StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Materiality in Auditing - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The essay "Materiality in Auditing" will discuss the importance of materiality in auditing. It will also study the reasons why the materiality levels used by auditors are secret. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.3% of users find it useful
Materiality in Auditing
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Materiality in Auditing"

MATERIALITY IN AUDITING Materiality is an idea or tradition inside reviewing and bookkeeping identifying with the significance/essentialness of a sum, exchange, or error. The objective of a review of monetary proclamations is to empower the auditor to express a conclusion whether the money related explanations are readied, in all material regards, in similarity with a recognized budgetary reporting system, for example, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). The evaluation of what is material is a matter of professional judgment. This paper will discuss the importance of materiality in auditing. It will also study the reasons why the materiality levels used by auditors are secret A matter is a material if its exclusion would sensibly sway the decisions of an address of the auditors. Materiality is the misstatements that include omissions that in the aggregate or independently could reasonably be predictable to affect the economic choices of users taken on the support of the financial statements. Judgments concerning materiality are made in the light of surrounding situation and are influenced by the nature or size of a misstatement or amalgamation of both. Materiality is important in auditing, both in designing the audit and planning the verification measures, and in evaluating whether the financial statements are reasonable to comply with accepted accounting values. Verification entails testing a sample of items or transactions from which is resulting an acceptable level of declaration of detecting misstatements. The degree of testing is determined by the option of the materiality level to be applied in audits. During the start of annual financial reporting audit cycle, auditors and company management will separately choose a materiality level to relate in preparing the financial statements and in reviewing those financial statements, correspondingly. In published financial statements, materiality is applicable in deciding whether to reveal an item and to adjust a misstatement or an error. Materiality is vital in determining the quantity of work carried out throughout the report. It also determines the nature of the audit view given, where other than a spotless opinion is essential. Materiality concept is necessary throughout the verification process, but it is relevant particularly in evaluating the outcome of the audit testing and planning the audit. The auditor determines the scale of materiality that is used to develop the range of the review. This materiality quantity is characteristically known as analysis or planning (Big Five Audit Materiality Task Force 1998; Holstrum and Messier 1982). Auditors apportion part of the planning materiality to classes of transactions or account balances known as tolerable misstatements. When the audit is completed, tolerable misstatements are compared to detected errors in order to decide if misstatements are material enough to necessitate adjustments of the client’s books. This fraction of the process is known as evaluation materiality (Big Five Audit Materiality Task Force 1998). The standard of auditing indicates that evaluation materiality should be similar to planning materiality theoretically if it were on the basis of information available at the planning stage. The conclusion arrived by the big five audit materiality task force indicated that practice issues connected to materiality involves evaluation materiality and not planning materiality for most of its part. The business account on which the auditor is reporting is related to materiality. Where the financial statements are set for financial reporting period of less or more than twelve months, such as the case of a change or new entity in the financial reporting time, materiality relates to the financial statements ready for that financial reporting era. To determine the percentage to be applied to a chosen benchmark entails the exercise of professional judgment. There is a relationship between the accepted benchmark and the rate such that a percentage functional to profit prior to tax from continuing operations will in general be higher than a percentage applied to ordinary revenue. For instance, the auditor may believe five percent of profit before tax from long-lasting operations to be suitable for profit-oriented entity in the building industry. While the auditor may recognize one percent of the total expenses or total revenue to be fitting for non-profit entity. Lower or higher percentages, however, may be deemed fitting in the circumstance. Setting up the audit exclusively to perceive individually material misstatements overlooks the reality collective of individually immaterial misstatements may reason the financial statements to be materially misstated, and leave no margin for possible undetected misstatements. Performance materiality is put to reduce to an appropriately low level the likelihood that the cumulative of undetected and uncorrected misstatements in the financial statements exceeds materiality for the financial statements in general. Correspondingly, performance materiality linking materiality level determines for a particular disclosure, account balance or class of transactions is position to reduce a suitably low level. Determining performance materiality is not an easy mechanical calculation and entails the exercise of professional judgment. It is influenced by the auditors thoughtful of the entity, renewed during the performance of the risk assessment measures; and the extent and nature of errors identified in previous audits and thereby the auditor’s hope in relation to misstatements in the current period. Features that may show the existence of more or one particular disclosures, account balances, and class of transactions for which errors of smaller amounts than the materiality for the monetary statements as a whole could reasonably be expected to manipulate the financial decisions of users taken on the basis of the following statements. First is whether regulation, law or the appropriate financial reporting structure affects users’ expectations regarding the disclosure or measurement of individual items, the key revelation in relation to the business in which the entity operates, and whether the is focused on a particular facet of entity’s business that is separately disclosed in the monetary statements. Considering whether, in the precise situation of the body, such disclosures, account balances or classes of transactions exist, the auditor may find it helpful to get an understanding of the expectation and views of those charged with management and governance. A significant quantity of research that was administered in 1970s addressed aspects of materiality idea. FASB’s resolution to examine materiality intensified interest in the subject (FASB 1975). Messier and Holstrum presented a comprehensive review of materiality text summarizing their results in four areas before 1982: materiality threshold. Others include the relative importance of factors used to determine materiality, the structural form of the decision model, and the nature of the item. Since the items scrutinize before research were diverse, Holstrum and Messier came to conclusion that it was hard to integrate the outcome of the reviewed research. This decision is important because there is evidence that the nature of the item is a necessary determinant of materiality, and there is a possibility of varying relative value of such items varies significantly. A substantial amount of behavioral research on materiality has found that auditors judgments can be modeled using a preservative model. For instance, Messier (1983) establish that a linear model accounted for most of the discrepancy in audit partners’ materiality judgments. The proportion effect of the item of the income was the most significant quantitative factor in determining materiality. The impact of the article on earnings trend was the second in significance. As Holstrum and Messier pointed out that the measurement of comparative importance of scrupulous factor is dependent upon the variety of experimental treatment used by the researchers. There was a substantial difference between auditors, preparers, and users with respect to materiality thresholds. Users showed lower materiality threshold than auditors or preparers, and the materiality thresholds for auditors tended to be amid those of users and preparers. In addition, auditors from large national firms had higher materiality threshold than those from small businesses. There has been descending pressure on audit fees through a combination of increased macroeconomic and tendering conditions in the last few years. These market forces create risks to audit quality as stated in the recent yearly reports on audit inspections. We also recognized a general trend for firms to make changes to their leadership to allow lower sample size to be used or to allow materiality to be set at a higher level. These changes may effect in a reduction in the quantity of audit work performed. Out of six firms, five of them have changed their management in the past two years as follows. In firm A, the percentage leadership to be applied to benchmarks for non-public concern entities was increased, with the maximum proportion for one benchmark having more than tripled. This increment was part of an initiative that appeared to be mainly focused on generating efficiencies rather than improving audit quality. In firm B, the evasion percentage to be used where materiality was intended using total assets or revenue benchmarks were doubled and the default act materiality was also increased. In addition, the guidance was altered to emphasize that the preliminary point should be the highest end of the variety specified. Firm C, the proportion range to be considered when using any gross benchmark was amplified. Company D, the preceding minimum sample size for statistical samples was dropped to permit lower sample sizes. Default clearly trivial percentage was further doubled. Company E, the changes in rates ranges were fairer, ensuing in lower materiality levels in some areas and higher materiality in others. The audit committees should look for to know the grounds for and the effect of any boost in materiality levels. These should include whether their auditors consider that the needs and the prospect of the users of the entity’s financial statements have become, and the likely impact on the stage of audit work undertaken. The quality and extent of sector-specific guidance varied between organizations. However, there was a sector specific leadership at a number of firms casing industries, where the judgments necessary may be more complex. The consequent of materiality of the audit work performed and planned diverse depending on the individual review strategies for trying classes of transactions and account balances. The location of variances that can be accepted without additional investigations during analytical measures requires judgment and a number of factors such as risk and the level of disaggregation of balance influence the planned investigative procedures. Although, these reports did not explain in many cases, there appeared to be an underlying inconsistency in how materiality is applied in this area. For instance, in an audit where the key substantive test performed over income were analytical measures. The variance set that could be accepted without further research was double the level of the performance materiality, which does not emerge to be justifiable. The subject has been raised with the organization concerned to allow them to take appropriate action. Setting separate on the whole materiality levels for the income statements and balance sheet is not steady with auditing standards. One instance of this was identified, where materiality for the revenue statement was based on the proportion of profit before tax. The bottom line is that materiality is a basic when it comes to all matters regarding auditing. It is also important to appreciate the fact that materiality helps the auditor to get the accurate results. If this were never the case, then the whole auditing process would be both a waste of time and resources in general. Therefore, all auditors need to pay special attention to materiality. REFERENCES Messier, William F., NonnaMartinov‐Bennie, and AasmundEilifsen. "A Review and Integration of Empirical Research on Materiality: Two Decades Later." Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory: 153-87. Brennan, N & Gray S. J 2005, The Impact of Materiality: Accountings Best Kept Secret Allen, R.D., and R.J. Elder. 2005. A longitudinal examination of auditor error projection decisions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 24 (2): xx-xx. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.2001. Audit Sampling (Audit Guide). AICPA: New York. Arnold, D. F., Sr., R. A. Bernardi, and P. E. Neidermeyer. 1999. The effect of independence decisions concerning additional audit work: A European perspective. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 18 (2) (Supplement): 45-67. Arnold, D. F., Sr., R. A. Bernardi, and P. E. Neidermeyer. 2001. The effect of client integrity, litigation, and culture on European materiality estimates. International Journal of Accounting 36: 459-483. Bell, T. B., F. O. Marrs, I. Solomon, and H. Thomas. 1997. Auditing Organizations Through a Strategic Lens: The KPMG Business Measurement Approach. KPMG Peat Marwick: (Downloadable from www.cba.uiuc.edu/kpmg-uiuc/). Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Materiality in Auditing Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words - 7, n.d.)
Materiality in Auditing Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words - 7. https://studentshare.org/finance-accounting/1850425-auditing
(Materiality in Auditing Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words - 7)
Materiality in Auditing Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words - 7. https://studentshare.org/finance-accounting/1850425-auditing.
“Materiality in Auditing Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words - 7”. https://studentshare.org/finance-accounting/1850425-auditing.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Materiality in Auditing

Changes in Net Profit Margin and Gross Profit Margin

Name…………………………………………………………………………….... xxxxx Institution……………………………………………………………………….... xxxxx Course……………………………………………………………………………xxxxx Professor…………………………………………………………………………....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Managing Companys Reported Operating Results

It outlined the organizations extremely traditionalist perspective on business operations, which spanned almost 100 years until some changes transpired during the 1990s, which… Under the traditionalist perspective, as the case study noted, the growth in revenues and profits of Campbell Soup registered very modest growth....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Financial Reporting and Analysis

This principle assures financial statement information is wholly included and reflected in the financial statements.... The principle ensures that companies even reflect negative information without failure.... Tim Roberts… b) An advance magazine subscription collection is reported as unearned subscription....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Week 3 team assignment outline

It is essential to understand the purpose of internal controls to implement it effectively and efficiently.... COSO explains internal… “Internal control is broadly defined as a process, effected by an entity's board of directors, management, and other personnel, designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of objectives....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Article Review: Accounting Principles by the Accounting Coach

Accountants communicate financial information to the shareholders and company directors at end of a financial year in… Accountancy follows set standards and principles that apply in accounting, auditing, and bookkeeping.... Accountancy follows set standards and principles that apply in accounting, auditing, and bookkeeping.... Both relate the independent public accountants to auditing the financial statements for compliance where the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) sets the accounting rules and standards governing the financial accounting sector....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Strategic Audit Report for Apple Inc

I have also been involved in making assertions concerning the auditing Report Affiliation.... auditing Report.... auditing report has not been that easy.... Proper auditing will generally reduce risks that may occur as a result of biased financial statement and will also act as a factor that will determine any decision to be made by the company's management (Johnstone, Gramling&Rittenberg, 2013).... ?auditing: A Risk-based Approach to Conducting a Quality Audit....
1 Pages (250 words) Term Paper

Auditing: A Practical Approach

auditing: A Practical Approach First Canadian Edition.... eporting on Financial Statements in the BC Public Sector under Canadian auditing Standards.... he auditor has no obligation to perform any audit proceduresHowever, if it is an event that may have caused the auditor to amend his report, the auditor shallDiscuss the matter with management and those charged with governanceDetermine whether financial statements should be amendedInquire how management intends to address the mattersIf management amends financial statementsAuditor should carry out procedures on the amendmentsProvide a new report on the amended financial statementsIf management does not amend the financial statements but the auditor believes that there is need to amend thenIf audit report has not been provided, he should modify the opinionIf report has already been provided, notify management not to issue financial statements to third parties until necessary adjustments have been ,madeQuestion 7It necessary to compare unadjusted misstatement to other bases of materiality because it enables the auditor to select audit procedures that can be expected to reduce audit risk to lower levels (Ex CAS 118)What should the auditor do if the unadjusted misstatements exceed one or more materiality thresholds?...
3 Pages (750 words) Assignment

Risks of Material Misstatement

This standard needs to be applied in conjunction with other auditing standards including AU 312, AU 326, and AU 318 which provide further guidance on assessing the materialism related to the existence of risks and procedures to be adopted by auditors in light of the assessed levels of risk (FASB, 2006).... Thus, AU 314 provides guidelines for a risk-based approach to auditing by providing guidelines for assessing business risks and control risks that may exist within the organizational environment so that auditors can plan out their activities accordingly....
1 Pages (250 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us