StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Religion in a New Age: Locke and Hobbes in Contrast - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
This paper “Religion in a New Age: Locke and Hobbes in Contrast” will summarize, compare, and contrast the views of both John Locke and Thomas Hobbes regarding spiritual beliefs. It will consider the chief virtue of religious faith and what role it should play in society. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.5% of users find it useful
Religion in a New Age: Locke and Hobbes in Contrast
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Religion in a New Age: Locke and Hobbes in Contrast"

Religion in a New Age: Locke and Hobbes in Contrast The major philosophers of the Enlightenment were both united and at odds in their views regarding religious belief. To a man they favored dispensing with the central role that it had played in European society since the collapse of the Roman Empire. They differed in what alternative role they thought it should take, however. They also disagreed in their views of what value, if any, it held for the new world that was emerging. This paper will summarize, compare, and contrast the views of both John Locke and Thomas Hobbes regarding spiritual beliefs. It will consider what each writer considered the chief virtue of religious faith and what role it should in society. This analysis will develop and support the thesis stated in the previous paragraph. Hobbes was, in today’s parlance, an apologist for totalitarianism. He saw the central issue facing human welfare as the threat individual persons pose to the safety and well-being of their fellows. This sprang from his view of human nature, which he perceived as innately selfish, brutish, and deaf to all appeals except the one to force. As he writes in chapter twenty-two of The Leviathan: For the laws of nature, as justice, equity, modesty, mercy, and, in sum, doing to others as we would be done to, of themselves, without the terror of some power to cause them to be observed, are contrary to our natural passions, that carry us to partiality, pride, revenge, and the like. And covenants, without the sword, are but words and of no strength to secure a man at all.  For Hobbes, there was but one way to guard against the human tendency to prey on others. An all-powerful sovereign must take hold of the reins of power and reserve to himself the use of force, with one goal in mind: the preservation of the public peace. To ensure the absolute control of this ruler, he must not only dictate what men may do but also what they must believe. As Hobbes writes in chapter twenty-three of The Leviathan: Sixthly, it is annexed to the sovereignty to be judge of what opinions and doctrines are averse, and what conducing to peace; and consequently, on what occasions, how far, and what men are to be trusted withal in speaking to multitudes of people; and who shall examine the doctrines of all books before they be published. For the actions of men proceed from their opinions, and in the well governing of opinions consists the well governing of men's actions in order to their peace and concord. No freedom of speech or press, then; the central government has not only the right but the obligation to approve or to censor as it believes is best for the purpose of keeping the populace in line. After all, bad opinions lead to bad deeds. Individuals simply cannot be trusted. For Hobbes, the essential challenge regarding religion was to find a way to harmonize it with his insistence upon an all-powerful leader. Whatever his personal opinions on the claims of the Church, he could not openly challenge them without facing the charge of heresy or, even worse, atheism. Nonetheless, the Church could not be allowed power over individuals. That would lead to a potential challenger to the sovereign, for what if Caesar declares one way is just and Christ another? In The Leviathan Hobbes tries to bypass this threat to his system by engaging in a delicate dance, in which he seeks a means to bring religion under the authority of the State. First he establishes that his views are consistent with Reason. He then exalts Reason as a means by which the will of God may be discerned. As he says in chapter forty-three: Nevertheless, we are not to renounce our senses and experience, nor that which is the undoubted word of God, our natural reason. For they are the talents which he hath put into our hands to negotiate, till the coming again of our blessed Savior; and therefore not to be folded up in the napkin of an implicit faith, but employed in the purchase of justice, peace, and true religion. The logic here is syllogistic in nature: (1.) Reason is a means by which God's will may be discerned; (2.) Reason shows that submission to an all powerful sovereign is the surest means of securing safety and peace; thus (3.) It is God's will that this sovereign should have our complete and undivided obedience, so that we may all enjoy the security that the Lord intends for us. This is a clever way of circumventing the question of whether Christians should follow the State's demands when they contradict Church teaching. Hobbes posits that such a dilemma could never arise. This resolves the possibility of said conflicts. It also reduces religion to the role of supporting the secular government by urging all good Christians to obey its dictates. This is its greatest quality and primary task. To say that Locke's view of government differs from that of Hobbes would be a gross understatement. Hobbes feared the threat posed by free individuals, and sought solace in the idea of an all-controlling sovereign. Locke's terror was of the specter of an omnipotent State, and found comfort in entrusting ultimate power to the people. He states this plainly in the following text from The Second Treatise of Government: In a constituted common-wealth, standing upon its own basis, and acting according to its own nature, that is, acting for the preservation of the community, there can be but one supreme, which is the legislative, to which all the rest are and must be subordinate, yet the legislative being only a fiduciary power to act for certain ends, there remains still in the people a supreme power to remove or alter the legislative, when they find the legislative act contrary to the trust reposed in them. For Locke, centralized power exists for the maintenance of social order and protection of property and personal rights. In this he agrees with Hobbes. Unlike him, he maintains that the people must not cede all authority to the government; rather they must reserve to themselves ultimate power, including the option to alter or to abolish the State should it prove to be tyrannical or inept. This is all well and good when writing about secular rulers. But, like Hobbes, Locke had to deal with the issue of ecclesiastical authority with discretion and tact. He could not deny the truth of the Christian religion without finding himself repudiated, renounced, and possibly burned at the stake. The conundrum he faced was resolved by removing religion from matters of state altogether, reassigning it to a private place of dominion over the individual conscience. He sees this as religion’s chief role. As he writes in An Essay Concerning Toleration: The business of true religion is quite another thing. It is not instituted in order to the erecting of an external pomp, nor to the obtaining of ecclesiastical dominion, nor to the exercising compulsive force, but to the regulating of men’s lives, according to the rules of virtue and piety. Whosoever will list himself under the banner of Christ, must, in the first place and above all things, make war upon his own lusts and vices. Locke intends for religion to have no hand in exercising the rule of law, nor in acting as a cheerleader for the government, as Hobbes would have. He takes Jesus’ statement that “my kingdom is not of this world” in John 18:36 as his rallying cry, and assigns to spirituality the singular role of policing one’s personal moral character. Two philosophers, two views of secular government, one view of the place of religion in society: this summarizes both Locke and Hobbes. Each sought in different ways to divorce Church and State. They differed only in the manner in which they would achieve this goal. Their ideas planted the seed for the separation of religion and statesmanship that differentiates modernity from the Church-dominated society that preceded it. What was once heresy is now the accepted wisdom. We truly live in a new world. Works Cited Hobbes, Thomas. The Leviathan. Oregon State University. Web. July 20, 2011. Locke, John. A Letter Concerning Toleration. Web. July 20, 2011. Locke, John. Second Treatise of Government. Web. July 20, 2011. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Religion in a New Age: Locke and Hobbes in Contrast Essay”, n.d.)
Religion in a New Age: Locke and Hobbes in Contrast Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/religion-and-theology/1578257-unlike-locke-hobbes-seeks-to-embrace-religion-but-it-is-a-deadly-embrace-discuss
(Religion in a New Age: Locke and Hobbes in Contrast Essay)
Religion in a New Age: Locke and Hobbes in Contrast Essay. https://studentshare.org/religion-and-theology/1578257-unlike-locke-hobbes-seeks-to-embrace-religion-but-it-is-a-deadly-embrace-discuss.
“Religion in a New Age: Locke and Hobbes in Contrast Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/religion-and-theology/1578257-unlike-locke-hobbes-seeks-to-embrace-religion-but-it-is-a-deadly-embrace-discuss.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Religion in a New Age: Locke and Hobbes in Contrast

Democracy - Locke, Voltaire, and Rousseau

In the second treatises, Locke disagrees with hobbes' opinion on the structure and function of the civil government.... To what extent is this statement true and does it fit the biography of locke, Voltaire, and Rousseau?... John locke championed individual freedom and he is regarded the father for democracy of liberalism.... locke fought for democracy even before the ages of democracy inauguration arrived.... By adopting a technique of social contract, locke was able to explain that the authority that the state legitimately owned was from individual people in the society....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Democracy in Ancient Athens and Middle Ages

The paper "Democratic Theory" tells us to discuss the overview of democratic theory from Athenian times to the present time.... nbsp;It discusses how democracy has developed throughout the ages.... nbsp;The term “Democracy” started in Ancient Athens in the 5th century BC, they were considered to be the “Cradle of Democracy”....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Ethics and Morality

Rousseau comes very close to hobbes when he says that religion binds the man to morality, law and hence, to social contract.... du/entries/contractarianism/According to hobbes, it is clear that common interest of fear leads men into political society and fear could be of gory death, insecurity, lack of cultural living, deprivation of comfort and industry, losing satisfaction derived out of life, losing kin and possessions, living with unfulfilled desires, separation, misadventure and hatred ruling every bit of life....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Why Does Locke Believe That Slavery Violates Natural Law

This paper gives information that locke believes that the law of nature is a divine command.... Though locke confessed that in the past, (one must remember that empiricist eulogized the glory of past), in the Jews and in other nations people sold themselves (locke is not ready to believe that they were made slaves instead he deliberately used the phrase “men did sell themselves”) to do the manual work.... locke says that it is evident that the person who sold himself voluntarily did not become a slave of some despot....
14 Pages (3500 words) Essay

The Main Features of Fascist Political Thought: Niccolo Machiavelli and Prince

It is necessary to use force to start a new system for example, Savaronola.... hellip; He goes ahead and argues that Principalities can either be brand new or inherited from previous generation.... He also talks about new principalities and mixed principalities which can be administered to the existing ones to the subjects.... new rulers come with new territories and if they are from the same culture, region and language, ruling becomes easy....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

The Ideologies Of Islam And Christianity

The writer of the paper "The Ideologies Of Islam And Christianity" compares the positive and negative principles of these two ideologies and makes the conclusion about they are similar or different.... The author also discusses the consequences of them for domestic and international politics.... hellip; When it comes to comparing two ideologies, it is clear that In a Saudi trial, the testimony of one man equals that of two women....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

What Does St Thomas Mean When He Claims that Law Is Something Pertaining to Reason

ohn locke and William Paley also offered their significant contributions towards the body of work of the theory of rights.... It was the famous English philosopher Thomas hobbes who introduced the English term 'right' into political philosophy with his interpretation of ius naturale as 'right of nature'.... Unlike hobbes, who supported the theory of natural reason and natural law, Locke proposes the theory of natural right.... John locke also an English philosopher argues that God created people free and equal in the state of nature....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

Application and Efficacy of Access Control Systems

This report "Application and Efficacy of Access Control Systems" discusses access control devices that are very important in improving the security around premises.... Their use has ensured that people do not incur the cost of human labor, which needs a lot of workforces.... hellip; The provision of credentials i....
7 Pages (1750 words) Report
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us