StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Prejudice vs Discrimination - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The essay 'Prejudice vs Discrimination" focuses on the critical analysis of the major issues concerning the comparison between prejudice and discrimination. Prejudice refers to irrational opinions, beliefs, and attitudes towards members of a particular group (Brown, 2010)…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.1% of users find it useful
Prejudice vs Discrimination
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Prejudice vs Discrimination"

?Prejudice versus discrimination Prejudice versus discrimination Introduction Prejudice refers to irrational opinions, beliefs and attitudes towards members of a particular group (Brown, 2010). Prejudice also entails the pre-conceived judgment towards an individual that is based on gender, ethnicity, religion or any other identifiable personal trait of the individual (Brown, 2010). On the other hand, discrimination is the positive or negative actions that is taken by an individual towards a member of a certain group and is influenced by the existing prejudice (Russell, Jarvis and Gorman, 2004). A prejudice is an extreme stereotype that is cognitive in nature and progresses through anti-locution, avoidance, discrimination, physical attacks and finally extermination (Brown, 2010). There are numerous theories that can be used to explain the nature of prejudice and why it leads to discrimination. Authoritarian personality theory This theory was proposed by Adorno et al. (1950) and asserts that authoritative personality is prone to prejudice (Brown, 2010). The theory utilized the F-scale and concluded that certain personality traits make the individual highly sensitive to totalitarian ideas therefore leading to prejudices. The theory also relied on case study of the Nazis and psychometric testing (F-scale) together with clinical interviews that revealed that social environment of the child influences the development of authoritative personality (Brown, 2010). According to the theory, authoritative personality tends to be harsh towards the inferior status and uphold the traditional values. Accordingly, such individuals with high F-scale exhibit rigidity in their beliefs and opinions (Russell, Jarvis and Gorman, 2004). Very strict upbringing will lead to development of personality traits such as preoccupation with power and obsession with status. The authoritarians have experienced a harsh upbringing thus tend to displace their emotional feelings on the minorities through prejudices (Russell, Jarvis and Gorman, 2004). Realistic group conflict Realistic Group conflict theory (RGC) asserts that prejudices arise due to competition for limited resources among the groups in society (Russell, Jarvis and Gorman, 2004). The inter-group hostilities arise due to the conflicts in competition and differing goals thus leading to feelings of hostility and prejudice towards the members of the other group. The theory was validated by Carolyn and Muzafer Sherif (1954) through the ‘Robber’s cave experiment’ (Brown, 2010). Muzaref Sherif demonstrated the principles of realistic group conflict through a series of studies on intergroup conflicts at Robbers Cave State park (Brown, 2010). The research studies entailed boys aged 11-12 years who were put in the Park as part of their summer camp. The boys initially showed not signs of emotional problems and were selected from similar socioeconomic background. The boys were then assigned in to two groups that comprised similarities in athletic skills and physical strength. The two groups were provided with adequate time for members to know each other and leaders to emerge within the group in order to ensure group cohesion (Russell, Jarvis and Gorman, 2004). After some time, the researchers introduced competition between the two groups through implementing several sports such as baseball and football and prize rewards would be awarded to the winning group (Russell, Jarvis and Gorman, 2004). The two groups engaged in name calling, verbal insults and ultimately physical aggression thus forcing the researchers to separate the groups (Brown, 2010). Sherif concluded that group members would display aggression and derogation towards the other group members thus concluding that existence of two groups competing for rewards, scarce resources and goals will lead to realistic conflicts and prejudices (Russell, Jarvis and Gorman, 2004). People within a group will dislike the members of the other groups since they view them as competitors for the scarce resources. Such hostility, ideology and stereotype will lead to prejudices that ultimately lead to discrimination in the allocation of the scarce resources among the various groups in society (Russell, Jarvis and Gorman, 2004). Accordingly, individuals are motivated by maximising their rewards even if such rewards entail denying the other people their own rightful ownership to the rewards. John Duckitt extended the work of Sherif through more case studies one type of competition and competition between groups with equal powers (Brown, 2010). John pointed out that conflicts and prejudices will arise between groups of unequal status and powers such as majority racial group dominating the minority racial groups thus denying the minority groups the access to material benefits and social rewards. Social identity theory This theory was developed by European psychologists who perceived that North American psychologists had ignored the role of social group influence on the attitudes and behaviours of each member individual. Henri Tajfel (1978) asserted that prejudices result from the social identity and self-concept of an individual (Brown, 2010). According to Tajfel, individuals will naturally strive to attain a positive self-image and self-identity is influenced by the categorization of individuals as members of the in-groups or out-groups (Whitley and Kite, 2010). The need for social identity supports the formation of a prejudice and discrimination occurs when individuals are categorized in to certain in-groups or out-groups (Russell, Jarvis and Gorman, 2004). Minimal group studies The minimal group studies outline the baseline conditions that make individuals prefer their groups over the others. The idea was to establish the in-group categorization and assess the effect of groups on the behaviour of individuals (Whitley and Kite, 2010). The study entailed 64 boys aged 14 to 15 years from Bristol school who would provide points to members of the two groups depending ion the estimation accuracy of the number of cards flashed by the researcher (Russell, Jarvis and Gorman, 2004). Tajfel minimal group paradigm required participants to allocate points to people in the two groups. Tajfel idea was to highlight discrimination since participants were expected to allocate more points to members of the in-group than members of the out-group (Brown, 2010). Tajfel and other researchers observed a bias in the allocation of the points since membership to a particular group would attract more points from the co-members. The participants ignore the logic and matrix of the point allocation and demonstrated a pattern of prejudice in their allocation of points (Whitley and Kite, 2010). This study concluded that there is always unknown psychological motivation for individuals to differentiate their own group members from the others despite the existence of economic or political benefits (Russell, Jarvis and Gorman, 2004). Self-categorization theory This is another prejudice theory that is based on cognitive processes that are associated with membership to a particular social group. Self-categorization focuses on assimilation to group norms and self-stereotyping and how the cognitive processes influence the intergroup behaviours related to prejudice and discrimination (Whitley and Kite, 2010). Individuals will depersonalize and adapt to prototypic qualities and behaviours that are associated with their groups (Brown, 2010). Discrimination depends on the context since individuals strive to maintain group distinctiveness and minimize subjective uncertainty. In order to minimize the subjective uncertainty, the individuals will make a comparison between the members of the in-group and out-group thus leading to in-group favoritism after identification of the perceived intergroup differences (Whitley and Kite, 2010). Comforting to group identity will enhance the self-image of the individual (Russell, Jarvis and Gorman, 2004). The contact hypothesis Contact hypothesis is a widely researched topic on the reduction of prejudice. Longitudinal studies have shed light on the causal processes that move from contact to prejudice reduction or from prejudice to contact reduction (prejudice effects). Several studies among school students in England and German have concluded that contact reduces prejudice and at the same time prejudice will reduce contact. Allport (1954) concluded that contacts that are characterized by common goals, support institutions, intergroup cooperation, and equality in status are effective in reducing intergroup prejudice (Brown, 2010). According to this theory, intergroup cooperation and common goals reduce the bias between groups while support institutions like schools influence positive behaviours and tolerant perceptions towards other groups (Russell, Jarvis and Gorman, 2004). Measures of prejudice There are numerous approaches that can be used in measuring prejudice. Some of the approaches include the explicit measures such as questionnaires, implicit measures such as association tests and finally ambiguous stimuli (Whitley and Kite, 2010). Implicit measures rely mainly on the differential automatic responses to both in-group and out-group targets and the differences in stimuli pairing over a particular period of time (Brown, 2010). Implicit measures operate in unconscious mode and reflect the automatic mental processes while the explicit measures of prejudice can be controlled by the respondent. The implicit measures reflect the culturally shared stereotypes while the explicit measures will reflect the deliberate personal beliefs that can be controlled. Explicit measures: questionnaires The relative gratification (RG) is one of the measures of explicit prejudice and is consistent with the notion that prejudice justifies the economic and social privilege of an individual (Brown, 2010). Individuals with a higher gratified position tend to have more prejudice towards out-group derogation. One of the studies of measuring prejudice involved tasking the participants to complete a questionnaire that contained ethnic attitudes. The first was a 15-item Likert-type prejudice scale towards the Arabs and Immigrants and second was the trait attribution risk (Brown, 2010). The participants would rate eight positive items and seven negative items using a seven-point scale that ranged from 0 for totally disagree and 7 for totally agree. The trait attribution task relied on the same adjectives. The results concluded that all trait attribution tasks were significantly and positively correlated with 15- item prejudice scale (Hugenberg and Bodenhausen 2003, p 642). Implicit measures: association test The implicit association test can be used to measure the strength of automatic association of unconscious mental processes with prejudices (Brown, 2010). It measures the implicit attitudes that mediate either favorable or unfavorable thoughts or feelings of an individual towards another group. The processes measured include self-esteem, stereotypes and attitudes thus reflect the attitudes that an individual may be unwilling to display to the public. Valence implicit association tests show that Whites have a higher implicit preference for Whites than Blacks (Hugenberg and Bodenhausen 2003, p 640). Ambiguous stimuli According to past researches, individuals with high implicit prejudice will classify a racially ambiguous angry face as Black individual compared with those with low implicit prejudice (Hugenberg and Bodenhausen, 2004, p 342). Accordingly, the participants with a high implicit prejudice reported high racially ambiguous angry emotions when the angry face had been classified as Black compared with when classified as White. Accordingly, the emotions displayed are also associated with implicit prejudice as well as the racial categorization. Conclusion Prejudice also entails the pre-conceived judgment towards an individual that is based on gender, ethnicity, religion or any other identifiable personal trait of the individual. Authoritative personality theory asserts that prejudice arises due to authoritative personality of the individual since traits since authoritarians have experience a harsh upbringing thus tend to displace their emotional feelings on the minorities through prejudices. Realistic group conflict theory asserts that competition for scarce resources lead to intergroup conflicts while social identity theory asserts that prejudice arises due to social-categorization of the individuals and self-identity of an individual. Prejudice leads to stereotyping and discriminatory behaviour towards out-group members. Contact hypothesis asserts that prejudice may reduce if members of the group share common goals and cooperate in eliminating the prejudice. Reference list: Brown, R. 2010. Prejudice: its social psychology. Malden: Blackwell publishers. Hugenberg, K and Bodenhausen, G.V. 2003. ‘Facing prejudice: implicit prejudice and the perception of facial threat’, Psycholical science, 14: 640-643. Hugenberg, K and Bodenhausen, G.V. 2004. ‘Ambiguilty in social categorization: the role of prejudice and facial affect in racial categorization’ Psychological science, 15: 342-345. Russell, J., Jarvis, M and Gorman, P. 2004. Angles on psychology. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes. Whitley, B.E and Kite, M.E. 2010. The psychology of prejudice and discrimination. Belmont: Wadsworth Cengage Learning. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Prejudice vs discrimination Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Prejudice vs discrimination Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/sociology/1477840-prejudice-vs-discrimination
(Prejudice Vs Discrimination Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
Prejudice Vs Discrimination Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words. https://studentshare.org/sociology/1477840-prejudice-vs-discrimination.
“Prejudice Vs Discrimination Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/sociology/1477840-prejudice-vs-discrimination.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Prejudice vs Discrimination

Slavery and Prejudice: The Antecedents of Discrimination. Based on the Case Study There is no such Thing as Rest

Slavery and Prejudice: The Antecedents of discrimination.... Slavery and Prejudice: The Antecedents of discrimination.... Based on the Case Study “There is no such thing as Rest” Kimberley Williams Strayer University Instructor: Paula Moore Sociology 100 February 12, 2012 Abstract Slavery as a notion has been around through the history of human civilization; and has left its mark on the psyche of the individuals who indulged in slavery as well as those who were enslaved....
3 Pages (750 words) Assignment

Racism, Prejudice and Discrimination

 This research paper deals with the issues of prejudice, racism, and discrimination.... People are caught in the cruel web of prejudice, discrimination, and racism.... Prejudice shapes perverted attitudes of one group people to another and discrimination shapes inappropriate behaviors from one group of people to another.... It is necessary to take into account different types of behaviors and outline potential impacts of prejudiced behavior, racism or discrimination in order to find out potential psychological hazards both for the oppressors and the oppressed people....
5 Pages (1250 words) Research Paper

Racial Prejudices

Many studies conducted shows that anti-Islam discrimination and prejudice increased since that incidence.... Racial Prejudices Date: Racial prejudices Racial prejudice is one of the pervasive problems to the societies worldwide (Pascoe, 1985).... In the contemporary society, racial prejudice manifests indirectly, directly, subtle and blatantly (Allport, 1954).... hellip; According to Oskamp (2000), additional racial prejudice forms were stimulated by attacks to United States by terrorists in 2001 September eleventh....
3 Pages (750 words) Research Paper

Racial Profiling of as another Form Institutional Prejudice and Discrimination

Racial Profiling as a Form of Institutional Prejudice and discrimination Name Institution Racial Profiling as a Form of Institutional Prejudice and discrimination Description of racial profiling It is the practice where law enforcement authorities or officers investigate certain groups of people chosen basing on their race.... hellip; It is a form of institutional prejudice and discrimination in that, groups that enforce law use race as a policy to select an individual out for more inspection....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Prejudice, Stereotypes, and Discrimination

discrimination due to prejudice and… Understanding these concepts and the mechanisms behind these behaviors may actually help us be a step closer to solving this social disease. Nevid and Rathus (2010) define 217).... More often than not, discrimination becomes the result of certain prejudices made against particular stereotypes.... discrimination is the action made by someone due to certain prejudices (Nevid & Rathus, 2010).... On a personal level, I can relate to these terms because I've also been a victim of discrimination at a certain level....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Prejudice and Discrimination

hellip; This paper shall critically asses the two cases provided in this paper's question, mapping out reasons as to why the prejudice and discrimination exists in each of the case and by drawing knowledge from the methods of reducing prejudice and discrimination based on psychological research provide three methods of reducing prejudice.... This research was aimed at trying to identify instances of white supremacy and to what extent it promoted prejudicial discrimination giving facts that the whites felt mentally superior, hence, a majority of psychologists held the notion that prejudice was a natural response to the races that were considered inferior....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Prejudice and Discrimination in American Society

According to research findings of the paper “Prejudice and discrimination in American Society”, in spite of the ideology that prejudice and discrimination give the majority a privilege, it comes with a cost not only to the victims but also to the American society.... nbsp; However, this turns out not to the case but encounters that only flame unreliable and unjustified hatred and categorization preconceived by prejudice and discrimination....
5 Pages (1250 words) Article

Health Disorders Associated with Chronic Stress Affected by Discrimination

Production of the stress hormones in the short term provides The paper “Chronic Stress Affected by discrimination Triggers Cardiovascular Diseases, Neural Atrophy, and Memory Impairment" is a thrilling example of a term paper on health sciences & medicine.... For example, social stressors such as prejudice or discrimination are quite dangerous as they can lead to chronic vigilance and provoke medical conditions as the result of the chronic stress action....
3 Pages (750 words) Term Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us