StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Hobbes State of Nature - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Hobbes State of Nature" focuses on the fact that Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) and John Locke (1632-1704) were two such outstanding thinkers of their time who argued against each other. Their arguments were influenced by their historical experiences…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER99% of users find it useful
Hobbes State of Nature
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Hobbes State of Nature"

The English Revolution (1642-88) set different thinkers and philosophers think and react differently. Their reactions were based on their own life experiences and the philosophical outlook. Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) and John Locke (1632-1704) were two such outstanding thinkers of their time who argued against each other. Their arguments were influenced by their historical experiences. They were both social contract theorists and natural law theorists but beyond this, their views differed on the state of nature, the social contract, and the system of government. “The ‘State of Nature’ is a term in political philosophy used in social contract theories to describe the hypothetical condition of humanity before the state’s foundation and its monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force.” (Wikipedia, 2006). In simpler words it is the condition before the rule of positive law comes into being or a way to discuss the conditions of society and government. Thinkers during the 17th and 18th century believed that whatever good things one had in the state of nature should not be lost when one entered into society. They evaluated the governments based on this condition. Locke believed that in the state of nature men mostly kept their promises. American frontier is an example of people in the state of nature, where property rights and (for the most part) peace existed (James, n.d.). He believed that the state of nature was good. People are in a state of nature when it is socially acceptable to punish for wrongdoings done against you. Hence, if the government could not do as much for people as they did for themselves in the state of nature, the government could be invalidated. Hobbes’ idea of the state of nature concern power and security and not the moral obligations. He believed that in state of nature people could behave badly towards each other. He compared the English Revolution to the ‘state of nature’, which was brutal. He had a very negative view of the Revolution and this convinced him that kingship was essential. Hobbes opposed Locke’s view that people will generally follow the law of nature because they are naturally rational and not given to constant war. Locke believed that government should be from the people and that it should be limited so as not to violate the natural rights of people. “Locke states that the entire population has the right to punish an offender so that he will not commit the crime again and so that others will be deterred from moral law breaking.” (Wikipedia, 2006). Locke opposed Thomas Hobbess view that the original state of nature was “nasty, brutish, and short” (James). Because Locke believed that human mind is a blank slate. All members staying within a society are assumed to agree to terms of a social contract and a violation of this contract signifies an attempt to return to the state of nature. Hobbes was of the opinion that without a society we would live in a state of nature with unlimited natural freedom. This freedom would also grant the freedom to harm all who threaten ones own self-preservation. To avoid this situation, there should be a civil contract, which would require some freedom to be surrendered and a head of the society has to be accepted and honored. Hobbes asserts that without subjection to a common power, men are necessarily at war. Locke felt in doing this we surrendered our rights to ourselves in return for impartial justice. We must retain the right to life and liberty and gain an impartial protection to our property. He argued that absolute power should not be granted. If the head of the state remains in a state of war with his subjects, people have a right to kill such rulers and their servants. Hobbes disagreed, as he believed that if we follow instructions, you have the right not to be killed. Hobbes believed in absolute kingship and argued that the king can do no wrong. The ruler’s will define the good and the evil, the lawful and the unlawful. Hobbes contended that people in a state of nature ceded their individual rights in order to make sovereignty, retained by the state, in return for their protection and a more functional society, so that social contract evolves simply out of pragmatic self-interest. For Locke, legitimate civil government is instituted by the explicit consent of those governed. As well, those who make this agreement transfer to the civil government their right of executing the law of nature and judging their own case. Lockes contract was for a judge while Hobbes contract was for a master (James). In regards to the preferred system of government, Hobbes preferred monarchy mainly because he believed that there should only be one government. He was in favor of unlimited power for the state as he felt it was necessary to end all conflicts and contentions. People in a society will come in conflict and it is the duty of the head of the state to end such conflicts. Locke argued that a government should work within the limits of the contract. According to him, all legitimate political power derives solely from the consent of the governed to entrust their “lives, liberties and possessions” to the oversight of the community as a whole (Kemerling, 2002). He was convinced that when the society interferes with the property interests of the citizens, they have a right to protect themselves by withdrawing their consent. Rebellion against such a government alone can restore the fundamental rights. Hobbes preferred system however, does not presuppose chaos; it presupposes a form of enlightenment, while Locke opined that possibility of revolution is a permanent feature of any properly formed civil society. There is a striking similarity in the two philosophers’ thoughts. Locke believed that the state exists to preserve the natural rights of the citizen. He further argued that revolution is justified against a government when it violates the natural rights of a citizen; Hobbes maintained revolution is never justified unless the government fails reasonably to assure the maintenance of the lives of its citizens from danger INTERNAL to the government/society created. This means they were similar in their approach to the use of reason and not divine rights to justify or oppose absolute kingship. Locke’s political philosophy emerged when the English Civil War was in full bloom, at a time when the English society had no proper direction (Wikiepedia). His political philosophy was expressed through Two Treatises of Civil Government which was published after the Glorious Revolution of 1968. Through this he distinguishes between the legitimate and the illegitimate civil governments. Locke characterized the state of nature in moral terms, while Hobbes characterized it in social or institutional terms. This too is again borne out of their personal experiences of the war and the society during that period. Locke had also experienced during his time that Rome and Venice were in a state of nature shortly before they were officially founded. Locke was the seventeenth century precursor of classic liberalism, and Hobbes was the seventeenth century precursor of modern totalitarianism (James). From this review, we can see that Hobbes and Locke had incredibly different views on some respectively significant issues, and it was the difference in their opinions that has had an everlasting affect on such things as political science and philosophy, safe to say, for all time. These two philosophers brought ideals and relations into the equation which had never been thought of before, and some of which are now considered to be dramatically altering to life altogether. Nevertheless, the modern state is far more Hobbesian than Lockean, but far from the absolutist government that Hobbes commended. References: D, J. (n.d.). Locke vs Hobbes. Retrieved May 22, 2006, < http://jim.com/hobbes.htm> Humanities. (n.d.). Hobbes’ State of Nature. Retrieved May 22, 2006 http://humanities.uchicago.edu/faculty/mgreen/JuniorSeminarF03/Notes/HobbesSN.shtml> Kemerling, G. (2002). Locke: Social Order. Retrieved May 22, 2006, Locke. (n.d.). Locke. Retrieved May 13, 2006, Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Analyse & assess how hobbes & locke's views differ on the state of Essay”, n.d.)
Analyse & assess how hobbes & locke's views differ on the state of Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1536948-analyse-assess-how-hobbes-lockes-views-differ-on-the-state-of-nature-the-social-contract-and-the-system-of-government-to-what-extent-was-each-philosophe
(Analyse & Assess How Hobbes & locke'S Views Differ on the State of Essay)
Analyse & Assess How Hobbes & locke'S Views Differ on the State of Essay. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1536948-analyse-assess-how-hobbes-lockes-views-differ-on-the-state-of-nature-the-social-contract-and-the-system-of-government-to-what-extent-was-each-philosophe.
“Analyse & Assess How Hobbes & locke'S Views Differ on the State of Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1536948-analyse-assess-how-hobbes-lockes-views-differ-on-the-state-of-nature-the-social-contract-and-the-system-of-government-to-what-extent-was-each-philosophe.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Hobbes State of Nature

Ivory Coast - Land of Trouble

According to him, there was a ‘state of nature' even before the formation of society.... According to him, there was a ‘state of nature' even before the formation of society.... And indeed, when one sees the current crisis in the Ivory Coast on both the social and political fronts, one is ought to come to the conclusion that Hobbes description of ‘state of nature' is still prevalent.... An individual's interest causing to break all the laws and regulations of the country as if they never existed and leading to the death of so many people makes one feel that indeed Cote da'Ivoire is currently in a ‘state of nature'....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Hobbes and Internationalism

This paper will explore Hobbes' theory of the state of nature and assess whether it is applicable to nationalism and demonstrable in international relations.... This paper will explore Hobbes' theory of the state of nature and assess whether it is applicable to nationalism and demonstrable in international relations.... It will be argued that, although his initial concept of man in the state of nature corresponds with internationalism, that a more detailed application of his theory is difficult to reconcile with realistic principles....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Hobbes, Machiavelli and Moral Relativism

Though Thomas Hobbes disagreed with Macchiavelli concerning the role of the state, the two agreed on this 2 point: “In stressing the power of the sword and the inefficacy of mere words, Hobbes was following Macchiavelli.... In this natural state, Hobbes argues that there is no possibility of morality because there is nothing to give it context and meaning.... Hobbes counters that in a commonwealth, the organized political state in which all have a place, it is essential, and the individual's bounden duty, to obey those who hold power....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

See intructions

In state of nature, men are competitive and need someone to safeguard their property.... Q2: Hobbes: state of nature In the state of nature according to Hobbes, the life of man is “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short” (Lloyd-Hughes 149).... This is because in their nature, men are “ungrateful, fickle, false, and cowardly” (Lloyd-Hughes 97).... Men in this state are equal in body and minds thus become enemies often....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Western vision and American values. Western notions of freedom and democracy

These political philosophies were British liberalism…Classical Republicanism…and Christianity,” It can be seen that the Western Ideals of Government and Democracy are directly a result of the way ancient Roman and European philosophers sought to understand the human nature by the concept of the “state of nature.... state of nature.... or Hobbes man is purely motivated by self interest and in his notion of the state of nature all humans are competing with each other ....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Do Hobbes and Thucydides Provide Timeless Truths

1 Subsequently, Thomas Hobbes, an Oxford University graduate, and an English philosopher wrote Leviathan in 1651, a social and political commentary on human nature and the necessity of the creation of one common power that will impose its will on all individuals to contain the anarchy inherent in conflicting interests.... In addition, the emergence of globalization which has the effect of blurring state boundaries and the advances made in travel has complicated the issue....
15 Pages (3750 words) Coursework

Hobbes' Theory of the State of Nature and Internationalism

This paper "Hobbes' Theory of the state of nature and Internationalism" explores whether the idea is applicable to nationalism and international relations.... It would be taxing for anyone vaguely familiar with Hobbes to not be aware of his widely quoted vision of man's brutal and short life in the state of nature.... For Hobbes, man's equality in the state of nature is the cause of his terrible existence in that every man has the right to everything, which causes conflict....
6 Pages (1500 words) Literature review

Political Theories

The paper "Political Theories" says that the work of Hobbes and Locke focused in the period before the formation of societies referred to as the state of nature when mankind looked at themselves as the individual rather than collectively and it is at this moment that man left the state of nature.... The intent of this paper is to evaluate the perspectives that Hobbes and Locke adopted and compare and contrast them as per their views on the state of nature, individual freedom, sovereign power, and property....
9 Pages (2250 words) Term Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us