The Justification of The Reign of Terror during the French Revolution - Essay Example

The revolution in the French Republic was characterized by major changes that were determined to elevate the political structure above any resistance. The leadership of Jean-Paul Marat was memorable with multiple executions taking place in the country. The problems that existed in the French community called for rapid decisions, and the executions were justified by some members of the political class. Robespierre was a shrewd leader who ensured that the country arrived at democracy and regard for equal rights through the National Assembly.

The reign of terror sends shivers to the bones of French nationals who identify with the history of terror in one way or another. The need to unite the country through policy and coercion was a reality that Robespierre adopted to ensure that his reign was faced with minimal resistance. It is notable that the queen and king of France were considered as traitors as they planned to import armies towards violation of human rights as many people innocently lost their lives for the sake of political power.

The fact that Robespierre chose to use his troops to execute the rebels indicates cowardice and dictatorial leadership that would lead by inflicting fear. Was The Reign of Terror Justified? The enemies of the reign of terror were dismayed by the decision by Robespierre to execute multiple French nationals in order to avoid resistance. Justifications of the reign of terror argue that the problems that existed in France were unbearable, and the executions would save the people from suffering under economic, social, medical, and pressure.

The creation of the National Assembly would enable the members to formulate strategies that would address the problems of the nation and the possible solutions. The government, under the leadership of Robespierre, was faced with the task of rejuvenating the French Republic and empowering the people through reforms and new opportunities. The new government was conscious of the existing problem, and the clergy was instructed to work together with the government and the people to present ideas on national development.

France was in debt, and the issues related to poverty ensured dragged the country’s economy behind. The reign of terror was argued as a relevant activity as the government was afraid that the people would give in to the pressure by rebels, and it would weaken the power of the existing government. The pressure from the micro and macro environment made the rulers deliberate on executions and other forms of human rights violations. It is argued that the government of Robespierre was corrupt and insensitive to the needs of people, and it was revealed in the pace of development at the national level.

The lives of many people ended up being hopeless as the government would not listen to the cries of the people through all means possible. Part of the reasons why the National Assembly was termed ineffective was because it eliminated monarchy from the political system while it was the desire for many French citizens. The ignorance displayed by the National Assembly indicated its inability to observe the rights of its people through all means possible. The Jacobins made upmost part of the National Assembly, and they were known for addressing issues with extremity.

The Jacobins ensured that the rights of the people were violated repeatedly. This trend led to the Vendee rebellion that sought to restore monarchy into the country. The people were faced with the task of fighting the issues that threatened their survival and the oppressive responses from the government. This situation was a pure violation of the rights of the people, and it made the people hopeless. Different documents have varying accounts of the reign of terror that highly contradict each other.

Jean-Paul Marat, a significant member of the National Assembly was determined to ensure that the reign of terror lasted longer as enemies were located everywhere. Document preserves that the decision to execute more French citizens was uncalled for as he could not secure his own life up to eternity. Marat was assassinated while taking a shower, and this proves his words true that enemies are always on the run. The murder of the assassin, Corday, was a move to revenge against the death of Marat, whereby her head was paraded with blood on cheeks.

The people celebrated this action revealed that the reign of terror was justified in the hearts of French nationals. The situation grew worse for the French republic as the government persistently oppressed the people and abandoned their duties of presenting the development and social order to the country. The executions have permanent scars that are incised in the hearts of French history for present and future purposes.