StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Abortions Should Remain Legal - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
Laws that coerce women to carry their pregnancy to full term are in conflict with the U.S. Constitution.It is unconscionable that a country founded on and devoted to civil liberties could permit its citizens to resort to unsafe self-abortion procedures…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.4% of users find it useful
Abortions Should Remain Legal
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Abortions Should Remain Legal"

Abortions Should Remain Legal Laws that coerce women to carry their pregnancy to full term are in conflict with the U.S. Constitution in addition to any definition of decency and compassion. It is unconscionable that a country founded on and devoted to civil liberties could permit its citizens to resort to unsafe self-abortion procedures. However, before the Roe v. Wade ruling in 1973 which legalized abortion in the U.S., this practice was common. Prior to abortion being legal, many untold thousands of young women were injured and died while trying to end a pregnancy while the wealthy women were able to have illegal abortions performed safely usually outside the country. The rich were able to travel overseas or pay inflated high prices to a local physician who was willing to perform the operation but poor woman had to resort to more dangerous options. Criminalizing abortions never has and never will stop them from happening; it just harms women. Those persons opposed to legal abortions are the same ones who oppose programs that aid the poor and abused kids who resulted from unwanted pregnancies. They point to ‘family values’ and ‘Christian morals’ as the rationalization for discrimination of the impoverished, the loss of liberty, and the increased numbers of injured women. There will always be ideological differences between factions but the dispute as to whether abortion should be legal is a matter for the justice system, courts and judges, as are all legal matters. This paper considers the legal arguments of the abortion issue. The emotional arguments for and against are important from a social context yet but peoples ‘feelings’ about abortion will not decide whether or not the procedure remain lawful and safe. The 1973 Roe v. Wade U.S. Supreme Court case decided that women have the constitutional right to have an abortion performed up to a point when the fetus is viable, meaning when it can live on its own outside the woman’s body. The decision nullified any state law that disallowed a woman to have or a doctor to perform an abortion during the first trimester (three months) of a pregnancy. The ruling also restricted abortions during the second-trimester with the exception being if a woman’s health is in danger (“Roe v. Wade”, 1997: 312). Though the decision was controversial then and remains so today, the Court’s decision was right from a constitutional perspective. Detractors of the decision have commonly made arguments based on personal ethical beliefs which are immaterial when the language of the Constitution is scrutinized. Their moral objections regarding the Roe decision can be rapidly invalidate by evaluating the precedents of constitutional decisions by the Supreme Court and reading the specific wordage of the Constitution. There are, however, legitimate questions concerning the Constitutional issues of the Roe decision that merit answering. When most people speak disparagingly of the Court’s decision, they base their disapproval purely on moral justifications but lawyers, scholars and especially judges who criticize the decision should only do so based for constitutional reasoning in addition to expressing their moral objections. Opposition to the decision should speak to the 9th Amendment which states, “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people” (“Bill of Rights”, 2006). Opponents say that the ninth, and all other amendments, do not explicitly mention abortion consequently the Constitution does not apply when trying to establish the legality of abortion rights. This view, however, clearly contradicts the short and succinct statement that is the Ninth Amendment which undoubtedly encourages the right to an abortion and all other rights whether or not explicitly stated in the Constitution. Just because a specific word or phrase does not appear, the Constitution remains the source for legal precedence for this subject as it is for all other civil rights matters. The Constitution also addresses another of the opponent arguments, that the question should be determined on the state level. The Ninth Amendment, in addition to the other amendments within the Bill of Rights, was originally understood to only relate to the federal government only, not to individual states. The Fourteenth Amendment (1868) expanded the Bill of Rights authority to include all states. Decisions since then have created solid precedent in the judicial interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment which states, in part, “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States” (“Fourteenth Amendment”, 2006). Most law experts are of the opinion that the language of the Fourteenth Amendment is rationally understood to indicate that citizens are protected from states violating the rights outlined by the Constitution. Those that condemn the Roe judgment have argued that the country’s founders used general terminology to construct the Constitution and did not mean for the ambiguous usage of the term ‘rights’ to infer the right to have an abortion. They further suggest that those who wrote then ratified the Constitution were ‘God fearing’ men who, like them, would have opposed this procedure. Even if this claim were valid on a constitutional basis, the conjecture that the Founders were entirely opposed to the procedure is likely incorrect. “A good deal of Justice Blackmon’s opinion regarding the Roe case was centered around the fact that prior to the latter part of the 1800’s, first trimester abortions were commonly allowable in the U.S.” (Dorf, 2003). The opposition’s opinion does take on some legitimacy when taking into account that the people who ratified the Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments thought the equal rights protected by the Constitution harmonious with the segregation of the races and the overt discrimination of women. However, both of these practices have been rightly condemned by invoking the precepts of the Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments. Two questions surface when discussing whether or not the Constitution legally protects a woman’s right to an abortion. The first is reasoning if the primary interests of women are affected by restricting access to abortion. The other questions if laws preventing abortions are defensible even though the Constitution does not address this specific issue. Answering the first question is relatively simple; yes, women’s interests are unquestionably affected. Courts commonly hear cases to decide if the rights of an individual are protected by the Constitution. If courts are compelled to determine whether or not the fundamental rights of citizens are protected, then the personal significance of the government forcing a woman to have an unwanted child surely applies. Recognizing that courts do have the power to intervene in decisions involving the rights of individuals citing the Constitutional precedence, could laws disallowing abortions still be justified despite this egregious intrusion on the civil liberties of women? Constitutional rights are not unconditional. The government does not have the legal authority to protect the rights of the unborn. The reason is that the Fourteenth Amendment begins by referring to “All persons born ... in the United States” (“Fourteenth Amendment”, 2006), demonstrating that the protections guaranteed by the Constitution apply to only those persons who are ‘born.’ Those against the Roe decision also assert that if the Constitution does not precisely address a subject, then the Congress, not the courts are the proper authority to decide matters such as this which have substantial moral implications. The Roe decision basically addressed this question by declaring the government’s concern for unborn life does not overshadow the constitutional rights of those already born and therefore their decision to end a pregnancy. The Court distinguished what it considers the murder of a child. On this matter, those who oppose abortion rights do have any legal rationalization for debate. Viability appears to be a suitable benchmark because in the early stages following conception, the fetus is not a cognizant being although many of religious conviction would argue that this being does have a soul. Viability is, to a great extent scientifically determinable but the presence of a soul cannot be. Therefore, “the line can only be drawn at the viability of the unborn as any other method by which to determine when abortions are considered murder is unclear” (Dorf, 2003). Criticizing the Roe decision simply by opposing it on moral grounds is easy but the solution is difficult and lies in offering an alternative that is understandable enough to be enforceable and is not subjective. The case for a legislative solution to decide socially troublesome questions and not the courts is often and extensively discussed. The Supreme Court decision that ended school segregation via the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education case was an extremely divisive issue but few oppose this decision though it was a moral subject decided on the language of the Constitution (“Brown v. Board of Education”, 2004). The important distinction between the Roe and Brown cases is that people eventually came to accept the belief that all races were entitled to the equal rights guaranteed by the Constitution. The debate progressed to how this equality could be realized. However, the abortion dispute remains an issue based mostly on moral grounds, not the best way to administer the law. Though the constitutionality concerning the Roe decision is often argued, it must be admitted that because the matter remains extremely controversial nearly 40 years after, opponents may be justified in believing abortion should not be thought of as a fundamental right. Fundamental rights reprove fundamental truths of a society. Rulings which prevented racial segregation now is widely accepted by the public therefore widely accepted as fundamental rights. The Supreme Court’s decision cannot be considered a mistake as its opponents claim unless they are willing to completely reject legal precedence and wording of the Constitution itself. Works Cited “Brown v. Board of Education: About the Case.” Brown Foundation for Educational Equity, Excellence and Research. (April 11, 2004). March 24, 2011 Dorf, Michael D. “Was Roe v. Wade Rightly Decided? Will it be Overruled?” CNN Law Center. (January 23, 2003). March 24, 2011 “Roe v. Wade: 1973.” Women’s Rights on Trial. 1st Ed. New York: Thompson Gale, 1997. March 24, 2011 “United States Constitution Bill of Rights.” Cornell Law School. Legal Information Institute. (2006). March 24, 2011 “United States Constitution Fourteenth Amendment.” Cornell Law School. Legal Information Institute. (2006). March 24, 2011 < http://topics.law.cornell.edu/wex/First_amendment> Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Abortions Should Remain Legal Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1413275-abortion
(Abortions Should Remain Legal Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1413275-abortion.
“Abortions Should Remain Legal Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1413275-abortion.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Abortions Should Remain Legal

Can Abortion be a Morally Acceptable Choice

Many people who say they are pro-life agree that abortions should be allowed in the case of incest , rape or to save the woman's life.... Second, the legal principle of 'self-defense' might be applied here.... Until recently abortion was illegal throughout the world, but with the appearance of comparatively safe medical techniques for the termination of a pregnancy the question was raised whether it should be legalized.... This seems a somewhat odd position as, if a person believes that human life begins at conception, should it matter how the baby was conceived Is the baby any less human because its father was a rapist Is it any less human because its mother may die because of the pregnancy The answer to both these questions would seem to be 'no'....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Abortion as Social Problem in the US

Backstreet Abortions IncreaseWill those who perform these abortions have either the equipment or the knowledge to deal with complications that may occur Count the cost in terms of money and human lives that will result from botched legal abortions.... [original emphasis]4Regardless of whether abortions are legal or not, some women will have abortions and some women will die from complications.... The Ministry of Health claimed that the 45 000 women treated in public hospitals for incomplete abortions each year is costing the state R19 million....
15 Pages (3750 words) Essay

Why Abortion Is Immoral

The life of a human, from the time of conception, should be considered equally as viable as any individual.... Consequently, the right of life as well as the social definition regarding ‘right' and ‘wrong' types of deaths should apply to potential lives which possess a future value of life, the same as any living person....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Hard News Abortion in the United States

Most of the decline is in countries where abortions are legal.... This paper 'Hard News – Abortion in the United States" focuses on the fact that the cause of most abortions has always been unwanted pregnancy.... nbsp; It has been reported that the number of abortions in the United States of America is decreasing but in other countries, illegal abortions stay steady.... The latest report by the Guttmacher Institute, a pro-choice institute, states that the number of abortions fell from over 45 million in 1995 to fewer than 42 million in 2003....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

Legalising Abortion

This essay "Legalising Abortion" sheds light upon whether abortion should be made legal or not and it is fair to conclude that it should not be made legal because more and more women would undergo abortion should it be made legal.... To conclude it is fair to say that abortion should never be made legal.... Making it legal will encourage more and more women to undergo it and may end up taking away several lives which surely no one would want....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

The Disadvantages of Abortions

It has raised voices from both legal and religious bodies and even social institutions.... It has raised voices from both legal and religious bodies and even social institutions.... I will also discuss on the legal nature of the act and the religious view of the practice.... Abortion is not respectful to all life in any society, and the government should illegalize on such practices due to that I think the governments take should not support abortions....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Ethical and Legal Aspects of Abortion

nbsp;   While therapeutic abortions, meaning the termination of a pregnancy when the health of an expecting mother is in jeopardy are commonplace and accepted by most health practitioners as a legal and ethical solution to an unfortunate situation, the idea of elective abortion is abhorrent to some and remains steeped in controversy.... Seeking to explore the ethical and legal aspects of abortion, this essay will provide a concise yet comprehensive introduction to the major issues surrounding abortion in America today....
6 Pages (1500 words) Term Paper

Abortion, Choice and a Right

This paper “Abortion, Choice and a Right” presents the pro-choice and right-to-life view positions, both of which are compelling then concludes that legal Abortions Should Remain Legal and safe.... This paper presents the pro-choice and right-to-life view positions, both of which are compelling then concludes that legal Abortions Should Remain Legal and safe.... To properly examine the subject, the opposing viewpoints including the legal, medical and moral aspects must be argued with similar determination....
5 Pages (1250 words) Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us