StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Realism and Liberalism in the Nowadays International Relations - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The essay "Realism and Liberalism in the Nowadays International Relations" discusses that the theory of international relations is a collection of ideas, which explain the manner in which the international system works but contrasting with ideology, a theory of international relations is supported by concrete evidence…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97% of users find it useful
Realism and Liberalism in the Nowadays International Relations
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Realism and Liberalism in the Nowadays International Relations"

International Relations s Submitted by s: Introduction A theory of international relations is a collection of ideas, which explain the manner in which the international system works but contrasting with ideology, a theory of international relations is supported by concrete evidence. Thesis statement A first look at liberalism and realism shows that they are paradigms that are diametrically opposed in the international relations theory as the democratic peace theory, which is associated with liberalism generates a warm outlook on the international system. On the other hand, the security dilemmas associated with realism as well as zero sum games show a different view of international politics. Realism As far as realism is concerned, states work towards solely increasing their own power in relation to that of other states while considering that the world is a dangerous place and the only way to attain certainty is to have power. When realism is considered, there is the perception a nation, which is influential, should always do better than those competing against it which are relatively weaker while the most vital form of power which can be relied on is military power(Baylis and Smith, 2001, p. 4). Realism considers the primary interest of a nation to be self preservation and therefore a nation should look for influence and should be in a position to protect itself at all times. The international system makes different states employ military might and war and even though leaders are capable of being moral, they are not supposed to let their ethical concerns be a source of guidance for their foreign policy. Politicians have always been practicing realism for as long as there has been an existence of states and most of them as well as other scholars during the Cold War looked at international relations through a realist perspective. The United States and the Soviet Union did not trust each other and they both looked for allies that would assist them in safeguarding their interests as well as increasing their political and military command outside their borders. Liberalism When considering liberalism, emphasis is placed on the fact that the broad ties existing between states have made it harder to identify the interest of a particular nation while they have also decreased the worth of military power (Brown, 2001, p. 22). Liberalism is a concept that came up in the 1970’s when some scholars were of the opinion that realism had been outmoded and the escalating globalization, enhancement in the communication technology industry as well as growing international relations were not in a position to depend on simple power politics to make decisions on issues. Liberal approaches towards international relations are also referred to as the theories of complex interdependence and liberalism looks at the world as being a harsh place that is also dangerous but the outcome of using military power are more often than not more than the benefits. This makes international cooperation important to all the states and military power should not be considered to be the only form of power since economic and social power are also very significant. Economic power has proven to be more effective and efficient than the use of military power and different states have varying primary interests that can be fostered by international rules and organizations to enhance cooperation, trust and prosperity. Classical realism and classical liberalism As far as international relations is concerned, there are very many issues that are for debate and the most critical issue is the pessimistic view that is accorded to the classical realism when compared to the view that is optimistic that is accorded classical liberalism. The theory of realism was derived from the ancient times and was initially established in Greece in 431 BC by Thucydides (Freyberg-Inan, 2004, p 23) and it is defined preferring to use power to develop and achieve the interests that a nation may have. The realism approach possesse a pessimistic perspective of human character and it holds principles that are associated with security of a nation with a lot of seriousness. The people that support the realist perspective are usually sceptical about progress as far as international politics is concerned and have the notion that the international relations is often filled with conflict. The classical realism possesses a pessimistic perspective of human nature and it considers that the international politics is driven to have a fight for a power, which has its origins from human nature and there is the perception that human nature is highly competitive (Seiple, Hoover and Otis, 2013, p. 129). This competitive environment makes the human try to become first and try their best to avoid being taken advantage of through aiming at getting good international relations with other countries by trying to stop domination by others. Liberalism on the other hand is in total contrast to realism and the classical liberalism theory is an ideology that is politically inclined that was based on ideas of freedom as well as equality. John Locke developed the ideology in the seventeenthcentury and the ideology believes in progress and has the conviction that there is a chance that international relations can have a way of being cooperative (Brown, Bromley &Athreye, 2004, p. 109). Neo-liberalism, Neo-realism debate The discourse associated with neo-realism, neoliberal institutionalism was the focus of IR discourse for many years, and these approaches have struggled over views of worldwide structure while trying to define the area of global politics. The two approaches are significant in coming up with the guidelines for coming up with policies as well as making enquiries that are associated with global laws(Lamy, 2005, p.207). The whole discourse is portrayed by differences, which they possesses over particular issues that include the nature and outcomes associated with anarchy, comparative against unconditional gains as well as the priorities of objectives which the states have. Neo-realism attempts to come up with a separation between internal factors associated with international political system and the external and this separation defines one realm from the other enabling the theorists to address each of them at a level that is intellectual. People who support the approach put their attention on the framework of the approach while evaluating variations, manner in which they impact their interconnected units as well as results (Waltz, 1990, p.29). In the cases where the people who support neo-realism focus on security measures, the supporters of neo-liberalists place more emphasis on environmental and economic issues where when interdependence generally refers to economic interdependence. Keohane and Nye state that this is a vital feature as far as the politics of the world is considered and that states are dominant entities in international relations even though there is an assumption that a pecking order exists in international politics and if need be, force can be utilized to achieve policies. Globalization has presented an escalation in interconnectedness and connections where the common interdependence that is seen between the states influences behavioural patterns in a positive way and necessitates changes in the way the states cooperate with each other (Keohane& Nye, 2001, p.21-31).  The Neo-liberalists are more concerned with the way states are likely to benefit overall and not how the state will be advantaged relative to other states and it is considered that the policy makers will look at the absolute gains that can be made from an agreement which include the possible long-term gains. Neo-liberalists hold the opinion that relative gains are misguided since trade and industry interdependence makes sure that neither sides has potential to exploit the relationship which is existing while exploiting the other either politically or economically. According to Mastanduno, (1991, p 76) the achievements and benefits compared to other states can have negative and unhelpful consequences as they are advantageous to protectionism as well as nationalism and focusing on division of gain could have an influence the overall gain. Conclusion Realism defines a wider array of systematic level constraints that are associated with cooperation than the way neo-liberalism does and thus it entails both absolute gains and relative gains when dealing with cooperation. The neo-liberal model makes improvements on the neo-realist model through privileging issues that are associated with time as well as trust as being factors that are critical in the determination of success of norms and socialization internationally. Under such kind of approach, close at hand is reduced likelihood of stakeholders free-riding or defecting in case they have knowledge which they would lose out ultimately. In the same thought, the role linked with ideas as well as debate arises and brings about the argument about how realism presents a small amount of big and vital things but the issues which realism addresses are actually too minute and require to be reviewed. Even though the years that the cold war was being experienced might in one way or another have supported neo-realist perception, the events that have taken place after the war and new agendas associated with economics, the building of peace as well as the environment have challenged strict real political analysis as far as international relations is concerned. Neo-realism can therefore without doubt be seen as a theoretical substitute to realism and the strength to consider international relations via the perspective that is linked with this kind of approaches is that one can be better equipped to appreciate and evaluate the processes of socializing between countries and other international entities. Bibliography Baylis, J. and Smith, S. 2001, The globalization of world politics, 1st ed, Oxford University Press, Oxford. Brown, C. 2001, Understanding international relations, 1st ed, Palgrave, New York. Brown, W., Bromley, S. &Athreye, S. 2004, Ordering the international, 1st ed. Pluto Press in association with the Open University, London. Freyberg-Inan, A. 2004, What moves man, 1st ed. State University of New York Press, Albany. Lamy, S, L., 2005, Contemporary Mainstream Approaches, 1st ed. Oxford University Press,Oxford. Keohane, R, O., &, Nye, J, S., 2001.Power and Interdependence. Longman, New York. Mastanduno, M., 1991, Do relative gains matter? Americas response to Japanese industrial policy. International Security, vol 16 no 1, pp.73--113. Seiple, C., Hoover, D. & Otis, P. 2013, The Routledge handbook of religion and security.1st Ed, Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon. Walt, Stephen M.2002, ‘TheEnduring Relevance of the Realist Tradition’, In: Ira, W.W. Norton, NY. Katznelson and Helen V. Milner (eds) Political Science: State of the Discipline, pp. 197–230.Norton, New York. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Realism and Liberalism in the Nowadays International Relations Essay, n.d.)
Realism and Liberalism in the Nowadays International Relations Essay. https://studentshare.org/politics/1826520-are-realism-and-liberalism-converging-paper-subject-international-relations
(Realism and Liberalism in the Nowadays International Relations Essay)
Realism and Liberalism in the Nowadays International Relations Essay. https://studentshare.org/politics/1826520-are-realism-and-liberalism-converging-paper-subject-international-relations.
“Realism and Liberalism in the Nowadays International Relations Essay”. https://studentshare.org/politics/1826520-are-realism-and-liberalism-converging-paper-subject-international-relations.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Realism and Liberalism in the Nowadays International Relations

International Relations

There are a number of approaches based on different international relations theories.... There are a number of approaches based on different international relations theories.... Political Thought and international relations: Variations on a Realist Theme.... Iran has consistently ignored international disapproval and sanctions and continued to misled the international community about its actions.... Iran has consistently ignored international disapproval and sanctions and continued to misled the international community about its actions....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

The Various Traditional and Contemporary Theories of International Relations

Critically assess the core ideas underlying the various traditional and contemporary theories of international relations.... Introduction A fundamental issue in international relations theory is the basis upon which mutual co-operation between states is founded (Jackson & Sorenson, 2010).... hellip; Academic discourse on the topic has often been framed within the polarised international relations theory paradigms of neo-liberalism versus realism (Randin, 2006)....
10 Pages (2500 words) Coursework

From Humanitarian Intervention to the Notion of the Responsibility to Protect

In his studies about democide (a term has come to be used to refer to the murders committed by governments on individual or groups, including genocides, mass killing and crimes against humanity), Rummel (1986, 1997) illustrated that democides are more threatening than international wars, as he estimated the total number of deaths killed by governments in the 20th century 174 million dead, which is more than the battle-deaths during the same period.... War Crimes, Genocide and Crimes against Humanity War crimes refer to the excessive violation of human rights within wars, and a serious breach of international humanitarian law (Clarisse, 2011)....
42 Pages (10500 words) Dissertation

Possibilities for peace in the international system: realism versus liberalism

16 Pages (4000 words) Essay

Theoretical Perspectives and the Strong Argument

hellip; In general, theory of global policy or international relations theory must be traced to at least three principal theoretical traditions, such as Realism, Liberalism, and Constructivism.... (Baylis and Smith, 2001) Then, in order to define historical events of the global policy within conceptual framework, according to Sens and Stoett, we must connect international relations with theoretical perspectives as their origins but on the contrary as their outcomes....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Marxist View on Globalisation

ccording to a typical definition, globalization is "the intensification of economic, political, social and cultural relations across borders" (Holm and Sorensen, 1995).... Roots of this process are in the epoch when colonial empires have laid the foundation of the first basis of the international economic relations in this millennium.... However the modern international economic relations underlying globalization essentially differ from those that have been generated from the beginning of an epoch of Great geographical discoveries and foundation of colonial empires....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

International Relations

The paper "international relations" tells us about discussion about political "realism".... hellip; The realistic theory usually is considered as the most consecutive interpretation of the essence and the reasons of political events such as confrontations, military alliances, diplomatic negotiations and international relations as a whole.... The realistic theory usually is considered as the most consecutive interpretation of the essence and the reasons of political events such as confrontations, military alliances, diplomatic negotiations and international relations as a whole....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

The Metatheoretical Assumptions That Underlie Idealism and Realism

It also places the fundamental distinction between Idealism and realism as philosophical approaches. ... On the other hand, realism claims that ideas must adhere to what is experienced in this world, and hence, upon the materials present in this world (MIA: Encyclopedia of Marxism).... In this respect, the debate between idealism and realism is whether what comes first - ideas or materials - and what is more important to pursue....
13 Pages (3250 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us