StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...

Restriction of Liability Using the Floodgates Argument - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The cases of negligence are the most often regarded torts. It is necessary to distinguish between the cases of negligence and cases of carelessness. There are three necessary facts that the claimant must provide in order to succeed. They are as follows:
The first element means that the claimant is to prove that the defendant must care after the claimant under definite circumstances…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.6% of users find it useful
Restriction of Liability Using the Floodgates Argument
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Restriction of Liability Using the Floodgates Argument"

Download file to see previous pages

For instance, Lord Atkin presented a neighbor principle. This principle defined that a duty of care should be addressed to neighbors, while the neighbors are the people that might suffer from our actions or errors. However, this description appeared to be too uncertain, and a number of cases where duty of care was regarded as to be owed, increased rapidly. Later, Lord Bridge added three elements that should be observed before making statement: This addition helped much in judges' experience, but the content of these three elements depends upon the kind of injury that was caused to the claimant.

There are 3 kinds of injury: physical harm, psychological injury and economic loss. The situation with the laws in relation to psychological damage has significantly changed during last hundred years. At first, similar cases were rejected by the courts: "One of the earliest reported cases on "nervous shock", as it was then called, was that of Victorian Railway Commissioners v. Coultas. 3. As a result of the negligence of a level-crossing gatekeeper, a train narrowly missed hitting the plaintiff.

This incident caused the plaintiff to suffer shock. The Privy Council rejected the claim stating, inter alia, that to allow recovery would result in " a wide field [being] opened for imaginary claims." (2)According to the law, before appealing with a complaint for nervous shock, the victim should prove the following items: 1. That he or she experienced a definite psychological illness. "Psychiatric injury can therefore include: clinical depression, personality changes and post-traumatic stress disorder (an illness in which shocking events cause symptoms such as sleeping difficulty, tension, horrifying flashbacks and severe depression)."(6) A definite diagnosis should prove the statement.

In case the person is just disappointed or upset, the case won't be regarded as the case of psychological injury.2. It is necessary to find out whether the injury is the result of defendant's omissions or actions. In this case the negligence of the defendant must be evident. It is also important to observe if it was possible to foresee the damage. If the above mentioned item is proved and it is established that the defendant didn't execute his duty of care towards the victim, then the usual laws that are related to the breach of duty can be implemented. 3. It is necessary to define whether the claimant is a primary or secondary victim As far as the cases of psychological injury are concerned, there are some questions that are to be solved. The

...Download file to see next pages Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Restriction of Liability Using the Floodgates Argument Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1519846-restriction-of-liability-using-the-floodgates-argument
(Restriction of Liability Using the Floodgates Argument Essay)
https://studentshare.org/law/1519846-restriction-of-liability-using-the-floodgates-argument.
“Restriction of Liability Using the Floodgates Argument Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1519846-restriction-of-liability-using-the-floodgates-argument.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Restriction of Liability Using the Floodgates Argument

Is the Current State of the Law Satisfactory in the Way It Deals With the Right to Claim in Tort

Voluntary Assumption of liability A blanket denial of liability can be considered improper, and the law remain engaged in pursuit of a new basis of practical, limited liability in tort for the incurred losses.... Within the English law, the notion of assumption of liability is now expressly utilized as an autonomous basis for a Duty of Care in Negligence (Mulcahy and Tillotson 7).... Voluntary assumption of liability details the notion that naturally belongs to the prefecture of the law of contract and forms the foundation of contractual liability....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Floodgates of litigation

The advocates of the concept of the floodgates of litigation argues that if a court takes certain course of action, it is likely to lead to a dramatic increase in legal litigations, which may affect the courts ability to discharge its duties.... The issue of floodgates of litigation has consistently appeared in the courts, especially when it comes to certain cases which seem to create a path through which more cases can be filed to the courts, based on a determination that had not previously been done....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

See the attachement and decide which question you are familiar with

Do you consider that the end result, in the form of the Companies Act 2006, provides an appropriate model for other countries to follow? The major purposes underlying the UK's Review of Company Law… s to protect shareholder rights, to ensure directors' responsibility, to promote corporate governance – all of which will, in the end, facilitate a better policy environment for commerce and trade....
16 Pages (4000 words) Essay

Tort Assignment

the floodgates argument has been around the legal profession since at least 1939 when William Prosser, an esteemed American tort law expert famously wrote, “It is the business of the law to remedy wrongs that deserve it, even a the expense of a flood of claims; and it is a… (Prosser, 1939) With renewed vigour the term is as relevant to tort law today as it was 70 years ago.... involvement in both Iraq and Afghanistan questions of the scope of liability have arisen with energy and imperative....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

What Is the Civil Liability Claims System for Negligence Liability in Ireland Criticized for

From this study “What Is the Civil liability Claims System for Negligence liability in Ireland Criticized for?... For example, in Lievre v Gould Lord Esher asserted that negligence liability could not be imposed unless the defendant owed the plaintiff a duty of care....
14 Pages (3500 words) Case Study

Materials on Intellectual Property

The researcher of the following paper highlights that the question of available protection for new products which are software is a complex issue.... Under UK law, the Copyright Design and Patents Act 1988 (“the Act”), software is protected by the law of copyright.... nbsp;… Although this is a powerful form of protection against authorized copying of code, it may not be adequate to protect novel underlying ideas....
16 Pages (4000 words) Case Study

Understanding the Effects of the Floodgates Argument On Cases Involving Psychiatric Injury and Economic Loss

The coursework "Understanding the Effects of the floodgates argument On Cases Involving Psychiatric Injury and Economic Loss" describes the main aspects of law connected with Floodgates.... To give us a clear picture of how the floodgates argument has helped shaped rulings of the courts in cases involving psychiatric injury or nervous shock and in claims of pure economic loss, let us discuss these issues one by one.... ecause of fear of opening the floodgates of litigation, the courts have been extremely cautious when it comes to evaluating cases involving nervous shock or psychiatric injury....
5 Pages (1250 words) Coursework

Goff and Palegray versus Chief Constable of South Yorkfordshire

The "Goff and Palegray versus Chief Constable of South Yorkfordshire" paper states that the contention of the appellant that they should be allowed to recover damages based on the fact that the White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire was decided on a misunderstanding of Page v Smith is untenable....
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us