StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...

Principle of Retribution for International Crimes - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
Most philosophical approaches to international criminal justice have focused on the jurisprudential rationale for punishing criminals in an international forum, seeking to defend the normative status of international criminal law against assertions that such trials violate the principle of nullum crimen sine lege…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.8% of users find it useful
Principle of Retribution for International Crimes
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Principle of Retribution for International Crimes"

Download file to see previous pages

h. Without a coherent philosophical theory of criminal punishment to justify international criminal justice, the mere authority or "permission" to apply a set of norms to international criminals remains vacuous. If such trials cannot provide substantive justice in a philosophically meaningful sense, they are more deeply flawed than any procedural objection would reveal. (John, 2001) The idea that all criminals should be punished for their illicit deeds, regardless of their political position, is at the heart of the modern international criminal law regime.

The former argues that the benefits, over either the short or long run, of punishing people such as Goring or Saddam Hussein in a legal forum justify such trials. Such thinkers point to the usual battery of utilitarian arguments for punishment: deterring future crimes, establishing a historical record of the criminal acts, reforming lawbreakers, providing a sense of closure to their victims, and so forth The other, more abstract view declares that justice itself demands that these people be punished independent of any harmful or beneficial consequences that may arise from their trial.

For retributivists, other benefits of punishment, though desirable in themselves, are morally insignificant. It is the latter view that is the only valid justification for trying the unique sorts of crimes that the international courts have been designed to handle. (Larry, 2005)Arnaud does not argue for the philosophical soundness of retributivism as such, nor he defendes the philosophical legitimacy of war-crimes trials in general. Specifically, he stated that one cannot make sense out of the intuitions, values, and beliefs that stand behind the current movement toward international criminal trials and war-crimes trials (or their shared ideology, if you will (Arnaud 2004, 1) unless one understands it to be rooted in a retributivist theory of punishment.

While the term "ideology" is a loaded one, it nonetheless captures the point: the ideology standing behind modern international criminal law and the laws of war displays a noted bias in favor of the retributivist principles articulated by Kant (among others). Ultimately, war-crimes trials do not provide the greatest happiness for the greatest number. (Christopher 2002, 43-61)Despite some important philosophical differences among individual thinkers, retributivists share some common central beliefs.

For these thinkers, the rationale for punishment is "metaphysical" in character in the sense that it is rooted in abstract principles of justice and right. Justice is the independent, nonmaterial motivation for punishment, and it serves as the sole determining ground for punishment. Punishment by a court (poena forensis) . can never be inflicted merely as a

...Download file to see next pages Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Principle of Retribution for International Crimes Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1524261-principle-of-retribution-for-international-crimes
(Principle of Retribution for International Crimes Essay)
https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1524261-principle-of-retribution-for-international-crimes.
“Principle of Retribution for International Crimes Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1524261-principle-of-retribution-for-international-crimes.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Principle of Retribution for International Crimes

The Death Penalty is Not a Deterrent

We are mortal like other humans who commit heinous crimes.... Pillsbury argued that it is the violence of our crimes that is the problem and not the number of crimes.... Proponents argue that people can be stopped from committing crimes by imposing severe sanctions and executing criminals deters others who planned to commit crimes from doing so.... In other words, death penalty or life imprisonment has no deterrence on violent crimes like murder....
9 Pages (2250 words) Research Paper

Cour Issues Analysis

The aim of the penal system is to exercise deterrence and retribution to offenders and other like-minded individuals.... Furthermore, in the discharging of justice, the judicial system has a role of deterrence and retribution via the correction facilities.... It is therefore the role of the judiciary to uphold this principle and protect the rule of law....
5 Pages (1250 words) Research Paper

State-sponsored oppression

The Holocaust, the butchery in Serbia, the genocide in Rwanda, and most recently, the barbaric killings in Sudan are crimes of such magnitude that it requires nothing less than an international tribunal to try these crimes against humanity.... The Holocaust, the butchery in Serbia, the genocide in Rwanda, and most recently, the barbaric killings in Sudan are crimes of such magnitude that it requires nothing less than an international tribunal to try these crimes against humanity....
17 Pages (4250 words) Essay

Foundations of Chinese and African Laws

The case study "Foundations of Chinese and African Laws" states that An exploration of the cultural diversity of nations often leads us to a pleasant discovery of unity amidst diversity.... In the area of laws, several countries having very different cultural nature.... nbsp;… African and Chinese laws though diverse in many ways have deeply rooted similarities which remain true even in modern times....
9 Pages (2250 words) Case Study

Public International Law

According to Michael Sharf, the Saddam Hussein trial can be classed as one of the most important cases in international law because (a) the scale of atrocities was high (b) Hussein was a top ranking leader (c) interest of the international community due to the coalition led against Iraq (d) sets a legal precedent for international crimes and (e) effect of the trial and whether it was perceived as fair.... international crimes are war crimes, including genocide, crimes against humanity, torture and aggression and international criminal law is the law that governs such crimes....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Sentencing Strategies

The question or morality lies without the confines of the law, and in as much as morality helps to prevent crimes; it is not the role of the judiciary to enforce morality.... The paper “Sentencing Strategies” seeks to evaluate the final process of a court process, which involves the final ruling of the judge, based on the evidence provided in a court of the Jury's verdict....
5 Pages (1250 words) Assignment

Criminal Sanctions and Criminal Remedies

The rationale behind deterrence is the fear that the authorities hope to inculcate in the minds of people in the hope that they will think twice before committing crimes.... There are several principles of the penal theory, among which are retribution, reparation, rehabilitation, incapacitation, and deterrence.... The retribution theory refers to the notion that penal sanctions are imposed to give the offender a dose of his own medicine, that is, to punish him for what he did....
9 Pages (2250 words) Assignment

Capital Punishment Is a Moral Ignominy

It is apparent that when criminals die, their ability to commit any further crimes disintegrates with them.... Supporters of capital punishment group up in three categories; the retributivists, who claim that for the most heinous crimes, the penalty of death is morally justifiable or perhaps even required, the consequentialists and the welfarists.... retribution is a valid reason to justify the death penalty according to the view of many....
8 Pages (2000 words) Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us