StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Hedonic Act Utilitarianism and Kants Formula of Humanity - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Hedonic Act Utilitarianism and Kants Formula of Humanity" discusses that the ‘ticking time bomb’ scenario poses a good argument that solidifies the merit of hedonic act utilitarianism and how it plays at our understanding of what could be morally permissible given the circumstances. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.4% of users find it useful
Hedonic Act Utilitarianism and Kants Formula of Humanity
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Hedonic Act Utilitarianism and Kants Formula of Humanity"

Many proponents against torture focus on the absolutist requirement that it should not be permitted under any circumstance and that enforcing torture given the possibility that the person to be tortured is innocent or that he does not have the information needed fails to give a concrete argument on the other side of the what-if question. Deductively, what if he is not totally innocent or that he truly does have the information and there are others whose lives are at risk. Founding on the singular basis of the Kantian formula of humanity undermines the correlation of impending critical decisions at crossroads in favor of moral predispositions. The “ticking time bomb thought experiment” presents a direct and unfaltering inquiry on our appreciation of utilitarianism and thus supposes that the second premise, “it is not morally permissible to torture the terrorist” is false.

Sussman presents a perceptive description of the effect of torture and the existing relationship between the victims of torture and the tormentor as being one of passivity as the suffering and its inherent pain brings the person to a state where he no longer has control of his body and emotions brought about by sheer pain and fear (Sussman 2). The book, “Torture: When the Unthinkable Is Morally Permissible,” suggests what the very title given by the authors means. Bagaric, Mirko, and Clarke provided for five variables that must be present to make torture morally permissible. First, there must be a consideration on the total number of lives to be saved, second, the imminence of the threat, third, the other available means besides interrogational torture, fourth, the degree of participation of the person in the plotted devious act, and finally, the plausibility of the person’s possession of essential knowledge of the plan. Additionally, if there are little to no other means to acquire information as discussed in the third variable, harm may be brought upon him in any form but maintaining the lowest possible degree of torture and pain towards him (Bagaric, Mirko and Clarke 34-35).

 In contradiction to this stance, Jeff McMahan maintains that torture must be prohibited without classification. That the use of torture is more abused by those who proliferate unjust means and that even the government cannot be trusted to be cautious in their use of torture, however noble their intentions are. McMahan affirms that to think that any government, no matter how civilized or democratic, could be trustworthy enough to be tasked to carry out torture to prevent terrorist activities and other such threats is nothing short of delusional. In this discussion, the author does not fail to mention notorious and well-known incidents such as the Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib torture controversies where the prisoners were subjected to inhumane acts of torture. “Throughout human history, torture has been very extensively employed, but the proportion of cases in which the user appears to have been morally justified seems almost negligible” (McMahan 125).

This argument illustrates realistic and current predilection toward the abolishment of torture as guaranteed by international and local laws but it does not address in any material way the ticking bomb predicament. McMahan deviates from negating the permissible morality aspect of hedonic act utilitarianism by raising contentions founded on barbarism and human dignity (McMahan 111) and instead focuses on torture abolition based on factual relevance of its ineffectiveness but it nevertheless falls short on concluding how interrogational torture for the lives of others is a complete falsity where torture is present in the process. The discussion focuses on the ‘what if’ scenario which tends more to favor the terrorist than on the protection of the greater number of people supposing on the idea that the person may or may not have information. The ticking bomb is unrealistic and McMahan agrees unequivocally to this supposition and that the lesser-evil approach cannot apply determinedly (McMahan 116). The discussion tends to tackle the ticking bomb question but then wavers to the digression that the scenario is unrealistic and has never actually happened in real life without providing a concrete basis that answers what action must be taken in the given situation.

I am not of the idea that torture is morally permissible, absolutely and at all times, but I am of the utilitarian opinion that given the ticking time bomb case the same could be concluded. Given dire circumstances, we must be able to make the choice to opt for difficult decisions instead of passively relying on the idea that our inaction is for the greater good in the long process. “They need to make such decisions is, of course, regrettable, but more regrettable still would be not making them and thereby increasing net human pain” (Bagaric, Mirko and Clarke 31). It is even by virtue of our humanity that we make these harsh decisions because dwelling on what could have been being much worse than doing anything at all cost while there is still time. Once you are faced with the decision between having to torture one who is not entirely innocent to save hundreds who are, I hardly doubt the choice is difficult. When lives are lost and you have to explain that there could have been something to be done, but it wasn’t in your opinion, morally permissible.

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Reflect on Hedonic act utilitarianism and Kant's formula of Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1481180-reflect-on-hedonic-act-utilitarianism-and-kant-s
(Reflect on Hedonic Act Utilitarianism and Kant'S Formula of Essay)
https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1481180-reflect-on-hedonic-act-utilitarianism-and-kant-s.
“Reflect on Hedonic Act Utilitarianism and Kant'S Formula of Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1481180-reflect-on-hedonic-act-utilitarianism-and-kant-s.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Hedonic Act Utilitarianism and Kants Formula of Humanity

Kantian and Utilitarian Theories and the Nestle Moral Issue

The institute, however, did not clarify whether the cause was the infant formula or improper sterilization-and-storage of baby bottles and feed.... Heightened indignation against Nestle resulted in a campaign led by the Infant formula Action Coalition (INFACT) to boycott Nestle products globally.... This study was used by the International Baby Food Action Network and its affiliates by accusing Nestle and other infant-formula companies of violating the WHO marketing code....
9 Pages (2250 words) Term Paper

Philosophical Issues of Business Ethics

Man has always wrestled with the ethical and moral questions concerning his actions in which he and other members of society are affected, either adversely or positively.... This made it imperative that he contemplate first the possible consequences of his actions on others.... .... ... ... PHILOSOPHICAL ESSAY ON BUSINESS ETHICS (Case Study of Yahoo, Inc....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Moral Ethics and Moral Standards

The focus of the paper "Morality" is on moral ethics, moral standards of the society, on what makes right acts right, Is morality relative or absolute, moral questions, the formula of telling what is wrong or what is right, an innocent person, deontologists.... According to normative ethical theory such as utilitarianism, it is assumed that the right act is always the one that results in the greatest possible happiness (PHL 275 Week Six p.... ) or according to Professor Moore's ideal utilitarianism 'actions productive of more good than could have been produced by any other action open to the agent' (Ross 16)....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Virtue Ethics, Utilitarianism, and Kants Deontological System

Both the teleological - moral systems are illustrated mainly by a focus on the consequences which any action may have - and deontological - moral systems are characterized by a focus upon observance to independent moral rules or duties - ethical theories are described deontic or.... ... ... Those hypotheses focus on the question that which action one ought to prefer....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

Principals of Morals and Legislation by Jeremy Bentham

This important concept of ethics was proposed by Jeremy Bentham, an English philosopher-reformer, in his book ‘Principals of Morals and Legislation” which was later developed by John Stuart Mill, an English philosopher-economist, in his book ‘utilitarianism'.... utilitarianism emphasis more on majority and it is concerned with the happiness of the greatest number of people in the society.... n the other side, Deontology totally opposes utilitarianism....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Diverse Perspectives of Ethical Care Theory

The paper 'Diverse Perspectives of Ethical Care Theory' lets us conclude that for the social humanity well-being and in a wider global context the ethics of care theory - particularly concerning the ladies - has an advantage over the other moral theories.... Moreover, it can become a universal concept....
16 Pages (4000 words) Research Paper

Kantian and Utilitarian Theories and the Nestle Moral Issue

In the mid-1860s, it developed an infant-food formula as a supplement and/or substitute to breastfeeding.... It then claimed humanitarian achievement after the formula was used by relief organizations such as the Red Cross to feed starving infants in refugee camps.... PAG also sought examination of undue marketing-and-advertising of infant formula, which may have been the cause of this decline.... The institute, however, did not clarify whether the cause was the infant formula or improper sterilization-and-storage of baby bottles and feed....
9 Pages (2250 words) Term Paper

The Categorical Imperative from Varied Philosophers

The paper "The Categorical Imperative from Varied Philosophers" presents that born to Portuguese Jewish parents, in 1632 in Amsterdam; Benedict de Spinoza, also known as Baruch, Benedictus, and Bento de Espinosa were among the proponents of Rationalism and Enlightenment.... ... ... ... The major tenets of Hobbes's philosophy are materialism, determinism, and hedonism....
22 Pages (5500 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us