Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/social-science/1656122-first-1
https://studentshare.org/social-science/1656122-first-1.
Therefore, though a president requires experts in the different departments he needs to balance the needs of the country and that of his interest group. Political science, therefore, guides on how to address political situations such as sharing of national resources to avoid disputes and dangers of conflict groups. According to Nelson (2014), politics is the science of ‘who gets what, when, and how’ (Nelson). The president has, therefore, a choice to appoint political scientists to help him address the struggle that exists in budgeting, military standpoints, and international powers brokering in a country's interest.
The political scientist has the know-how to address regional and international politics. The issue of the energy crisis, for example, requires the understanding of energy-producing country policies to better sigh cost-effective and long-lasting political, economic, and social ties. How likely is it that presidents would have a political scientist on staff? ExplainA president who is keen on keeping a high rating on his performance and always a delight to his electorate would have political scientists as his staff.
Political scientists ensure that the policies pursued by their president are that that address people’s needs Vis a Vis other's interests (Nelson). For example, President Obama is keen on addressing the immigration problem in the United States because it is at the heart of his electoral college. The majority of the people that voted for him were hopeful that he would address their needs while he is the president. Therefore, a political scientist has a priority to roll out immigration policies more than any other academician.
In contrast, if the president were to hire an economist or an environmentalist as his staff he would suffer from political unrest and poor rating because these experts are best at addressing problems disregarding political effects. An economist answers economic problems touching on every American while a political scientist would have a different view of the same as he or she would be weighing the benefit of economic policies on the needs of the president's political strengths. What are the downsides to having a political scientist on staff?
A political scientist on staff runs the government at the risk of poor performance (Nelson). The productivity of a political scientist is always minimal compared to the use of experts as staff in the presidency. One of the problems of having political scientists as a staff is that they err in guiding the president on the correct and essential policies to implement. Political scientists manipulate policies for political expedience and are more interested in short-term gains rather than long terms gains.
A political scientist staff would be more willing to forgo a cut in government expenditure because it would ruin the operation of government in the period of the current president.
Read More