StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Foundation of Business Law: Australia Law - Case Study Example

Summary
"Foundation of Business Law: Australia Law" paper analizes the situation where Kosmo wants to know what kind of legal action, if any, he might have against Gerry. This is after Kosmo lost 50% of his investment in Facebook’s shares after the first month of his investment. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.5% of users find it useful

Extract of sample "Foundation of Business Law: Australia Law"

Foundation of Business Law (Australia Law) Student’s Name: Instructor’s Name: Course Code & Name: Date of Submission: Foundation of Business Law (Australia Law) Question 1 Kosmo wants to know what kind of legal action, if any, he might have against Gerry. Issue In the current situation, Kosmo wants to know what kind of legal action he can take against Gerry. This is after Kosmo has lost 50% of his investment in the Facebook’s shares after the first month of his investment. Gerry is a financial advisor at ‘Tom and Gerry Limited’ and is a financial advisor to George’s business in which Kosmo is an associate. Gerry had advised George, a business associate of Kosmo that investing the Facebook’s initial public offer is a good investment opportunity for George’s business to invest in. However, the value of the Facebook’s share has dropped by 50% in its first month of trading. The issues of the case can be identified as below: Is Gerry to blame for Kosmo’s loss? Is Kosmo entitled to Gerry’s financial advice? Does Gerry have an obligation to advise Kosmo financially? Law In this scenario, Gerry is the financial advisor to ‘George’s business. As the financial advisor, he has several liabilities to the company. Since he is an advisor, he has a ‘duty of care to his clients’ (UNISA, 2012a, p.41). This is due to the following reasons: His advice is business related; hence any inappropriate advice leads to an adverse effect on the company’s financial situation. Secondly, Gerry knows what George’s business wants to do. To be specific, George is looking for an investment to invest in which will have a high return on capital in addition to reducing the amount of taxes on the business. This is the reason as to why George is asking for advice from Gerry. Thirdly, Gerry knows that he is the sole financial advisor to George’s business. The business relies on him for any financial advice hence it is due to use the advice he gives to the management. The law governing such a situation is indicating below. One is not supposed to cause harm to someone because of his / her negligence. This happens if one gives information to a person which leads to harm, with full knowledge that the person is relying on the information to make a decision. This amounts to a Tort of Negligence. According to Esanda Finance Corporation Ltd v Peat Marwick Hungerfords (1997) 188 CLR 24, information given to a person can also cause harm to a third party if used (). This is in line with Kosmo who uses the advice given to George to invest in the Facebook’s IPO. In such a situation, liability to third parties is subject to the information pointed out below. Authority Under a tort of Negligence, Kosmo is a third party to Gerry’s advice. He is entitled to Gerry’s advice due to the following reasons: Gerry must have known that George will communicate the information he had given about a possible investment into Facebook’s shares. This is because Gerry is an associate to George hence it is more likely that the money that George’s business would invest in the Initial Public Offer would be a collective amount from all the associates in the business, and not George’s. Secondly, before the financial advice on investing into the Facebook’s Initial Public Offer, Gerry knew that his client was relying upon the information to make a decision on which investment to make using the profits which was accumulated in the just concluded financial year. Thirdly, Gerry knew if that the advice given was wrong, it would surely lead to a financial loss. Since Gerry is a financial advisor, he has full knowledge the implications of investing wrongly in shares and securities and he must have the ability to predict on the likely performance of the Facebook’s shares. Application According to the law, Kosmo can charge Gerry of negligence and a duty of care due to the following reasons. To start with, Gerry knew that George would surely communicate the information to Kosmo who was his business associate. Gerry knew that George and his associates would use the advice which he gave to them in making a decision on where to invest in. Lastly, Gerry knew that is the advice given on the investment in Facebook’s shares was not correct; it would lead to a financial loss to George and his business. For this reason, Gerry owes Kosmo a duty of care due to the following reasons. The advice which he was giving was of a business nature. Gerry knows that George and his associates, Kosmo included intends to use the information which he is giving in order to know is the best place to invest their profits in. It was reasonable in the given circumstances for Kosmo to rely on the information given. However, on the side of defence, Gerry was giving advice on the shares and securities field. In the stock exchange, the prices of shares are subject to change due to market forces which are beyond the control of an investor. Trading in shares is in itself a risk. For this reason, Gerry saw an opportunity for George’s business to invest. He was optimistic and did not think of any changes in the market forces which would lead to a fall in the prices of the company. If investments in the stock exchange are to be profitable, they are meant to be a long term investments while Kosmo had only invested in the shares for one month only. One month is not enough to make a conclusion about the value of a share. Under the breach of duty, the court would consider that: Gerry did not intend harm to George and his associates ‘Bolton v Stone [1951] AC 850’ (DC Tek Solutions, 2010, p1). In his mind, he was thinking of an investment which had low taxes and one which would have a high return on investment. Long term investment in shares has that ability. Secondly, Gerry did not have the ability to change the market forces which would lead to the fluctuation of share prices. For this reason, he did not know of the seriousness of the price falls ‘Paris v Stepney Borough Council [1951] AC 367’ (Docstoc, 2011, p.1). Conclusion Due to the fact that Gerry does not have power over the market forces which affect the prices of shares, he is not responsible for Kosmo’s loss. Secondly he is an advisor to George’s and Associates business. However, Kosmo had invested in the Facebook’s shares as an individual, not as the business. Gerry is not responsible for individual investments. Thirdly, the advice given to George was a suggestion, but not a formal financial advice. For this reason, Kosmo is acquitted off the charges. Question 2 Newman wants to know what kind of legal action, if any, he might have against Kosmo Issue One month after Kosmo had invested in the Facebook’s shares, the prices had fallen by 50% leading to Kosmo lose 505 of his money. Due to frustration he had decided to go and confront Gerry for the advice he had given to George. While he was coming out of the building in agitation to go to confront Gerry, he slams the door on Newmans face which results to injury. This causes him not to participate in the Adelaide Pétanque Club Championship, which he had won for the past 3 years, earning $40 000 cash prize each time. The issue of the situation is: Is Kosmo to blame for Newman’s injury? Is Newman entitlement to be paid by Kosmo? Law According to the Australian law, the injuring of Newman’s face by Kosmo which led to him not participating in the championship is a civil wrong which the law ought to address by awarding damages incurred by Newman, hence it is a tort (UNISA, 2012b, slide 19). Since Kosmo did not intend to injure Newman, he is to be charged with a tort of negligence. Authority Under the tort of negligence and a duty of care in Australian law, Kosmo has a case to answer due to his neglect of care. Under the circumstances, Kosmo had a duty of care to Newman due to the following reasons: First, at the time of the incident, Kosmo knew that his conduct could cause harm to someone who was behind him. For this reason, the damage was foreseeable ‘Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562’ (UK Law Online, (1998, p.1). Secondly, Kosmo was in control of the situation since he was the one holding the door. He ought to have chosen to let the door go slowly rather than slamming it. Thirdly, it is immoral to slam a door. This act goes against social values in Australia. Slamming the door may also lead to its damage hence leading to financial losses due to damages caused on the door ‘Jaensch v Coffey(1984) 155 CLR 549’ (Owen, K., n.d. , p.1). Application With reference to the case, Kosmo acted in a negligent manner, slamming the door without taking into consideration the person who might be behind it. To start with, Kosmo knows of the effects of slamming a door and injuring a person behind it is one of the effects. Because of his action, he injured Newman causing him not to participate in the championship and as a result loses $ 40,000 which he has won in each of the last 3 years. Secondly, Kosmo was in control of the door. He would have chosen to slam it or just release it slowly. He chooses to slam in and in turn hurting Newman’s face. Because of his action, he injured Newman causing him not to participate in the championship and as a result loses $ 40,000 which he has won in each of the last 3 years. Thirdly, Kosmo is negligent since he slams the door which is immoral. In addition to this, it has adverse financial implications if the door gets damaged. Conclusion Kosmo is guilty of a tort of negligence. He has a duty of care to Newman, a person who was behind the door. In effect of this, Kosmo should pay Newman the physical damages incurred. He is responsible for all the expenses incurred as a result of his action. He should also pay him an equivalent sum of $40, 000 which Newman lost by not competing in the Adelaide Pétanque Club Championship. References Docstoc, 2011. Paris V Stepney Borough Council [1951] AC 367, Viewed on 30th September 2012 from DC Tek Solutions, 2010. Case - Bolton v. Stone, A.C. 850, 1951 Viewed on 30th September 2012 From http://www.onlinelawtutoring.com/Case_Reference/Bolton_v_Stone_AC_850_1951.htm Owen, K., n.d. Tort Reform (There is Movement at the Station), pp.1-14 UK Law Online, 1998. Donoghue v Stevenson, Viewed on 30th September 2012 From < http://www.leeds.ac.uk/law/hamlyn/donoghue.htm > UNISA, 2012. Foundations of Business Law, COML 1001 Study Guide, pp. 41- 48 UNISA, 2012. Foundations Of Business Law, COML 1001, Lecture 3. Slides 1-40 Read More

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Foundation of Business Law: Australia Law

Criminal Law and the Australian Legal System

The aspect of the issue depicts the significant controversy upon which the basic foundation of the case is formulated.... The paper "Criminal law and the Australian Legal System " states that generally, in relation to the accident caused by Michael within the periphery of the Australian legal system, Anna can also sue Michael for the accident under Criminal Jurisdiction.... law is a tool to regulate the social as well as economic behavior of society....
13 Pages (3250 words) Essay

Analysis of Business and Law Cases

"Analysis of business and Law Cases" paper analyzes such cases as Steggles Limited v Yarrabee Chicken Company Pty Ltd in which the Federal Court in Sydney has handed down its judgment.... Both from a viewpoint of orthodox precedential doctrine and from the perspective of functional participation in legal renewal, it is simply impossible to leave all re-expressions of judge-made law to a final court.... It is very natural to see something anomalous in the introduction into Malaya of a special rule of the English law of this kind....
14 Pages (3500 words) Case Study

Immigration Law Issues

The author of this essay "Immigration law" touches upon the law issues in terms of immigration.... It is mentioned that understanding the law with relation to immigration is one of the most important steps to take towards understanding an economy better.... he nature of the term, which the primary judge had implied into the contract, reflected that against that background, there is, no doubt, a major challenge for the legal adviser in communicating comprehensibly to those who conduct their business, through corporations, large and small, about the law, which those structures lie, created and which regulates their operation....
14 Pages (3500 words) Essay

The Liability of Accountants and Auditors

The Liability of Accountants and Auditors – Just How Vulnerable are these Professionals to any negligent action Under the Australian Consumer law or at the Common law?... And The History of Negligence law in Relation to Professional Advisors One of the most important advancements in the laws governing professional negligence was the establishment of duty of care in negligence laws under the land mark case of Donoghue v.... Effects of Donoghue V Stevenson (1932) A decision by the British house of commons in 1932 concerning the alleged presence of a snail inside a ginger beer bottle is commonly perceived to be the best known judgment in the entire common law world....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Taxation Law: Australian Foreign Income Laws

This paper is mainly about tax obligation on the example of such country like australia which have continually revised their taxation rules in order to create an environment which is conducive for a global economy.... For small businesses and individuals in business, there may be some exemptions which may be applicable to their case.... According to Australian Tax Office rules, if the business is run as a company and not as a sole trader or a partnership, the owner can claim tax exemptions for salaries paid to both self and any other employees....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Identify and Critically Analyze the Relationship Between Law Enforcement and Harm Reduction Aims

This paper seeks to analyze and discuss the statement that “law enforcement and practice, particularly at the street level, can have a negative impact upon harm reduction outcomes.... ?? This will identify and critically analyze the relationship between law enforcement and harm reduction aims.... This paper will also examine ways in which law enforcement practice may exacerbate drug related harms.... This paper maintains that law enforcement is one of the means to prevent drug related crimes but the process of crime prevention may result to unintended harm....
14 Pages (3500 words) Essay

ETHICS, LAW AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT

These business philosophies are looking similar on the Although, the augmenting complexity of business, because of the extensive transformations and developments of the technologies and globalization offers an apparent indication that now we have in an extremely complex business environment and is turning out to be more complex due to novel ethical, cultural, social and legal transformations (Maniam & Teetz, 2009).... This research is aimed at providing a detailed analysis of the implications in scenario of different corporations, business, and nations....
20 Pages (5000 words) Essay

Advantages and Disadvantages of International Financial Reporting Standards in Australia

After the pronouncement in 2003 July that australia will implement IFRS, more has been inscribed on the concern by critics in educational and business journals along with the economic journalists.... The theme for this proposal involves the 2005 IFRS adoption by companies in australia....
10 Pages (2500 words) Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us