StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Search Warrant Requirement - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "The Search Warrant Requirement" highlights that police officers searching public schools do not require a warrant or they should be no probable cause for them to conduct a search. Government offices and prison cells should be searched without any restrains on probable cause…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.8% of users find it useful
The Search Warrant Requirement
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Search Warrant Requirement"

Running head: EXCEPTIONS TO THE SEARCH WARRANT REQUIREMENT IN AMENDMENT RIGHTS Discussion Board 5 Discussion Board 5Unreasonable searches and seizures are guarded by the United States Constitution under the fourth amendment. This came about due to the controversial writs of assistance during American Revolution. The amendment IV is has two distinct parts whereby: The first part usually safeguards people against unreasonable searches and seizures. There had been numerous ways of remedying unreasonable searches in the ancient times unlike in the modern jurisprudence that has facilitated respect of the amendment by the police officers. The second part usually concerns the proper issue of warrants whereby it states that there should be a probable cause in case a warrant has been issued. The totality of circumstances tests the probable cause. A clear distinction of the amendment can be seen whereby one part deals with arrest by state police while on the other hand, the second part concerns searching and seizing somebody's property. A police officer cannot be said to be conducting a search where he/she looks through the window when walking along the street. This is because the window is viewable by anyone one walking along that street. For example in Katz v. United States, a case ruled by the Supreme Court that there was no search if a person has an expectation of privacy and this expectation should be reasonable. For this case, if a police officer looks through the garbage, this cannot be termed as a search since there is not expectation that the garbage is private. The Congress has already placed statutory restrictions on incidents like when a police officer monitors telephone numbers dialed by individuals. At one time, the Supreme Court ruled in the case of Florida v. Riley, where police officers had hovered above a suspect's house with a helicopter and conducted surveillance. There can be no expectation of privacy in illegal activities. For example where a police officer uses a drug sniffing dog to investigate an illegal activity is not a search. Under certain circumstances, it is not necessary for warrant for a search or seizure. For this case, the police officer must have a probable cause that makes him believe that the object in question is contraband before the search and seizure. There is search without a warrant on open fields if at all; the person conducting his activity in the open field had no reasonable expectation of privacy. For this case the meaning of 'open field' doctrine is expanded so that it includes any open space. For example in a case that was ruled by the Supreme Court that there was no search where the police had ignored a "no trespassing" sign when they entered the suspect's land without a warrant and as they walked through a path to the interior, they discovered he had planted marijuana in his land. The Supreme Court ruled in this case of Oliver v. United States that no search had taken place at the suspect's land. At time, there are exceptions to the warrant requirement for example in case the police officer suspects that the accused is likely to destroy evidence. For this case, the police officer is permitted to search and seize the suspect's property for evidence without a warrant. According to Supreme Court, individuals have reduced expectation of privacy while driving in their vehicles since the vehicles are not repositories of personal effects nor do they serve as a residence place. However, the automobiles are not supposed to be randomly stopped to be searched without a probable cause or reasonable suspicion of criminals driving in it. The police officer for this case is allowed to extend the search to any part of the vehicle where they believe weapons or drugs could be hidden. They may also extend their search to the passengers if there is a probable cause to search them if he suspects that they may hiding drugs or any harmful weapon. If a person has not been arrested and it appears that he has to be searched, then the search should be conducted in an area where that person has a reasonable expectation of privacy. For this case, the police officers are required to get such permissions from the court in order to conduct the search. For instance it would be unlawful to force a suspect to undergo a surgery in order to uncover incriminating evidence since this interferes with his human body privacy. However, the federal agents are permitted to conduct a search on the medical records that do not require court approval under HIPPA. In some circumstances, it is not a must that there should be a probable cause for a police officer to conduct a search. For this case, a police officer may conduct a search if he suspects that if one is a threat to others on reasonable suspicion. A search can be conducted by a police officer on reasonable suspicion if one is driving while drunk. On the other hand, one can be tested for drugs without necessarily establishing any probable cause. Before a search is conducted on an individual, he must be notified that a search is to be conducted and what they are searching. However, if the police officers believe that evidence may be destroyed after one is notified of the search, then for this case there should be no notification of the search. On the other hand, if an individual blood test is removed to conduct a pregnant test and the blood is used to test whether on has used illicit drugs, then this is termed as an illegal means of search since one was not informed that beside the pregnancy test, they would also conduct another test. The courts used exclusionary rule to dissuade police officers from not to conduct unlawful searches and seizures. For example in a case of United States v. Leon, that was ruled by the Supreme Court, the "good faith" rule was applied and it was held that the police officer relying on a warrant seized evidence that was later on found to be defective. That evidence would still have been excluded if the police officer had recklessly prepared an affidavit to act as a warrant if neutrality had been abandoned by the magistrate. Police officer searching public schools do not require a warrant or they should be no probable cause for them to conduct a search. On the other hand, government offices and prison cells should be searched without any restrains on probable cause or reasonableness. Reference Kilman, J. and George, C. (2000): The Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Amendment rights Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Amendment rights Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1510423-amendment-rights
(Amendment Rights Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
Amendment Rights Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1510423-amendment-rights.
“Amendment Rights Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1510423-amendment-rights.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Search Warrant Requirement

Search warrents

Prior to the issuance of the search warrant, the police officer intending to carry out a search must fill out an affidavit stating particularly the person to be searched and arrested and the items sought.... search warrant Name and number search warrant A search warrant is a court order authorizing the examination of a place for the purpose of discovering smuggled goods, stolen property or evidence of guilt to be used in the prosecution of a criminal action....
3 Pages (750 words) Research Paper

Search and Seizure 4th Ammendment

This paper will deal with the 4th amendment's history, applicability, the rules for exclusion, exceptions made to the requirement of a warrant, and finally compile a number of important cases.... It also requires judicial sanctioning of any warrant, which must be supported by probable cause.... The second acts to prohibit seizures and searches, which are unreasonable, while the third insists based on a warrant, which means they must describe specifically what is to be seized, grounded by probability cause....
5 Pages (1250 words) Research Paper

Situations in Which a Law-Enforcement Officer May Conduct a Search Without Obtaining a Warrant

In the following situations, a law enforcement officer does not require a search warrant to conduct a search:Situation One: A law enforcement officer when spot something in context with the plain view doctrine where he has a legal right to seize, does not require a search warrant to seize the object, evidence or contraband.... The plain view doctrine supports 'open fields doctrine' that states that any open pastures and areas related to it are eligible to be searched legally by an officer even without obtaining any search warrant....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Exceptions to the Search Warrant Requirement

The paper "Exceptions to The Search Warrant Requirement" highlights that permitting searches incident to an arrest without a warrant is permissible in US Law.... A search warrant may be defined as an order, issued by a justice, under statutory powers, authorizing a named person, to enter a specified place, to search for and seize specified property, which will afford evidence of the actual or intended commission of a crime.... A search warrant is not an administrative function, it is a judicial act....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Business and the Bill of Rights

Rule of the Case: The right against unreasonable searches exists under the Fourth Amendment but an exemption from The Search Warrant Requirement exists for administrative inspections of closely regulated industries.... Parlor owners contested the constitutionality of the ordinance, claiming that the warrantless search provision violated the Fourth Amendments' prohibition of unreasonable searches....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Constitutional Law: Horton v. California

In that sense, once all the items described in the search warrant have been found, the search is required to stop and no further privacy invasion is allowed.... econdly, the suggestion that the inadvertence requirement allows the police officer from carrying out general searches is not persuasive enough.... This is because inadvertent discovery requirement does protect possessory interests (Eyer, 482).... n the criminal justice system, most Courts reiterate that conversion of specific warrants into general warrants is deemed unconstitutional besides emphasizing the requirement for unscrupulous compliance to the needs that warrants specifically the place that is to be searched and particular things to be searched (Carmen, 114-116)....
2 Pages (500 words) Assignment

Police civil liability for high risk drug enforcement operations

n this case if I were the police officer, I could have acted differently in order to avoid violation of The Search Warrant Requirement of the Fourth Amendment.... After recording the plaintiff and noticing that she will bring the marijuana in the next visit, it was necessary for the officer to acquire the search warrant (Kappeler, 2006).... The officer was supposed to acquire the search warrant before the plaintiff visits her brother.... n the case, the court ruled in favour of the plaintiff because the officer had violated the warrant requirement of the fourth amendment....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Situations in Which a Search Without Obtaining a Warrant

The paper "Situations in Which a Search Without Obtaining a warrant" discusses that the Court decided that seizing and searching people walking around in public places did not require a warrant, but in most cases, the police could only do so if they had probable cause.... The Court balanced the property and privacy rights of the people against the legitimate needs of law enforcement and divided the world into three areas, those that could only be searched with a warrant, those that could be searched or seized with probable cause and those that could be searched without either probable cause or a warrant....
13 Pages (3250 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us