StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Ethics of Food - Research Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
This work called "Ethics of Food" demonstrates several principles of the Food Ethics, possible criticism for this approach as well as a refutation of it. The author takes into account the ethical aspect of consuming it, the emergence of the system according to which the food will be divided into levels. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.4% of users find it useful
Ethics of Food
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Ethics of Food"

Ethics of Food The development of human civilization is largely connected to the development of technology. Indeed, from the very dawn of the society, people were trying to find ways to cope with the problems that they had to face on a daily basis. Thus, over centuries one of the most nagging problems for the world was lack of food. In spite of the fact at the present moment there are also regions that experience hunger, but in the majority of the countries, especially in the developed ones, people not only have the abundance of food, but they also think about the ethical aspect of consuming it. This paper will present several principles of the Food Ethics, possible criticism for this approach as well as refutation of it. First of all, it would be highly important to provide a general perspective on the issue. Thus, one would not make a mistake pointing out that among the food that people consume there are certain groups of products that are different from others. For example, if pigs have been domesticated from numerous centuries and the production of their meat has been developed in great detail, there are some animals which are also consumed, but their meat or other parts of the body have been introduced to the people relatively recently. In addition to that, some meat might come from the animals the population of which is far less than the one of pigs or cows. Finally, the development of the science has brought up a new category of food which consists of Genetically Modified Organisms. So, the primary question focuses on the idea whether people have a moral duty to support certain food. Since the above mentioned question lies in the realm of Ethics, it would be logical to use several Ethical Theories than are relevant in this case. The first approach that is able to provide an answer to this problem is the Kantian Ethics. Thus, according to it, people should be considered to be responsible for the preserving of the wildlife as well as fragile ecosystems around the world and, therefore, they should never consume flesh of the animals that are endangered. In addition to that, since food that is made of Genetically Modified Organisms might be harmful to the bodies of the people, it should not be introduced to the market in any form. However, a completely different approach is presented by the Utilitarian Ethics. Indeed, it argues that there is no problem in eating meat of the endangered animals or the meat that was produced in a cruel way as long as it pleases the people and they are able to cope with the consequences of it. For example, it may be permissible to consume meat of rare animals as long as the scientists will be able to restore its population in the future. As for the used of Genetically Modified Organisms, the negative impact that they are able to have on the body of a person is still a matter of debate; so, those who are willing to take the risk should be allowed to do so (Freedman). Having examined the possible solutions to the problem in question, it would be advantageous to turn to concretization of the problem, namely viewing some of the examples of it in great detail. First of all, the issue deals with the process of production of meat as the majority of the developed countries have cuisines that rely on different meals with meat. It would not be an exaggeration to point out that the people all over the world should pay more attention to the way the animals the flesh of which they consumed are killed, preferring those companies who do it in a sustainable way and rejecting those who do it in a cruel way. In addition to that, the practices of ritual killing, such as halal, should be restricted to the countries where it was traditionally spread. As for the consumption of meat of the endangered animals, there might be a simple answer: keeping in mind that science is not able to affect the wildlife effectively and it may be rather difficult to restore the population of a particular species, it is highly advisable to refrain for this practice. Indeed, if people think that in the distant future the population will come to normal and continue killing a particular animal, there might be a situation when then number of animals will be too small to ensure successful reproduction. In other words, people who stop consuming flesh of the endangered species until it is too late. Another point that should be brought up is the use of Genetically Modified Organisms. As of now, the factories are required to mark their products as those which contain or do not contain GMO. However, this can hardly be called an effective solution to that problem. Thus, the introduction of this kind of organism might seem as a way to cope with the food crisis that the world is currently experiencing, but it may also spawn another crisis that would affect the humanity even more. In other words, if there is even a slightest possibility that eating Genetically Modified Organisms might be harmful to the people, they should be banned until the technology of their production is not refined to the best possible level. After a detailed examination of the issue on concrete examples, one should articulate the three rules that would guide the Ethics of Food. The first of them might be formulated in the following way: the humanity should consume food that does not harm organism of a person. In spite of the fact that this might appear to be too obvious, this simple rule excludes the use of Genetically Modified Organisms at least until the science will be able to tell with a hundred percent certainty that they are not dangerous. In addition to that, this rule may also put an end to consuming such gourmet food as fugu: the peculiarity of it lies in the fact that every year there is a number of people who are poisoned by it. The second rule in the Ethics of Food that is advocated by this paper focuses on the idea that companies that produce food should adhere to the certain standards making sure that those are not able to comply with them will not enter the market. This is particularly important to keep in mind as this will help to put companies that are reported to kill animals cruelly out of business. Leaving aside the spiritual dimension of the discussion, it is beyond any doubts that humans as more developed creatures should be responsible for the well ware of the animals and are not allowed to treat them cruelly even if the latter were bred to be killed. There is another rule that should be articulated as it holds important implications for the Ethics of Food. Thus, according to it, while producing the food, the mankind should think about the future as well as future generations. In spite of the fact that this postulate might seem too broad, it is still able to regulate the production of food effectively. For example, it out rule out the consumption of the flesh of the endangered animals as this might lead to their potential extinction and, consequentially, the future generations will not be able to enjoy the same biodiversity as the people today. This put different limits on the practices that are implemented all over the world, significantly changing the approach of the people towards the food production. It would not be a mistake to point out that the adherence to the above mentioned rules might result in the emergence of the system according to which the food will be divided in the two levels. On the one level, there will be products that are produced from the organisms that are not endangered and might be considered sustainable to a certain extent. Indeed, there are no worries about the population of pigs or cows. In spite of the fact that they also might be affected by various diseases, they meat may be consumed without any risk of negatively affecting biodiversity. On the other hand, there will be a level that will consist of the organisms that are endangered or the introduction of which into the diet should be restricted because of a certain reason. Finally, it might be quite suitable to analyze the possible criticism that might arise due to the discussion of the proposed Ethics of Food. Thus, the opponents are likely to say that the division between the organism that may or may not be consumed is not based on a logical explanation and limits experience that a person might gain. They might also point out that the above mentioned rules are too vague and leave a broad space for interpretation, like the second rule which does not specifically mentions the standards, but has clearly defined sanctions for those companies which are not able to comply with them. There is not doubt that the claims that are made by the critics are valid to a certain extent. However, there are several points which they tend to forget. To begin with, the introduction of the two level system of food is based on a common sense: in spite of the fact that people are able to eat flesh of different organisms on this planet, if this process is not controlled it will most certainly lead to a disaster which can be easily avoided if the people implement the proposed rules and adhere to hem. Secondly, the rules are deliberately designed to be vague as this makes them universal and suitable for an infinite number of situations which does not allows those who are not willing to comply with them use a particular provision and bend the law. As one can easily see, the consumption of food might be easily regulated by different Ethical rules. Thus, the first of them puts emphasis on the effect that the food has on the body of a person, namely it should not bring any negative consequences. In the broad perspective, this rule is dedicated to eliminate the use of products the impact of which is a subject of debates. Secondly, there is a need for different standards that would guide the performance of the companies that produce food so that those would are not able to deliver the produce of the required quality or in the acceptable manner would be pushed out of the business. Finally, the mankind should think about the future generations. Works cited Freedman, David H. "The Truth about Genetically Modified Food." Scientific American Global. 20 Aug. 2013. Web. 24 Nov. 2014. . Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Ethics of Food Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words, n.d.)
Ethics of Food Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words. https://studentshare.org/social-science/1667426-ethics-of-food
(Ethics of Food Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words)
Ethics of Food Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words. https://studentshare.org/social-science/1667426-ethics-of-food.
“Ethics of Food Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words”. https://studentshare.org/social-science/1667426-ethics-of-food.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Ethics of Food

Ethics of Consumption: the Good Life

In the paper “ethics of Consumption: The Good Life” the author analyzes the idea of buying ethical products, which has already been introduced and widely accepted.... People are ready to pay a greater price, or forego a little taste in the food, to follow the ethical practices and to support what they believe in; hence the increased spending on ethical goods.... a) ethics can derive many responses from the consumers; they may be neutral towards products which are ethical, they may be aware of them but don't consider it an incentive enough to make a purchase or they follow the ethical approach and confine themselves to buying only ethical goods....
7 Pages (1750 words) Assignment

Morality and the Good Life - Ethics

nbsp; Ethics are deeply rooted in human behaviour and therefore it is difficult to change people's behaviour without altering the ethics of an organization.... This paper under the headline 'Morality and the Good Life - ethics" focuses on the fact that, in general, human relations and interactions are only sustainable with defined rules and conducts.... ethics are systems of accepted code of conduct within a given society.... ethics can then be subdivided into applied ethics, normative ethics, and Meta ethics (Solomon, 1984)....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics

The paper 'European Society for Agricultural and food Ethics' focuses on climate changes which not only affect the food production but also influences global, national and local functioning of the food system.... This can lead to the production of large amounts of greenhouse gases which affect the food adversely (Romeo et al.... There is a need to harmonize climate change and food security policies.... In the Caribbean and Latin America alone, almost 53 million people suffered from hunger due to food insecurities caused by negative climate change (Romeo et al....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

The Issue of Food Ethics

 This essay focuses on the issue of food ethics is a relevant debate that characterizes contemporary society.... The critical overview of Wendell's ideas make more sense as the emerging ignorance about the source of food exposes the global population to severe nutritional deficiency health risks.... This is a clear indication of the increased risk of blind consumption of food with the significant disconnect between the source and the end user....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

How Journal Assignments Improve Writing and Thinking about Writing

Bakir and Vitell made conclusions about what parents think regarding the Ethics of Food advertising that targets children, only after they have gathered their data.... “The Ethics of Food Advertising Targeted toward Children: Parental Viewpoint.... ?? Journal of Business ethics 91....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Ethics and Social Responsibility: Ford Pinto

The paper “ethics and Social Responsibility: Ford Pinto” discusses the Ford Pinto case, a famous case in the history of social responsibility.... It represents a classic case of ignorance and negligence of human welfare on the part of management.... The case also sheds light on the faulty design of products....
11 Pages (2750 words) Term Paper

The Ethic of Food

This review "The Ethics of Food" debates on food security go around the issue of shortage of food in the world, the issue of healthy food is also a major issue.... According to Mayo Clinic (Para 3), organic food production is geared towards making sure that the process of food production leads to conservation of soil, water, and environment while at the same time producing healthy food.... This brings in a conflicting factor because organic food production hinders the mass production of food and therefore goes against the strategy of mass production of food to solve food insecurity (Basu 59)....
5 Pages (1250 words) Literature review

Analysis of Peter Singers Practical Ethics Book (Chapter 10)

The author of the paper examines Peter Singer's "Practical ethics" Chapter 10 which focused on the environment.... This ethical perspective avoids waste because it discourages the hoarding of resources as a measure of success that strains the environment and instead prescribes for us to become full and contented as persons Teacher Peter Singer's Practical ethics Chapter 10 Peter Singer's Practical ethics Chapter 10 focused on the environment....
2 Pages (500 words) Book Report/Review
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us