StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

One of the hallmarks of any good decision-making process is consistency: judicial precedent helps to ensure this - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
In the English law, judicial precedent doctrine is used effectively as an application with regard to stare decisis, which implies that the decision in the legal cases are to be made in accordance with identical decided cases…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.4% of users find it useful
One of the hallmarks of any good decision-making process is consistency: judicial precedent helps to ensure this
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "One of the hallmarks of any good decision-making process is consistency: judicial precedent helps to ensure this"

One of the Hallmarks of any Good Decision-Making Process is Consistency: Judicial Precedent Helps to ensure this.” Discuss Table of Contents Table of Contents 2 Introduction 3 Discussion 3 Conclusion 6 References 7 Introduction Conceptually, ‘judicial precedent’ is recognised as a procedure on the basis of which, judges follow the decisions that are made in prior cases with identical or similar facts. In the English law, judicial precedent doctrine is used effectively as an application with regard to stare decisis, which implies that the decision in the legal cases are to be made in accordance with identical decided cases. In this regard, in the current practice of the judicial system, it has often been identified that the inferior courts apply and make judgements based on the legal principles formulated as well as implemented by higher courts in previous instances. In this context, the courts practicing this principle are deemed to be able to ensure that legal decisions are made in a consistent along with predictable manner (Tufal, n.d.). Taking into account a similar notion, the essay emphasizes the importance of judicial precedent in developing a hallmark in the decision making process. Additionally, the different situations where the principle of precedent is not included in decision making have also been considered in this discussion. Discussion In the English law, judicial precedent doctrine plays an important role, with the assistance of which, effective future legal decisions are made on the basis of judgements delivered in the past identical or similar cases. The judges, while making decisions apply the law sources following their analysis. In this regard, the judges are recognised to make effective decisions on the basis of different legal principles. Contextually, the judges represented with similar decided cases of the past should follow the legal principle with the aim of making judgements consistently and in the fairest manner. Accordingly, based on the concept of ‘judicial precedent’, the decisions made by the judges are segregated into two dimensions, including ratio decidendi and obiter dictum. ‘Ratio decidendi’ implies the practice or law on the basis of which, the decision is made. Ratio decidendi depicts the facts that are outlined by the judges as a basis of evidence. In this context, the judges, on the basis of evidence, facts and identified laws, make their judgements. On the other hand, obiter dictum signifies that the judges are required to make adequate speculations to deliver appropriate judgements of cases having different facts along with legal issues (Kallis, n.d.). In the English legal system, the primary hallmark of law is to make effective decisions in a consistent manner with the application of relevant legal principles as well as precedent. In this regard, the doctrine of judicial precedent is identified as an important consideration of English law, especially in the field of equality, contract and tort law. Additionally, in the English law, the principle of judicial precedent is applied as a unique feature with the aim of maintaining consistency in their decisions and judgements. Moreover, the judges are recognised to apply the decisions of latter cases so that better flexibility as well as certainty is maintained in the decision making process. The judicial precedent in the English legal system is also deemed to possess appropriate quality of applicable law sources, being capable of associating future judges for appropriate positioning in the judicial system as well as hierarchy [Boys v Chaplin [1968] CA and Fitzsimons v Ford Motor Co [1946] CA] (Sixth Form Law, 2008). However, the decisions made on the basis of judicial precedent might not be applicable if judgements are overruled or distinguished. In this regard, the binding of the judicial precedent in the later cases shall rather facilitate the judges to maintain uniformity in the judgements made in different courts consisting House of Lords, Court of Appeal, High Court, Crown Court and County Courts along with Magistrate Courts. Subsequently, the doctrine of judicial precedents will also facilitate in ensuring that justice and judgements are made in a stable and consistent way adhering to the principle of continuity, which is commonly recognised as stare decisis (Mitchell & Dadhania, 2003; Vong, n.d.). Respectively, it can be comprehended that judicial precedent is an effective approach in the decision making procedure of the judicial system as it assists in making consistent and reliable judgements. Nevertheless, the doctrine of judicial precedent has been contradicted on different grounds in the present legal proceedings. It is accordingly identified that the principle of judicial precedent can increase complexity as the judges in their decision making procedure are required to go through a large number of decided cases, which comprises different law sources and additionally, the newly devised legal regulations. In this context, the judges might face complexity and time-consuming challenges in making appropriate decisions and identifying suitable law sources as well as legal principles to deliver fairest judgement. Additionally, judicial precedent is also recognised to raise rigidity as the judges may be prejudiced to make judgement on the basis of inappropriate decisions in the precedent cases. Moreover, judges might face the problem of illogical distinctions as the judges are required to undergo enormous number of cases with different precedents. In this respect, judges might make decisions in an unpredictable along with uncertain manner (Pearson Education Ltd, 2014; Watkin, 1989). Correspondingly, the Parliament of the UK is entrusted with the responsibility of formulating as well as implementing laws, also acting as an important law making body. The Parliament formulates statutes, which are the primary source of law for the English legal system. In this respect, a lack of retrospective effective with the practice of judicial precedent can be witnessed, as in the case of SW v United Kingdom (1995) (Pearson Education Ltd, 2014; Hudoc, 1995). Contextually, it can be ascertained that the judicial precedent doctrine may be criticized on certain grounds as it adversely affect the decision making process of the judges in the English legal system. Conclusion The above discussion apparently reveals that judicial precedent is an effective principle adopted in the English law with the objective of making legal decisions appropriately. Additionally, judicial precedent is also recognised as a doctrine assisting in making judicial decisions in a reliable as well as consistent manner. It is also determined as a hallmark in the English legal system of making successful decisions. It has been identified that there are certain limitations of judicial precedent, which includes increased complexities, rigidity, illogical distinction and lack of retrospective effects among others. These limitations are identified to adversely affect the decisions delivered by judges in the present scenario due to increased number of identical cases and rising complexities in relevant law application. Nevertheless, emphasising the competencies of the judges, judicial precedent can be argued as an important principle of making consistent decision in relation to common laws. References Hudoc, 1995. Case of S.W. v. the United Kingdom. Sites. [Online] Available at: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-57965#{"itemid":["001-57965"]} [Accessed January 28, 2014]. Kallis, R., No Date. Is the English Doctrine of Judicial Precedent Becoming only an Illusion? Files. [Online] Available at: http://www.law.muni.cz/sborniky/dp08/files/pdf/mezinaro/kalis.pdf [Accessed January 28, 2014]. Mitchell, A. R. & Dadhania, M., 2003. As Level Law. Psychology Press. Pearson Education Ltd, 2014. Sources of Law. Part 1. [Online] Available at: http://catalogue.pearsoned.co.uk/assets/hip/gb/hip_gb_pearsonhighered/samplechapter/1408267004.pdf [Accessed January 28, 2014]. Sixth Form Law, 2008. Cases - judicial precedent in the Court of Appeal. Cases. [Online] Available at: http://sixthformlaw.info/02_cases/mod2/cases_precedent_coa.htm [Accessed January 28, 2014]. Tufal, A., No Date. Judicial Precedent. Introduction. [Online] Available at: http://www.lawteacher.net/PDF/Judicial%20Precedent.pdf [Accessed January 28, 2014]. Vong, D., No Date. Binding Precedent and English Judicial Law-Making. Art. [Online] Available at: https://www.law.kuleuven.be/jura/art/21n3/vong.pdf [Accessed January 28, 2014]. Watkin, T. G., 1989. Legal Record & Historical Reality: Proceedings of the Eighth British Legal History Conference. Continuum. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“One of the hallmarks of any good decision-making process is Essay - 2”, n.d.)
One of the hallmarks of any good decision-making process is Essay - 2. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1626705-one-of-the-hallmarks-of-any-good-decision-making-process-is-consistency-judicial-precedent-helps-to-ensure-this
(One of the Hallmarks of Any Good Decision-Making Process Is Essay - 2)
One of the Hallmarks of Any Good Decision-Making Process Is Essay - 2. https://studentshare.org/law/1626705-one-of-the-hallmarks-of-any-good-decision-making-process-is-consistency-judicial-precedent-helps-to-ensure-this.
“One of the Hallmarks of Any Good Decision-Making Process Is Essay - 2”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1626705-one-of-the-hallmarks-of-any-good-decision-making-process-is-consistency-judicial-precedent-helps-to-ensure-this.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF One of the hallmarks of any good decision-making process is consistency: judicial precedent helps to ensure this

The Judicial Precedent Doctrine

judicial precedent Name: Course: Lecturer: Institution: Date: Consistency is key to making good decisions.... The judicial precedent is such that all courts rely on the judgments of the superior courts and all courts are bound by previous decisions of their own court.... In some instances, the judicial precedent did not apply in court decisions especially with changes in economic and social status.... (Duxbury 2008) defines a precedent as a past decision which serves as a guide for present action....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

System of Precedence in Judiciary Law

In cases where only one meaning can be applied to a precedent to ensure that its meaning is not absurd, the golden rule is applied in a manner that widens the meaning.... nbsp;A precedent as utilized in the legal lexicon is a case that creates a set of legal guidelines based on a specific set of facts.... When the facts are unique and have not previously been examined in a court of law, a precedent is set.... nbsp;The term Stare decisis translates to 'Let the decision stand' and it is the judicial rule that dictates that as long as a precedent is binding, it must be followed....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Types of Judicial Precedent

The essay “judicial precedent” describes a decision by the court that is used to make decisions in the future, in any case, a judge will set out facts of the case then state the law applicable and finally make the decision regarding the case.... judicial precedent is important in that it helps in the development of new law.... Despite the importance of judicial precedent higher courts can have an effect on it and this occurs when the following occurs: This happens when a court rejects decisions of an earlier case on the bases that there were not sufficient facts to support the decision, in this case, therefore, judicial precedent is affected....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Operations of Judicial Precedent in the House of Lords and in the Court of Appeals

The law judicial precedent otherwise referred to in legal parlance as “stare decisis” or to stand upon decisions has been used in the English Court for many years (see Rondel v.... The governing principle of this law is that cases with more or less… Technically, the law on judicial precedent is a double edge sword.... On one hand, courts would be better of without it since it will be free to decide the case at hand based its merits and not on the merits of previously decided cases and on the other hand, the law of judicial precedent is important as part of the courts internal control mechanism....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

: Judicial Decision Making Analysis

(US Supreme Court VIII) The Court ruled that while medical risks of judicial Decision Making Analysis In The Case Of Roe v.... These opposing views have significant ramifications for American public opinion, judicial decision making and politics.... District Attorney The decision arose from a constitutional challenge to the Texas legislation banning all abortions except where the mothers' life is clearly threatened....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Influences on Judicial Decision Making

Partisanship-In some cases especially the ones involving a given political affiliation, many judges have been found to make decisions that are favoring one of the sides that they favor.... judicial precedent-in some cases the decision made in one case acts as a link or Influences on Judicial Decision Making al Affiliation The decision making process by various judges is influenced by various factors as we shall establish in this activity.... judicial precedent-in some cases the decision made in one case acts as a link or binder to later cases that are to be made using the same reasoning and law....
1 Pages (250 words) Assignment

Main Features and the Role of E-business and E-commerce

e-mail),2 details of any trade registrations, authorisation or regulatory schemes, details of regulated profession (if applicable); and VAT identification number(if applicable) "in the form and manner which is easily, directly and permanently accessible to recipient.... hellip; In the last five years, the government has argued that introduction of some levels of guidelines founded on EU legislation into UK law has increased customer confidence in e-businesses and increased these businesses' standards of good practice (Meads 2002, 179-182)....
8 Pages (2000 words) Coursework

The Doctrine of Judicial Precedent

This work called "The Doctrine of judicial precedent" describes general rule where all courts are required to follow the same rationale in delivering decisions.... The author outlines three elements that are interwoven in the provision of the doctrine of the precedent thus allowing for delivery of justice.... he hierarchy of the court system in the English context offers a better comprehension of precedent doctrine.... The hierarchical structure bears five divisions under which the precedent is applied....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us