Our website is a unique platform where students can share their papers in a matter of giving an example of the work to be done. If you find papers
matching your topic, you may use them only as an example of work. This is 100% legal. You may not submit downloaded papers as your own, that is cheating. Also you
should remember, that this work was alredy submitted once by a student who originally wrote it.
The author of "The Death Sentence Errors or Gun Control" paper focuses on the reasons why gun control laws should not be implemented. Gun control laws should not be implemented because law-abiding citizens use guns as self-defense against goons who use are armed. …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Extract of sample "The Death Sentence Errors or Gun Control"
Gun Control Introduction The second Amendment of the constitution of the US s that all UScitizens have a right to own and carry arms and ammunition and this right cannot be infringed upon (Uviller 21). There are different perception about this amendment of those who are against and even those who are in the favor of American citizens owning and carrying arms. Those in the favor are of the idea that all kinds of arms and ammunition should be allowed to be carried, those who are against ownership of arms are of the idea that certain weapons should be allowed to be carried and in extreme cases they believe that American society will be better off if no weapons are allowed to be carried. A moral and legal analysis of the second amendment can help in clarifying whether infringement of right of owning and carrying arms should be allowed or disallowed. Firstly, there are no rights that are absolute in nature; even the rights that Americans have been allotted by God and by the Bill of Rights have certain limitation. Similarly, the right of owning and carrying arms cannot even be absolute and can be infringed upon if the person having a particular right is indulged in the act of misusing his/her right. The absolute nature of the right of owning and carrying arms has been challenged by the courts itself for several times. For example during the Miller case which took place during the 20th century, the court ruled that citizens of US are only allowed to carry certain kinds of weapons and not all weapons (Uviller 21). Later in the case of Stevens v. US, the court ruled that citizens cannot be awarded the duty of militia until they become an official of the militia and the right of owning and carrying arms should only be limited to the militia (Carter 558). This writing will focus on the reasons due to which gun control laws should not be implemented. Gun control laws should not be implemented because law abiding citizens use guns as a self defense against goons who use are armed, secondly, guns in the hands of law abiding citizens deters crime and criminals and gun control laws can only control guns that are registered to the names of law abiding citizens and cannot control guns that are in the hands of criminal minds.
Body
Issues Associated with Guns
According to the statistics of the period of 2010, 358 of individuals were murdered with the use of rifles, 6,009 were murdered through hand guns and 1939 individuals experienced being shot through an unknown firearm (FBI, 2013). During the same period, a total of more than 19000 suicides were committed with the use of firearms. Various costs associated with the use of firearms include medical bills, insurance cost, and costs experience by the US criminal justice system and during the period of 2010, these costs totaled to $174 billion due to incidences of violence conducted while using guns (Goldman, 2012). During the last month of 2012, a 20 year old guy named Adam Lanza went on a shooting rampage in the Sandy Hook Elementary School and took the precious lives of nearly 20 children and six faculty members of the school along with the murder of his own mom and later shot himself. These incidences clearly show that causing injury and killing others and oneself are the two main tasks of guns. Murders conducted with the assistance of a gun can be recognized as a 1st degree murder which means that the killer had intent of killing and a gun made the task easier. Other kind of murders that may take place includes: murder caused while another form of crime was taking place, murder of a friend due to passion and murders caused due to negligence that is criminal in nature. There have been various incidences where the murderer has no intention of committing a murder and was at the crime scene to commit another crime such as rape or theft, but the availability of an armed weapon makes the crime lethal. This means that individuals are not rational choice makers and at times they conduct behaviors which they initially do not intend to. Kates states that individuals living in a residence where a fire arm is available are five times at a high risk of going through a suicide and three times higher risk of going through a homicide as compared to households without firearms (Kates 690). Hemenway asserts in his research that individuals who use guns and report the usage as self defense are not telling the truth and are using guns in an illegal manner and he even supports the argument that individuals, who have kept guns in their houses, do so to threaten their spouses instead of keeping these weapons to secure their households (Krohn 489). Another issue is psychological issues and usage of guns. Individuals suffering from psychological issues cannot make rational decisions and fire arms in their hands can lead to unwanted circumstances. For example: James Hopes killed 12 individuals while a screening of a movie was taking place and his actions were associated with his psychological issues.
Against Gun Control
There are various claims made by the opponents of gun control laws, the main argument they use to support their perception is that guns are owned and used for the purpose of self defense. Gary Kleck a well known criminologist asserted that victims of crimes who have guns to defend themselves against criminals are less likely to experience loss of property and experience injury as compared to those who did not stand against a crime or stood against criminal activity without the support of guns (Valdez 106). He further asserted that victims who use weapons during criminal incidences are at a higher risk as compared to victims who do not use guns. Those who do not support gun control laws even are of the idea that increase in the number of guns in the hands of common population leads to reduction in crime rate. For example: John Lott asserted that the ease with which citizens of any particular nation are able to obtain and carry weapons are less likely to experience criminal activity and criminal activity in these regions even decline (Valdez 44). Lott’s assertions are in compliance with the deterrence theory of crime and he states that if laws on gun control are removed or relaxed, these laws will deter crime as while making a choice of whether to commit a crime or not, the criminal mind will make a choice not t commit crime because he/she is unsure whether the potential victim owns a firearm or not. Those against gun control laws even believe that strict gun control laws can only take away arms and ammunition from citizens who abide by the laws of their nations and cannot control guns that are in the hands of anti-socials. This is because a law abiding citizen will go through a proper procedure of obtaining a license and then owning and carrying a firearm instead of obtaining firearms in an illegal manner. On the contrary, criminals never go through the same procedure and they obtain guns from illegal sources and these guns are not registered to their names and they do not even have a license to carry these guns. They even obtain guns that do not even have a registration number or the number is removed. If gun control laws will be made, the authorities will only be able to take control of guns that are registered and licensed. Gun control laws are even against the law of equal treatment. Gun control laws only take away guns from citizens who abide by the law and not from the citizens who are deviant in nature. This means that the law itself is treating individuals unequally. Gun control laws cannot counter the issue of gun violence and its negative effects, still measures can be taken to ensure that the weapons are in the hands of the right people. Before issuing licenses and registering guns to any individual’s name, the law enforcement agencies need to ensure that they are handing a lethal weapon in the hands of the right people. This can be done by scanning people for psychological issues and by checking their previous criminal records. Certainly, there will be no reason for a law abiding citizen to carry a weapon if the criminals on the street are separated from their weapons.
Conclusion
Gun control laws have been debated for several years; these laws are again under scrutiny. Those in the favor of these laws believe that gun control laws will decrease the number of crimes that take place with weapons and these laws are needed as people cannot make rational choices so they should not own a weapon. Those against assert that removal of such laws will decrease crime rates, loss of property and decrease in injury of victims and these laws are against the second amendment. They even state that these laws do not take away weapons from the hands of the criminals.
Works Cited
Carter, Gregg Lee. Guns in American society: an encyclopedia of history, politics, culture, and the law. Santa Barbara, Calif.: ABC-CLIO, 2002. Print.
FBI — Expanded Homicide Data Table 8." FBI — Homepage. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Feb. 2013. .
Goldman, Henry. "Shootings Costing U.S. $174 Billion Show Burden of Gun Violence - Bloomberg." Bloomberg - Business, Financial & Economic News, Stock Quotes. N.p., 21 Dec. 2012. Web. 28 Feb. 2013. .
Kates, D B, and G Mauser. "Would Banning Firearms Reduce Murder and Suicide? a Review of International and Some Domestic Evidence." Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy. 30.2 (2007): 649-694. Print.
Krohn, Marvin D.. Handbook on Crime and Deviance. Dordrecht: Springer, 2009. Print.
Uviller, H. Richard, and William G. Merkel. The militia and the right to arms, or, How the second amendment fell silent. Durham: Duke University Press, 2002. Print.
Valdez, Angela. Gun control. Philadelphia: Chelsea House Publishers, 2003. Print.
Read
More
Share:
CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Death Sentence Errors or Gun Control
Based on the events that took place on the evening of Christmas Eve, Tommy Zeigler was convicted for the four murders and put on death row.... The case of Tommy Zeigler is an intricate one; he was convicted of perpetrating four murders: Perry and Virginia Edwards (his in-laws), his wife Eunice and a client named Charlie Mays) in a shoot-out that occurred at his furniture and appliance store....
Restructuring of the death penalty began in Europe by the 1750s, and academicians such as the Italian jurist Cesare Beccaria, the French philosopher Voltaire, and the English law reformers Jeremy Bentham and Samuel Romilly supported this.... Restructuring of the death penalty began in Europe by the 1750s, and academicians such as the Italian jurist Cesare Beccaria, the French philosopher Voltaire, and the English law reformers Jeremy Bentham and Samuel Romilly supported this....
n practice and of necessity, police--and probably prosecutors--develop a powerful sense of autonomy that operates beyond the usual devices for control.... Because the definition of organized crime has never enjoyed even the semblance of consensus, efforts to control it have similarly been the ad hoc product of those doing the enforcing....
The United States along with many countries in Asia still have laws that can sentence a person to death unlike most European nations, where this practice has been abolished.... Even laws and statutes allowed death penalty or capital punishment if found to be justified.... Sixteen states in the country including the District of Columbia have removed death penalty as a form of punishment, but all other states still consider it lawful.... It is the duty of the government to protect its citizens and that by providing death penalty; a capital crime will not be committed by the same person again....
The author of the following paper under the title 'the death Penalty in the USA' focuses on one of the most controversial punitive measures that are used to punish offenders.... The United States is one of a small number of countries that uses the death penalty.... The use of the death penalty is a permanent solution that can provide human error room for terrible mistakes.... The use of the death penalty, when handed down after conviction of a crime from which the offender cannot be liberated or from which the forgiveness of society is not conceivable, provides a service of justice to the citizens in providing a resolve for the crime committed, an example to promote the deterrence of crime, and a relief in costs that are incurred during a lifelong prison term....
By 1500 in England, only major felonies carried the death penalty - treason, murder, larceny, burglary, rape, and arson.... TDP said, 'Reform Of the death Penalty Began In Europe by the 1750s and was championed by academics such as the Italian jurist, Cesare Beccaria, the French philosopher, Voltaire, and the English law reformers, Jeremy Bentham and Samuel Romilly.... They argued that the death penalty was needlessly cruel, overrated as a deterrent and occasionally imposed in fatal error....
the death penalty has been an issue of controversy and debate for ages and one comes across a large number of arguments for and against capital punishment system.... Capital punishments were prevalent at one stage or other in the developmental history of many nations and many of them have constitutionally abolished the death penalty.... On the other hand, the major argument against the death penalty is that it is against human rights, ethics, and morality....
Have you ever admired using a gun or learning how to shoot?... Professor Jason is interesting to me because of his current research examining the processes that underlie human memory, including why memory errors occur, how memory errors can be limited, and how emotion influences memory.... ist 3 interesting facts about the school and a sentence or two about why each fact is interesting to you (e....
6 Pages(1500 words)Assignment
sponsored ads
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the term paper on your topic
"The Death Sentence Errors or Gun Control"
with a personal 20% discount.