold double-standards to justify the ill-treatment meted to domestic animals in particular, and considers the different approaches advocated by animal protectionists....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us