StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Dealing with Burglary Offences - Research Proposal Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Dealing with Burglary Offences" highlights that prior permission from relevant authorities needs to be taken and all data would be treated with utmost privacy and confidentiality and in conformity with the Code of Ethics governing such studies. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.5% of users find it useful
Dealing with Burglary Offences
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Dealing with Burglary Offences"

Research Proposal An investigation of public beliefs and attitudes towards sentencing practices of courts when dealing with burglary offences. Introduction: Explanation of the topic: It is necessary at the outset to understand the meaning of the term 'burglary' in its current context. The action of breaking into the edifice, or premises of another person is generally called burglary. The motive for the action is to commit felony - steal, rape, or murder. Thus the very act of trespassing into the house of another person with the intent to commit a crime is called burglary, whether any offense is committed or not. Over the years, it has been noticed that the concept of burglary in terms of public attitudes has undergone significant changes. While in the past, the retributive or punitive aspect has been a foremost element of burglary sentences, in recent times, this has been slowly evolving into a kind of restorative justice, or sentencing, aimed primarily at reparation of economic status of the victims, or seeking to put them in a position, had the felony not taken place. This is apparently aimed at providing material succor to the victims for the property lost or destroyed, due to the felonious act. Current studies show that, imparting from the charge of leniency in burglary pronouncements, the restorative and reparation part of sentencing practices of courts are gaining more currency, especially with regard to public attitudes and outlooks towards burglary crimes in United States of America. It is also being increasingly seen that punishment for felony needs to commensurate with levels of actual felony the culprit has indulged in. In public eye, the punishment need not be too severe. Main objectives of the study: to evaluate how public thinking and beliefs on the subject of sentencing by courts and juries in burglary cases in US has changed over time. Clarification of the topic: This proposal seeks to examine public opinion and beliefs towards sentencing practices by Judges and juries and how these have impacted felony cases. It needs to be appreciated that there are many influences that impact upon opinions. Impressions drawn from media coverage and how the general public view felony crimes and its final sentencing results also determines the formulation of opinions. The changing trends in legal pronouncement are also important since they would, to a large extent, set precedents for future trials and sentencing of defendants in burglary cases. Summary and evaluation of seven designs and methods used in previous research with similar objectives Summary: 1. Questionnaires presented to Senate Court Judges on cases of felony. 2. Interviews conducted with executive functionaries of correctional schools 3. Public surveys with selected respondents and responsible private citizens. 4. Interviews with prison wardens and jailers of juvenile homes 5. Conducting studies in prison settings housing criminals with recidivist occurrences of burglary, larceny and similar crimes 6. Information gathered from State police troopers and law enforcement departments. 7. Internet information gathered from US Department of Justice (DoJ) websites 1. Coming to the involvement of senate court judges, it transpires that the members of these juries are responsible for hearing trials and passing verdicts on crimes relating to burglary offences. Their wide ranging knowledge and experience would be important aspects for a study of this kind. 2. It is seen that in cases of burglary crimes committed by juveniles and young people, the courts would sentence them to detention or incarceration, in correctional or reformatory schools, depending upon the severity of the offence. Although forming a minority for the purpose of this survey, this would be useful for the purpose of this survey. 3. Since the public opinion or benefits are a significant part of this research study, it is but natural that this aspect needs to be considered. Therefore, a survey in the line of public research through online questionnaire, or video conferencing could also be used to determine the validity of the hypothesis. 4. Meetings and deliberations with people in charge of juvenile homes and rehabilitation centers could provide data and information on public opinion for this research study 5. Interviews with prison wardens housing criminals detained for burglary and other law enforcement officials felony or larceny crimes could throw sufficient light upon the present state of public opinion in the matter of this study. 6. The law enforcement departments and their personnel would be able to provide up-to-date and relevant data regarding burglary and how its sentencing could affect public opinion. 7. It is believed that a plethora of information could be gathered from appropriate Department of Justice (DoJ) websites and how public reactions regarding sentencing of burglary cases are viewed. Thus, it could be seen that the proposal needs to gather research design to assimilate data and research materials from different sources and contacts in order to bring out a meaningful research paper. Description of range of possible research designs Obviously, a research study of this kind requires observational studies, or behavioral or attitudinal studies into various aspects of the qualitative/quantitative impacts of sentencing in burglary cases in the United States on public opinion and benefits. This could also be seen in terms of a prospective or retrospective cohort study, based upon the settings of the study and the main objectives to be derived. It needs to be said at this stage that public opinion does, to a certain extent, impact sentencing and vice versa. The research design needs to consider the four important aspects of modern day sentencing, in terms of a robust deterrence for transgression of American Criminal Codes, need for equitable retribution to proven felons, the consistency and fairness in legal pronouncement in burglary cases, and finally, provide justification for deviation in consistent lines of judicial pronouncement, considering situation of the case. (Chapter 1: Public Opinion and Sentencing). The range of research design would need to be considered from point of view of severity, retributive aspects, recidivism and need for strong punishment for chronic offenders. The research design also needs to take in to account the fact that public opinion underpins sentencing in that the sentencing for the punishment needs to commensurate with the offence, and should not be too lenient, or too strict, to be really effective. Next, it is seen that retribution sentencing to serve as a preventive measure needs to be in line with public opinion. "For deterrence to be effective, public views of sentencing have to be related to actual punishments. Punishments regarded as too lenient arguably cannot serve as deterrents. To the extent that the public's views of just punishments are influenced by ideas of deterrence they become relevant." (Chapter 1: Public Opinion and sentencing, 2). This research design also needs to consider that public opinion, to a certain extent, does shape judicial sentences, although the latter may not be determined by the former. Justification and detailed description of preferred design and related data collection methods: The preferred design would be in terms of Cohort Study in correctional and rehabilitation centers for offenders sentenced in burglary cases by courts. Here the intended respondent is between 10-14 years, with, or without previous record of burglary or related offenses. A total of 75 respondents, drawn at random from a group of 500 inmates would be used for the purpose of research and their responses would be recorded live. There appears to exist a trend that current pronouncements veer towards constructive, correctional and restorative aspects of crimes, especially burglary, rather than enforce harsh and punitive treatment, that could exacerbate the situation and encourage more such crimes over time. Thus, this research design has been preferred over the others, in keeping with changing times and also to address the needs for creating responsibility and reform measures among young criminal minds. Prior permission from relevant authorities needs to be taken and all data would be treated with utmost privacy and confidentiality and in conformity with the Code of Ethics governing such studies. The names of the respondents would be changed for privacy reasons and to protect their future. All matters relating to this study would be used only by authorised persons. At the end of the study, the records would be kept in safe custody, with responsible persons in order to avoid undue publicity and negative reactions, from public or private quarters. The collection method would envisage personal interviews and group discussions, along with questionnaires to be responded by wardens of Correctional Centers. Before the actual survey takes place they would be briefed about the modus operandi of the study. Flow charts with associated dates for implementing the proposed research Background Research work (01.07.2009 to 05.07.2009) / Field survey work (06.07.2009 to 10.07.2009) / Initial preliminary research (11.07.2009 to 12.07.2009) / Interviews and data collection work (13.07.2009 to 14.07.2009) / Interviews and data collection work (15.07.2009 to 17.07.2009) / Data analysis and interpretations (18.07.2009 to 20.07.2009) / Interviews and data collection work (21.07.2009 to 24.07.2009) / Drafting and finalization of final Work and approval of client. (25.07.2009 to 28.07.2009) Detailed table summarizing the resources that would be required for implementing research design Serial Resources Achieved/not achieved (A/NA) evaluation report Conduct of the survey Clarity of objectives Design and incubation facilitates meeting of objectives Well- coordinated and structured conduct of survey plans and processes Presence of plans, project diary and preliminary reports Work carried out according to plans and established ideas end result evaluation Survey invokes utility value Succinct final report Results concur methodology Objectives met and in compatibility with contemporary research studies Dissemination of research results Matches premise of research Acceptable to all parties Could be the basis of future research Meets all research criteria Works Cited Chapter 1: Public Opinion and sentencing. 03 Jul. 2009. . Chapter 1: Public Opinion and Sentencing: Why Study the American Public's Views on Sentencing. 03 Jul. 2009. . Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Offenses of burglary Research Proposal Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words”, n.d.)
Offenses of burglary Research Proposal Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1514569-offenses-of-burglary
(Offenses of Burglary Research Proposal Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words)
Offenses of Burglary Research Proposal Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words. https://studentshare.org/law/1514569-offenses-of-burglary.
“Offenses of Burglary Research Proposal Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1514569-offenses-of-burglary.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Dealing with Burglary Offences

The Right to an Occupational License

Citizen B, basically, committed several offences; namely, sexual harassment per se; intimidation; and firing an employee who would not acquiesce to her demands.... The paper describes the right to vote.... Citizen A should be allowed to vote while in prison if the general requirements to vote are met; namely, that the person is 18 years of age, is a US citizen, and meets the residency requirements of his or her state....
5 Pages (1250 words) Research Paper

The Classical Principles of Sentencing

The Adult Court Bench Book2 on pages 3-44 to 3-106 sets out checklists for passing sentences on various offences.... The paper "The Classical Principles of Sentencing" discusses that the proposition before us is to examine how relevant the classical principles of sentencing cited in R V Sargeant 1974 are today....
13 Pages (3250 words) Book Report/Review

THE CAUSES OF CRIME ARE REALLY IRRELEVANT AS FAR AS SITUATIONAL REMEDIES ARE CONCERNED - DISCUSS

Further it moves onto the root causes of crime and then defines exhaustively the concept of situational prevention of crime.... After this it makes an attempt.... ... ... Glanville Williams defines Crime as “a legal wrong that can be followed by criminal proceedings which may result in punishment....
14 Pages (3500 words) Essay

Criminology: Uniform Crime Reports and the National Incident-Based Reporting System

The crimes in the Group ‘A' category are 46 offences classified into 22 crime classes.... Certain details about the offences are collected and documented in the NIBRS system.... When reporting crime data to the FBI in United States, most of the law enforcement departments use the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) and the National Incident-Based Reporting System....
15 Pages (3750 words) Essay

The Decision Making Process of Property Crime Offenders

If there is an intention to commit a crime, this is burglary.... The paper 'The Decision Making Process of Property Crime Offenders' seeks to evaluate a cognitive process which eventually produces a final choice.... It is a five-step process, whose first step is the identification of the decision....
4 Pages (1000 words) Research Proposal

Situational Crime Prevention Techniques

The paper 'Situational Crime Prevention Techniques' insists that it is better to prevent a crime by creating preventive conditions that make it technically impossible to commit (by installing surveillance cameras, security systems, etc.... without relying on the potential offender's consciousness....
18 Pages (4500 words) Research Paper

Moral Reasoning in Burglary

The paper "Moral Reasoning in burglary" highlights that individuals who involve themselves in such acts have not yet developed strong consciences, simply due to their inherently very poor conditionality that is linked to Eysenck's three major dimensions.... The strength of relationship significantly varies in accordance to other factors, such as young offenders who committed the offenses without any financial gain like assault, sex offenses and murder implied to have the maturity of moral judgment compared to the other young offenders who involved in the acquisition crimes such as robbery, fraud, and burglary and theft cases (Kohlberg, 1978)....
9 Pages (2250 words) Assignment

Impact of Mandatory Sentencing Laws

This paper ''Impact of Mandatory Sentencing Laws '' tells that In the year 1996, the Western Australia government introduced mandatory sentencing laws for offenses of home burglary related cases.... Precisely, the laws were meant to ensure that criminals in burglary cases were incapacitated for a longer time.... According to the laws, the punishment for people guilty of burglary crimes for the third time would a minimum of twelve months in custody (Yeats 1997, 370)....
8 Pages (2000 words) Report
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us