StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Expansion of the Eye Appeal Rule - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
"The Expansion of the Eye Appeal Rule" paper identifies whether eye appeal remains an underlying factor in determining the registration of designs under the 2001 Registered Design Regulation. Pre-2001 a design had to meet conditions that were set by section 1 of the 1949 Act in order to be registered …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.1% of users find it useful
The Expansion of the Eye Appeal Rule
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Expansion of the Eye Appeal Rule"

Does "eye appeal" remain an underlying factor in determining registration of designs under the 2001 Registered Design Regulation The 1949 Act Pre-2001 a design had to meet a series of conditions that were set by section 1 of the 1949 Act in order to be registered. Registration was (and still is) an important step in protecting a company/individual's investment in a research and development as it prevented third parties from appropriating the look of an original design. Under Section 1 of the 1949 Act the following could be registered and thus protected: 1) Any feature of shape, configuration, pattern or ornament; 2) Applied to an article by any industrial process; 3) which has appeal to and is judged by the eye. Thus a design had to meet the specifications of 1 and 2 as well the provisions of the "eye appeal" that will be explored in detail here. The exact definition of "eye appeal" has been litigated over the years in a number of cases, perhaps most importantly in Amp Inc. v. Utilux Limited [1972] RPC 103. In this case, the House of Lords considered the meaning of the phrase "appeal to and judged by the eye" in the context of an electrical terminal chip that was used inside a washing machine. The Lords held that this was a "functional design" (Amp, 1972) which did not "appeal to" nor was it "judged by the eye". The Lords proposed a number of general propositions that have become a part of established precedent: a) the eye to be considered is "the eye of the customer" and not the "eye of the judge", or of the expert within the particular design field. b) the article may still appeal to the eye even though it is not of aesthetic quality or a work of art. c) the intention of the designer is of value but it is not conclusive d) a solely functional feature does not possess features judged solely by the eye since the only issue of interest to purchase is whether the article will meet its intended function. This definition of eye appeal was relaxed in the Gardex Ltd. v. Sorata Ltd. [1986] RPC 623 in which the court held that the design on the underside of a shower tray was not registrable. This, and similar cases, led to the 1988 amendment of the Act that stated that a design could not be registered if the "appearance of the article is not material" (Act, 1988, 1(3)). Thus aesthetic considerations are not normally taken into account to a material extent by persons acquiring or using a product or if the design were applied to the product: that design cannot be registered. The amendment had the important effect of removing from registration protection many everyday household items that would otherwise have been covered on the basis that their design is not solely dictated by function. Essentially, the onus was thus moved to the designer to prove the aesthetic importance of the design over functionality. New Design Law: 98/71/EC The justification for the European community's institution of new design laws was basically quite simple and perhaps inarguable: 2) Whereas the differences in the legal protections of designs offered by the legislation of the Member States directly affect the establishment and functioning of the internal market as regards goods embodying designs; 3) whereas such differences can distort competition within the internal market. 4) Whereas it is therefore necessary for the smooth functioning of the smooth functioning of the internal market to approximate the design protection laws of the Member States. (Directive, 98) Thus the Directive was designed not to harmonize all design law perfectly but rather to prevent discrepancies between national provisions that would stifle trade between member states. One of the reasons for the inclusion of the Directive within the 1949 Act is that the latter was seen as inflexible and uncommercial, especially considering the need for eye appeal, which was always rather amorphous and contentious issue. The new requirement is that the design falls within the definition of "design", that the design is new and that design exhibits individual character. The new definition of design is more universal, and clearly meant for a definition that broadens beyond industrial use. Thus the Directive states that a design is "the appearance of the whole or a part of a product, resulting from the features of, in particular, the lines, contours, colours, shape, textures of material of the product or its ornamentation," (s.1,2) while a product is defined as "any industrial or handicraft item other than a computer program." (s.1.3) Two important difference are the fact that there is no longer a need of the design being "industrially applied" and also no need for "eye appeal". The fact that a design no longer needs to have industrial applications means that far more products are thus protected than in the original 1949 Act. Thus artistic designs may be protected under the new provisions. 'Eye appeal', always a subjective and thus perhaps confusing provision under which parties might not know what designs were protected and which not, is replaced by the idea of novelty. The test of novelty is subtly different from that of eye appeal: . . . no identical deign or no design whose features differ only in immaterial details has been made available to the public before the relevant date. (s.1b,2) Once again definitions become important as "immaterial details" is a somewhat amorphous concept that may mean different things to different people. Other law may be helpful in formulating a definition, as "immaterial details are features which no significant visual impact on the design." (Household, 1998) Immaterial details may thus be those that are so small or so generic that they are unlikely to have an effect upon the decision as to whether a product should be bought or not. This, of course, comes perhaps dangerously near to the subjectivity of the eye appeal. The "individual character" of the design is formulated by a consideration of the overall impression of the design as would be formed by an informed user. The Act now specifically states that "the overall impression it produces on the informed user differs from the overall impression on such a user by any design which has been made available to the public before the relevant date." (s.1b,3) It is particularly important to note that this specifically rejects the argument made by the Lords in Amp that the judge should be the "eye of the customer" rather than the "eye of the expert within the field". It is now firmly placed within the eye of the expert. One reason for this change is that design is now far more complex within a multitude of products than it was in 1949. The customer may not perceive the similarity, but this is irrelevant to the fact of whether the design has actually been stolen from another's ideas. In an age of increased specialization of knowledge, whether it be legal, design or otherwise, greater weight must be given to the expert's eye than the layman's. The latter is no longer qualified to make the assessment of the uniqueness (or otherwise) of the design. Another addition to the idea of eye appeal has been those complex products that have an individual character. A complex product "is comprised of at least two replaceable component parts permitting disassembly and reassembly of the product" (s.1,3), and parts of this product count towards deign protection if they remain visible during normal use of the product. Those designs which are not protected are those that fail to fall under the function of 'design', those that are dictated by technical function, those that are contrary to public policy or which are immoral in nature and certain emblems. The exact definition of these has yet to be tested, and problems may arise over the exact definition of "technical" and "immoral". Many electronic goods have design features that serve both a technical function but which are also part of the aesthetic appeal of the product; for example the features of a remote control. Second, immorality (or morality for that matter) is in the eye of the beholder. To conclude, the recent changes to design registration law were instituted in order to reflect the transformation that has occurred within many industries, both consumer and otherwise. The expansion of the eye appeal rule to include novelty and individual character, together with the deliberate inclusion (rather than deliberate exclusion) of the expert eye is sensible considering the great complexity and thus subtly of many designs. The consumer's eye should be important, but it is not the only eye which can be thus construed. __________________________________________________ Works Cited Act, 1988, 1(3) Amp Inc. v. Utilux Limited [1972] RPC 103 Directive 98/71/EC, October 1988 "The Legal Protection of Designs" Gardex Ltd. v. Sorata Ltd. [1986] RPC 623 Household Articles Limited's Registered design [1998] FSR 676 Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Registration law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words”, n.d.)
Registration law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1521136-registration-law
(Registration Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words)
Registration Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words. https://studentshare.org/law/1521136-registration-law.
“Registration Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1521136-registration-law.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Expansion of the Eye Appeal Rule

'Photographic seeing: what, if anything, could be meant by this concept

This easily given confidence evidenced by the mischievous appeal of "photoshopped" pictures, in which images are digitally altered in such a way as to appear legitimate.... In his own words he offers upon discovering the Leica, "It became the extension of my eye, and I have never been separated from it since I found itdetermined to "trap" life-to preserve life in the act of living"....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

People, Power & Politics

Malcolm X countered the speech “the American Dream” given by King, by giving the equally famous speech “the American Nightmare” where he details his notion of “an eye for an eye”.... King once said “the reason I can't follow the old eye for an eye philosophy, is that it ends up leaving everybody blind”....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

How Art Can Be Used for Many Purposes

The paper "How Art Can Be Used for Many Purposes" states that it is important to state that there are a number of ways in which the paintings are similar in their presentations of Venus, but the effects are achieved differently as are the messages conveyed.... .... ... ... Although there is no means of proving their claim, archaeologists have long believed art was originally practiced as a magical means of calling a successful hunt or discovering healing rituals among other possible hopes (Gombrich, 1995)....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Expansion Through Franchising

The writer of the paper "Expansion Through Franchising" discusses the reasons behind a company's option of choosing a franchise for the expansion such as the high cost of opening new stores and the need to expand rapidly to take the control over the territory.... With the expansion and maturity of the franchise, the chain management often buys them or became interested in opening own stores for themselves which help in gaining a better understanding and controlling of the operations....
10 Pages (2500 words) Case Study

Orientalism and 19th Century Views on Space and Setting

During the 19th century, a period of great Western expansion, Orientalism became an academic movement.... It was only as the British and French imperial expansion provided artists with more information of the Orient and to an extent permitted them an opportunity to travel and observe the beauty and cultures of the East first hand that these attitudes slowly began to change....
16 Pages (4000 words) Research Paper

Panera Bread Inc - Ability to Stay Competitive in the Dynamic Business Environment

The paper 'Panera Bread Inc - Ability to Stay Competitive in the Dynamic Business Environment' is an actual example of the management case study.... Successful companies and multinationals often derive their success from a multiplicity of factors that are designed to improve their efficiency and market position....
7 Pages (1750 words) Case Study

Understanding Misunderstanding: Non-Verbal Communication

It is important to maintain appropriate eye contact with your communication partners.... Consistent, intermittent eye contact is the most effective.... Not making eye contact results in your sending some significant unintended negative messages: lack of confidence, untruthfulness, arrogance, and condescension.... Effective eye contact is usually maintained for a count of three with a brief look away, and then re-establishing the connection....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Tiled Roof Technology

First, they have an appealing aesthetic value that is highly attractive to the eye of the viewer.... As such, Boral Masonry and Roofing Company continued to post supernormal profits and revenues resulting from increased business activities, expansion, and attraction of loyal and potential customers....
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us