Donald Trump Administration Policy - Coursework Example

Introduction

Through an extensive range of concerns and issues, Donald Trump's administration policies are bound to have devastating consequences on the majority of Americans. Since his inauguration, the administration has supported and adopted several strategies that have a bearing on wide-ranging areas. These areas are such as racial inequalities, drug policy, the criminal justice system, poverty and criminal justice, rights to healthcare rights of American women and the disabled and the rights Girls' and Women's. The people that are expected to suffer more from Trump's administration policies in the U.S are ethnic and racial minorities, children, immigrants, prisoners and the poor. These sensitive groups of people have endured repeated infringement on their rights since trumps administration. This paper attempts to explore how Trump's administration policies have singularly affected black women in America. The paper inspects Trump's policies on key areas such as healthcare, women and girls' rights and more concerning black women comparing their impacts on other groups impacted with the same Trumps administration policies.

Trumps Policies Which Impact Black Women

Firstly, Trumps administration has instigated policies that target to Suppress the Civil Rights as well as to ramp up the mass incarceration of the black community. According to Abdollahian, (2018) incarceration must be employed judiciously by society as it diminishes the aptitude an individual to be a productive member (Abdollahian et al., 2018, pp.6). The mass incarceration policies that were racially inclined to some years before the Obama administration altered them. The change entailed a shift from policies targeted to incarcerate offenders who were non-violent.

Moreover, the policies that harmed African-Americans disproportionately were also shifted. However, the administration led by Trump has overturned a majority of these strategies and policies. For instance, the U.S Department of Justice has overturned the policy to prevent American citizens from being imprisoned or jailed just for merely being poor (Abdollahian et al., 2018, pp.8). What is more, the department has opposed reforms on sentencing that would only set aside the harshest judicial punishment for criminals that are the most dangerous. The U.S Department of Justice Civil Rights Division has moved to assault the civil rights of citizens rather than safeguarding. The Division through Trump's policies now accepts the unlawful voter expulsions that violate the of the Voter Registration Act (Abdollahian et al., 2018, pp.11).

Trump’s Administration policies through the Department of Labor has allowed racial discrimination within the labor market. Research indicates the wage gap between the black community and white American citizens are more significant and continuously budding mainly because of prejudice (Amin, 2018, 26). Trump’s administration has disregarded the data on wage gaps between the black and white citizen. Instead, the administration has embraced policies that allow employers to discriminate against ethnics and black employees. Trumps administration through the Department of Labor suspended a policy suspended a form the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) (Amin, 2018, 26). The policy was purposed to compel big corporations to account and report confidential data and information on how they pay their workers by sex, race, ethnicity and job category. The data was vital in detecting and tackling any prejudiced wage practices which have enduringly suppressed the wages afforded to black workers. Hence, by stopping the data collection, Trumps Administration was permanently discarding a critical tool in addressing the growing disparities in salaries. Moreover, Trump's administration support regulations that are relatively detrimental to African American laborers. An example of such a rule is one that permitted some business like restaurants that hire tipped employees to account the proportion tips paid to employees legally. The policy would enable the business owners to take away around $480 million annually from tips paid to African American workers (Amin, 2018, 26).

Trumps Administration has also tailored housing policies that discount the low-priced housing predicament as well as segregation. Even though African Americans constitute just 12% of the entire U.S population, they make up 42% percent citizens without a home. Lamont, (2018) suggests that a household should only use 30% of their disposable income on housing (Lamont, 2018, pp.423). However, nearly half African-Americans citizens who rent spend way above the recommended 30%. Furthermore, the U.S.A at present has an estimated shortage of 8 million low-priced housing units (Lamont, 2018, pp.423). Despite these statistics on housing, the Trump administration through the Housing and Urban Development (HUD) department has purposed to make it difficult for low-income families to find low-cost housing that is affordable to them (CBC, 2018, pp.59). Recently, the Housing and Urban Development has contemplated increasing the rent of inexpensive housing units whose tenant are mostly poor. Also, the department has decreased its pledge to combat housing segregation and even racial prejudice in housing. Hence, it is likely that there will be an increase in homelessness among the black community as a result of the policy changes by Trumps administration (Amin, 2018, 26).

Some black women are also bound to be impacted by the recent trumps policies on healthcare. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) was formulated to outspread affordable and quality health care insurance to more than 21 million American citizens who formerly uninsured Americans encompassing a large number of black women (CBC, 2018, pp.59). The proposed policies by Trump's administration are likely to result to cutbacks, particularly on ACA's Medicaid. The resolve to enforce the damaging cuts ACA’s programs will possibly leave many American women short of the support and care they require to look after their well-being and that of their young ones (CBC, 2018, pp.59). Moreover, Trump's policies intend to negate the numerous protections in the ACA's for maternity protection coverage in private cover plans. This cancellation of the ACA's protective cover for a woman could aggravate the matter, particularly for women of color who have far higher proportions of deaths that are pregnancy-related compared to white women in America (Amin, 2018, 26).

Trump has suggested profound cutbacks that total to more than $210 billion throughout ten years to food aid programs like the Supplementary Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and the WIC. A majority of individuals that rely on the SNAP and WIC program are African Americans and may, therefore, lead to hunger and starvation of families who depend on this aid (CBC, 2018, pp.39). The policies suggested also include restructuring some of the aid programs by sending the food aid directly to beneficiaries, depriving households of having to choose what they prefer. This kind of restructuring, additional stigmatizes beneficiaries and perpetuates stereotypes that underprivileged citizens are incapable of making constructive choices for themselves and households (Lamont, 2018, pp.423).

How Trumps Racist Rhetoric Hurt Black Women

Trump’s has time and time again made comments and racist rhetoric that has been viewed as offensive to some groups including black women. According to (Lamont, 2018, pp.423) radical discourse or speech sounds just like a monotonous backdrop; however, it tends to have a significant influence on people. me insults from Trump. (Lamont, 2018) Notes that social science vetoes that sexist, rude and racist comments are more detrimental than many assume. A study by Lamont (2018), pp.423 discovered that it is okay to listen to opposing political opposing opinions on whatever platform. However discourteous radical and political speech weakens an individual trust in a state. Even more, “such rhetoric also rejects aspiring female politicians from running for office," notes (Amin, 2018, 26). Amin, (2018) notes that opinions of discrimination or sexism tend to make women question their level of qualification going into the political field (Amin, 2018, 26). Trump’s rhetoric and comments will stay around in the minds of women across America and additional propagate the notion that girls and women cannot be prosperous should they vie for a political sit. Undeniably, the adverse magnitudes of prejudiced rhetoric tumble strangely on the targets of ordinary American women, in this case.

Furthermore, unlike forms of discernment are likely to compound one another. Lamont, (2018) noted that when an individual such as Donald Trump when someone like Trump condemns women on the one hand and the black community on the other, it is the black women who are more likely to feel the feel utmost disrespected (Lamont, 2018, pp.423). Does, Seval and Margaret, (2016) in a study found that black women who recounted extra sexual objectification felt additional terrified for their physical security. Amin, (2018) in a different study, discovered that sexism, sexual objectification, and racism were three elements were all interrelated with PTSD symptoms among black women (Amin, 2018, 26). Trump racist rhetoric is indeed adverse experiences when one perceives the amassed consequences over time (Lamont, 2018, pp.423). Radical and political prejudiced rhetoric that especially targets specific groups of a society tend to become actual experiences on members in the targeted group and thus cannot be disregarded discounted. The negative rhetoric like Trumps substantially has some bearing on the mental health of women (Abdollahian et al., 2018, pp.6).

Why black women are hurt more than other women or men

Black women are likely are hurt more than other women or men because of many factors. To begin with, the income gap that has existed between Black and White employees in similarly situated settings and circumstances has intensified and become graver over the last four decades. Various aspects have added to the income gap between the Black and White citizens from the incongruent bearing of national budget cuts to the deteriorating industrial sector (Amin, 2018, 26). Nevertheless, research indicates that prejudice and discrimination are unquestionably elements that additionally play a large part, particularly for African American women. Studies similarly suggest that the income gap has persisted and budded regardless of educational achievement of a reasonable proportion of individuals in black communities. The income gap is predominantly uncertain for women from the Black community (Amin, 2018, 26).

When it comes to earnings, the pay gap is especially difficult for women of color. According to CBC, (2018) in 2015, ladies laboring full-time were still just remunerated 80 cents for each dollar earned by their male colleagues (CBC, 2018, pp.59). The gender wage gap is more difficult for Black women as African-American females only make 60% of what their white male counterparts earn (CBC, 2018, pp.59). Moreover, the Republican plan would additionally abolish funds from the government for planned parenthood. Women of color make up a third of women who use women health services including abortion and contraception (CBC, 2018, pp.59). Therefore, limiting their access to these services would impact these women negatively. It was projected that the bill would deduct government funding for planned parenthood by approximately $178,000,000 in 2 years (CBC, 2018, pp.59). That is to say, abolishing the Affordable Care Act without a proper substitute would be distressing to the Black community (CBC, 2018, pp.59).

The conservatives in Congress and Trump's administration's policy priorities concerning a wide range of issues are likely to cause upsetting consequences on many Americans. The women of color mainly plus their families and communities, are the group at risk from recent attempts to slash domestic programs, gut Medicaid and eliminate the Affordable Care Act (CBC, 2018, pp.59). Black women have for a long time suffered stark health inconsistencies in areas like pregnancy-related complications, unintended pregnancy, breast as well as cervical cancer. All these issues stem from a long history of discrimination and racism incorporating lack of access to high quality, affordable care plus health insurance and, for others, the prolonged mistrust with the medical society. Nevertheless, despite all these obstacles, the Black woman in the past years have recorded improvements like the reduction in unintended pregnancies and increases in insurance coverage (Does, Seval and Margaret, 2016, pp.44). These benefits, although incomplete, are currently highly threatened. More precisely, the bill to revoke main segments of the Affordable Care Act might cause massive damage to the Black community (CBC, 2018, pp.59). That is to say, the harm this legislation could cause may be exaggerated by other damaging policy proposals, encompassing deep outlay slashes plus absolute abolishment of essential programs required by the Congressional conservatives and the administration.

What solutions are being offered

Cutting and capping the Medicaid risks the health coverage of many women of color compared to the average American. Nevertheless, there are proposed solutions that could compete with any efforts to cap and cut the Medicaid. First, the US needs to abandon any ideas of eradicating the Medicaid expansion as well as modifying Medicaid into a per capita cap package. Therefore, rather than restricting Medicaid, attempts ought to be towards the expansion of Medicaid coverage to offer healthcare for the citizens trapped in the coverage gap, 40% of whom are women of color (CBC, 2018, pp.59). Additionally, America needs to fight against the attempts to turn over the healthcare systems by raising premiums. The irresponsible interference with the health care system without a suitable safety net is ethically unacceptable since it will without a doubt affect women of color disproportionately. Liberals advocate for plans that avail more revenue for all laborious American workers, talk about the distinctive challenges of African-American female employees as well as develops the American employees in the 21st century. The other solution focuses on reinforcing office protections and increasing the minimum wage. The government minimum wage has persisted at $7.25 per hour for almost ten years now (CBC, 2018, pp.59). Hence, an employee who works round-the-clock earns a mere $15,080 annually (Lamont, 2018, pp.423). Therefore, increasing the minimum wage can help elevate millions of families and individuals from poverty through placing billions of dollars in the accounts of industrious Americans (CBC, 2018, pp.59). Women of color would thus stand to gain from the raise because they represent a disproportionate portion of employees getting the minimum wage. Moreover, the tipped minimum pay ought to be eradicated to abolish the two-tiered minimum plus subminimum income structure.

The tipping practice in the United States is a relic of slavery from when railway businesses and restaurants struggled to keep the practice to dodge remunerating newly liberated slaves (Lamont, 2018, pp.423). The restaurant business has the highest ratio of employees getting a similar rate or less than the minimum wage. As such, granted the tipped staff hang on their clients to survive, it is no wonder that the restaurant business yields the most figures in sexual harassment claims. Therefore, it is crucial that just as with raising the minimum wage, the federal administration eradicates the tipped pay (CBC, 2018, pp.59). Eventually, women of color, who mostly struggle to make ends meet are set to benefit. Lastly, the federal administration and Congressional representatives must ensure there is equal compensation for equal work. Even with the approval of the Equal Pay Act in 1963, women, nearly sixty years later are still not earning the same as their male counterparts for doing similar work. Due to this income gap, the economic plight of people of color worsens daily. In America, Black women are the breadwinners in 68% of Black homes (CBC, 2018, pp.59). Therefore, in such families, it is crucial that the federal government make efforts to ensure equal pay for equal work. Ladies must have a right to completely recover reimbursements for income discrimination based (CBC, 2018, pp.59).

Food insecurity in low-income households where most of the time the women are sole breadwinners can be tackled through opposing the current Trump polices on the set cutbacks and also rejecting food deserts. A majority of black communities throughout the state, both rural and urban regions do not have access affordable and to healthy. Food. Granting funding for food nutritional training and food banks will comprehensively improve the wellbeing of underprivileged individuals in the community (CBC, 2018, pp.59). Also, the existence of grocery stores is latent to fuel localized economies by securing complementary stores and generating employment opportunities. In the long run, dealing with food insecurity advances the well-being and financial state of people within the community (CBC, 2018, pp.59).

Lastly, there must be equal access to homeownership openings. As a start, the subsidy at the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) needs to be protected. HUD has a significant role in endorsing value accommodation for every citizen of America, irrespective of national origin, creed, color or race. For instance, the HUD plus other corporations tangled in the management of community development programs or housing according to the Affirmatively Further Fair Housing Rule, need to make hands-on strategies to underwrite residential integration to undo the historical impacts of discrimination (CBC, 2018, pp.59). The administration ought to execute strong state rules plus clear direction to housing providers barring segregation. These shields are especially vital for citizens using assistance programs like housing choice vouchers. Ill-advisedly, the president's $6,000,000,000 deduction in HUD finances translates to fewer assets to enforce this plus other essential tasks of the organization (CBC, 2018, pp.59).

What About the Fact That Trump Has Decreased Black Unemployment?

Currently, 6.6% is an abnormally high unemployment percentage paralleled with all other main ethnic and racial assemblages in America (Amin, 2018, 26). Six months ago, the unemployment rate for Asian-Americans was 2.7%, 3.6% for Whites and 4.8% for Hispanics (Lamont, 2018, pp.423). Nevertheless, it is an improvement, and it is worth acknowledging as President Trump did in a characteristic style at the beginning of 2018 (CBC, 2018, pp.59). He claimed that people attributing the low unemployment rates in people of color to his policies was extreme since the rate has been dropping in the same rate as six years before his election (Amin, 2018, 26). In the same way that recessions have been problematic for people of color than other ethnicities and races, extra-long expansions seem to be moderately better for the Black community since they pull people into workplace who there before struggles to get a foothold. Therefore, extending the recovery appears to be particularly suitable for people of color (Lamont, 2018, pp.423). A solution that will have a positive bearing on black American women is the expansion of economic openings. Trumps administration needs to endow state programs and projects that generate employment prospects, especially in communities and areas with high unemployment rates. The unemployment catastrophe in black communities’ demands state and federal policies response that affords undeviating employment prospects to the public sector.

The jobs crisis in the African-American community warrants a federal response that provides direct public sector employment, career training for couples with direct occupation placement as well as to craft some incentives for the private division to employ the unemployed on a long-term basis. Trumps administration needs to adopt new programs and policies such as giving grants to the state government to employ laborers from within the black communities to undertake community projects. Such policies will augment the job openings for the black community whereas amplifying the value and state of the local community. As well, Trump's government needs to deal with the unemployment in black communities by combining training initiatives and programs with positive work placement initiatives. Women from black communities are more unlikely to get jobs paralleled with correspondingly qualified Latino and White people (CBC, 2018, pp.59). The inescapable form prejudice and discrimination in America warrants necessitate employment placement and enlisting exertions that link competent individuals regardless of their gender suitable opportunities for work.