StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Appeal Court - Research Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
The essay "The Appeal Court" describes any supporter who lost the case in a court of litigation has the legal right to appeal this decision and ask him to consider it in the federal appellate court. The Court of Appeal may or may not be accountable to the court…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.3% of users find it useful
The Appeal Court
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Appeal Court"

 The Appeal Court Any litigant who had lost a case in the trials court has the legal right to appeal against the decision and ask for its review in the federal court of appeal. The appeal court may or may not grant review to the litigant and has the authority to overturn the verdict given by the trial court if they find the verdict to be erroneous. Any defendant or a litigant who did not receive a favorable decision from the trial court can appeal the verdict to a federal court of appeals for its review. If the litigant is found guilty of some or all the charges then they have the legal right to file a petition for reviewing the decision to at least one level of appellate court. There are several courts of appeal in the United States and a litigant can appeal the court's verdict in these courts in a hierarchal manner until the case reaches the Supreme Court. On a broader term, an appeal is a formal request to a higher court to review the decisions made by the trial court in a particular case. Persons receiving unfavorable verdict are the one who makes the appeal. The litigant who files an appeal or a petition is known as the appellant and the persons who defend the decision of the lower court in the federal court of appeal is known as appellee. The appellant must try hard with proper evidence to prove to the courts of appeal that the verdict taken by the trial court has made a legal error which had affected the outcome of the case significantly. On the other hand, the appellee must also work to defend the trial court judgment and convince the court that the error, if any, caused by the trial court is not significant enough to affect the verdict. The appeal court has their own sets of rules for reviewing the verdict given by the trial court. The appeal court does not receive any additional pieces of evidence or hear any witness regarding the case. The court has the authority to overturn a verdict if they found it to be erroneous in interpreting the law. An appeal court generally comprises a panel of three judges who work together to review the case petitioned by the appellant. The appellant and the appellee submit the legal arguments of the concerned case to the panel in writing in a document which is known as the brief. Almost all the cases which are sent to the appeals court are heard on the basis of the writ filed by the appellant and the appellee. However, there can be certain cases where the court may ask for oral argument in order to have a better understanding of the case before giving the final verdict. The oral argument asked by the appeals court is a structured discussion which happens between the appellant’s lawyers and the panel of judges. The argument is essentially based on the difference of understanding of a particular law. Both the sides are generally given a short notice of fifteen minutes to present their case. The decision made by the appeals court after its careful revision is considered to be a final decision unless the appeals court sends the case back to trial court for additional proceedings. The litigant also has the option to file a request petition to the Supreme Court for reviewing the case. The Supreme Court may or may not grant review to all the cases. The review is only granted in cases which involve an important law which has been interpreted differently by two or more courts. The appeal process is very necessary for a fair trial as it gives enough chances to the litigant to prove their innocence before the court gives the final verdict. Although the government has tried their best to make the trial systems fair and just, yet a lot should be done for further improving the overall judicial system of the country. It is important that due time is given to all the cases. No case under any circumstances should be judged swiftly because of any kind of pressure. It is also very necessary that none of the cases are delayed because of the lack of resources or man power. The government should take all measures to appoint more judges for improving the overall federal judiciary system. The appeal is necessary for strengthening the overall judicial system of the country by making it more fair and just. Appeals have been very beneficial in numerous cases where the entire decision made by the trial court has been reversed in favor of the appellant. The above statement can be demonstrated by using a real life case of an appellant Jonathan Parker who was convicted by the trial court for murdering his associate Leroy Lewis. The defendant Parker then filed an appeal for reviewing the court's verdict. The appeal was based on the fact that the evidence put forth by the prosecution was not sufficient enough to prove him guilty and the decision should be reversed in favor of the appellant. According to the case, the prosecution in the trial court postulated that both Jonathan Parker and Leroy Lewis were narcotics dealers and that Parker had killed his associate Lewis because of his failure to share the robbed cocaine equally among themselves. The prosecution argued that Parker shot Lewis on his head after discovering that Lewis had lied about the total amount of narcotics stolen. The prosecution roped in three other drug dealers to strengthen their argument. On the other side, Jonathan Parker appealed that the evidence put forth by the government was not direct but a wrong inference which was deducted out of unrelated activities. His main defense points were that there was no eyewitness to testify the shooting or to give any statements concerning about the shooting. The prosecution also could not prove the matching of DNA or fingerprints nor the motive for killing. They also failed to find or identify the weapon used for killing Lewis. The above case shows how the prosecution used circumstantial evidence to present their case. The appeals court, in this case, had to reverse the decision as this circumstantial evidence does not stand as absolute evidence against the appellant. The court decision must be based on concrete evidence which supports the conclusion of the inference drawn by the prosecution against the defendant. Reference Appeals Process Paper. (n.d.). In United States Courts. Retrieved September 4, 2011, from http://www.uscourts.gov Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“The Appeal Court Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1579388-the-appeal-court
(The Appeal Court Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
https://studentshare.org/law/1579388-the-appeal-court.
“The Appeal Court Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1579388-the-appeal-court.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Appeal Court

Read a case and reflect on it

Unsatisfied with the ruling, the victim went ahead to appeal the judgment of the lower court, but The Appeal Court upheld the ruling citing lack of evidence.... The evidence that had been presented before The Appeal Court indicated that the defendant had no obligation to the victim.... As such, the bar's insurer, Mid-Continent, was sucked into the case since they were the ones to make the payment if the victim… The victim filed a case in the trial court, but lost due to lack of substantial evidence against the bar for any wrong doing and the fact that the insurance policy did not cover such incidences....
2 Pages (500 words) Research Paper

Week 12 Real Estate CD

However, The Appeal Court did not grant any damages to Stambosky in relation to misrepresentation of facts concerning the stature of the house.... According to The Appeal Court, searching the house by the buyer could not reveal the existence of a ghost, and according to the principles of equity, it was prudent to rescind the contract.... On realizing the story behind the house, Stambosky sought a legal action against… He was demanding for a rescission of the sale contract, and an award for damages because of fraudulent misrepresentation of facts concerning the stature of the house (Warda, 2001). The magistrate's court ruled against Stambosky, The case under discussion is the 1991 case involving Ackley, against Stambosky....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

The Case Involving Garner against Tennessee

The Appeal Court was particularly interested on the fact that fleeing suspect did not pose any danger to the police officers, or other people within the surrounding.... The Appeal Court ruled that by killing a suspect who is unarmed, by officer violates the rights of such a person in regard to seizure outlined in the Fourth Amendment of the American constitution (Levy, Karst and Winkler, 2000).... The district court ruled in favor of the mayor, the police department and Hymon....
1 Pages (250 words) Research Paper

Ford Pinto Product Liability Case

Consequently, a legal case was brought before the trial court by the Grimshaw family popularly known as Grimshaw vs.... The California law court found the defendant guilty of the death and injuries suffered by the victims.... Furthermore, the court ordered the defendant to pay $125 million for punitive damages.... This was arrived at after the court was informed of the design failure of the organization in manufacturing the car....
5 Pages (1250 words) Research Paper

Problem of Miscarriages of Justice in England and Wales

The Appeal Court and for that matter the criminal appeal system has been in place since 1875 with the purpose of ensuring that no one falls out on the need to... is directly vested in the roles and procedures of Her Majesty's court of Appeal in England and mandated under the Criminal Appeal Act 1995.... there is so much prominence placed on the criminal appeal system such that the Her Majesty's court of Appeal is made to come only second to the Supreme court of the U....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

The Liability of Employers for Psychiatric Illness Suffered by Employee

(1995), The Appeal Court ruled that an employer's legal duty of care to the employee in the provision of risk free workplace conditions extends to a reasonably foreseeable extent to which it is determinable that an employee can suffer from psychiatric injuries because of amount or nature of work which is performed by the employee.... ) Moreover, in the case of Sutherland v Hatton, even though The Appeal Court took a cautious approach in awarding damages, the court ruled that liability can only arise on the side of employer if it is determinable that the real risk of breakdown was reasonably foreseeable by the employer and that it would have been prevented....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Helen Palsgraf v The Long Island Railroad Company

Palsgraf and Long Island Railroad are the parties to the case that Palsgraf had won at trial and first appeal court.... riterion for determining the duty of care owed to a partyThe party to whom duty of care is owedDecisionThe appeal court reversed the earlier ruling in which four votes supported the decision against three votes.... Palsgraf and Long Island Railroad are the parties to the case that Palsgraf had… the appeal is based on previous decision on matters of law. An appellate court dismissed an appeal by Long Island Railroad in a case that Palsgraf had won against it....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Software ownership

On the other hand, The Appeal Court based its judgement on a side agreement between the University and Cyprotex.... The High Court and appeal court, therefore, found the university guilty.... Both the court of Appeal and the High court set investigations to get to the bottom of the matter.... Both the court of Appeal and the High court set investigations to get to the bottom of the matter.... The High court judge ruled that there was a misinterpretation of how the software was to be used....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us