StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Critical Evaluation of the Jurisdiction of the ECJ and National Courts - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Critical Evaluation of the Jurisdiction of the ECJ and National Courts" discusses that generally speaking, ECJ has made remarkable judgments on a wider base but has also compelled the European States to follow the jurisdiction given by it…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.4% of users find it useful
Critical Evaluation of the Jurisdiction of the ECJ and National Courts
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Critical Evaluation of the Jurisdiction of the ECJ and National Courts"

Critically Evaluate the Above ment, Referring To the Case Law of the Court Of Justice of the European Union, That of the National Courts In the UK, And Two Other Member States Table of Contents Table of Contents 2 Introduction 3 Critical Evaluation of the Jurisdiction of the ECJ and National Courts 4 Conclusion 7 References 8 Introduction The European constitution and the national court of justice endure different forms of jurisdiction for a particular case. In accordance with the preliminary ruling system, it states the fundamental mechanism related to the European Union law. In this regard, this preliminary ruling system essentially aims at allowing the national courts to ensure the uniform application along with interpretation of the similar law within the member States. The initial ruling measures were based upon the cooperation of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) and the national courts with a view to ensure effective cooperation and proper flow of relevant information1. The central issue circles around the interpersonal relationship between the European Court of Justice and the national courts related to supremacy claim over the national law that is embedded in the ECJ’s jurisdiction. At the base level, clashes between the community laws along with the national law are readily apparent. It has also been observed that according to the ECJ, it has decided that the law associated with the European Community (EC) must be supreme related to any kind of conflict that might arise in the decisions of the community and the national courts. On the basis of the new regulations, it has been observed that the principle of ECJ’s supremacy over the rulings of the national courts has been well recognised in the case of Costa v. ENEL among others2. This study intends to discuss the relevant gaps between the decisions of the European Court of Justice and the national courts. The presented views include the internal authority of the EU law that essentially places the national constitutions and the EU legal order on a collision course. Critical Evaluation of the Jurisdiction of the ECJ and National Courts ECJ had been established in the year 1952 with a view to mitigate the three roles that are associated with the member states that frame the part of the European Community (EC). One of the three major roles includes laying a constant check upon the EC’s legislative and the executive bodies. Another key role depicts clarifying along with interpreting the indefinite EC’s law. The last vital role entails the implementation of non-compliance of the EC jurisdiction by the member States3. The development of the jurisdiction under the ‘European Legal System’ has enabled to enlighten certain flaws associated with the system. It has been observed that the member States have apparently supported the ‘European Legal System’. Member States have readily passed on the authority to the ECJ for carrying out the judicial function, which the State cannot pass. Nonetheless, the main gap remains in the rulings of the ECJ that contradict the interest of the member States. In fact, in numerous rulings of the ECJ, it has been observed that it usually challenges the national interest. This can be made further evident by depicting examples of certain cases4. According to the Cassis de Dijon case (Case 120/78)5, the primary rulings of German regulation state the blocking of French liqueur sales as it failed to mitigate the general regulations of Germany associated with the alcoholic beverages. However, according to the judgement of the ECJ, it stated that the German government’s restrictions on the French liqueur sales are rather contributing towards an illegal trade barrier. According to the judgement of the ECJ, under ‘mutual recognition’, it is considered that when a product is produced lawfully and is sold within one of the member States, it is likely to be accepted by other member States as well. Herein, the judgement of the ECJ readily contradicts the national interest. Another example i.e. the Kramer case (Case 3/76)6 mainly concerns the establishment of structural policy within the Netherlands’ fishing industry. In this case, it has been observed that the jurisdiction of the European Community (EC) related to a precise section of competence has taken the power of the national authorities to decide autonomously. Correspondingly, R (Factortame Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport case7 reveals a host of cases litigated in between the United Kingdom and the EU courts. There were a number of breakthrough decisions corresponding to the case within the EU law as well as the UK constitutional law. The acceptance of the Community law’s supremacy has raised certain problems. The basic lawful principle of sovereignty of Parliament has created obstacle towards accepting supremacy of the EC by the UK. With regard to the case, it is determined that ECJ stressed on providing interim relief as an obligation which superseded conflicting national principles. The domestic court had been necessitated to keep back national law. The other example of the contradiction within the jurisdictions of ECJ and the member States is Costa v ENEL (1964)8. The case basically highlights the conflict between the provisions of the Treaty and ENEL, a power based company. Costa being the shareholder of the company refused the payment of the electricity bill. He further claimed that the jurisdiction of the Italian government is contradicting the law stated by the ECJ. In this regard, the Italian government argued about the law, which was framed during the Italian Ratification Act. However, by applying the supremacy power of the ECJ, it stated that “The transfer by the States from their domestic legal system to the Community legal system of the rights and obligations arising under the Treaty carries with it a permanent limitation of their sovereign rights, against which a subsequent unilateral act incompatible with the concept of the Community cannot prevail”3. This apparently explains the legislation that allows the supremacy to the ECJ related to jurisdiction, with a view to avoid any kind of conflicts but the limitation to the sovereignty of the state courts within the legislation has given rise to contradiction pertaining to national interest. The above mentioned instances that reflect about the ECJ’s ruling against the authority of the member States show the supranational authority. Conclusion Conclusively, it can be mentioned that the study reveals that ECJ has made remarkable judgements on a wider base but has also compelled the European States to follow the jurisdiction given by it. The given examples of real cases depict the rulings of the ECJ which clearly contradict the interest of the member States. The above discussion reflects that the national courts have given power to the ECJ for deciding upon the disputes, with a view to avoid any kind of conflict. In this regard, the cases reveal the gap between the given supremacy power and contradiction to the national interest. This shows that the given legislation at the bottom line is not being able to mitigate the conflicts between the ECJ and the national and state courts effectively. References Case 3/76 Cornelis Kramer and others [1976] ECR 1279 Case 6/64 Flaminio Costa v. ENEL [1964] ECR 1, 2 Case 120/78 Cassis de Dijon [1979] ECR, 649 EUR-Lex.europa.eu, ‘Court Of Justice’ (2009) 297 eur-lex http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2009:297:0001:0006:EN:PDF> accessed 09 January 2014 Giuliano Amato and Jacques Ziller, The European Constitution: Cases and Materials in Eu and Member States Law (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2009) 92-96. Paul Craig, ‘The ECJ, National Courts and the Supremacy of Community Law’ [n.d.] 35-51. R v. Secretary of State, ex parte Factortame (No 1) (1989)2 WLR 999 Stephanie Bier, ‘The European Court of Justice and Member State Relations: A Constructivist Analysis of the European Legal Order’ [2008] PL 1-4. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Critically evaluate the above statement, referring to the case law of Essay”, n.d.)
Critically evaluate the above statement, referring to the case law of Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1625287-critically-evaluate-the-above-statement-referring-to-the-case-law-of-the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-that-of-the-national-courts-in-the-uk-and-two-other-member-states
(Critically Evaluate the above Statement, Referring to the Case Law of Essay)
Critically Evaluate the above Statement, Referring to the Case Law of Essay. https://studentshare.org/law/1625287-critically-evaluate-the-above-statement-referring-to-the-case-law-of-the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-that-of-the-national-courts-in-the-uk-and-two-other-member-states.
“Critically Evaluate the above Statement, Referring to the Case Law of Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1625287-critically-evaluate-the-above-statement-referring-to-the-case-law-of-the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-that-of-the-national-courts-in-the-uk-and-two-other-member-states.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Critical Evaluation of the Jurisdiction of the ECJ and National Courts

Judicial politics of the EU Court of Justice

The second section will evaluate the interpretation of the ecj's general provisions on the EC treaty towards free movement of goods.... From the judgment in the case, it was recognized by the ecj that the prevailing legal remedies were not completely liable to provide guarantee in all the circumstances that a measure would be reviewed... Various obstacles impede on the free movement of goods inclusive of explanation of the European Court of Justice (ecj) towards general provisions concerned on the goods' free movement under the EC treaty....
18 Pages (4500 words) Coursework

Hybrid Domestic-International Tribunals

An evaluation of what this relationship should be will also be discussed.... It shall also discuss any conflicts between these courts, and the challenges and issues which are seen with the emergence of these multiple courts.... Body Hybrid domestic-international tribunals International courts also operate within the context of hybrid domestic-international tribunals which provide another approach to transitional justice, where societies consider accountability for mass atrocities1....
20 Pages (5000 words) Essay

Should the Restrictions on Party Autonomy Be Allowed

Should the principle of party autonomy be restricted, by giving effect to their choice of jurisdiction only if the parties have chosen an applicable law which that court considers itself to be competent to apply?... jurisdiction – description and effects 1.... jurisdiction 4 a.... Subject matter jurisdiction 4 b.... In personam jurisdiction 4 B.... Choice of jurisdiction clause v choice of law clause 6 C....
21 Pages (5250 words) Coursework

Handbook on International Insurance Law and Regulation

Regulation of the Belgian insurance sector is also under Europe's highest court, the ecj, which issues directives to member countries.... In Belgium, there are no special courts for insurance disputes.... The European Court of Justice (ecj) was deemed as the appropriate authority in this ruling.... Insurance disputes are brought before any court although the domicile of the policyholder has jurisdiction....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

JUDICIAL ACTIVISM BY EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE

The main aim of this research essay will be analysing in detail the activist strategy of the ecj which appears to have initiated some courageous and bold efforts to establish a constitutional cornerstone for the EU2.... Thus, the direct effect offers an individual citizen right to sue national government in their own national courts for not willing to implement the treaty6.... In the above case, ECJ created the doctrine of direct effect thereby restricting national courts from proclaiming the illogicalness of Community law....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Impact of the European Union and EU Law on the UK Law and Business

Whilst the sheer complexity of multifarious issues raised by the impact of EC law and EU institutional policymaking on the UK is outside the remit of this paper, in evaluating the issue this paper will focus on the policy initiatives of the EU, the impact of legislation, and undertake a contextual evaluation of the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 ('HRA').... It discusses the tension between European Community law and national law.... It outlines the legal framework of the EU and its enforcement practice and makes references to both European and national laws....
18 Pages (4500 words) Article

European Court of Justices judgment

Basically, the ecj's task here was to consider whether Article 5(2) on the Gender Directive was compatible with Article 6(2) of the Treaty with a keen interest in the principle of equality and non-discrimination guaranteed by that provision.... Regulation of the Belgian insurance sector is also under Europe's highest court, the ecj, which issues directives to member countries.... nsurance disputes are brought before any court although the domicile of the policyholder has jurisdiction....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

The Subject of Anti-Suit Injunctions in English Courts

Although there are no precedents in international arbitration, However, the general perception is that anti-suit injunctions are an interference with disputes that are currently in foreign courts.... Arbitration tribunals lack the coercive power that the courts have.... he subject of anti-suit injunctions in English courts is a controversial one with regard to the relationship between the English courts and foreign jurisdictions5....
24 Pages (6000 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us