StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Crisis Afflicting the Formation of Association of Southeast Asian Nations - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Crisis Afflicting the Formation of Association of Southeast Asian Nations" states that the solution of the ASEAN crisis is complex to establish, owing to the fact that the factors hindering the formation of the regional bloc are so real, unique and personalized to the region…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.9% of users find it useful
Crisis Afflicting the Formation of Association of Southeast Asian Nations
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Crisis Afflicting the Formation of Association of Southeast Asian Nations"

Crisis afflicting the formation of Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Grade (April 2, International relations: Crisis afflicting the formation of Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) The deadline for the ratification of the declaration forming the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) was set for the end of 2015 (Goh, 2015). However, the recent failure of the member states establishing the regional bloc to issue a common statement is an indication of a possible failure of the establishment of the regional bloc before the set deadline (Goh, 2015). The South East Asia is a region that is highly disconnected, with physical factors such as forests, mountains and seas playing a major role in dividing the region into separate national territories. Further, the customs and the heterogeneity of the indigenous populations within each national territory as defined by the physical boundaries have concentrated on minding the issues of their own territories, as opposed to focusing on integration of the region. Thus, despite the region having a higher potential for contributing and even influencing the global geopolitical and economic system, the disconnected territories have retained their cultural, political and economic developments within their individual territories (Severino, 2009). Nevertheless, it cannot be argued that the region lacks inter-countries interaction completely. There has existed some interaction among the different areas of the South East Asia, although the interaction has been such minimal as to significantly alter the preservation of the individual cultures of these nations. Consequently, the idea of the formation of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) was one major stride towards bringing this region into a common economic bloc, which would then be able to negotiate its political and economic space in the global geopolitical and economic system (Lee, 2006). There is no doubt that the region could be highly influential on the global platform if it could be united under one umbrella, which would act as its vehicle of international negotiations. However, the preservation of strong individual culture among the nations of the South East Asia region has played a major role in hindering the formation of the regional economic bloc. The competing interests purely based on the uniqueness of the individual culture of each nation has meant that creating a regional bloc that would integrate the South East Asian countries of Philippines, Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore (Basu, 2013). The ASEAN was first established on 8 August 1967, when the five countries came together and signed the Bangkok declaration, which founded ASEAN as a loose organization (Lee, 2006). However, numerous attempts have been put in place since then, to see the ASEAN agreement fully ratified and implemented into the formation of a strong economic bloc consisting of the South East Asia countries. The real intention of forging the united front being for the sake of creating a political and economic platform that would enable these countries manage to negotiate their global space effectively. However, the possible failure of the full implementation of the ASEAN was clearly identifiable since its birth. This is because, the ASEAN was established upon the foundation of three pillars namely the renunciation of the use of force in resolving the political disputes that may arise, respect for sovereignty and nonintervention (Lee, 2006). The three pillars, as can be clearly seen, were simply focused on maintaining and protecting the individuality of each country’s internal political, social and economic systems, thus preserving the individuality of each member state’s unique culture. Therefore, the major weakness associated with the formation of ASEAN right from its inception is that it did not establish a strong dispute resolution mechanism, which would have in turn created orderliness in the manner in which the member states interact (Myanmar, 2005). Further, the major focus of ASEAN since its establishment was to promote economic growth of the region, while fostering political stability and preserving the individual social indemnities o he member states. The Bangkok declaration had sealed the intention of the formation f ASEAN as an economic growth-oriented entity, through stating that the regional bloc sought to accelerate economic growth, social development and cultural identity of the region (Lee, 2006). However, the major interests of the individual nations was much political than socioeconomic. The different nations forming the ASEAN bloc swathe political angle as much more important than merely promoting trade and economic growth between the nations. Thus, deep inside, each nation had its own reasons for wanting the formation of an integrated economic and political bloc binding the South East Asian countries together. Indonesia as a country saw an opportunity to amend its relationship with the neighboring countries which had deteriorated historically, while at the same time eying an opportunity to exercise regional leadership (Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2008). In doing so, Indonesia was seeking to limit the influence of the external powers on the South East Asian region, such as Europe and China, which were increasingly becoming influential in the internal affairs of some of the regional nations. On the other hand, Malaysia wanted to bind together with Singapore and Philippines, so they could prevent Indonesia from its continued aspirations for regional control, which Indonesia had focused on since its early history (Lee, 2006). Singapore on the other hand sought to join the ASEAN, as a way of seeking for alternative security protection mechanism, after the pulling out of the British army in the region. Singapore was highly suspicious of Malaysia, and thus entered the agreement with the intention of first being recognized as an equal state in the region (Lee, 2006). This way, the threat of Malaysia to Singapore would be neutralized, since the two nations would interact as equal parties on the ASEAN platform. Philippines on its side sought to sign the agreement establishing ASEAN, so that it could completely seal its identity as Asian Filipino nation, as opposed to its earlier perceived identity as a pro-European nation in Asia (Guan, 2004). Through being recognized as an equal partner in the regional economic and political bloc, Philippines would have sealed its identity as an Asian nation. Finally, Thailand was joining the regional bloc with the hope that the bloc would eventually become a strong political machinery that would offer political security to the member states. This way, the bloc would avert the threat of insecurity that Thailand was facing from the Asian giants such as China and Japan (Narine, 1997). It is the failure of the ASEAN to take into account the political interest of the member states, rather focusing purely on the economic interest, which served as the a major weakness of the regional bloc since its inception, thus setting the stage for its subsequent crisis and failure. The other factor accounting for the conflict facing the ASEAN regional bloc is the problem of internal diversity. The countries forming the South East Asian region are internally so much diversified, thus speaking in the same voice for the whole population regarding an issue of national importance is always a problem. The region consists of a myriad of diversity in terms of population, culture, region, political systems and geographical factors, all of which play towards hindering the full integration of the region into a common regional bloc (Lee, 2006). The fact that the different nations constituting the South East Asian region are comprised of different ethnicities within the individual countries, while also being confronted by religious, ethnic and linguistic divisions internally, impend the formation of a regional front. The countries that are constantly faced by the linguistic, religious and ethnic challenges are Malaysia, Singapore and Philippines (Webber, 2001). The consequence is that the ethnic, religious and linguistic diversity within these countries poses the challenge of the nations establishing and wholesomely agreeable national cultural and social norm, which would then translate into a regional cohesion. Thus, with the internal cohesion for such nations being a major impediment to national unity, the subsequent formation of a united regional front becomes jeopardized by the lack of common voice from within these nations. The formation of a united and strong international or regional economic bloc requires that there must be a lot of political goodwill that is coming from the member states involved in establishing the regional or international bloc (Lee, 2006). The inter-state diversity is another factor that contributes to the crisis surrounding the effective establishment of the ASEAN regional bloc. Malaysia and Indonesia are countries that are highly pre-disposed to the Islamic religion and culture, while Thailand is largely a Buddhist nation, with Singapore being a highly pre-disposed Confucian state and Philippines a predominantly catholic state (Shimizu, 1998). This religious and cultural difference among the nations forming the ASEAN regional bloc serves as a major impediment to the unification of the interests of the nations, whether on the social or the political perspectives. Consequently, even when the leaders from these nations may have the political goodwill to support the formation of the regional bloc, the cultural, social, religious and linguistic diversity among these nations creates the major crisis requiring being overcome (Webber, 2001). Further, the population diversity of the regions also creates another sociopolitical dilemma for the unification f the region. For example, the region consists of a population mixed with Eurasians, Papuans, Europeans, Chinese and their subsequent hybrids (Lee, 2006). This diversity also impend the formation of a unified sociopolitical interest, thus further impending the formation of the united ASEAN bloc. The solution of the ASEAN crisis is complex to establish, owing to the fact that the factors hindering the formation of the regional bloc are so real, unique and personalized to the region, that it becomes difficult to overcome them. Nevertheless, according to the Theory of Political Realism, a society is governed by objective laws, which have their roots in the human nature, requiring that in order to improve a society, then it is first essential to understand the rules by which the society lives (Morgenthau, 1978). Therefore, overcoming the ASEAN crisis requires that the uniqueness of the ethnic, linguistic and religious culture of the religion is understood, and a regional framework that does not only focus on the economic but also on the social and political integration is established. The first stage of failure of ASEAN was set by the signing of the Bangkok declaration, which overshadowed the social and political interests of the individual nations forming the regional bloc, rather imposing on them an economic perspective alone (Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2008). Thus, to overcome this shortcoming, it is necessary to alter the principles of the Bangkok declaration, and include the political objective of the nations within the pillars upon which the regional bloc is formed. This way, political interests will help unify the cultural and social diversity of the region under a common objective. This would help to overcome the ASEAN crisis. References Basu, D. et al. (2013). The ASEAN economic community: A work in progress. Goh, A. (2015). ASEAN talks fail, no joint statement ASEAN talks fail, no joint statement. CIMB ASEA Research Institute. Guan, B. (2004). ASEANs Regional Integration Challenge: The ASEAN Process. The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies 20, 70-94. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. (2008). The ASEAN community: Unblocking the roadblocks. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. Lee, M. S. (Fall 2006). ASEAN: brief history and its problems. Korean Minjok Leadership Academy. Morgenthau, H. J. (1978). Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Myanmar, T. (2005). Myanmar in ASEAN: Regional cooperation experience. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. Narine, S. (1997). ASEAN and the ARF: The Limits of the ASEAN way. Asian Survey 37(10), 961-978. Severino, R. (2009). The ASEAN Regional Forum. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. Shimizu, K. (1998). Political Economy of Regional Economic Cooperation in ASEAN. Tokyo: Mineruba Shobo. Webber, D. (2001). Two Funerals and a Wedding? The Ups and Downs of Regionalism in East Asia and Asia-Pacific after the Asian Crisis. The Pacific Review 14(3), 339-72. Read More
Tags
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“International relations Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words”, n.d.)
International relations Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/social-science/1686641-international-relations
(International Relations Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words)
International Relations Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words. https://studentshare.org/social-science/1686641-international-relations.
“International Relations Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/social-science/1686641-international-relations.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Crisis Afflicting the Formation of Association of Southeast Asian Nations

Environmental Issues of Southeast Asia

Environmental Issues (Environmental Protection, Specific Industries, etc) of southeast Asia Table of Contents Environmental Issues (Environmental Protection, Specific Industries, etc) of southeast Asia 1 Table of Contents 2 Introduction 3 Long-Established and Continuing Bilateral Relationships 4 The Influx of Japanese Companies into Thailand 5 The Present Environmental Problems in Thailand 7 Water Pollution Problems 8 Air Pollution Problems 10 Other Environmental Problems 12 Pollution Control 13 Conclusion 14 References 15 Bibliography 17 Introduction The key issue and concern in regard to the policy making in this era is to encourage liberal business activities and simultaneously taking enou… gh measures to defend and conserve the natural resources....
10 Pages (2500 words) Research Paper

Diplomatic negotiation and conflict resolution in the Asian multilateral arena

uring the recent years, political events in the former Soviet Union resulted in dramatic changes and the formation of new republics that made up the larger part of Central Asia.... Earlier, nations in Southeast Asia had formed the ASEAN (Association of South east asian nations), which was however limited in terms of influence, thereby falling short of addressing economic and political issues from a broader Asian perspective (Kent Calder, 2008).... The need to create a forum for the nations of the Asian continent can be attributed to the countries such as China, Japan and even neighboring states such as Australia, which had realized more than 20 years ago of the need of a collective approach for the advancement of shared… Further, the era of globalization had started to gain prominence with the opening up of former closed economies such as China and India (David Shambaugh, 2008)....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Southeast Asian in the US

Due to this concern, this paper focuses on some of the important lessons from the southeast asian refugees' experiences, southeast asian in the US Introduction Today, the refugee problem is a global phenomenon since nearly every country or region has refugees.... Due to this concern, this paper focuses on some of the important lessons from the southeast asian refugees' experiences, which can be considered in addressing the new refugees' needs in Massachusetts from other areas such as Burma, Bhutan, Iraq, and Somalia....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Government & Business in Southeast Asia

Patrimonial administrative systems hinder general economic growth, as has been the case in southeast Asia.... In southeast Asia, economic development has three sections.... hellip; Secondly, the lowland southeast Asia that includes Cambodia and Vietnam that depend mostly on agriculture.... Lastly, the Island South East Asia, which is the most Government & Business in southeast Asia Good businesses that influence the growth of an economy can thrive due to a certain systems of governance....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Current Publications in Southeast Asia

According to Aung-Thwin,2 when historians refer to the “classical” period in southeast Asia, they are usually referring to the period between the ninth and fourteenth centuries AD.... This paper highlights that according to Wheeler, “classical” may be used to refer to an age of antiquity or something that is valuable to the extent that it largely shapes what comes later....
8 Pages (2000 words) Research Paper

Status of ASEAN integration process

The association of South East Asian was formed in the year 1967 by Malaysia, Indonesia, Philippines, Thailand and Singapore, with signing the ASEAN declaration in Bangkok.... It has also taken a lead for creating ASEAN regional forum, whose purpose is to engage all its asian-Pacific neighbors for the first time, for conducting discussions in the form of structured dialogues on a number of asian security issues (Guan).... It can be observed that the strategic presence of US in the discussed regions cannot guarantee the security of States present in southeast Asia, especially in the areas of terrorism, conspiracies and non-conventional threats....
4 Pages (1000 words) Research Paper

High-Speed Rail Association

This essay "High-Speed Rail association" talks about how in spite of this provision, there has been an increasing interest in building an efficient and reliable intercity rail system, which led to laying the groundwork for the development of an excellent network of high-speed rail.... hellip; In response to the belief, the High-Speed Rail association has set strategies for financing, designing, building, and operating the passenger rail (APTA, 2012).... High-Speed Rail association n the year 2009 (USHSR, 2014)....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Challenges of Development in Southeast Asian Countries

The "Challenges of Development in southeast asian Countries" paper examines the factors facilitating development in the US, the aspects of democracy in the United States, the authority implemented by the majority in the United States over thought.... Not only in India but also even in highly developed nations like the USA individuals are not well informed on the problems and conferred interests influence public judgment through media.... The Legislature could instruct at the Hub as well as in the nations for few years subsequently after independence as it stepped like a giant for its prestige it attained during freedom fight and also the governance of giants like Jawaher Lal Nehru and Mahatma Gandhi....
12 Pages (3000 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us