StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Federal vs State Law - Case Study Example

Cite this document
Summary
November 1976, Dallas County, Texas. A 28-year-old man named Randall Dale Adams ran out of gas in the middle of a highway. Luckily, a good Samaritan picked him up in a blue Mercury Comet. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.4% of users find it useful

Extract of sample "Federal vs State Law"

(Name)(Instructor’s Name)(Course Title)(Date)ADAMS v. TEXASNovember 1976, Dallas County, Texas. A 28-year-old man named Randall Dale Adams ran out of gas in the middle of a highway. Luckily, a good Samaritan picked him up in a blue Mercury Comet. David Harris was the Samaritan. On the same evening, a police officer stopped the car since it was traveling with no headlights. As the officer headed towards the window, a hand from the comet pulled out a revolver shot him six times killing him on the spot.

The manhunt that followed led police to led police to one Mr. David Harris who after being grilled pointed a finger Randall Adams as the trigger man (Gillers 117). Based on Harris’s testimony, Randall Adams convicted for murder and sentenced to death. The conviction however, later became one of the most infamous miscarriages of justice in America.Mr. Adams, as would later be proved, was not the killer. In fact, he was not in Harris’s car when the officer was killed. He was only railroaded to prison because his shaggy appearance made him look like a criminal as compared to young David Harris.

However, in 1980, the Supreme Court ruled that it was unconstitutional for Texas to require that jurors must promise that the obligatory inconvenience of a capital punishment would not meddle with their thought of verifiable matters, for example, blame or purity, amid a trial. The case was eventually thrown out and Adams released after 12 years behind bars. The unconditionality of some of the state laws were eventually put to light as seen in the case of Adams. Thus, the need to revise such laws that predetermined a suspect’s innocence or guilt was raised.

Van Orden v. PerryThomas Van Orden took Texas to the federal district court on the grounds that the Ten Commandments monument at the state capitol building an unconstitutional in that it violated the First Amendment's establishment clause (Unger 34). According to Orden, the law prohibited the government from passing laws that respected religious establishment. The district court and the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals all ruled against Orden. Their argument was the same and stated that the monument had a secular role and was not government’s endorsement of religion for keen observers.

On an appeal to the Supreme Court, it issued arguments based on historical and religious value of the monument. It stated that the monument only showed that the nation recognized the Ten Commandments' historical meaning. Thus, through the Chief Justice, the Court held that the establishment clause did not bar the existence of the monument. The court on constitutionality of the monument, further stated that even though the Commandments are religious, having such content consistent with messages akin to religious doctrine does not violate the establishment clause.

In sum, both of these cases show supremacy battles between the states and the federal government due to conflicting laws. Nonetheless, in most cases such as these, the doctrine of pre-emption rules in favor of the federal government (Lemos 84). Basically, if a federal and state law bring ambiguity, then federal law can supersede the state law. Thus, the relationship will always be strenuous.ReferencesUnger, Michael. "After the Supreme Word: The Impact of Van Orden v. Perry and McCreary v. ACLU on Public Opinion" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the The Midwest Political Science Association, Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, Illinois, Apr 20, 2006 .

2013-12-17 http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p139250_index.htmlGillers, Stephen. "Proving the Prejudice of Death-Qualified Juries after Adams v. Texas." U. Pitt. L. Rev. 47 (1985): 219.Lemos, Margaret H. "State enforcement of federal law." NYUL Rev. 86 (2011): 698.

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Federal vs State Law Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Federal vs State Law Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1702647-federal-vs-state-law
(Federal Vs State Law Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
Federal Vs State Law Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words. https://studentshare.org/law/1702647-federal-vs-state-law.
“Federal Vs State Law Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1702647-federal-vs-state-law.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Federal vs State Law

State of confusion paper

Additionally, federal district courts are trial courts with authority on matters of law and questions of fact presented by residents of the judicial district.... The Main Issues The case in question seeks the determination of the court as regards the constitutionality of a statutory law enacted by the state of confusion requiring trucks plying its highways to install B-Type truck hitch or bypass the state rather than going through it.... In this regard, the court will find if the State of Confusion abrogated Congressional powers by making a law that regulates commerce on the nation's highways to the extent that it limits interstate commerce....
4 Pages (1000 words) Research Paper

Role and Functions of Law Paper

Thus it is clear under the Supremacy Law that any state law or regulations in conflict with the Federal law or the law of the land is without power and effect.... However, this controversial Section 5(b) was now amended by the 1969 Act or Public Health Cigarette Smoking Act of 1969 which clearly discussed "No requirement or prohibition based on smoking and health shall be imposed under state law with respect to the advertising or promotion of any cigarettes the packages of which are [lawfully] labeled (Cipollone vs Liggett Group Inc, 1992)....
3 Pages (750 words) Research Paper

Articles of Confederation vs. the Constitution

main law more effective.... The Avalon Project at Yale law School.... The Avalon Project at Yale law School.... The confederation of states, established by the Articles of Confederation was loose, as they stated that "Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every power, jurisdiction, and right", while the preamble of the Constitution is authored by "We the People of the United States".... citizens were reflected in the Congress, as it stated that every state must have two Senators and the number of Representatives proportional to the population of the state....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

The Australian Federal System

The question for the commonwealth and the state government is not only to enhance its performance and reputation but also to secure a better future, independent of the monarchy .... Australia is already a republic by any reasonable test- a state in which sovereignty is derived from the people.... nbsp; The essential characteristics of a federal constitution are the supremacy of a written constitution.... he Australian federal system has generally worked satisfactorily even though it had undergone substantial changes in the years following its establishment....
4 Pages (1000 words) Term Paper

What Are Living Wills

Most importantly, state law considers any interference with the proper use of directive forms, including unauthorized cancellation, falsification or forgery, as well as withholding knowledge of revocation, as a criminal offence.... This paper Living Wills: what are they, and how do state and federal guidelines affect documentation by healthcare providers talks that advance medical directives are legally binding forms of ensuring that your wishes regarding medical care will be respected....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Local, State, County and Federal Law Enforcement

The paper ''Local, State, County and Federal law Enforcement" discusses that the federal police are trained in vast areas of ensuring they have the best training in the course of their duty....   law enforcement has a number of agencies that are responsible for controlling the country.... To begin with, there are law enforcers depicted as county police.... The second law enforcers are the state police.... The state police are mandated as a statewide government agency deemed to provide law enforcement in the state....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

States versus Federal Rights

uring the infancy of United States, the main idea of the strong federal government champions mainly focused on having a strong centralized government while the advocates of states' rights believe in minimizing the law of the Federal government and that laws should come from the state.... He is for the loose interpretation of law so that the national government will have as much power as possible.... The conflict between state and federal rights is really just about big government and a devolved government....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Case and Statute Law for Balancing between the Rights of Defendants and the Interests of Justice

"The Extent to Which Case and Statute law Strike the Right Balance between the Rights of Defendants and the Interests of Justice in Respect of Unfelt Obtained Evidence" paper focuses on statute law that is an identified act by the legislature that gives declaration, and proscription on some things....   Case law is a set of legal principles that are enunciated and embodied by the judicial decisions which are provided by the application of specified areas of law to the facts of single cases....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us