Analysis of Hacking Attacks - Coursework Example

Hacker, as a subgroup, is classified depending on the intention and what leads an individual to indulge in it (Post, 1996). To be able to become a good hacker, one must acquire certain skills, make good acquaintance with the computer, networks and be of a high technological level (Howard, 1997). Hacking is not just carried out, but the attack is thoroughly planned with smaller details (Goldstein, 1997). This shows that the hackers are normally aware of committing the act and they select well the system to be hacked prior to the attack (Howard, 1997).

Computer attackers can generally be classified into three major types, namely: (a) unsophisticated ‘’script kiddies’’; these carry out the junk of the cyber intrusions, (b) crackers; these carry out cyberattacks for self-interest or malicious reasons, and (c) hackers; these are In more smart attackers who are guided more by their curiosity rather than being malicious. The three groups put their skilled expertise into vigorous practice in order to be able to suggest and identify ways to make the system better and destroy any lead that can be exploited.

This entire act they do without the system owner’s authority. In just one cyberattack, different actors may be involved with different ambitions they intend to achieve. This is not only possible with a single category of attackers (Harris, 2012).This term is normally used to describe the type of hackers who do not express the seriousness and lack the ethics in principals as practiced by professional hackers. Professional hackers do so with lots of knowledge, respect for skills and a sense of self-mentorship.

On the contrary, the script kiddies hackers like shortcuts in most of their hacking practice in order to get their hacking skills to go through (Harris, 2012). To gain access to computers, these hackers put into practice programs that were developed by different individuals which they have less idea about how they function.