StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

What Proves James Needs to Establish a Claim in Negligence - Essay Example

Summary
The paper "What Proves James Needs to Establish a Claim in Negligence" states that James can be able to prove that the team doctor owed him a duty of care that the duty of care was breached, and, as a result, there was an injury which made him suffer recoverable damages…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.9% of users find it useful

Extract of sample "What Proves James Needs to Establish a Claim in Negligence"

UNIVERSITY STUDENT’S NAME NEGLIGENCE COURSE PROFESSOR DATE OF SUBMISSION Negligence Negligence is a conduct that falls below the standards that has been established by law to protect others against risk of harm that is unreasonable. If a person’s actions have departed from the conduct expected from a reasonable person, prudent person acting under similar circumstances then negligence is said to have occurred.1 Negligence can only be established as a cause of action under the law of tort if the claimant proves that the defendant owed him a duty of care there was a breach of this legal duty the breach caused him some injury, and the injury caused him recoverable damages.2 James is a young talented hockey player whose future is looking very bright. He wishes to do everything to further his career as a professional hockey player. To succeed in this, he knows he must listen to his coach, the team doctor and the physiotherapist. He signed a contract that stated that he agrees to a special diet including vitamins and supplements. The young boy trusts his coach, team doctor and the physio, and he does not question it when he is given supplements by the team doctor. After taking a drug test, he tested positive for a prohibited substance. James has never used any drugs. He claims he is innocent. This paper explores what proves James needs to establish for a claim in negligence and the likelihood of the defense of volenti non fit injuria. Proves needed to establish a claim in negligence Duty of care Therefore, duty of care is a legal obligation imposed on an individual requiring that he or she adheres to a standard of reasonable care when he performs any act that could foreseeably cause harm to others. To proceed with an action in negligence, duty of due care is the first element to be established. The plaintiff must show clearly that it is a duty of care established by law that has been breached by the defendant. In our case, James must prove that the team doctor owed him a duty of care.3 Being a young player, James had every right to listen to the advice of the team doctor. He considers the team doctor to be a medical professional, who should be able to advise him on what to use and what not to use as far as his career in hockey is concerned. The team doctor acted as an expert in his field and, therefore, James had to take his instructions and advice as expert’s advice. The team doctor also failed to warn James that some of the supplements he was taking may contain some prohibited substances. Therefore, the team doctor owed James a legal duty of care, i.e. to make sure that he does not take any special diet, vitamins or supplements that contained substances that are prohibited. Breach of duty of care The plaintiff must prove that the duty of care owed to him by the defendant had been breached. A breach of duty is said to occur when a person who owes another a duty of care fails to live up to the expected standards.4 Courts use reasonable man test to determine whether or not a duty of care has been breached. If a person fails to act as a reasonable man with similar skill and knowledge and under similar circumstances would, then a legal duty of care is said to have been breached. The breach of duty of care must cause some injury to the claimant.5 The team doctor did not act as a professional doctor would do. This is because he failed in his Job by giving James supplements that contained substances prohibited for ice hockey players. The team doctor knew, or ought to have known that supplements posed some risks as far as James’ career was concerned, and he should have warned him so as to escape liability. The team doctor’s breach of due care caused James some injury in terms of testing positive for prohibited substances, and this caused the damage i.e. ruined James’ career as an ice hockey player Causation of damage This relates to the link between the defendant’s negligence and the plaintiff’s damage. Even if it is proved that the duty of care was breached by the defendant and the plaintiff sustained injuries, the negligence claim will fail unless it is proved that the damage resulted from the breach. “But for” test is used to prove the cause of the damage, where the defendant would be liable only if the damage caused to the claimant would not have occurred, but for this negligence.6 In the case of James and the team doctor, it is clear the negligence of the team doctor is the only cause of the damage. This is because James claims he is innocent for he operates a ‘clean body’ policy and he has never taken any drug before. Defense of Volenti Non fit injuria Volenti non fit injuria is a common law doctrine which holds that if a person willingly places himself or herself in a position where harm is likely to result, having knowledge that some harm might result, then they will not succeed in bringing a claim in tort or delict against the other party.7 The doctrine of volenti non fit injuria is applicable in limited situations only. It provides that the claimant may not recover for the loss which he or she assumed the risk of injury voluntarily. The defense of assumption of risk requires a claimant to have entered an agreement freely and voluntarily, having full knowledge of the circumstances at hand so as to absolve all legal consequences of the defendant’s actions. The requirement of the defense of assumption of risk is; voluntary, agreement, made in full realization of the nature and the extent of the risk.8 Voluntary The plaintiff must have had genuine freedom of choice. The defense will fail if the claimant was not in a position where he or she could exercise free choice. If a person cannot exercise free choice, then it cannot be said he was truly willing.9 Agreement Where the parties involved had reached express agreement, before the occurrence of the negligent act, that the plaintiff will assume the risk of harm voluntarily then the defense would operate. Knowledge In order for the defense of assumption of risk to operate the defendant must prove that the claimant had knowledge of the risk that was in existence, its nature and extent. The test applied here is subjective. If the plaintiff ought to have been aware of the risk, but he was not, the defense will fail.10 Considering the three requirements for a defense of assumption of risk to be successful, it is clear the coach and the team doctor cannot rely on the maxim of volenti non fit injuria as a defense to the civil tort of negligence that James can bring against them. The only response that the coach and the team doctor are giving is that James voluntarily consented to taking the prohibited substances. James was capable to make his own free choice, but his choices were influenced by the team doctor. If a person’s freedom to choose is influenced by another, then it cannot be said that the choice was truly voluntary. Another reason that would make the defense of assumption of risk to fail is the lack of express agreement stating that the claimant would assume the risk of harm voluntarily. Finally, the defendants would face more difficulties to prove that James had full knowledge of the risk that was posed by the use of a special diet, vitamins and supplements that were given to him by the team doctor. He was entitled to trust what the team doctor was giving him since the team doctor was an expert in that field, and James had no reasons to doubt his credibility. The team doctor also failed to warn James that what he was giving him may not be 100% free of prohibited substances. Looking at the facts and circumstances surrounding this case, it is most likely that a cause of action in negligence by James against the team doctor will succeed. This is because James can be able to prove that the team doctor owed him a duty of care that duty of care was breached, and, as a result, there was an injury which made him suffer recoverable damages. James can also be able to prove the causation of damages. He can be able to show a physical link between the team doctor’s negligence and the damages he suffered. On the other hand, defendant’s efforts to use the defense of volenti non fit injuria will fail. This is because, for the defense to succeed there must be a voluntary, agreement, made in full realization of nature and the extent of the risk. This has not satisfied given the facts of this case. Bibliography Corfield, Lorraine. 2007. The law, negligence and sick doctors. British journal of hospital medicine London England 2005 68, no. 9: 494-496. De Rose, EH. Doping in athletes--an update. Clinics in Sports Medicine, 27.1 (2008): 107-130, viii-ix. Accessed from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18206571. Gibson, A and Fraser, D. 2011, Business Law, 6th edition, Pearson Apprentice Hall’ Hirsh, H L. Malpractice liability of physicians to nonpatients. The Southern Medical Journal 69.6 (2008): 762-763. Madden, J J. Malpractice liability. The Veterinary Clinics of North America Small Animal Practice 23.5 (1956): 1027-1052. Mahar, PD and Burke, JA. What is the value of professional opinion? The current medicolegal application of the “peer professional practice defence” in Australia. The Medical journal of Australia, 194.5 (2011) 253-255. Accessed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21382000 Maughan, P J. Medical negligence and the law. The British journal of surgery 4.3 (2001): 116- 118. Mulholland, D.M. Managed care liability for medical malpractice and utilization review. The Medical staff counselor, 7.2 (1993): 35-43. Olick, R S and Bergus, G R. Malpractice liability for informal consultations. Family Medicine 35. 7 (2003): 476-481. Weinrib, Ernest J. 1983. Toward a Moral Theory of Negligence Law. Law and Philosophy An International Journal for Jurisprudence and Legal Philosophy. P.37-62. Read More

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF What Proves James Needs to Establish a Claim in Negligence

Ricky Gervais & Co Ltd Case

It would be advisable for Mr Gervais to decentralise his line of authority to other people as a way of attempting to minimise cases of negligence of duty by employees.... It is a fact that a duty of daycare exists owed by the defendant to the claimant which has resulted in the claimant suffering a heavy loss in his life and career as well and this can be described as negligence to a greater extent since the injury caused to Geoff could have been avoided if the defendant has not been neglecting his duties....
7 Pages (1750 words) Case Study

THE ENGLISH LAW OF TORT

ntention can be of relevance in bringing a claim in cases of malicious prosecution5, falsehood6, or defamation7 as well as in claims for nuisance.... n contrast, however, it is possible for a claim to be brought where no damage has been suffered.... To bring a successful claim for a tort the claimant has to show that the damnum is a.... In cases where injuria cannot be proven, the claimant would not be able to claim for the harm caused....
18 Pages (4500 words) Essay

Tort and Negligence of Company

The paper "Tort and negligence of Company" describes that specific duties are imposed by the law and are applicable to everyone hence it is advisable for Kids Pty Ltd to sue Bull Pty Ltd as a result of loss of business caused by Dan's negligent behaviour.... Tort law can be described as a civil wrong not arising from a contract and in the case of negligence, one should owe due consideration to one's neighbour (Capiro Industries vs.... negligence, therefore, can be described as the act of doing something a reasonable man would not do and a plaintiff must prove in such a case that the defendant owes a duty of care (Donoghue V....
7 Pages (1750 words) Research Paper

Medical Ethics and Law

Moreover, doctors would be subjected to the allegation of clinical negligence, if there were to be inadequate communication between them.... Such physicians will be prosecuted for negligence by the courts, if the patient files a case in this regard.... In this context, important case law and statutes have to be scrutinised. ...
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Medico-legal Issues in Radiology Case Analaysing

There is every possibility of a claim being allowed for negligence on the part of both the radiographers and the two nurses.... All their actions and non-actions meet the criteria to establish negligence.... "Medico-legal Issues in Radiology Case Analyzing" paper discusses the case, in terms of negligence, focuses on the roles of both Leo and Polly.... This is based on the premise that a thing which the professional can control causes harm otherwise impossible to occur but for the professional's negligence....
6 Pages (1500 words) Case Study

Claims in Negligence Name

james needs to establish a claim in negligence.... This essay discusses the legal issues involved in the successful application of a claim in negligence with reference to James' state of affairs.... Abstract: James, a rising ice hockey star, asks for advice to deal with legal issues about the claim in negligence.... Abstract: James, a rising ice hockey star, asks for advice to deal with legal issues about the claim in negligence....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Claims in Negligence

However, he needs to establish a claim in negligence against his team doctor and coach.... However, he needs to establish a claim in negligence against his team doctor and coach.... However, he needs to establish a claim in negligence against his team doctor and coach.... ames needs advice on what he would have to do to establish a claim in negligence.... or James to successfully apply for the claim in negligence, he must satisfy the necessary prerequisites for a claim in negligence....
6 Pages (1500 words) Case Study

The Tort of Deceit

The ruling determined they were not liable for the tort of negligence, as they did not make any fraudulent misrepresentation.... In addition to being a civil claim, the parties may also decide to level criminal proceedings against the other party for issuing such information.... An individual may cause damage to their own motor vehicle and claim another vehicle caused the damage, to which the insurance company compensates the individual; the insured is there for liable to the insurance firm for the tort of deceit (Thompson 2006 888)....
8 Pages (2000 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us