StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...

Judicial Precedents - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The great term 'precedent' could be seen in terms of established Court decisions. Judges need to try cases based on earlier decisions. As a matter of judicial practice, judges in lower courts need to observe the established precedents set by higher courts, and this establishes the hierarchy of decision-making…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.1% of users find it useful
Judicial Precedents
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Judicial Precedents"

Download file to see previous pages

However, this is not binding on cases of Federal Courts, or by Courts of other States or country. The principle of stare decisis can be split into two parts. The first is the rule that a decision made by a higher court is a binding precedent, which a lower court cannot overrule. The second dictum is that a court should not upset its own precedents unless there is valid reason to do so. This needs to be motivated by principles from similar and lower courts. Under English legal system, judges are not justified to make their own decisions about the development, or interpretations of law.

They may, or may not be held by a ruling made in a previous case. Two facts are important in finding out whether a precedent is binding: One of the main disadvantages of the use of precedents is that there is no mental exercise on the part of judiciary and it may not do the best brand of justice that could be rendered in a specific case. When a jury takes a decision based on previous case ruling, it has not exercised its own discretionary and discriminative powers, and, in a way has just copied its predecessor by way of issue of legal judgment.

Whether there are sufficient reasons to believe that both the cases are similar for a common ruling is another matter, to be tried by the Court of Appeal or any other competent legal body. Precedent has a very important role in the common law. It ensures firmness, uniformity, logical sequence and expansion of the law. At the same time, it can be rigid and complex - what is "the law" on a subject may be very difficult to find or to state as it is often spread across many cases with varying degrees of intricacies.

The law is also easier to find and state and is rationally prospective rather than based on the chance event of litigation, which may give rise to laws based on extreme or unusual situations, or erratically argued cases. Precedent is dependent upon written record of cases: Precede means that the judges have to place before consideration before granting verdict, the full accounts of the case history and other relating matters to the subject. Therefore, it could be argued that, in the absence of such matters and documents, the order of precedent may not be established.

The second dictum is that a court should not upset its own precedents therefore, records are a sine quo non, which must be present to enforce legal pronouncements. Necessary documentary evidence may be needed before precedents could be established. Before the concept of precedent lays down previous similar decision, it

...Download file to see next pages Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Judicial Precedents Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words”, n.d.)
Judicial Precedents Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1510333-judicial-precedents
(Judicial Precedents Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
Judicial Precedents Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1510333-judicial-precedents.
“Judicial Precedents Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1510333-judicial-precedents.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Judicial Precedents

Understanding the Law

This paper seeks to discuss the doctrine of Judicial Precedents and application of jury in administration of justice.... While the binding principle of Judicial Precedents applies to ratio decidendi as applied in the original case, obiter dicta do not bind.... Types of Judicial Precedents Application of Judicial Precedents defines the types of precedents that have been identified in the judicial system.... Judicial Precedents Judicial Precedents, as defined by Robertson, are a source of law that originates from the judicial system....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Rules, Rights and Justice: an Introduction to Law

Developments of new laws through legislations as well as Judicial Precedents with the aim of safeguarding the interest of citizens also lead to changes in content of law.... Changes in law are realized through parliamentary legislations, judicial interpretations and the European court of human rights....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Hart-Fuller Debate issues

Hart-Fuller Debate 'While Fuller's argument that law has an inner morality is unsuccessful, his eight principles provide an important supplement to Hart's rule-based concept of law.... ?? HLA Hart wrote the book “The Concept of Law” in 1961 which defined the way a legal system should work.... hellip; In response to this literature, Lion Fuller developed a scientific approach towards identifying key areas for the development and sustainability of a legal system....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

The Main Sources of Law That Have Shaped the English Legal System

0 As creative and as important as Judicial Precedents are, it is a long established principle that Parliament can overrule or alter any judicial precedent.... The Main Sources of Law that have Shaped the English Legal System Introduction The main sources of law that have shaped the English legal system are parliamentary acts, judicial precedent, European Community law and delegated legislation.... European Community law consists of both primary and secondary legislation and judicial precedent....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

The Judicial Precedent Doctrine

hellip; However, as elusive as consistency is, it may be achieved by the application and development of Judicial Precedents.... Binding precedents and persuasive precedents are the two categories of Judicial Precedents where the former is a case that is certain; a court has to keep an eye on.... Persuasive precedents though not binding, may be considered.... In some instances, the persuasive precedents from the Privy Council may be binding like in the Attorney General for Jersey v Holley [2005] 3 WLR 29 cases where the defense of provocation in criminal law was functional....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Operations of Judicial Precedent in the House of Lords and in the Court of Appeals

The law judicial precedent otherwise referred to in legal parlance as “stare decisis” or to stand upon decisions has been used in the English Court for many years (see Rondel v.... The governing principle of this law is that cases with more or less… Technically, the law on judicial precedent is a double edge sword.... On one hand, courts would be better of without it since it will be free to decide the case at hand based its merits and not on the merits of previously decided cases and on the other hand, the law of judicial precedent is important as part of the courts internal control mechanism....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

Business Law: Courts in England and Wales

By faithfully following Judicial Precedents, judges normally find it a lot easier to interpret laws.... These criteria are the application of the: legal and language assumptions; the literal rule; the golden rule; the mischief rule; the purposive rule; and following Judicial Precedents....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Explain the doctrine of precedent

There are two main types of Judicial Precedents namely binding precedents, persuasive precedents.... Binding precedents are mandatory Judicial Precedents that lower courts must abide by when making their rulings.... Lower courts have to honor these precedents and apply them in their rulings.... Persuasive precedents are those that a judge can rely upon for guidance when making a ruling but need not necessarily apply them.... The doctrine of precedent, also known as stare decisis, is a judicial policy requiring judges to abide by earlier judicial rulings when making their… Judges can also rely on decisions from courts in other jurisdictions when making judgments....
4 Pages (1000 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us