StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Budget Savings Omnibus Bill 2016 - Case Study Example

Cite this document
Summary
This paper 'Budget Savings Omnibus Bill 2016' tells that Debates on Budget Savings Bill 2016 remain multifaceted as its reduction on Commonwealth spending as pegged at $6.3 billion remains unclear. Scholars such as Malik have argued that the bill is a reflection of several other budgeting challenges in Australia…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.8% of users find it useful

Extract of sample "Budget Savings Omnibus Bill 2016"

Budget Savings Omnibus Bill 2016 Debates on Budget Savings (Omnibus) Bill 2016 remain multifaceted as its reduction on Commonwealth spending as pegged at $6.3 billion remains unclear. From the one hand, scholars such as Malik (2016) have argued that the bill is a reflection of several other budgeting challenges in Australia, including but not limited to how well the bill can be with regard to repairing budget. Despite this position, there is need to reflect the challenges and position different organs of government have had in harmonizing the bill. Based on these viewpoints, this paper critically reflects on Budget Savings (Omnibus) Bill 2016 by ascertaining its prospects for further, and specifically, more meaningful spending cuts as it has been argued by its proponents. From the viewpoint of $6.3 billion, Omnibus Bill 2016 remains political tactic. This bill, if traced from its onset, was a collection of different legislative changes that included some that has had regressive measures. The challenge is that Budget Savings (Omnibus) Bill 2016 represents a number of bills that were not allowed to pass the parliament for scrutiny. As it stands, Economics Legislation Committee was not given opportunity to ascertain the extent to which the proposal could help in budget repair. It is expected for instance, that with the bill aiming to save the country $6.3 billion in critical areas such as clean technology investment, it should be passed through Senate for evaluation to validate the extent to which it can repair budget and how it can affect lives of those directly involved with clean technology investment. As a matter of fact, Bainbridge (2016) reports that the Liberal Party got the support from Labor Party to deny economic experts to evaluate the extent to which the bill could help in budget reparations. In a nutshell, this bill remains political tactic as what was witnessed was one political party joining hands with another political party to create ‘savings’ that one cannot understand---basically it remains a dirty deal between the two political parties to cut funding with regard to Australian renewable energy investment. Instead of looking at this bill as ‘budget reparations’ it is actually a thing that has been intended to cut funding that used to support families or imposition of more debt on Australians renewable energy investment. Another way of looking at the challenge of this bill is in terms of research and development (R&D) incentives which are no longer in the hands of those implementing it but will be an agreement between the two political parties. One aspect of this bill that need to be noted is that there is likelihood of around $1.6 billion by bringing to an end tax benefit A with regard to families over $80,000. Additionally, the Labor Party argument that they have saved ARENA when they decided to cut half a billion dollars may not make sense to any economist. As a matter of fact, the best way to put this point to common citizen is like meeting that surgeon who tells you that the operation was successful but the patient was lost. With regard to saviours of renewable energy, there is where Australians are as far as $6.3 billion, Omnibus Bill 2016 is concerned. Blanchard (2016) supports this position arguing that one cannot argue to be saving renewable energy investment and yet in the process take half a billion dollars out of the same. Australia saw Bill Shorten in the process of election campaign thus taking away about 50 percent renewable energy target. The best way of understanding how significant the bill can be in terms of budget repair is the assessment of specific elements of the bill including consideration of the extent to which changes in the bill is warranted. To begin with is the half a billion dollar cuts with regard to Australian Renewable Energy Agency that has been proposed and the Labor Party has consented to. To any economist, Abbott government remains to be the only one for Australians to have taken away a price on pollution. Additionally, Australia remains to be the only country to have had a deal engineered by political pacts to put price on pollution but later on removing it, not to mention the reduction on renewable energy target. These undertakings cast doubts on the viability of Omnibus Bill 2016 when it comes to budget reparation. To conceptualise this point, economies were brought to the attention of Senator Xenophon and Senator Hinch who hinted that they were not going to support the bill as the bill was not going to do much when it comes to budget repairing. It is therefore not possible to argue that Budget Savings (Omnibus) Bill 2016 will help in repairing the budget to its expectations. In addition to these uncertainties, the prospects for further and more meaningful spending cuts depend on the assessment of the bill beyond the argument of renewable energy by focusing on the aspect of family payments more so, cuts that concern family tax benefit A. As it is currently put, Australia will have a cut in in family tax benefit A when assessing households stretching over $80,000. While this is the point as argued in the bill, no technical advice from economist as none was allowed to scrutinize the bill to ascertain the extent of the tax benefit. Furthermore, Wilkinson (2016) adds that the process of bill did not allow the house or legislators the opportunity to investigate the extent of those cuts so that Australians could understand families who will be benefits and the exact impact the benefit will have on the families. From the one hand, economist would argue that the move aimed in the bill was a cut tax aimed at people earning hundreds of thousands of dollars and of course people will say that they have been spared the cut when it comes to the clean energy. On the other hand, the reality is that the bill is actually attacking some of the most vulnerable citizens in the country. If one looks at the youth payment cuts that currently remain before the parliament and the information that has come from Australia Counsel of Social Service (ACOSS) is that the process of allowing Budget Savings (Omnibus) Bill 2016 will only lead to cases of unemployment for the young persons. Stevens and Suzor (2016) put this point succinctly arguing that young people are likely to lose about $47 every week and being forced to wait for up to four weeks for their payments. One fact that cannot be ignored while assessing Budget Savings (Omnibus) Bill 2016 deeply is that currently, Australia is facing a number of challenges in the budget and that the main objective of this bill is to address some of the challenges that have been reported in the budget. However, there is no point in balancing the problems in the budget on the back of Australia’s most vulnerable citizens. It does not help when the country balances the budget on the back of cuts in cleaning energy when clearly there are other alternatives. The government and opposition need to work with everyone for Australia to realize the needed innovations and a clear indication is about diesel fuel rebate. Instead of focusing on Budget Savings (Omnibus) Bill 2016, it would be better if one would eliminate the diesel fuel rebate and introduce fossil fuel industry. Better still, it would be better to replace the existing perks located to mining industry through accelerated depreciation then the country would likely save about $10 billion to help in addressing some of the challenges such as structural long-term problems within the country’s budget, thus there is no need of taking it out of pockets of Australians through Budget Savings (Omnibus) Bill 2016. In consequence, if the government would give a listening ear to mainstream economists they would have ended the distorting and inequitable effects that are likely to be brought by Budget Savings (Omnibus) Bill 2016, especially when one looks at the situation in terms of discount allowed and capital gains tax system which could allow Australia to raise billions of dollars. Just like Wilkinson (2016) has noted, government has an intention through Budget Savings Bill 2016 to abolish Medicare funded dental care for Australia children---which remains to be one of the achievements of Greens. Instead of focusing on Budget Savings Bill 2016 why should the government not deal with inefficient, inequitable and distorting private health insurance rebate and further reinvest the money into the public health systems. In so doing, the government will be addressing spending; in fact, this is the approach some countries have been using in addressing the issues of structural challenges within the budget. Conclusively, this study aimed at assessing Budget Savings (Omnibus) Bill 2016 from different perspectives including the prospects of further solutions to the budget including meaningful spending cuts. Furthermore, the study has incorporated ways in which the bill’s reduction of Commonwealth spending by the suggested $6.3 billion over four years will be essential. This study finds that the piece of legislation (Omnibus) will make Australia less fair. It is likely to increase different structural inequality that Australia has known to be embedded within the country’s tax system. References Bainbridge, A., 2016. Why is labor even considering voting for the budget omnibus bill?. Green Left Weekly, (1110), p.8. Blanchard, O., 2016. Rethinking Macro Policy: Progress or Confusion?. Progress and Confusion: The State of Macroeconomic Policy, p.287. Malik, J.A.N., 2016. House bill seeks to secure energy critical elements. MRS Bulletin, 41(02), pp.91-92. Stevens, J. and Suzor, N., 2016. Creative Commons Australia Response to the Productivity Commission Draft Report Intellectual Property Arrangements. Wilkinson, G., 2016, June. The human rights (parliamentary security) act 2011 (Cth) and the increasingly visible intersections between the human right to health and intellectual property in Australia. In Intellectual Property Forum: journal of the Intellectual and Industrial Property Society of Australia and New Zealand (No. 105, p. 46). Intellectual and Industrial Property Society of Australia and New Zealand Inc. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Budget Savings Omnibus Bill 2016 Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words, n.d.)
Budget Savings Omnibus Bill 2016 Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words. https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/2067491-the-recentcurrent-omnibus-savings-bill-which-aims-to-reduce-commonwealth-spending-by-63-billion
(Budget Savings Omnibus Bill 2016 Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
Budget Savings Omnibus Bill 2016 Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words. https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/2067491-the-recentcurrent-omnibus-savings-bill-which-aims-to-reduce-commonwealth-spending-by-63-billion.
“Budget Savings Omnibus Bill 2016 Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”. https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/2067491-the-recentcurrent-omnibus-savings-bill-which-aims-to-reduce-commonwealth-spending-by-63-billion.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Budget Savings Omnibus Bill 2016

Would green deal achieve objectives by 2020

Over the years, a number of nations have taken initiatives in order to protect the environment by being responsible in terms of using natural resources and different sources of energy.... Environment plays a significant part in the growth and development of all sorts of resources.... ... ... ... Would green deal achieve objectives by 2020?...
44 Pages (11000 words) Dissertation

Stem Cell Way at the Crossroads of Religion and Politics

Under President bill Clinton's administration, NIH, in 2000 issued federal funding guidelines for embryonic stem cell research (John and Joe, 2007).... The bill, however, did not allow stem cell research to be funded by the federal government.... In April 2007, the bill was passed in the senate and the house by June.... The 2009 act triggered more concerns on whether to enact the bill into law but was later passed by the congress in 2009....
7 Pages (1750 words) Term Paper

The Existing Market for CAM in the UK

This essay discusses the business concept of Herbal Medicine as an independent business which offers massage therapy and also sells homemade herbal products.... The business plan would increase revenue and also widen an existing client base using the business of homemade soaps and other cosmetics....
20 Pages (5000 words) Essay

Efforts to Reduce the Budget Deficit

The national debt has not only suppressed the overall national savings, which, in effect, has reduced domestic investments, but has also increased the country's borrowing abroad, as evident in the current account balances.... Efforts to Reduce the budget Deficit Author's Details: Institutional Affiliation: Efforts to Reduce the budget Deficit It is now in the history books; the US debt crisis got even worse under the stewardship of the current regime to outstrip the gross domestic product (GDP) by over 100 percent in the year 2012, three years after surpassing the $1 trillion mark for the first time, all courtesy of a worldwide financial crunch that originated in our very own backyard (Thornton, 2012)....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Policy That Guides Community Services for Older Adults

The paper "Policy That Guides Community Services for Older Adults" states that the out-of-pocket costs that result from high hospital deductibles, co-payments for a lot of outpatient medical care and annual deductibles for physician's visits may hinder proper medical attention.... ... ... ... The only preventive services allowed are the ones covered through the change in Medicare Act....
8 Pages (2000 words) Research Paper

The Ideal Nature of the Health Care Reform

The bill works by getting reimbursements from public and private insurers with charges and co-pays that don't apply to all veterans.... The essay aims to address the following objectives to wit: (1) to delineate the different ways on how the recent health care reform measures have expanded or inhibited access to care; (2) to discuss on how those changes to access might influence utilization; (3) to explain the....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Future of Healthcare into the United States

This essay "Future of Healthcare into the United States" examines government health care in the United States.... Public health seeks to promote healthy behaviors such as exercise, healthy eating, prevention, and treatment of disease to improve the lives and health of the communities.... ... ... ...
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

To reduce public debt, the welfare state has to be cut back. Discuss

With a lower public debt, risk management can be ensured including the aspiration for more options in managing unanticipated or contingent.... ... ... Both high public and low public debt has its risks especially where financial crises would be experienced by a country.... There are different causes discussed as causes for high public debts....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us