StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

National treatment standard in international investment law and international trade law - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
Name: Instructor: Course: Date: National Treatment Standard in International Investment Law and International Trade Law While the national treatment concept in international trade laws and international investment laws have a common origin, i.e., the treatment of aliens, they have always been focused on different purposes…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.7% of users find it useful
National treatment standard in international investment law and international trade law
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "National treatment standard in international investment law and international trade law"

National Treatment Standard in International Investment Law and International Trade Law While the national treatmentconcept in international trade laws and international investment laws have a common origin, i.e., the treatment of aliens, they have always been focused on different purposes. In the case of international investment laws, the focus has mainly been on the promotion and protection of foreign investment. On the other hand, international trade laws have dealt with the liberalization of the flow of trade (DiMascio & Pauwelyn 64).

In international trade laws, the concept of national treatment attempts to deal with exchanges between different countries with regards to market access, liberalization, efficiency, overall welfare, and opportunities of trade. International trade laws do not deal with individual rights of the states. However, international investment laws’ political economy is strikingly different. BIT’s, initially, were meant to deal with the protection of foreign investors and investments that were already present in their host countries.

International investment laws seek to come up with favorable conditions aimed at investments through imposing international standards that respect non-discrimination, fair and equitable treatment, and expropriation. Investment protection, then promotes private financial and industrial enterprise, encourage investment, and increase both countries’ prosperity (DiMascio & Pauwelyn 65). The concept of national treatment in international trade laws ensures that, the interests of the two parties are aligned reciprocally since both look to find market access in each other’s country.

In international investment laws, on the other hand, the interests of the home country, or the capital exporting party, diverges from the interests of the host or capital importing countries (DiMascio & Pauwelyn 65). In essence, the country that is exporting capital will seek protection for its investors and its investments, whereas the capital importing party will offer this protection if only to promote and attract investment, as well as to accelerate its economic development. The capital importing country will exchange more investment for more protection of the investment.

Finally, international investment laws are based on fairness, protection, and individual rights, while international trade laws are based on efficiency, liberalization, and state-to-state market opportunity exchanges (DiMascio & Pauwelyn 66). Jurisprudence in international trade and investment laws acts to hinder the fulfillment of national treatment’s purpose in the individual fields. In making a determination on how investments from domestic and foreign sources are to be compared and contrasted, tribunals that are meant to deal with the investments have, to a degree, departed from precedents set by the national treatment principle in international trade law (DiMascio & Pauwelyn 71).

International investment laws and treaties require comparison made between treatments given to investors in like situations. However, tribunals aimed at resolving investment issues have decided that, unlike international trade law jurisprudence on products that are the same, a relationship based on competition is not as vital when it comes to domestic and foreign investment in similar circumstances (DiMascio & Pauwelyn 71). International investment tribunals have also rejected the use of likeness tests as used in international trade laws, emphasizing that the use of “in like circumstances” and the protection of investors from loss was indicative of the drafters’ intent to create different regimes for both fields (DiMascio & Pauwelyn 72).

Provisions for national treatment have acted as a pivotal component in trade agreements among nations for a long time. However, the importance of the national treatment principle in international investment law, to a certain degree, is recent, showing that a convergence exists between the two fields (DiMascio & Pauwelyn 72). As the provisions of national treatment are now resolved using the BITs, as well as other agreements on international investment, arbitration panels in international investment laws have been forced to deal with tensions that arise, from respect for the sovereign right of nations, to regulate internally and the prevention of foreign investment and investor discrimination.

Some experts have referred to jurisprudence in international trade laws and agreements, whereas some others have been slow and reluctant to take lessons from national treatment tests in international trade law. They, instead, have sought to create distinct national treatment body of jurisprudence, which has often seen them adopt legal stances that seem to be at odds with precedents in international trade law (DiMascio & Pauwelyn 72). For this reason, it seems as if jurisprudence in international law has hindered the fulfillment of national treatment’s purpose in international trade law.

To a certain degree, it is possible that divergent interpretations of international investment and trade law with regards to the principle of national treatment could be due to their very different institutional beginnings and settings (DiMascio & Pauwelyn 14). Arbitrators in investment law may possess very different motivations and professional backgrounds as compared to panelists who draft international trade laws and agreements. For instance, those arbitrators who deal with international investment disputes are often from a private commercial background.

On the other hand, international trade law and agreement adjudicators are usually from the public office domain. In addition, international trade law actors also act as a trade community that is institutionalized and well established, including experts and trade diplomats. These may sometimes find it hard to integrate new ideas into investment law. In contrast, arbitrations by state-investors is a newcomer that is now attracting increased attention with cases beginning to pick up in number in the early to mid 90s.

Therefore, the actors could feel that they have to legitimize and establish themselves (DiMascio & Pauwelyn 14). This, in turn, is behavior that could involve dissidence such as rejection of established international trade and investment law precedents. Their importance aside, focusing on the possible impact of political economies, underlying objectives, and historical impacts show that jurisprudence in each of the fields has hindered national treatment fulfillment in each other’s fields. Works Cited DiMascio, Nicholas.

& Pauwelyn, Joost. "Non-discrimination in Trade and Investment Treaties: Worlds Apart or Two Sides of the Same Coin." The American Journal of International Law (2008): 48-89. Print.

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“National treatment standard in international investment law and Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1482287-national-treatment-standard-in-international
(National Treatment Standard in International Investment Law and Essay)
https://studentshare.org/law/1482287-national-treatment-standard-in-international.
“National Treatment Standard in International Investment Law and Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1482287-national-treatment-standard-in-international.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF National treatment standard in international investment law and international trade law

The Most-Favoured Nation Treatment Principle

However, the expansion of MFN status in international trade began to develop during the 18th century3.... Before the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), the MFN treatment could be found only among Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) which indeed aided in liberalizing international trade.... Advantages to international trade The most important benefit of the MFN principle is that it allows nations to import goods from the most cost-effective and efficient producer without disrupting the notion of comparative advantage5....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

The Implications Of Bilateral Investment Treaties On Sustainable Economic Development

Accordingly, the observation made in this article is that, BITs have become pivotal to both national treatment (NT) and Most-Favored Nation (MFN) treatment whereby foreign investors are treated on equal measure and basis just like investors from the host country.... The observation made in this article is that, BITs have become pivotal to both national treatment and Most-Favored Nation treatment whereby foreign investors are treated on equal measure and basis just like investors from the host country....
7 Pages (1750 words) Literature review

The Classical Theory on Foreign Investment

Table of Contents Table of Contents 2 Introduction 4 Theories 5 The Classical Theory on Foreign Investment 5 Dependency Theory 5 Middle-Path Theory 7 The Arguments of Capital Importing and Capital Exporting Countries 7 The Conflicts in Regards to Foreign Investment Protection 9 Standards of Treatment and Government Regulations 9 Compensation Upon Expropriation 13 Dispute Settlement 16 World Trade Organisation (WTO) 16 Bilateral Treaties 18 For… eign Investment Treaties 20 Role of OECD 21 NAFTA 22 ASEAN 22 Conclusion 24 References 25 Books 25 Journals 26 Introduction There have been certain fields in relation to the international law which have been stimulating quite some disagreements similar to the law regarding the foreign investment....
18 Pages (4500 words) Essay

International Investment Law

international investment law Introduction International investments by corporations have become rampant.... This paper shall present the relevant facts of the dispute; the findings of the tribunal in relation to each of the relevant claims; and the analysis of the arbitral award and the reasoning of the tribunal in light of the applicable international investment law.... Prior to the privatization, the electricity assets of the respondent were operated by three companies which were later restructured for privatization based on Decree 634/91 and law 26,065....
16 Pages (4000 words) Essay

Fair and Equitable Treatment

Debates over the FET revolve around whether this standard should be based on other standards of law or whether it is an autonomous and self-contained standard in itself.... The standard it is most commonly related to is the customary international law minimum standard, and sometimes it is measured against more general principles of international law.... 8 There are a host of cases that link FET with customary international law in a variety of ways, as shall be seen in the discussion of the use of FET in BITs in the...
16 Pages (4000 words) Essay

The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Investment Law

The aspect of modelling FET concept in the limelight of international investment proceeded in two significant ways, firstly, in the 1940-1960s due to unsuccessful State engagement in multilateral treaty making.... Fundamentally, FET strives to strike a balance between protection of the international investment and the capability of the states to regulate the key public policies.... Its negotiating materials provided an insight into the way the “just and equitable” in association with the relation to the law on investments received an understanding in the 1940s....
12 Pages (3000 words) Assignment

International Monetary and Development Law

international investment law is one such important bit of legislation which regulates one of the most important economic functions.... This research paper describes the International Monetary law.... hellip; Therefore we can say that law is not enacted to merely guide the citizen's acts and omission to act, but also to make norms ensuring basic social needs, equal political rights and fair intercourse of economic activities among the people....
13 Pages (3250 words) Research Paper

Concept of Fair and Equitable Treatment in Investment Treaties

The present research has identified that the principle of fair and equitable treatment occupies an important place under BITs and international foreign investment generally.... A review of current and recent practices it has become clear that arbitrators and adjudicators, in general, are typically forced to choose between ascertaining whether or not the host state has a specific duty to guarantee the foreign investor fair and equitable treatment as a separate duty, or whether or not this duty compliments the minimum treatment standard....
13 Pages (3250 words) Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us