American foreign policy - Essay Example

Moreover, according to Lang (2003), it should be identified who would be allowed to perform the intervention, how humanitarian intervention should be established, and whether there are provisions under which consent to intervene becomes a responsibility. Humanitarian intervention is normally talked about as an exemption to the nonintervention rule. This rule points out that states are prohibited to use their power, and definitely to exercise force, within other states’ jurisdiction. The rule has received strong patronage from the United Nations Charter, which allows states to protect themselves from attacks but prohibits employing the military against the political autonomy or territorial sovereignty of other states (Lang 2003).

Exactly speaking, these conditions ban armed intervention, as well as intervention to safeguard human rights. Generally, contemporary international law weakly supports humanitarian intervention. Nevertheless, there is a more traditional rule in which the exercise of force is acceptable not just in self-preservation but also to defend the innocent and punish violations. This rule is somewhat in conflict with contemporary international law and particularly with the UN Charter (Lang 2003). . The decision over humanitarian intervention is still complex and difficult.

Today, the international community has inadequate alternatives for dealing with humanitarian issues. Prospects for Democracy Noam Chomsky leads the way by making public his assessment of the Prospects for Democracy. Starting with a general evaluation of political history and democratic theory, he claims that traditional democrats like Thomas Jefferson would be disappointed at the poor shape of American democracy today. The vast expansion of corporate capitalism has by now ruined democratic traditions and the state by giving power to a few (Chomsky & Otero 2003).

And the prospect for democracy seems bleaker. Despite of this gloomy evaluation, Chomsky upholds that the revival of true democracy depends ultimately on the people or on whether they can get rid of their political dissatisfaction and put together a democratic prospect. The destiny of democracy is still changeable, Chomsky claims, but “unless people here and in other rich societies can recapture and revitalize” (Chomsky & Otero 2003, 259) the misplaced institutions of democracy and liberty, “the prospects for democracy are indeed dim” (Chomsky & Otero 2003, 259).

The rapid development of democracy in numerous countries has built expectations for a healthier future; the hopes are that democracy will not just advance human rights and political rights but will also result in better welfare and swift economic growth aside from international relations distinguished by shared understanding and diplomatic cooperation. As argue recently by Samuel Huntington and Robert Dahl, we should not anticipate other