StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Strategic Horizons: Americas Failed Strategy in the Islamic World, by Steven Metz - Research Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
In this paper, I will provide a summary and analysis of Strategic Horizons: America’s Failed Strategy in the Islamic World by Steven Metz. Metz provides a critique of the U.S. strategies toward Islamic extremism and argues that the latest strategy is in principle no different from previous strategies. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.3% of users find it useful
Strategic Horizons: Americas Failed Strategy in the Islamic World, by Steven Metz
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Strategic Horizons: Americas Failed Strategy in the Islamic World, by Steven Metz"

?Short Paper: Strategic Horizons: America’s Failed Strategy in the Islamic World, by Steven Metz. Part I Introduction In this paper, I will provide asummary and analysis of Strategic Horizons: America’s Failed Strategy in the Islamic World by Steven Metz. Metz provides a critique of the U.S. strategies toward Islamic extremism and argues that the latest strategy is in principle no different from previous strategies. As such, just as the last strategy failed, the latest strategy is also failing and the time has now come for the U.S. to regroup and revise its Islamic extremism strategy. Part II Summary Metz begins his article by observing that anti-Americanism in the Islam world is spreading throughout the Middle East reflecting that the U.S. strategy toward Islamic extremism is failing. Metz points out that prior to September 11, 2001, the U.S. focused on partnering with and fostering relationships with Islamic leaders regardless of how tyrannical they may have been. However, since September 11, the U.S. came to the realization that his strategy did not work with respect to controlling Islamic extremism. The U.S. then adopted a counterinsurgency-type strategy. This strategy was a double-edged sword in that it simultaneously targeted fighting terrorism itself and sources of support for terrorists. Former President Bush took the position that Islamic extremism grew out of a lack of political and economic participation although Al-Qaida was led by individuals who were not short on opportunities for economic and political participation. Bush would promote the concept that democratic and economic reforms and strategies would root out support for terrorism. While Obama agreed with Bush’s strategy in principle, he argued that the approach was too severe and thought partnership and a cooperative approach was more desirable. Obama’s approach was more or less based on paying lip service to a perception that Americans and Muslims wanted the same thing: peace, security and prosperity. Regardless, Metz argues that despite what might appear to be different approaches by Bush and Obama, they are both based on the same concept: democratic reforms. Both strategies assume that democracy is the solution to extremism. The reality is democratic rules are averse to quelling opposition, particularly when the public outrage is not directed at them, but abroad. Moreover, technological advances has made it easier for public rage to spread and more difficult for any government to control. For governments in the Islamic world, it has become a lot easier and far less expensive to simply allow public displays of hostilities toward the U.S. to die of natural causes. Metz also argues that while Islamic governments have taken the initiative to implement democratic reforms, very few have followed through with the necessary economic reforms. Therefore the U.S. counterinsurgency strategy advocating for economic and political reforms as a means of eradicating support for extremism and terrorism cannot work without the necessary economic reforms. Metz also points out that the gap between the U.S. and the Islamic world will not be closed by proposing greater respect and careless speeches about unity when in reality, U.S. display of power and priorities reflects otherwise. For example, the U.S.’s close relationship with Israel clearly demonstrates a lack of respect for the Islamic world. Metz suggests that the U.S. strategy for economic and political reforms and the latest call for respect toward the Islamic world is perceived as a weakness and may not garner respect in return. At the same time, the hard ball played by the Bush administration was similarly met with anti-Americanism from the Islamic world. While it is necessary to continue to fight terrorism itself as it has made America safer, it is time to rethink strategies for fighting the underlying causes of terrorism and support for terrorism. Part III Analysis Metz view of U.S. strategies toward Islamic extremism is based on an oversimplification of how the U.S. views the problem of Islamic extremism. Certainly, the U.S. strategy of directly fighting terrorism can be taken at face value: an attempt to improve homeland security. However, the broader strategy of compelling political and economic reform is not merely an attempt to fight the root causes of terrorism and support for terrorism. As noted by Metz, this strategy makes little sense since Al-Qaeda was led by political and economically influential individuals. Certainly, I do not believe that this fact is also lost on the Islamic world. Therefore, in my opinion, anything that Obama or any former president says publically about unity, respect, cooperation and partnership will only be seen as nothing more than paying lip service to a disingenuous Islamic extremism policy. I believe that hostilities toward the U.S. may very well be related to what appears to be a disingenuous strategy, not simply because the strategies are inherently weak as Metz contends. I think the solution is for the U.S. to adopt a strategy that it can be honest about or at the very least be honest about its current strategy. As Yazdani suggests, the U.S. strategy with respect to the Islamic world has always been guided by an attempt to root out threats to U.S. hegemony. This strategy took “shape in the Cold War age and has continued in the post-Cold War era”.1 In other words, the U.S. counterinsurgency strategy is not failing because it is incorrect, but simply because it is not perceived as a genuine counterinsurgency strategy, but an excuse for promoting U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East: regional and global hegemony. In my opinion, Metz’s contention that in essence, the U.S. has persistently adopted a strategy of cooperation and partnership toward the Islamic world is also misleading. For example, Yazdani points out that the U.S. has been very inconsistent with respect to its strategies toward the Islamic world. For example, the U.S. has forged relationships with despots in the Middle East, while at the same time bombing other states such as Lebanon, Syria, Iran, Afghanistan, Iraq and so on. In the meantime, the U.S. has demonstrated significant bias toward Israel while attempting to forge relationships with its main adversaries. In this regard, I think that it is not so much that the U.S. has adopted a weak counterinsurgency strategy as Metz contends. Rather, I think the problem is the U.S.’s strategy is contradictory and speaks to a broader U.S. foreign policy and not specifically toward counterinsurgency. A report released by the Defense Science Board, an advisory panel to the Pentagon made observations that are consistent with both Metz and Yazdani’s arguments. Like Metz, the Defense Science Board warned that the U.S. strategy toward Islamic extremism is flawed and does not effectively dissuade Islamic extremism. Like Yasdani, the Defense Science Board cautioned that the U.S. strategy toward Islamic extremism is based on a Cold War strategy. However, the Defense Science Board does not argue as Yasdani did, that the U.S. strategy is based on promoting U.S. hegemony. Instead, the Defense Science Board takes the position that the U.S. seeks to convince Muslims that they are oppressed in much the same way that they attempted to convince Russians that they were oppressed by the Soviet Union’s Communism. The only difference is that the U.S. is not attempting to “contain a threatening state empire” instead, the U.S. is attempted to “convert a broad movement within Islamic civilization to accept the value structure of Western Modernity” which is an “agenda hidden within the rubric of a ‘War on Terrorism’”.2 It therefore follows that the U.S. strategy toward the Islamic World and Islamic extremism is not particularly truthful. Rane, like Metz point out that Obama said all the right things in articulating his strategy toward the Islamic World: partnership, respect and so on. However, Rane points out that Obama spoke of being truthful with each other. This is ironic since the U.S., according to Shanker and Yazdani, has not been truthful about its strategy toward the Islamic world. Rane, like Shanker and Yazdani also doubts the authenticity of the U.S. strategy relative to the Islamic world. According to Rane, the U.S. is focused on accomplishing its own goals: oil flows “from the Middle East and the security of Israel”.3 Therefore, while Metz criticises the U.S. strategy toward the Islamic world on its merits, there is reason to believe that the strategy is not a genuine strategy with flaws, but rather a disguise for achieving other U.S. goals. Part IV Conclusion In this paper, I provided a summary of Metz’s article Strategic Horizons: America’s Failed Strategy in the Islamic World and analysed his arguments. Metz treats the U.S. strategy toward the Islamic World as a genuine strategy and one that fails on its merits. I analysed Metz’s arguments by reference to other recorded critiques of the U.S. strategy toward the Islamic world. I therefore concluded that the U.S. strategy toward the Islamic world is not failing because of its inherent weakness, but as a result of its disingenuous goals: to further the U.S.’s own economic and political goals in the international community. Bibliography Metz, Steven. “Strategic Horizons: America’s Failed Strategy in the Islamic World.” World Politics Review, (19 September 2012). Rane, Halim. Islam and Contemporary Civilisation. Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne University Press, (2010). Shanker, Thom. “U.S. Fails to Explain Policies to Muslim World, Panel Says.” The New York Times, (November 24, 2004). http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/24/politics/24info.html?pagewanted=print&position= (Assessed April 23, 2013). Yazdani, Enyatollah. “US Policy Towards the Islamic World.” Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations, 7(2&3), (Summer & Fall 2008): 37-46. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Strategic Horizons: Americas Failed Strategy in the Islamic World, by Research Paper”, n.d.)
Strategic Horizons: Americas Failed Strategy in the Islamic World, by Research Paper. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1475452-strategic-horizons-americas-failed-strategy-in-the-islamic-world-by-steven-metz
(Strategic Horizons: Americas Failed Strategy in the Islamic World, by Research Paper)
Strategic Horizons: Americas Failed Strategy in the Islamic World, by Research Paper. https://studentshare.org/history/1475452-strategic-horizons-americas-failed-strategy-in-the-islamic-world-by-steven-metz.
“Strategic Horizons: Americas Failed Strategy in the Islamic World, by Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1475452-strategic-horizons-americas-failed-strategy-in-the-islamic-world-by-steven-metz.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Strategic Horizons: Americas Failed Strategy in the Islamic World, by Steven Metz

Strategy and key discourses

Three Horizons for Strategy Different companies all over the world now-a-days are very much focused on enhancing their profitability of their business operations.... strategy is one of the key constituents within the periphery of an organisation needed to set forth and determine the long-term aims and objectives of the company.... … Essay Plan Table of Contents Introduction 3 Discourse Analysis 3 Three Horizons for strategy 4 Discourse Analysis of Risks Involved in Using the Three Horizons Framework for strategy 7 Levels of strategy 7 Discourse Analysis of the Notion of Levels of strategy 12 Conclusion 13 References 14 Introduction strategy is one of the key constituents within the periphery of an organisation needed to set forth and determine the long-term aims and objectives of the company....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

Thesis On E-Government In Jordan

The different countries have adopted the E-government way ever since technological changes started to impact the lives of everyone.... The paper "Thesis On E-Government In Jordan" discusses the changes to the in the governmental environs after adoption the E-government.... hellip; The results have been pretty drastic ever since E-government was implemented within different nations thus showing the benefits loud and clear....
80 Pages (20000 words) Dissertation

Corporate Strategy Management

The company is given credit on changing how people in America and the world all over perceive and take coffee.... This case study discusses the corporate strategy management of Starbucks Company which is trying to enter the Indian market.... The joint venture was a market entry strategy undertaken by Starbucks as it is a more easy way of entering into a new market.... strategic corporate management is a continuous corporate process which examines the corporate business status and the industry competition in which the corporate is operating in, assessing the competition and setting goals and strategies to meet new challenges....
5 Pages (1250 words) Case Study

Islamic religion and culture

The West has many difficulties with Islam and many in… The result has been an upsurge in grievances in the islamic world and the appropriation of terror as a tactic.... Accordingly, is the islamic world in a clash of civilizations with the Western world?... and was shepherded into this world by the Prophet Mohammad.... These include persistent underdevelopment in the Middle East, a legacy of authoritarian rule and rising expectations in a global world....
5 Pages (1250 words) Admission/Application Essay

Islamic Politics and Culture

Moreover, such meaningful cooperation would strengthen Islam as well as the democratic movements across the world.... They try to empower the people in the Arab world about these religious atrocities through different media.... nbsp;Social networks and other modern communication channels have been used extensively by westerners to empower the people in the Araba world.... The paper "islamic Politics and Culture" highlights that political Islam is a new concept evolved out recently to fight against Western expansionism....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Islam and World Politics

Seeking to understand the islamic revival, this paper aims to provide a thorough overview of Islam and world politics since the late 1960s.... Thus, the eventual goal of Arab nationalism is the creation of one Arab state which will take its place amongst the other nations of the world and promote Arab interests on the global stage.... In juxtaposition to Islamism, secular Arab nationalism sees a strong central government, socialist economic policies borrow from Marxist-Leninist ideology and Arab unification as the only way in which the Arab world can rise up and overcome the significant challenges that it has faced since the demise of the Ottoman Empire....
9 Pages (2250 words) Assignment

Jihad in Relation to Other Islamic Tenets

nbsp;… This paper's content will delve into the islamic faith, specifically, the concept of jihad, both as most understand it, and as for how it is really defined.... Thus, this paper's content will delve into the islamic faith, specifically, the concept of jihad, both as most understand it, and as of how it is really defined.... This paper, Jihad in Relation to Other islamic Tenets, highlights that Jihad has become their most frequent excuse for perpetuating their acts of terrorism; that is, according to them, they are merely retaliating for America's (real or perceived) oppression of Muslims....
8 Pages (2000 words) Admission/Application Essay

Islam and Political Violence

Unfavorable policies developed by the elites led to the uneven socio-economic development of the islamic states.... claim that the increasing number of Muslims in the diaspora have debunked the classical division between Islam and the Western world.... To explain the metamorphosis of Islam, this book examines the Muslim world, the differences groups in Islam as well as Muslims in the diaspora.... (2010, 3) argue that political violence that is common in many islamic states began during the nation-building process....
5 Pages (1250 words) Book Report/Review
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us