StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Judicial restraint and judicial activism - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The doctrine of judicial activism is based on the belief that the federal judiciary is supposed to take an active function by utilizing its powers to examine the activities of the state legislatures, administrative agencies, and the Congress (this is in the case where the…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.2% of users find it useful
Judicial restraint and judicial activism
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Judicial restraint and judicial activism"

Judicial Restraint and Judicial Activism The doctrine of judicial activism is based on the belief that the federal judiciary is supposed to take an active function by utilizing its powers to examine the activities of the state legislatures, administrative agencies, and the Congress (this is in the case where the aforementioned government bodies go beyond their authority). The Supreme Court acted in an activist manner in the period between 1953 and 1969, and this is in an era when Chief Justice Earl Warren headed the Court.

The Warren Court instigated the civil rights onward by suggesting that the laws allowing racial segregation were in violation of the equal protection clause (Bardes, Schmidt, and Shelley 459). On the other hand, the doctrine of judicial restraint holds the assumption that the courts are supposed to submit to the decisions made by the executive and legislative branches. This is because the people elect the president and the members of the Congress and the federal judiciary members are not. The courts are also supposed to submit to the agency decisions and rules.

In other words, under this doctrine, the courts are not supposed to hinder the implementation of agency rules and legislative acts unless they are precisely unconstitutional. For instance, many states before the case of Roe v. Wade held that abortion was illegal, regulated sodomy, made homosexual sodomy and adultery a crime (Bardes, Schmidt, and Shelley 459). Judicial activism approach is appropriate because the courts are able to act in an independent manner. In other words, the courts can make their decisions without the influence of the executive and the legislature.

These two branches of the government (executive and legislature) at times make decisions that only serve their interests and not that of the people (Bardes, Schmidt, and Shelley 459). For instance, the in Griswold v. CT case of 1965, the court suggested that the rights to privacy existed and thus, the case overturned the Connecticut law that regulated birth control. Works CitedBardes, B. A., Schmidt, S. W., & Shelley, M. C. American Government and Politics Today: The Essentials. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning, 2008. Print.

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Judicial restraint and judicial activism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words”, n.d.)
Judicial restraint and judicial activism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1621551-judicial-restraint-and-judicial-activism
(Judicial Restraint and Judicial Activism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 Words)
Judicial Restraint and Judicial Activism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 Words. https://studentshare.org/history/1621551-judicial-restraint-and-judicial-activism.
“Judicial Restraint and Judicial Activism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1621551-judicial-restraint-and-judicial-activism.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Judicial restraint and judicial activism

Judicial Activism - Roper v Simmons

judicial activism and restraint are points of controversy for politicians, general public and the Supreme Court itself.... judicial activism refers to the court's willingness to become involved in major issues and the extent that it makes decisions based on constitutional grounds.... judicial activism and restraint are concepts that can be readily viewed in the Roper v.... hellip; judicial restraint is when the Court takes the stand that law making is to be left to the legislators and it opposes the nullification of a law only when the Constitution is unquestionably violated....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Separation of Powers

This dicsussion explores that various Home Secretaries have taken judicial decisions from time to time on grounds of national security, whether during war time or in otherwise tenuous situations like the ongoing global war on terrorism.... The Constitutional Reform Act 2005 seeks to redress some of these grey areas though there are many who have, “defended the current system on the grounds that it discourage judges from making law by judicial rather than legislative means”....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Judicial Activism, Abortion and the Supreme Court

However, there are numerous judicial activism The issue as to whether judges should interpret or apply the constitution is debatable.... The Supreme Court in American politics: judicial activism vs.... Basically, the constitution is seen by advocators of judges being interpreters as a laid down… Scalia (1972) asserts that the constitution is supposed to guide the judge to solve any dilemma with a judicial bearing.... To a larger extent, the judicial function incorporates interpretation of the provisions of law....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Are the Courts Policymakers or Not

and put it in the perspective of judicial restraint versus judicial activism using relevant court cases to justify the author 's position and explain why he chose those cases.... Even as the court exercises its constitutional mandate, it is critical that judicial restraint is used as opposed to judicial activism....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Democracy and development-xz

This concept allows the Supreme Court judges and other lower judges to go beyond their traditional role of interpreting the constitution and other rules in the United State and therefore make… judicial activism can be liberal or conservative.... judicial activism has created controversy in the political and judicial realm leading to the formulation of the imperative The analysis of law by the Supreme Court can be understood as destructive or proactive depending on an individual's beliefs and opinion....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Difference between Judicial activism and Judicial restraint

This essay aims to provide more insight on some of the differences that exist between judicial activism and judicial restraint.... In an attempt to ascertain that passion for justice is maintained and that difficult legal situations are managed satisfactorily in the face of all the concerned parties, political science has brought forth several aspects including judicial activism and judicial restraint.... This essay aims to provide more insight on some of the differences that exist between judicial activism and judicial restraint....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

American Policy, Judicial Activism and Restraint

The reporter states that judicial activism and restraint are both opposite approaches to constitutional and legal interpretation applied as the grounds for decision-making in a court case.... As a criticism, judicial activism might be rooted in the political bias of the individual applying the label and might or might not, in reality, have a foundation.... hellip; One recent case of judicial activism is the US Supreme Court's ruling in Federal Election Commission v....
4 Pages (1000 words) Assignment

Do the courts (judges) make policy Should they

Thomas Jefferson referred to this tendency or trait as despotic behavior, and in reference to the… However, judicial activism does not have to be motivated by political or personal bias.... judicial activism should exist in order to allow courts make decisions without fear of reprisal or reprimand from policy makers, who tend to pass the buck whenever things are tough.... The formulation of ambiguous legislation in most areas of the United States is what leads individuals to believe that judicial activism should exist in order to bring some sanity to the justice system....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us