StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Gnostic Gospels and Church Authority - Book Report/Review Example

Cite this document
Summary
The review "Gnostic Gospels and Church Authority" focuses on the critical, and multifaceted analysis of Elaine Pagels’ book Gnostic Gospels, one of the opening salvos in the reopening of conflicts that, far from being new, are thousands of years old…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.5% of users find it useful
Gnostic Gospels and Church Authority
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Gnostic Gospels and Church Authority"

The Gnostic Gospels and Church ity In many way Elaine Pagels' book Gnostic Gospels was one of the opening salvos in the reopening of conflicts that, far from being new, are in fact thousands of years old. In a way, the discovery of the Nag Hammadi scrolls has sent the calendar rolling back to the earliest struggles of Christianity, the struggles between the various sects to unify into one vision and one voice. Since the victory of what would become the orthodox Catholic Church over the so-called heretics and the successful eradication of most of the so-called heretical texts, Christianity has been for the most part unified in its vision. That claim may seem groundless in view of the multitudes of denominational differences and the enormous upheaval that took place after the Reformation, but in fact denominations as varied as Lutherans, Baptists and Mormons all agree on the basic tenets of the original Catholic canonical texts. This unification of belief stands in sharp contrast to the early struggles to define that consistency and as well to contemporary arguments and debates taking place since the discovery of texts that have raised serious questions about the authority of the New Testament. Pagels refuses to advocate either Gnostic or traditional Christian viewpoints; instead her thesis stems from the concept that history can never be unraveled to fulfill a pure truth, because it is always written by the winners. In the case of Christianity, Pagels suggests that it may never have developed into the unified, universal religion it became had the struggle among its multiple sects not eventually been won; had the Gnostics been capable of organizing as well as the Catholic sect, Christianity could well have become just another ancient religious cult falling by the wayside. Pagels' methodology in writing this book is to establish connections between what is contained within the Gnostic gospels and what is contained with the Biblical canon in order to more fully realize and understand the authority of the traditional Church. For Pagels, Christianity is not merely a system of spiritual or religious beliefs. She urges the reader to become more fully aware of the hierarchical structure of the Church in order that the unitiated can become more cognizant of just how political and bureaucratic an entity is. This is important for her overall point because authority can only be established coincident with order. Pagels is quite clear in her belief that the early Catholic church was able to win the struggle for the role of Christianity's mouthpiece because of its ability to impose order and structure. She writes in the introduction that "Christianity had become an institution headed by a three-rank hierarchy of bishops, priests and deacons, who understood themselves to be the guardians of the only 'true faith'" (xxiii). Since Pagels' argument is that Christianity may not have survived to become a major religion had a single vision not emerged, the importance of this order cannot be underestimated. Any organization wishing to build membership must imbue itself with authority, with orthodoxy, and further it must be able to convince potential members of its authority. Early on the Church saw the advantages of ritual and organization as a methodology of convincing. The Gnostics attempted an elitist and complex qualitative method for inclusion, whereas the Catholic Church "created a clear and simple framework, consisting of doctrine, ritual and political structure, that has proven to be an amazingly effective system of organization" (104-105). She asks why Gnostic authors described the church in "fantastic and imaginative terms" (107). Pagels point is that the doctrine and ritual inherent in the Catholic Church served the purpose of turning the idea and structure of the religion into something more concrete. Indeed, in her book and in this essay when I have been referring to Christianity as we know, I have been calling it "the Church." The Gnostics saw a "heavenly church" (106) whereas the Christians were much wiser in bringing the church down to earth. The Gnostics perceived the church as an invisible entity that only those who were able to see it could join. Pagels' thesis that the religion might never have formed into a powerful force is certainly strengthened by this point. As wonderful an idea as a religion without a church might be to entertain, it is clearly unlikely that any religion could ever achieve anything beyond cult status by maintaining such a point of view. In essence, the Gnostics undid themselves by clinging to their beliefs. Pagels views the establishment of this authoritative, concrete church as the end result of a struggle between opposing viewpoints springing from the early Christian movements. As she states, had these multiple movements survived and continued battling amongst each other, Christianity as we know it today would be significantly different, if present at all. Establishment of a concrete church as a political entity was the most crucial development in establishing what we today call the Christian Church. Of significant importance in establishing authority and orthodoxy was creating the aura of heresy in any writings or beliefs that did not coincide with the dominant beliefs. In her introduction, Pagels questions the exclusion of certain Gnostic beliefs while other, more questionable beliefs were accepted as doctrine. She wonders why, for instance, Christians are expected to accept that a perfectly good God created a world that includes such misery, that Jesus was born to a virgin, and that He was resurrected after being dead for three days (xxxv). Gnostic texts were not excluded and defined as heretical because of their often bizarre and unbelievable contents, but rather because they contained ideas that threatened the developing view of Christianity (xxxvi). The bulk of Pagels' book is an examination of the differences between Gnostic and Christian versions of the Christ story, but she doesn't focus on these differences in themselves, but rather in how they relate to the political and philosophical organization of the religion itself. The fundamental difference between the Gnostics and the early Christians lay in the manner of salvation. For the Christians, humans must have a divine guide to salvation; for the Gnostics this wasn't so. While this certainly creates a spiritual divide, it more importantly for Pagels creates a political divide. From this bifurcation of belief systems can be extrapolated a series of deep differences on every topic imaginable and Pagels takes the opportunity to apply these differences to her thesis. Central to this divide between the Gnostics and the Church is the central belief of Christianity, the one aspect that separates it from nearly all religions: the resurrection of Jesus. Interestingly, the accepted version is the more wildly imaginative and unbelievable. The Gnostics held several different views of the resurrection, but none included earthly appearances. For Gnostics the resurrected Jesus was essentially a spiritual vision, yet the literal fleshly resurrection became doctrine. According to Pagels, the acceptance of this as doctrine is filled with political implications having to do with apostolic succession within the church based on the scriptural witnessing of Jesus by Peter who then became the leader of the church. Part and parcel with this, Pagels also examines how women were systematically excluded from leadership positions within the Church at an early stage and how the justification for this is at odds with Gnostic teachings. The Catholic Church in all its doctrines and ritual gives the perception that God is wholly masculine, despite the obvious spiritual, fleshless nature of His being. Even in this essay, it seems almost a sacrilege to describe God in any but masculine terms. God the Father, Holy Father, Our Father who art in Heaven; all of these point toward a singularly masculine perception of God. The Gnostic texts, on the other hand, consistently give God both masculine and feminine qualities. Even more dangerous, of course, is the Gnostic text The Gospel of Mary. In this text, Mary Magdalene is not only elevated to the position of apostle, she is shown to be Jesus' favorite. Within this gospel is a story that goes to heart of the political divide between Gnostics and the early Christians. Pagels relates the story and the concludes by explaining that "Mary admits to Jesus that she hardly dares speak to him freely because, in her words, 'Peter makes me hesitate; I am afraid of him, because he hates the female race'" (64-65). Pagels uses this story to strengthen a point she makes earlier in the book about how the bishop of the church was supposed to "preside 'in the place of God'" (35). The bishop is, in other words, the father figure of the congregation. By declaiming The Gospel of Mary and all other Gnostic texts that elevates the female to positions of authority, the early church was able to concretize the idea of a father figure and only a father figure, with no room-indeed, no need-for a mother figure, who stood in place of God Himself. Again, Pagels' arguments that it was the establishment of authority that allowed Christianity to flourish are shown to have validity. At the end of her introduction Pagels suggests that the Gnostic texts and their differences from the Biblical canonical texts contain "political implications that are crucial to the development of Christianity as an institutional religion" (xxxvi), and I believe she then goes on to prove her case by showing how those differences affected the growth of a religion based upon the teaching of Jesus Christ. Having read her book and having read some of the texts, I feel that what we accept as Christianity is only half the story at best. I have watched television shows and read books that have given a great account of exactly how the New Testament was formed. Contrary to the established belief that the Bible is the word of God handed down to man and divinely chosen, the canon was actually voted upon. And the vote didn't even have to be unanimous! Even if only a small minority of those voting desired for a text to make it into the Bible, therefore, it would make it in. More than that, according to some sources money actually changed hands during the voting process. Therefore, it would seem as though Christianity as we know it, though it may very well be based upon the teaching of Jesus, may not be based upon his entire teachings. The distinct impression is that Christianity is a religion that needs to have enough faith in itself to allow for the possibility that some of the Gnostic writings as well as other gospels that failed to make it into the canon contain the actual words of Jesus and should be re-evaluated for consideration of being introduced into the Bible. It is time to put aside tradition merely because it is tradition and welcome the opportunity to include as much of Jesus' teaching into Christianity as is possible. Until that happens, the legitimacy of Christianity is going to be open to debate by an ever-increasing number of believers and non-believers alike. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“The Gnostic Gospels and Church Authority Book Report/Review”, n.d.)
The Gnostic Gospels and Church Authority Book Report/Review. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/religion-and-theology/1509956-the-gnostic-gospels-and-church-authority
(The Gnostic Gospels and Church Authority Book Report/Review)
The Gnostic Gospels and Church Authority Book Report/Review. https://studentshare.org/religion-and-theology/1509956-the-gnostic-gospels-and-church-authority.
“The Gnostic Gospels and Church Authority Book Report/Review”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/religion-and-theology/1509956-the-gnostic-gospels-and-church-authority.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Gnostic Gospels and Church Authority

Impact and Meaning of the Gnostic Movement

This research aims to evaluate and present impact and meaning of the gnostic Movement.... According to the research findings, it can, therefore, be said that the gnostic Movement had assumed formidable proportions during the second and the third century CE.... Alexandria in Greece developed as the main center of the movement where the important gnostic teachers preached their philosophies.... This research will begin with the statement that the gnostic Movement was a Christian religious movement where an extended base of knowledge from the pagan and the scriptural sources formed the path to salvation leading to the divine personality Jesus Christ....
14 Pages (3500 words) Research Paper

Faith and Reason in the Early Christian Church

This further translated into the growth of religious authority through the priesthood in orthodox Christianity, which ultimately resulted in Gnosticism being branded as heretical and its documents destroyed.... This paper ''Faith and Reason in the Early Christian church'' tells us that the theological division between the Gnostic Christian movement and the groups that would later form the basis of Christian orthodoxy through the Imperial church is one based on fundamentally different views of faith and reason in religious practice....
9 Pages (2250 words) Term Paper

Critical Teachings of Jesus

The Early Christian church of Acts 5 IV.... Introduction The modern Christian church can be categorized into followers of Catholic, Orthodox, Protestant, and Coptic schools as the main divisions of theological interpretation, though even within these divisions there is a wide variety of beliefs and spiritual practices with regard to the faith of individuals.... To consider what it means for Jesus to be “the son of God” in Christian theology can lead to different interpretation based on the school or church which the believer belongs to or derives teachings from personally....
17 Pages (4250 words) Essay

Synoptic Gospels - Relationship between the Synoptic

John knew that his gospel was directed toward the whole church unlike the synoptic that were directed to specific audiences.... Synoptic gospels of submission Table of contents 1.... 1 Introduction The first three books in the New Testament (Mathew, Mark , and Luke) are referred to as synoptic gospels.... Relationship between the Synoptic gospels The book of Mathew was written about 6 years after the ascension of Jesus Christ....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

The Holy Scriptures: Revelation, Inspiration, Criticism

The assignment "The Holy Scriptures: Revelation, Inspiration, Criticism" focuses on the critical, and thorough analysis of the religious and socio-political factors that necessitated the need for the early church to determine the correct New Testament Canon.... The early church was prompted to come up with the 27 books of the New Testament by several factors.... A combination of these factors compelled the early church leaders, as it were, to come up with the list of authentic and authoritative books in the New Testament....
11 Pages (2750 words) Assignment

Buddhist Economics

n the leadership, the Orthodox Christian group held the belief that leadership only belongs to a small group of persons whose authority could not be challenged in any given way whatsoever and the right to ordain such leader was a prerogative of the apostle.... ' Resurrection then became a controversy where all Christians believed that only Christ or God hold that spiritual authority yet when questioned on who bears that authority presently, one Valentinus responds by saying that it is only the one that comes into direct contact with God that holds this authority....
1 Pages (250 words) Assignment

Comparison of the Account of Salvation Offered by Irenaeus with a Gnostic System

The gnostic is beyond description in search for the irreconcilable (Osborn, 2001, 268).... Modern skepticism regarding the gnostic phenomenon unnecessarily has to encourage people to adhere Tertullian in the 'duty of derision' against Gnosticism.... Since the objective of this paper is to elaborate on the premises of Irenaeus, the deficiency in the synthesis of gnostic thoughts is less significant than Irenaeus' explanation of the motivation to his thought....
14 Pages (3500 words) Term Paper

Synoptic Gospels

John knew that his gospel was directed toward the whole church unlike the synoptic that were directed to specific audiences.... This paper ''Synoptic gospels'' tells that synoptic gospels have differences and similarities.... This is according to the chronology of gospels that are found in the crucial dates in the lives of Mary and her son, Jesus Christ.... It is important to note that the synoptic gospels have difference and similarities....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us