StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...

Implication of Dicey's Definition on the Rule of Law - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
Introduction Royal Prerogatives can be described as the discretionary powers which belonged to the Crown1. They were exercised as the residue of powers that belonged to the King or the Royal. The Crown today can only enjoy the prerogatives as derived from the common law and has no power to claim that there is a new prerogative that has come into existence (Pollard D et…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.5% of users find it useful
Implication of Diceys Definition on the Rule of Law
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Implication of Dicey's Definition on the Rule of Law"

Download file to see previous pages

Implication of Dicey’s definition on the ‘rule of law’; The implication of Dicey definition can be explained in three-fold: to prevent state from harassing citizens by means passing dubious laws, to exude the notion that everyone is equal in the eyes of the law and finally to protect the rights of the common citizen by limiting action of the state2. The role of prerogative powers was to offer flexible remedies where common law failed. This is due the rigidity of the common law3. In today’s world the control of exercise of the prerogative powers is normally exercised by way of judicial review4.

Since there is no codification of the prerogative powers, the judicial officers through the judicial review process have become the final arbiters in determining what actually forms the prerogative powers. It is also concerned with checking the extent to which such powers are used (Pollard D et. Al 2007 p 42). In the enjoyment of prerogative powers it is important that these powers are actually defined and given a scope that is quite free from discretionary interpretation as this brings about a lot of inconsistency in interpretation of the law (Brayzer R, 1999 p 339).

The English courts have given a wide interpretation of prerogative. In a decision in the case R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Northumbria Police Authority5 prerogative powers was taken to mean doing whatever was necessary in order to avert what is considered threat to peace. The Dicey construction or rule of law makes every citizen have equal rights in the eyes of the law (Dicey A.V 1959 p 424). Upholding this, Lord Denning in the English case of Gourriet v. HM Attorney General6 stated that “Be you ever so high, the law is above you.

The Attorney General has no prerogative to dispense with or suspend the law of England." This is always the prima facie stand in terms of being equal in the eyes of the law (Pollard D et. Al 2007 p 42). This has raised several debates. When we say equality before the law should mean that no one has special treatment yet at the same time the prerogative powers are enjoyed only by the Crown7. The scope and general prerogative powers It is quite difficult to actually and narrowly determine the province of prerogative powers8.

Prerogative powers exist by the dint of common law. No new prerogatives can be established (Pollard D et. Al. 2007 p 82) . However, prerogatives can be abolished through enactment of statutes. Prerogative has to be exercised in accordance with the statute. This was shown in R v. Secretary of State for Fire Department ex parte Fire Brigade Union9. This case showed that there was no prerogative to deviate from what the statute clearly stated. Here the secretary of state was precluded from implementing another statutory in lieu of the one that the statute had provided for.

The prerogative powers exists in the form of the Crowns powers to appoint the Prime Minister, the power of Royal mercy among others. Historical origin and developments In the history the prerogative were vested on the King or the Crown. The King then delegated the judicial powers to the judicial officers who then who exercised the prerogative on the behalf of the Crown. The constitutional Convention is the rules that are used for determining the mode in Crown exercises its discretionary powers.

These discretionary pow

...Download file to see next pages Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Implication of Dicey's Definition on the Rule of Law Essay”, n.d.)
Implication of Dicey's Definition on the Rule of Law Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1440786-critically-evaluate-the-extent-to-which-the
(Implication of Dicey'S Definition on the Rule of Law Essay)
Implication of Dicey'S Definition on the Rule of Law Essay. https://studentshare.org/law/1440786-critically-evaluate-the-extent-to-which-the.
“Implication of Dicey'S Definition on the Rule of Law Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1440786-critically-evaluate-the-extent-to-which-the.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Implication of Dicey's Definition on the Rule of Law

Parliamentary Sovereignty

Likewise, Parliament as a representative of the public has always been required to comply with the rule of law.... In particular Lord Hope identified two ways in which Parliamentary sovereignty has been limited: the court's ability to determine whether or not an Act of Parliament satisfied procedural propriety and the rule of law which permitted judicial review of administrative actions and decisions.... Specifically, Dicey argued that Parliament, elected by and representing the public, had the authority to make and unmake any law....
5 Pages (1250 words) Coursework

The Rule of Law in the Studies of Tamanaha and Belton

the rule of law is taken very frequently as a widely spread piece of rhetoric, but it can't be disregarded in no way, as it is indeed an extremely significant prerequisite for the establishment and permanence of a free, democratic society.... A lot of politicians speak over and over again about the rule of law, and in this way the rule of law constitutes a relevant accessory of their empty political discourse.... We should be deeply concerned about the actualization of a true rule of law in our world as a global society where diversity and tolerance are key points in our everyday agendas. There some theorists and researchers who have written about the rule of law lately....
15 Pages (3750 words) Essay

Constitutional & Administrative Law

68) is described as the Act of the United Kingdom Parliament providing for the incorporation of European Community law into the domestic legal order of the United Kingdom The Human Rights Act 1998 is a United Kingdom Act of Parliament which received Royal Assent on November 9, 1998, and came into force on October 2, 2000.... hellip; Its aim is to "give further effect" in UK law to the rights contained in the European Convention on Human Rights. Specifically talking about the UK scenario, since entrenched "constitutional law" or the Codified Constitution does not exist, the UK constitution is flexible, as opposed to rigid constitutions such as the Constitution of the United States....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

Understanding of the Rule of Law

The legal nature and character of the UK's constitutional democracy, which over several hundred centuries has undergone and continues to undergo a constant process of evolution, serves as a solid point of departure in any examination and analysis of Albert Venn Dicey's views on the rule of law in a constitutional democracy, insofar as they pertain to the central notion that official power must not be absolute, but controlled and limited.... In Dicey's seminal Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution first published in 1885, which gives a classic exposition on the rule of law, he posited that the rule of law consisted of three key attributes: the supremacy of 'regular law' as opposed to arbitrary power; equality of all before ordinary courts applying ordinary law of the land; and the rights of individuals as defined and enforced by the courts....
8 Pages (2000 words) Book Report/Review

UK Constitutional Law

very Act which the executive government can lawfully do without the authority of an Act of Parliament is done in virtue of this prerogative (Dicey,1885) Notably dicey's definition, unlike that of Blackstone's admits that the prerogative power is residual, inherent and particular to the Crown.... Critically discuss this statement using case law, Acts of Parliament and other primary sources.... The essay evaluates along with case law and acts of parliament the residual political power of the monarchy today and whether it is desirable to have a monarch with "prerogatives" or any other special powers in the new era of democracy. "The special pre eminence which the king hath over and above all other persons and out of the ordinary course of the common law, in right of his legal dignity....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Constitutional Law of the UK

A common definition of constitutional conventions is: "By convention is meant a binding rule, a rule of behavior accepted as obligatory by those concerned in the working of the constitution.... There is no technical difference between ordinary statutes and law considered constitutional law.... The phrase "unwritten constitution" is sometimes used, despite the fact that the UK constitution incorporates many written sources, statutory law being considered the most important source of the constitution....
5 Pages (1250 words) Term Paper

Separation of Powers in UK Law

Thirdly, constitutional laws do not provide the source of the rule of law but is the consequences of the Section 4 of the Act of Settlement 1700, comports with Dicey's concept of the rule of law and sets the basic framework of the UK's constitution.... It is perhaps best understood by reference to Dicey's rule of law which encapsulates three guiding principles.... ??2 dicey's definition of the UK's constitution, together with Section 4 point to the significance of the separation of powers under the British constitution....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

The Structure of the United Kingdom Constitution

There are moves by some quarters for a proposal to legally entrench the UK Constitution, particularly the Bill of Rights, but there is doubt whether this can be done unless the fundamental rule of the UK Constitution is itself changed.... Constitutionalists believe that entrenchment is necessary to institutionalize the rules that govern the limitation of governmental powers either through law or by a constitutional convention so that these organs of government whose powers are limited by the Constitution cannot easily tamper with these limitations to bend to their will....
9 Pages (2250 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us