StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Management of Innovation - Assignment Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper entitled "The Management of Innovation" is a perfect example of a Management Assignment. An organization structure is a diagram showing the structure of an organization as well as the relative positions and ranks existing (Mohr, 1982). It involves the activities taking place in an organization…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.6% of users find it useful

Extract of sample "The Management of Innovation"

ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE NAME COURSE TUTOR UNIVERSITY Introduction An organization structure is a diagram showing the structure of an organization as well as the relative positions and ranks existing (Mohr, 1982). It involves the activities taking place in an organization. This includes allocation of tasks, coordination and supervision functions which are aimed at achieving the organization’s objectives (Weber, 1948). The organization structure of a business is determined by its objectives. The kind of structure an organization adopts will influence the performance and modes of performance (Jacobides, 2007). The structure of an organization provides the basis upon which the operating procedures and routines of the organization is managed. Additionally, it determines the level of participation of the employees and other stakeholders in the decision making processes of the organization (Mohr, 1982). It ensures harmony between the various sections and departments of the organization. Appropriate choice of an organization structure is very vital for the performance of an organization. Wrong structures may decrease performance while correct choice improves the performance. An organization may choose to develop an organic or mechanistic organization structure based on its objectives. In my interview with the one of the supervisors, I realized that organizations use a combination of organic and mechanistic organization structures to enable them achieve their objectives (Heckscher and Donnellon, 1994). The diagram and table below represents the organization structure and answers to the questionnaire based on the interview. I interviewed a supervisor of one of the local firms. Organization structure of a local firm Policy board Executive Director. Program social services health and nutrition clerical staff maintenance Director staff supervisor staff Teachers Cook Assistant teachers Aides Volunteers Question Two The questionnaire was obtained from Management in Practice: Experiential Challenge text book page 401. The following responses were received from the manager whom I interviewed. Answer the following questions. Use a tick (√) Strongly disagree strongly agree No 1 2 3 4 5 1. Your work would be considered routine √ 2. A clearly known way is established to do the major tasks you encounter √ 3. Your work has high variety and frequent exceptions √ 4. Communication from above consists of information and advice rather than instructions and directions √ 5. You have the support of peers and your supervisor to do your work well √ 6. You seldom exchange ideas or information with people doing other jobs. √ 7. Decisions relevant to your work are made above you and passed down. √ 8. People at your level frequently have to figure out for themselves what their jobs are for the day. √ 9. Lines of authority are clear and precisely defined √ 10. Leadership tends to be democratic rather than autocratic in style √ 11. Job description are written and up-to-date for each job √ 12. People understand each other’s jobs and often do different tasks. √ 13. A manual of policies and procedures is available to use when a problem arises. √ Question Three An organic organization structure is one where the employees are at equal levels. They have equal powers and none can be said to be in a higher rank than the other. In fact they do not have any specific job descriptions or qualifications. Instead of individual leadership, such organization advocate for group leadership thus promoting collective responsibility. Workers are not specialized in areas where they are best suited. As long as one is employed, he/she should be ready to work in any department and perform any duties assigned to him/her from time to time. They cooperate in their duties and work together for the success of the organization. Authority is delegated and no one in particular wields power. One can never exactly predict what work he/she will be assigned and is never predictable (Burns and Stalker, 1961). Communication takes horizontal format in such organizations. Much of verbal communication is used to pass information. As a result, face to face communication is the order of the organization. Teamwork is encouraged and people work in shifts. The organization is concerned about the welfare of its employees which serves as an incentive for hard work and achievement. In a mechanistic organization structure, individuals are highly specialized. The employees are highly specialized and everyone concentrate in the task that he/she can do best. The chain of command is well defined and every employee is responsible to another office of higher ranking. Decision making process is highly centralized. Only few persons are charged with the responsibility of decision making. Thereafter they communicate to people in lower ranks, that is, communication is vertical. Such communication is usually written and should be taken as it is. Rules are stringent and procedures should be followed all the time. The organization consists entirely of positions and a lot of bureaucracies exist (Jacobides, 2007). Question Four From the questionnaire above, the scores obtained were 47. This is close to 52 which signify organic structure. It is also above 26 which signify mechanistic structure. This is very close to the organic structure than the mechanistic one. Thus the kind of structure described in the questionnaire should be close to the organic structure. Yet the features outlined have a lot of similarities with mechanistic structure. As a result the structure of the organization I interviewed did not suit the nature or the organization’s environment. The mechanistic organizations are known for its rigidity with regards to information flow and processes (Butler, 1986). It is suitable for manufacturing industry where firms aim at enhancing productivity so as to increase their profits. This kind of structure did not suit the interviewee’s organization because the responses he gave represent a mechanistic rather than organic structure. There are a number of reasons why it did not suit because of the following characteristics. In the first place the organization aims at maximizing output. The stages of production are differentiated and the output in one stage affects other stages. Variations in output and employee characteristics should thus be minimized. In order to achieve this, the organization utilizes documented procedures that must be followed to the latter. This ensures that employees and every stage of production are maximized. Secondly manufacturing firms usually have fixed objective, for example maximization of sales or output. Therefore they restrict the free flow of information in order to discourage creativity as well as minimize information exchange. It should be noted that a mechanistic structure is very suitable for organizations that have achieved conditions of stable operations (Pugh, 1990). On the other hand organic structure suits best unstable conditions that are changing and uncertain. In mechanistic structures there are rigid hierarchies where authority and control are well defined. Decision making is also left in the hands of a few people. Unlike in organic organizations where tasks are regularly revised to suit the changing needs of the organization. In organic firms problems are usually jointly solved. In addition communications is more lateral though through informal networks. Everyone is committed to the achievement of the organization’s objectives. This is not the case with mechanistic ones where communication is vertical and the workers pledge loyalty and obedience to superior personnel (Robbins and Judge, 2007). Organic structures tend to vest power in the hands of the employees. They keep redefining the rules and procedures in the organization for selfish gains rather than the organization’s gains. This may negatively affect the organization by negatively influencing customer relations. In addition the collective responsibility that organic structures advocate for may not be able to respond to urgent and immediate (Pugh, 1990). This may result into a great loss to the company because such issues should be dealt with without delay. The other problem with organic structure is that it usually results in ineffective leadership. It is difficult to lead the employees because they are leaders for themselves. Sometimes the employees even fail to incorporate the top management in the affairs of the organization. This results into the creation of communication barriers within the organization. The barrier is created between departments or in the policies of the organization (Weber, 1948). References Burns, T. and Stalker, G., (1961). The Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock. Butler, J.K., (1986). A global view of informal organization. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 3, 39-43. Heckscher C., Donnellon A., (1994) The Post-Bureaucratic Organization: New Perspectives on Organizational Change, Sage Publications Jacobides., M. G., (2007). The inherent limits of organizational structure and the unfulfilled role of hierarchy: Lessons from a near-war. Organization Science, 18, 3, 455-477. Mohr, L. B. (1982). Explaining Organizational Behavior. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers Pugh, D. S., (1990). Organization Theory: Selected Readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin. Robbins, S.F., Judge, T.A. (2007). Organizational Behaviour. 12th edition. Pearson Education Inc., p. 551-557. Weber, M., (1948). From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, translated, edited and with an introduction by H. H. Gerth and C. W. Mills. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(The Management of Innovation Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words, n.d.)
The Management of Innovation Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words. https://studentshare.org/management/2079315-assessment-task-2
(The Management of Innovation Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
The Management of Innovation Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words. https://studentshare.org/management/2079315-assessment-task-2.
“The Management of Innovation Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”. https://studentshare.org/management/2079315-assessment-task-2.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Management of Innovation

How a Competitive Market Operates and How it Moves towards Equilibrium

… The paper "How a Competitive Market Operates and How it Moves towards Equilibrium" is a wonderful example of a report on macro and microeconomics.... Competition is a term that has a wide range of meanings depending on the field to which it is being referred.... In the field of economics, competition is expressed in terms of entrepreneurial rivalry....
6 Pages (1500 words)

Leadership, Culture and Management Practices of High Performing Workplaces in Australia

This paper presents the manner in which issues of culture, management for change, innovation, and knowledge management have an effect on business performance.... To ensure the relevance of these factors different articles and past research has been gathered in areas pertaining to issues of culture, management for change, innovation, and knowledge management.... The entire paper then concentrates on the manner in which different issues pertaining to culture; management for change, innovation, and knowledge management help in the development of future strategies and has a positive outcome on the performance of the business as the critical analysis of the articles will help to broaden the horizon....
11 Pages (2750 words) Literature review

Managing the Innovation - Philips Lighting

This report is based on a case study that is about The Management of Innovation in the Philips lighting company.... This report is based on a case study that is about The Management of Innovation in the Philips lighting company.... Analysis of Philips lighting and its management of innovation Joe Tidd & John Bessant in their Book Managing Innovation, conclude that a shared vision, leadership and the will to innovate are some of the key components of an innovative organization....
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study

Recommendations on Management of Starbucks Innovation

The report then gives recommendations on the management of Starbucks innovation.... … The paper 'Recommendations on management of Starbucks Innovation" is a good example of a management case study.... The paper 'Recommendations on management of Starbucks Innovation" is a good example of a management case study.... This shows a successful social media innovation.... This report examines Starbucks use of Facebook innovatively in the light of organising for innovation, serendipity and innovation strategy....
9 Pages (2250 words) Case Study

Marketing Plan of Great Wall Motor

… The paper "Marketing Plan of Great Wall Motor" is a perfect example of a marketing case study.... Marketing plan refers to a document that is written containing the steps of actions needed to be taken in order to achieve the goals and the objectives of the business.... The plan can be of service, brand, product or the entire product line....
6 Pages (1500 words) Case Study

A Bank-Active in the Banking Industry

Organization GoalsThe organization (the bank) had the following goals: the bank needed to expand in the region through branch expansion, the bank also plans to double its profit margins after every for years, to improve the control environment, the bank focuses on reducing the cost management ratio from 67% to 40 % by 2013, implementation of risk management and core banking system, making an effort of improving the capacity and quality of the people in the business environment by building high performance and cohesion teams, be an admirable bank in the region, develop a robust and tested business continuity plans( BCPs), strengthen and rationalize the brands so as to win consumer preferences, and consider diversification to other services and products like stockbroking, housing finance, unit trust, and investment banking....
5 Pages (1250 words) Term Paper

Problems with Managing a Group of People

orces of change and innovationThere are forces of innovation and change in various industries that these managers should be aware of.... management of a group of people includes managing their productivity too.... management of a group of people includes managing their productivity too.... … The paper “Fostering Innovation and Creativity, Forces of Change and Innovation, Eliminating Blocks to Innovation and Communicating Change”  is an intriguing example of an essay on the management....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us