StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Euthanasia: Leo Viscos - Case Study Example

Cite this document
Summary
The author of the case study aims to analyze whether euthanasia should be regarded as murder or as an assisted suicide using facts and circumstances of Leo Visco’s Case. According to the author, Leo Visco’s shooting of Eva Visco cannot categorically be proved to have been done with her consent…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97% of users find it useful
Euthanasia: Leo Viscos Case
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Euthanasia: Leo Viscos"

Running Head: CASE STUDY Case Study. Institution: Abstract. Leo Visco’s shooting of Eva Visco cannot categorically be proved to have been done with her consent. His failure to follow through with the murder-suicide pact and to explore all available medical options for improving the quality of her life, leave his motives open to question. As this case cannot unequivocally be accepted as a mercy death, Leo Visco’s position is not morally defensible. Case Study. Euthanasia is a term derived from the Greek ‘eu,’ or well and ‘thanatos,’ or death and connotes ‘a good death.’ It is the intentional killing, by act or by omission, of a dependent human being for his or her alleged benefit. Euthanasia can be voluntary: when the person requests it (mercy death); non-voluntary: when the person is unable to give consent, as when in a coma (allowing someone to die); involuntary: when the persons’ consent has not been secured (mercy killing). Voluntary euthanasia, or mercy death, is termed assisted suicide when the individual is given help by another person (Euthanasia, n. d.). Assisted suicide involves “direct action taken to terminate someone’s life at his or her request” (Thiroux and Krasemann, ). The Case Study under discussion is apparently, on the surface, an instance of assisted suicide. However, Leo Visco’s rejection of any medical help to alleviate Eva’s chronic symptoms, the absence of written directives and Leo’s failure to adhere to the murder-suicide pact call into question the morality of his action. The medical examiners’ unequivocal statement that Eva’s medical condition did not “warrant an execution,” and was not a terminal illness, makes it difficult to justify Leo’s argument that the mercy death was carried out to save his wife from a continuing unpleasant existence. Even when Visco’s attorney’s depiction of Eva’s condition of chronic pain, incontinence and degenerating sight and hearing is corroborated by her children and the neighbors, the fact that it was not terminal makes it open to two pertinent questions: was a doctor consulted to explore all available avenues, including hospice care, to improve Eva’s quality of life? Was Leo better qualified than a medical professional to make the subjective judgment on the quality of Eva’s life? When chronic pain can be treated and managed with medication and the often accompanying clinical depression can be lessened with psychological counseling, Leo’s failure to consult a doctor on ways to alleviate Eva’s pain leaves his motives open to question (Maine Right to Life, 2006). Leo’s moral justification of killing Eva to save her from an unpleasant existence can be accepted only in the light of conclusive medical evidence that there was no hope of improvement in her condition, no medication to alleviate her pain and no possibility of a cure. In the absence of such evidence, Leo Visco is not morally justified in killing Eva Visco. The distinction between terminal illness and chronic ailments is definitely relevant in this case. The morality of Visco’s action is further undermined by the absence of any written directive or living will from Eva. Even in cases where there are convincing arguments in favor of mercy death, the institution of safeguards is considered essential, in the form of permissive laws, written requests, waiting periods, proof of absence of coercion and counseling. In this case, none of the above safeguards have been in place and we have only Leo’s word in support of the murder-suicide pact. Even when his devotion to his wife, as vouched for by his neighbors, is accepted, in the absence of corroboration to support his claim that his wife wanted to die, it is difficult to morally justify his action as mercy death. In fact, in the absence of evidence of Eva’s “explicit request or permission to perform the act” (Thiroux and Krasemann, ), Leo’s action can be construed to be mercy killing, or even murder, and not mercy death. Leo’s choice of a revolver to kill Eva, instead of some other painless, non-violent, gentle means, again weakens his moral stand, as his action resulted in a lingering death for Eva. A lingering death from a gun shot wound certainly does not qualify as allowing a person to die with dignity, which is the moral justification for mercy death. The circumstances of this case cast a doubt on the contention that it is an assisted suicide and bring in the possibilities of mercy killing and murder, neither of which is morally justified. The breaking of the murder-suicide pact definitely has a bearing on Leo Visco’s moral standing. When we accept Eva’s right to the freedom of individual choice, Leo’s failure to commit suicide brings up the troubling question: Would Eva have chosen this mercy death if it entailed leaving behind a grief-stricken, guilt-laden husband as a survivor? In the context of mutual devotion between Leo and Eva, her decision to opt for assisted suicide would definitely have been influenced by the belief that Leo’s immediate suicide would save him from any negative repercussions from the act of taking her life. She would categorically have rejected the injustice of making Leo live with his burden of guilt and the risk of making him vulnerable to conviction for murder. Eva would definitely not have consented to being killed by Leo, without the promise of his subsequent suicide. Another pertinent factor here is that it is explicitly stated by the medical examiner, the neighbors and the children that Eva had limited mobility and was “nearly” bedridden – not completely immobilized. In such a scenario, Eva was presumably capable of taking her own life, without subjecting her husband to the ordeal of killing her and then living to face the consequences. A suicide pact would be more morally acceptable than a murder-suicide pact: especially a broken one. Leo’s failure to follow through with the murder-suicide pact definitely impinges negatively on his moral position. In the light of the ethical theories, again the morality of Leo Visco’s action is debatable. There is no clear-cut evidence that Eva was the person who took the decision to end her life rationally in her self-interest, as advocated by Ethical Egoism or by the Principle of Individual Freedom. Even if Leo Visco’s uncorroborated version of the murder-suicide pact is true, his failure to commit suicide leaves him as a guilt-laden survivor and a murder accused in the eyes of the law, which is against the position taken by Utilitarianism and against the Principle of Justice. If, on the other hand, Leo acted without Eva’s consent, from ulterior motives of economic gain or relief from the burden of caring for her, it becomes mercy killing or murder, both of which violate the Divine Command Theory and the Value of Life Principle. Similarly, Leo’s actions cannot be condoned by Ross’ Prima Facie Duties, as Leo did not explore the options available to improve Eva’s condition. His action is also against Virtue Ethics, as Eva was not suffering from a terminal illness and could have developed in virtue through the experiences of her continued existence. In conclusion, Leo Visco’s position is morally indefensible. The clear absence of a terminal illness, the lack of conclusive evidence that Eva consented to a mercy death, Leo’s failure to show that all available options for medical treatment had been explored before the decision to end her life was reached and his breaking of the murder-suicide pact all leave his motives open to question. This case cannot categorically be said to be one of mercy death: the possibility of mercy killing or murder are too high for them to be eliminated from the scene and for Leo Visco’s actions to be condoned as morally right. References. Euthanasia (n.d.) National Right to Life. Retrieved on 21 February 2007, from http://www.nrlc.org/euthanasia/index.html Maine Right to Life Committee (2006). Euthanasia. Retrieved on 21 February 2007, from http://www.mainerighttolife.com/euthanasia.php Thiroux, J.P. and Krasemann, K.W. ( ) Ethics Theory and Practice. Ninth edition. Read More
Tags
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Euthanasia: Leo Viscos Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Euthanasia: Leo Viscos Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/ethics/1706337-ethics-case-study-on-the-taking-of-human-life
(Euthanasia: Leo Viscos Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
Euthanasia: Leo Viscos Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words. https://studentshare.org/ethics/1706337-ethics-case-study-on-the-taking-of-human-life.
“Euthanasia: Leo Viscos Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/ethics/1706337-ethics-case-study-on-the-taking-of-human-life.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Euthanasia: Leo Viscos Case

SISCO Marketing Plan

Saudi Installment Services Company (Sisco) is a comprehensive Mortgage and Property financing company.... Sisco is a local company whose main services include residential mortgage, installment services, leasing and Syndication. Sisco serves Jeddah area in Saudi Arabia.... hellip; Our mission is to provide an unmatched financial service to our customers....
5 Pages (1250 words) Case Study

The Morality of Euthanasia

In the paper “The Morality of Euthanasia” the author discusses the case of the ill cancer-stricken mother who had been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer about two months ago and she has just undergone all the necessary treatments for cancer patients.... The priest in the calmest spirit reacts by way of directly asking his elder brother if what he meant was using euthanasia to end the sufferings of ....
3 Pages (750 words) Case Study

Pete Solvik's Approach to IT Governance

It was incorporated in 1984 and since its incorporation; it has underwent tremendous growth.... In the Q4 of 2010 financial year, the revenue of the company touched $ 10.... billion.... The company focuses on… Pete Solvik joined CISCO in 1993 as CIO.... After his arrival he made several changes....
4 Pages (1000 words) Case Study

THE LEO BURNETT COMPANY

In case of OBC, the headquarters in London sometimes rejected the idea of Canadian brochure of using ‘three-piece' advertising flier.... First of all the two markets of the products were different in culture and different type of advertising was needed to reach them.... This was costly and lead to budget problems....
2 Pages (500 words) Case Study

Advertising Cruise Ships

In 2010, Carnival Cruise Lines' cruise ship named Splendor, caught fire at sea.... In February 2013, Triumph, a cruise ship under the same brand caught fire causing four thousand two hundred… These accidents have raised concern over the safety of cruise ships with some passengers opting out of the luxurious trips....
1 Pages (250 words) Case Study

YouTube Business Analysis

It was founded in 2005 and was acquired by Google in 2006 for the sum amount of U.... $1.... 5 billion.... Since then YouTube has experienced an explosive growth and increased its products and services.... YouTube is the leading video… Due to this fact, YouTube has seen an increase in the amounts of revenue....
1 Pages (250 words) Case Study

Viacom is Successful in 2011

? When Viacom's Analysis of Viacom's case al Affiliation Viacom initially emerged as at around 1970 as an independent Company.... It was established by the CBS Broadcasting with the aim of complying with rules and regulations that had been set by the Federal Communications Commission of U....
1 Pages (250 words) Case Study

Improvement of CEO Efficiency

The paper "Improvement of CEO Efficiency" discusses that the employee is exploiting the employer with higher demand than is ethical.... But as the managers seem to have autonomy over the salary they can demand, it has become the generally followed procedure.... hellip; The rent extraction theory suggests that the main cause of pay exploitation done by the managers is due to the shareholders' inability to judge their performances thoroughly....
7 Pages (1750 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us