StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Management Consulting and Competitive Advantage - Term Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
The main objective of the current paper is to identify the link between companies that adopt management consulting and achieving competitive advantages. Therefore, the paper will discuss how consulting can be utilized in order to increase organizational performance…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.3% of users find it useful
Management Consulting and Competitive Advantage
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Management Consulting and Competitive Advantage"

A look into the probability and assessment on how may a consulting firm differentiate itself and achieve competitive advantage Generally speaking, the term comparative advantage is more of a relative term. The term can be used for an infinite number of variables. In this case it is to be taken into consideration that a consultancy firm may generate enough potential to govern the absolute majority in altering the time tested paths of the usual tricks and trade of a genuine organisation by differentiating itself and thereby gaining a significant amount of comparative advantage over its rival companies, which in this case are consultancy firms. Nevertheless, it is hard to underestimate the strategic significance of a consulting firm achieving comparative advantage by differentiating itself from other rival firms. This differentiating technique is a substantial tool that could transform the nature of products, processes, companies, industries, and even competition itself. Until recently, most managers treated differentiating principals as a support service. Now, however, every company and especially consulting firms must understand the broad effects and implications of the new differentiating principals and how it can create substantial and sustainable competitive advantages. (Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Oullette, J. A., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T., 341) The principals of differentiating itself from the rest of the industry are in the process of a silent revolution and this revolution is sweeping through our economy. No company can escape its effects. Dramatic reductions in the cost of obtaining, processing, and transmitting information are changing the way we do business. (Williams, J. R. 1) Most general managers know that the revolution is under way, and few dispute its importance. As more and more of their time and investment capital are absorbed in market evaluation and their effect, executives have a growing awareness that the differentiating principals can no longer be the exclusive territory of the elite panels and theoretical niche departments. As they see their rivals use differentiating principals for competitive advantage, these executives recognize the need to become directly involved in the management of the new theories and principals. In the face of rapid change, however, they dont know how. The goal is now to analyse how the framework of differentiating principals can be combined with behavioural evidence on comparative advantage to understand the differential performance of organizations. First, we describe the emerging role of knowledge as a basis for the competitive advantage of organizations. Then we apply our framework to explain why successful differentiating principal is difficult and to organize the evidence regarding knowledge that is more easily transferable. Finally, we present evidence indicating how organizations can develop the knowledge that is a basis for competitive advantage. (Hollingshead, A. B. 279) The recent trend in the field of strategic management has been to emphasize the role of organizational principals as a basis of the competitive advantage of particular organizations. Explanations of competitive advantage that rely primarily on the positioning of organizations in an industry or the deployment of organizational assets through competitive interaction with rival firms have been relatively deemphasized. (Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete, 268) Novel work continues on industry structure, but that work integrates organizational differentiating principal perspectives with industry or rivalry perspectives. Empirical findings have shown that differences between organizations may account for more variance in firm performance than differences between industries. Although important industry effects may be present, organizational-level differences are now acknowledged as a critical source of variation in firm performance over and above industry differences. Although empirical findings make the case for organizational resources as a basis of competitive advantage, theoretical arguments have been powerful for identifying the types of resources that are keys. Barney (1986) pointed out that for resources acquired through competitive markets, the value that the resource brings to the organization should be reflected in its price to the organization. For this reason, the focus for competitive advantage should be on resources developed or made valuable inside the organization rather than those purchased from outside it. The set of relevant resources is further limited by the recognition that resources cannot be the source of competitive advantage if many competitors have them. Therefore, to be the source of competitive advantage, resources must also be difficult for competitors to imitate. The focus on resources that are developed within the organization and difficult to imitate puts knowledge of differentiating principals in a pre-eminent position as the principal source of competitive advantage. Despite variance in terminology for differentiating principals (competencies, capabilities, routines, or innovations), there is growing agreement that it is what the organization comes to know that explains its performance. The problem for those who want to develop competitive advantage for their organizations, however, is that, in the field of business strategy, more effort has gone into identifying knowledge as the basis of competitive advantage than into explaining how organizations can develop, retain, and transfer that differentiating principal. As Spender and Grant (1996, p. 6) observed, "The surge of interest into organizational capabilities and competencies has directed attention to organizationally embedded knowledge, but has made only limited progress in understanding its anatomy and creation." To the extent there has been progress, it has been at the level of identifying consistencies in organizations knowledge of differentiating principal development paths and almost never at the level of the human interactions that are the primary source of knowledge and knowledge transfer. Against this backdrop, there is a clear opportunity for the research effort represented in this special issue to contribute to the understanding of how organizations gain competitive advantage through knowledge. The framework of differentiating principal knowledge reservoirs outlined represents the "anatomy" of knowledge of differentiating principals in organizations. We show how the framework can be applied to illuminate the problem of differentiating principal knowledge transfer, indicating when organizations can be expected to derive competitive advantage by transferring knowledge internally and preventing its transfer to competitors. However there is always the chance that differentiating principals would illuminate the process by which organizations can create knowledge. It is also evident that this can well contribute social psychological guidance for the task of developing competitive advantage in firms. (Wegner, D. M., Erber, R.,&Raymond, P. 925) Managers must first understand that differentiating principals is more than just principals. Today, differentiating principals must be conceived of broadly to encompass the information that businesses create and use as well as a wide spectrum of increasingly convergent and linked technologies that process the information. In addition to computers, then, data recognition equipment, communications technologies, factory automation, and other hardware and services are involved. Effective use of differentiating principals can broaden this scope and evoke productivity thereby enhancing the totality of absolute utility. (Leonard-Barton, D. 266) The revolution of differentiating principals can change thought processing within the consultancy firm could and potentially effect the competition in three vital ways: It can change industry structure and, in so doing, alters the rules of competition. It can create competitive advantage by giving companies new ways to outperform their rivals. It can spawn whole new businesses, though generally speaking, often from within a companys existing operations. (Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Oullette, J. A., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T. 334) It has been discussed the reasons why differentiating principals has the potential of acquiring strategic significance and how it could affect all businesses from the perspective a definite consultancy firm. It could also be assumed and described how the differentiating principals hold the key potential to change the nature of competition and how astute companies could exploit this. Finally, it can be outlined as a pro forma of a procedure that managers can use to assess the role of differentiating principals in their business and to help define investment priorities to turn the technology and other principals to their competitive advantage. (Hollingshead, A. B., 264) Most products have always had both a physical and an information component. The latter, broadly defined, is everything that the buyer needs to know to obtain the product and use it to achieve the desired result. That is, a product includes information about its characteristics and how it should be used and supported. For example, convenient, accessible information on maintenance and service procedures is an important buyer criterion in consumer appliances. (Teece, D. F. 2) Historically, a products physical component has been more important than its information component. The new differentiating principal, however, makes it feasible to supply far more information along with the physical product. For example, a consultancy firm can generate appliance service data base supports a consumer hotline that could help differentiate its service support from its rivals. (Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Oullette, J. A., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T. 229) Similarly some other consultancy firm can offer up-to-the-minute information on the whereabouts of client related updates, which can improve coordination between the firm and the client. The new differentiating principal is also capable of making it increasingly possible to offer service with just the outline of the proposed results. Customers can also be made available with the firm’s data whereby the customer can have access to corporate financial data filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and many companies can easily utilise the probability to perform better use analyses of statements. (Zander, U., & Kogut, B, 81) More generally, future empirical studies should examine the conditions under which knowledge is embedded in the various reservoirs. For example, how do the member-member, the member-task, and the member-tool networks develop? Research should also empirically determine the extent to which knowledge in the various reservoirs transfers to new contexts. Factors that support or impede such transfer should be identified. Information about these issues will greatly advance our understanding of differentiating principal knowledge transfer in organizations. (Argote, L., & McGrath, J. E, 338) Finally, the new differentiating principal has a powerful effect on competitive scope. Differentiating principals can also create many new interrelationships among businesses, expanding the scope of industries in which a company must compete to achieve competitive advantage. Thus, the processes underlying knowledge transfer provide a basis for understanding the competitive advantage of consultancy firms. Reference: Argote, L., & McGrath, J. E. (1993). Ideas in organizations: Continuity and change. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8, 333-389. Hollingshead, A. B. (1998). Training: The impact of practice on performance. Small Group Research, 29, 254-280. Leavitt, H. J. (1961). Structural, technological and humanistic approaches. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 1144-1170). Chicago:Rand McNally. Leonard-Barton, D. (1988). Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization. Research Policy, 17, 251-267. Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review, 69 (6), 96-104 Teece, D. F. (1988). Theoretical change and the nature of the firm. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Theoretical change and economic theory (pp. 256-281). New York: Pinter. Wegner, D. M., Erber, R.,&Raymond, P. (1991). Tentitive memory in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 923-929. Williams, J. R. (1998). Advantages and dis advantages in contemporary consultations. New York: Free Press. Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Oullette, J. A., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence: A meta-analytic review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 323-345. Zander, U., & Kogut, B. (1995). Consultancy firms: A review of knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities. Organization Science, 6, 76-92. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Management Consulting and Competitive Advantage Term Paper - 1, n.d.)
Management Consulting and Competitive Advantage Term Paper - 1. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/management/1537247-manaement-consulting
(Management Consulting and Competitive Advantage Term Paper - 1)
Management Consulting and Competitive Advantage Term Paper - 1. https://studentshare.org/management/1537247-manaement-consulting.
“Management Consulting and Competitive Advantage Term Paper - 1”. https://studentshare.org/management/1537247-manaement-consulting.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Management Consulting and Competitive Advantage

Marketing Strategy and Analysis for Apple, Inc

Apple successfully utilises marketing in order to build relationships with consumers that lead to brand loyalty, attachments that have consumers favouring Apple branded products over other competitive products offered by such competitors as Samsung and Blackberry.... Apple is not generally taken to creating marketing strategies as a response to competitive efforts, but to build proactive methodologies of promotion that enhance its public brand reputation through media coverage....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Services Industry in Canada and Porters Diamond Theory

Management Introduction ‘Porter's Diamond theory', formulated by Michael Porter, intends to recognise the competitive positioning of firms in a specific industry taking into concern, the various micro as well as macro elements identifiable within the external business environment of any company at the industry level.... To be precise, the model measures the extent of competitive advantages that a firm possesses within a particular industry setting (Pascal, Widiantoro, Nguyen & Sharief, 2011)....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Demonstrate how to evaluate client capabilities and business opportunities

By discontinuing use of two prices supermarkets' competitive advantage will suffer (Wickham P.... Lack of integrity and irresponsible behavior affect negatively competitive advantage (Wickham P.... Business factors that we need to evaluate are buyer power and competitive rivalry (Wickham P.... hellip; Paper provides samples of the management consulting for specific situations and examines issues of supporting of two prices, authority of managers and conflict solving....
3 Pages (750 words) Assignment

Organizational Consulting

Besides that, they consult on outsourcing thereby ensuring companies take advantage of globalization to subcontract part of their production process to attain cost effectiveness and maximize profitability.... The firm serves clients in more than 20 countries, and its phenomenal success ensuing after splitting-up from Deloitte has been largely attributed a merge with William R Muns who turned it into a competitive and highly productive company.... Consultant Firm Profiles Instructor Date PROXC consulting PROXC consulting is one of the world's leading consultation firms operating in Europe, the Middle East and Africa with the primary objective of bridging regional and global management strategy gaps....
3 Pages (750 words) Research Paper

Business Project

Recent changes in the technological milieu have provided Microsoft with several opportunities which they could exploit in order to gain advantage in the market.... To illustrate, there is a growth of the use of mobile applications among the business sector as reflected by the emergence of personal digital assistants which could provide Microsoft the opportunity to take advantage of the virtually small number of companies offering software services for the said hardware....
7 Pages (1750 words) Case Study

International Management Group and Competitors of IMG

he vision of the firm, the association of a number of renowned athletes, and the goodwill of the founder may be said to be a few of the competitive advantages of the firm.... he overall areas on which the competitor companies are mainly engaged are like athletes, models, authors, speakers, artists, actors, events, television production, consulting/ licensing, film production, money management, advertising, and academies.... WPP and Dentsu focus only on academics and licensing/consulting....
6 Pages (1500 words) Research Paper

The Key Strategic Issues of Andersen Consulting

This report sets out to highlight the environment in which Accenture plc operates, the key strategic issues (both opportunities and threats) to which the company might be expected to respond to, as well as its resources, key capabilities, and the underlying factors that give the… Additionally, this report will also assess the extent to which the organizations current strategies match its environment while suggesting improvements where possible, to enhance its performance, and to solidify its market position and market Formally known as Andersen consulting and with its incorporated headquarters are in Dublin, Republic of Ireland and its operations headquarters in Chicago, Illinois, Accenture plc is a global management consulting, technology services and outsourcing company (Accenture plc, 2014), which began as the business and technology consulting division of an accounting firm Arthur Andersen....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Adopting Methods and Tools for All Consulting Jobs

Throughout this essay, the notion that prescribed methods and tools can be developed for all consulting jobs will be analysed for the development of novel arguments.... The main source of data that will be used to back the assertions in the thesis statement will be in-class role… The notion that prescribed methods and tools can be developed for all consulting jobs is based on the principle that most organisations face comparable forms of problems.... The consulting industry is broad and encompasses a wide range of projects....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us