Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/social-science/1684326-order-vs-justice
https://studentshare.org/social-science/1684326-order-vs-justice.
Bull contends that the representatives of the world are the states, which come together with certain shared values, as well as, interests. Such nations share norms and understanding and interact with each other to give material forces and structures. Fundamentally, constant communication and negotiation strengthen the representatives of the world. Communication influences diplomatic functions. Bull (1977) holds that inter-subjective structures tend to determine the principles that sustain international society. However, common values and interests are prone to transformation. Hence, it is significant to re-assess the alternatives regularly. Bull envisions elements of war, transnational loyalties, and conflict posing a challenge to the stability of the international society. In effect, war can cause anarchy in international relations. Similarly, transnational loyalties and conflicts can affect the degree of interaction among the states with shared interests and values.
The nations need to embrace communication, enforcement, adaptation, and safeguarding of mutually shared and understood law. In my opinion, policy, and regime change can affect the international relation order. Although shared rules, as well, as institutions exist to preserve order, the policy can result in different interpretations of global relations. Notably, Bull does not take into account the role justice plays in the international relation order.