StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Arson in Historical Common Law - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
This essay "Arson in Historical Common Law" focuses on Arson in historical common law assumed that the act of fire was something that occurred from natural causes and not manmade. This automatically rendered arson to be a crime since it was considered not to be a natural occurrence…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.4% of users find it useful
Arson in Historical Common Law
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Arson in Historical Common Law"

Arson at common law was a highly punishable offence and those found guilty were punished by being burnt to death. The cause of the crime was largely speculated that it resulted from fire (Carlan, Nored & Downey, 2011).

However, it was also pointed out that fires that were caused due to arson did not necessarily cause permanent destruction of a structure rather it involved the slightest impacts of structure caused by fire. Back then, the magnitude of fire to a structure was determined by the presence of charring making other impacts like blackening not to be considered as an act of arson. Things like detonations were not considered acts of arson as the act was considered the end result of the products which resulted from the fire itself. Moreover, arson in historical common law also included burning materials that were within a structure as they were considered as part of the structure itself. This excludes personal property as it was not included in the common law of arson since chances of an individual suffering a loss caused by others was limited. Individuals who lost their personal property through burning had no one to lay their blame on; thus stomached their losses individually.

For an act of arson to occur, it was required that the burning act should be accompanied by more than one action hence finding an individual to be liable for the punishment. It emphasized that the act in question was to involve a house or any place which was used by individuals to serve the same purpose as a dwelling place. A dwelling in arson common law was considered as a place known by the public to exist therefore a place that was viewed by individuals to have the potential of providing shelter to an individual. In addition, dwellings did not have to be places that currently contained individuals but even those that we're currently not being inhabited by individuals. Places that were considered to be illegal but were inhabited by individuals were considered under the arson common law in cases where the crime was perpetrated (Carlan, Nored & Downey, 2011).
Therefore the attending circumstances which determined the act of fire as arson were dwelling and second party individuals.

Arson for Current Louisiana State Statue
The current Louisiana state statute recognizes arson in different forms and they include aggravated arsons, simple arson, arson with an intention of committing a fraud, making false communication to parties with an intention of perpetrating arson, obstructing efforts of those putting out a fire, creating and owning explosive devices, starting a fire on other properties owned by other individuals and neglecting to put it out, starting intentional a fire on lands owned by individuals and all other related offences which directly relates to the acts mentioned above, support the acts or try to conceal the acts. The main purposes of the statute are to prevent, dissuade, investigate and bring to book those found liable for perpetuating the act (Mission Statement & Program Goals. (n.d.).2014).

Comparison to Historical Law
Arson for current Louisiana differs from the historical law because unlike the historical law, there is a classification of offences committed through the act of arson and their punishment is determined via the levels and classification of the offences in question. The statute separates offences committed under the dangerous situation which threatens the life of human beings unlike the historical arson which did not weigh the magnitude of the arson committed; it just mainly focused on burning down a structure that had the potential of inhabiting human beings. The current Louisiana arson statute distinguishes arson that causes the harm from those which do not cause harm. An example is that when an individual sets fire on a structure and individuals are harmed in the process like police or firefighters, the penalty for the offender will be much heftier than in a scenario where individuals are not harmed.

Secondly, the Louisiana arson statute differs from historical arson as unlike arson in historical common law which takes into consideration only dwellings that provided sheltered used for sleeping purposes, it involves all types of building structures, vehicles and even personal properties.

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Arson Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words - 1”, n.d.)
Arson Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words - 1. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1641659-arson
(Arson Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words - 1)
Arson Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words - 1. https://studentshare.org/law/1641659-arson.
“Arson Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words - 1”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1641659-arson.
  • Cited: 1 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Arson in Historical Common Law

The Death Penalty is not a Deterrent

English common law listed eight capital crimes, such as treason, petty treason, murder, larceny, robbery, burglary, rape, and arson.... Capital crimes include treason, murder, manslaughter, rape, and in some countries, they include arson, counterfeiting, and theft....
9 Pages (2250 words) Research Paper

What Is Intentional Tort All About

iscussion Intentional tort is one of the three classifications of Personal law or Tort law.... Personal law or Tort law is intended to protect a person or property from injuries or harms because of someone else's action of failure to act (http://public.... The most common examples of intentional torts are assault and battery (Larson, 2005).... Muniz filed a case against Everly alleging assault and battery, the two most common examples of intentional torts....
4 Pages (1000 words) Research Paper

Missouri Crimes Against Property

Under the historical common law or older definitions of robbery, it demands proof of theft, the key common law theft, the theft is by fear or force, and the theft is from immediate presence or person of the victim.... Taking from Presence or Person Another element of robbery, under historical common law, is that the action be in the immediate presence of the victim or from the individual.... The definitions of robbery crime used are mainly of two types: those that are modified to the standards of American Law Institute Model Penal Code and those directly originated from the former English common law (Friedman, 2005)....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

1927 U.S. Supreme Court case of Buck v. Bell

Abstract Buck v Bell, the notorious judgment of 1927 justified Virginia's sterilization law authorizing compulsory sterilization of those whose off-springs were genetically pre-disposed to inherit their mental retardation and such other mental disabilities.... Bell Abstract Buck v Bell, the notorious judgment of 1927 justified Virginia's sterilization law authorizing compulsory sterilization of those whose off-springs were genetically pre-disposed to inherit their mental retardation and such other mental disabilities....
4 Pages (1000 words) Research Paper

Psychology in Relation to Crime

Firstly, it is notable that it was common for Amanda to ride a bike along the mentioned path- from her home to the blue pond.... There are a number of events that happen in relation to crime which requires an adequate analysis in order to arrive at effective conclusive results regarding the investigation (Erickson, 2013)....
13 Pages (3250 words) Essay

Abuse of Separate Entity

nder the common law courts would allow the lifting of the corporate veil only in cases where the company is a 'mere facade concealing the true facts', or, in the parlance of earlier cases, a mere 'sham', Gower,LCB (1992)However the circumstances under which the courts will find such a 'faade' or 'sham' are considered to be very rare.... This situation may arise when the company continued to carry on the business for a period of six months after the number of its members was reduced below the minimum as prescribed by law with the knowledge of the shareholder ...
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Discrimination And Racial Prejudice In Cleveland

Prejudice is defined as the negative attitude expressed on the basis of their association with a particular social group or ethnicity.... The paper "Discrimination And Racial Prejudice In Cleveland" discusses the United States as a nation which has struggled with race relations since its founding....
16 Pages (4000 words) Term Paper

Manezh Hall Fire-Incident

(BBC News 2004: Online) There were around 60 fire trucks trying to control fire as the flames reached 30 meters above the structure causing danger to the historical Kremlin building.... Soon after, there were several versions on the cause of the fire, some citing it to be arson but it had to be ruled out as it was very difficult to prove this theory as no evidence was cited for the same....
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us