StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Globalization Going To Promote Greater Equality - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The essay "Globalization Going To Promote Greater Equality" provides the impact of globalization, historical evidence are provided and with referring to recent events various aspects of globalization are examined…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.2% of users find it useful
Globalization Going To Promote Greater Equality
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Globalization Going To Promote Greater Equality"

Running Head: GLOBALIZATION Globalization Going To Promote Greater Equality Globalization Going To Promote Greater Equality Introduction Globalisation can be defined as the increasing interaction among, and integration of, the activities, especially economic activities of human societies around the world (Mussa, 2003). Globalisation is not a new phenomenon. The twentieth century began when the first wave of globalisation was approaching its peak. It has ended on the rising crest of a second wave far more forceful than the first (Yusuf, 2003). Globalisation, in the sense of increased integration of international markets, has waxed and waned throughout history (Bordo, 2002). The recent wave of globalisation has generated intense debate among economists, attracting both strong supporters and opponents and although characteristics of current globalisation are different from previous ones, but still by turning the pages of history, one can find similarities and learn from past experiences. Therefore, initially the history of globalisation with the focus on the last two waves is reviewed and analysed. The opinion of various researchers have been presented and discussed. Throughout the next section and during the analysis of the impact of globalisation, historical evidences are provided and with referring to recent events various aspects of globalisation are examined. The economic development, open door policies, financial liberalisation, sound institutions, the role of international financial intuitions, governance and welfare policies have been briefly discussed and investigated. Globalisation: Good or Bad O’Neill (2004) argues that there is no argument that the levels of income and disparity and poverty are significant between advanced and emerging countries. O’Neill claim that from enormous range of contributions to the literature on globalisation, a consensus has been reached that overall globalisation has brought more benefits than costs; that it has exacerbated inequalities both within and between countries because of sharply diverging experience at individual and country levels; and that it has increased economic and political insecurity even for those who have benefited in monetary terms from globalisation. But they challenge making casual link between changes in poverty and inequality with increased globalisation, as the globalisation process today has an impact far beyond its economic aspects, and is increasingly influenced by global health and environmental crises. O’Neill (2004) disagrees with the claims that globalisation has increased global poverty and income inequality worsened over the last 40-50 years. He argues that if correct economic indicators are used, global income distribution has become more equal over the last twenty years although inequality increased slightly in the 1970s. He also points out that the relative improvement of developing countries is not even across the world but evidence from both economic and social indicators suggest that open developing economies have grown double the rate of those of developing countries that have not opened up. But he also concurs with the belief that openness to trade and investment are not the only factors that have contributed to the improvement of living standards of many developing countries. Sound domestic policy choices, including fiscal discipline, privatisation and other institutional reforms and sectoral restructuring (especially of the financial system) have played key roles in making them ready in embracing globalisation. But Kohl (2003) does not agree and argues that even if globalisation is not a major cause of income inequality and poverty, it is likely to have contributed to the poor performance of efforts to reduce poverty. Stiglitz (2003) adds another dimension to the discussion as he argues that globalisation has not produced the promised benefits but he does not question that globalisation will benefit the poor of the world but that globalisation needs to be managed in the right way. Hill (2005) agree with these comments and indicate that at the international level, two sets of policy action have received broad support in the globalisation literature: a development round of trade negotiations; and a new financial architecture. Schmulker (2004) focuses on financial globalisation. He argues that financial globalisation tends to develop financial system, enhancing the financing opportunities, reducing the cost of capital and increasing investment and liquidity. Although financial globalisation has several potential benefits, it also poses enormous challenges as countries become exposed to external shocks and crises not only generated in their own country but also from contagion effect. In the initial stages of liberalisation, if the right infrastructure is not in place or put in place, financial liberalisation can lead to increased risks. Moreover, in a financially integrated economy, policymakers have fewer policy instruments to conduct economic policy. Jomo (1998) indicates that the financial sector has become increasingly divorced from the real economy. He argues that in the world economy where foreign exchange spot transactions are now worth more than 70 times the total value of international commodity trade transactions, the financial sector has a great potential to inflict damage on the real economy. Jomo(1998) also indicates that recent findings proves alleged benefits of financial liberalisation have not been realised, including improved macroeconomic performance – with greater investment and growth expected from better allocative efficiency- and in fact overall macroeconomic performance has been worse than before liberalisation. In line with this discussion, Chomsky (2004) indicates that since World War II, international economy has passed through two phases: the Bretton Woods phase from the late 1940s to the early 1970s and the subsequent period based on, among other things, the dismantling of the Bretton Woods system of regulated exchange rates and control on capital movement. The term “Globalisation” as is used today is associated with the neo-liberal policies of what Williamson termed the ‘Washington consensus’. The second phase has accompanied by marked deterioration in standard macroeconomic measures- the growth of the economy productivity, capital investment and world trade, higher interest rates, vast accumulation of unproductive reserves to protect diverse national currencies; increased financial volatility, and other harmful economic, social and environmental consequences. The East Asian countries were exceptions, which did not follow the rules: they did not worship at the alter of the religion that markets know best (Stigliz, 2002). Many economists such as Jose Antonio Ocampo, director of the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean , observe that the mirage growth in 1990s was far below that of three decades of ‘state-led development’ in phase I (Chomsky, 2004). Many international economists regard the liberalisation of capital as substantial factor in explaining the poorer outcome of phase II (Chomsky, 2004). In an interesting argument, Rosenberg (2000) starts his discussion by asserting that logical structure of the theoretical argument in globalisation theory is flawed by inversion of explanas and explanandum, or cause and effect. What presents itself initially as the explanandum, that is, what needs to be explained, is globalisation as the developing outcome of some historical process. Yet this is “progressively transformed into the explanans: it is globalisation which now explains the changing character of the modern world”. Toppen (2004) also argues that while there is certainly evidence connecting increased trade and poverty reduction, our understanding of the empirical relationship between globalisation and poverty, like most important questions of social science, is incomplete and contradictory. Harvard economist Rodrik (2001), for instance, finds no evidence that reduction in import tariffs are related to economic growth. In fact, he finds that countries dismantle their trade restrictions only after they experience economic development. Furthermore referring to the previous discussion on history of globalisation, many authors (Bordo 2002, O’Neill 2004) indicate similarities and differences between two contemporary eras of globalisation. But question should be asked: if globalisation is the source of prosperity for countries, then why history has experienced reversal of globalisation even in cases as recent as 1914s. Can the reversal of globalisation can be attributed to the fact that globalisation has been the result of economic development and not vice versa? Therefore as soon as the development has faced major setbacks, the globalisation trend has diminished rapidly and even led to protectionism. Does history show that globalisation and open door policies by itself, without proper check and balances in place, won’t result in economic development and prosperity and in fact in circumstances can lead to political upheaval as experienced in 1914 which Bordo (2002) argues have led to World War I? Although there are no direct answer to these questions but there are some common area of agreement among researchers. Buchs (2004) reiterate many lessons drawn from recent financial crises, but finds the need for more policy making for coping with the globalisation of financial markets, as the most powerful one. He strongly argues that the trade off between the benefits of a largely unregulated financial system and the cost of financial vulnerability makes it clear that before taking a huge leap forward toward further globalisation, more needs to be done in the field of domestic as well as international regulations. Obviously sound macroeconomic management is crucial for health of growth, but the increasing integration of financial markets provides one additional confirmation that the conduct of autonomous macroeconomic without greater interaction and cooperation among the different players is just an illusion. Some critics of globalisation such as Toppen (2004) argue that globalisation could be made fairer with more government actions. Although he accepts that global market integration has been and is good for the poor in that it helps to advance worldwide living standards, but when trade barriers are lowered and poor-country economies are opened to an influx of imports, it is often the case that many local producers and industries are unable to keep up with their technologically advanced competitors in the developed world. The result is unemployment and other problems of social instability as local businesses and even entire industries are destroyed. At the same time, poor countries are under pressure from IMF and others in Washington to limit social welfare spending. Toppen recognises the harmful side effects of globalisation and argues that its proponents have paid too little attention to these matters, and claims that more should be done to ameliorate painful but necessary dislocations. These researchers find the basic problem of globalisation, how to address “the damage that is done to some as a result of change that is beneficial to most” (Toppen, 2004). Therefore they do not question the structure of the international economic order as much as they argue that enhance safety-net policies are needed at the national level. They advocate policies designed to maintain worker income and benefits when globalisation results in job losses, to educate and retain people for the new opportunities created by globalisation, and to assist retrained workers seeking new employment (Toppen, 2004). Some other researchers led by Stiglitz (2003) argue that the IMF particularly but also major international economic institutions (the World Bank and World Trade Organisation (WTO)) divided and pushed policies that “have served interests of the more advanced industrialised countries – and particular interests within those interests- rather than those of the developing countries. Stiglitz devotes most of his attention to how public international financial institutions have worked to advance the financial interests of Wall Street, but he also notes that major commercial interests and priorities have similarly held away at the WTO. Conclusion To conclude, I believe that globalisation benefits everyone in some way. It is true that globalisation has its negative effects. However, if integrated with care, it may well prove to be a boon instead of a bane. Globalisation can benefit nations politically, economically and culturally. Ideas of resistance would ring a nation nowhere, as globalisation is needed for a nation to compete at the international stage. Globalisation could lead to the triumph of democracy over autocracy. In the end, it is happening now, if not already. The large scope that globalisation encompasses makes it an inevitable process. What is ironic is that while protesters fight against globalisation efforts in the name of Africans and the worlds poor, Africans themselves may well want it to go their way. Thus, I strongly believe that globalisation should not be resisted, but should be embraced as its advantages outweigh the disadvantages. Bibliography Bordo Michael D. (2002), Globalization in Historical Perspective, Business Economics, Jan, 37, 1, pages 20-29. Buchs Thierry D., (2004), Consequences of Financial Globalization for Policy making, Aussenwirtschaft, 59, Jahrgang, pages 31-50. Chomsky Noam (2004), Reflections on Power and Globalization, Veltmeyer Henry (eds), Globalization and Antiglobalization, Dynamics of Change in the New World Order, London, Ashgate. Jomo, K.S., (1998), Introduction: financial Governance, Liberalisation and Crisis in east Asia, In Jomo, K.S. (ed), Tigers in Trouble, London, pages 1-32. Kohl, Richard (editor) (2003), Globalisation, poverty and inequality, Paris, Development Centre of Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. Mussa Michael, (2003), meeting the Challenges of Globalisation, Journal of African Economies, 12, 1, pages 14-34. O’Neill Tim, (2004), Globalization: Fads, Fictions and Facts, Business Economics, 39, 1, pages 16-27. Rosenberg Justin (2000), The Follies of Globalisation Theory: Polemical Essays, London: Vesro. Stigliz, Joseph E. (2002), Globalization and its discontents, NY & London, Norton. Toppen Joel L., (2004), Fixing Globalization – A Review Essay, Christian Scholar’s Review, Spring, 33, 3, pages: 379-390. Yusuf Shahid (2003), Globalisation and the Challenge for Developing Countries, Journal of Africa Economies. 12, 1, pages: 35-72. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Globalization Going To Promote Greater Equality Essay, n.d.)
Globalization Going To Promote Greater Equality Essay. https://studentshare.org/gender-sexual-studies/1713713-is-globalization-going-to-promote-greater-equality-ot-just-make-the-rich-richer-and-the-poor-poorer
(Globalization Going To Promote Greater Equality Essay)
Globalization Going To Promote Greater Equality Essay. https://studentshare.org/gender-sexual-studies/1713713-is-globalization-going-to-promote-greater-equality-ot-just-make-the-rich-richer-and-the-poor-poorer.
“Globalization Going To Promote Greater Equality Essay”. https://studentshare.org/gender-sexual-studies/1713713-is-globalization-going-to-promote-greater-equality-ot-just-make-the-rich-richer-and-the-poor-poorer.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Globalization Going To Promote Greater Equality

Critical Evaluation of Globalization Process

The emergence of the Internet has enabled businesses to coordinate their international operations to a greater extent.... The author states that globalization enabled companies in the developed economies to seek business opportunities in the developing economies where demand is growing.... nbsp;… globalization can be defined as the process of integration of international trade.... Through international trade, globalization leads to a world economy in which the goods that are available in one country are also available in another part of the world....
8 Pages (2000 words) Term Paper

Globalization Issue according toThomas L. Freidman and William J. Duiker

Duiker about anti-globalizationglobalization contest.... hellip; The increase in criminal activities is a threat to globalization.... The book portrays a scenario where untimely flattening of the opponents of globalization is inevitable.... He feels that the forces of fragmentation are too strong to allow globalization to gain a stable footing.... Although William presents steep challenges to globalization, the basis of his arguments and speculation are on uncertainties....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

The Industry of Tobacco

While it is difficult to completely end the growth of tobacco and the proliferation of cigarettes around the world, the exploitation of nations that have yet to reach an enlightened position on the use of tobacco allows an industry that is built on addiction to have greater market potential which supports an industry that should be on the decline and eventually phased out of existence.... hellip; globalization is an important factor in the continued success for tobacco companies because they are depending on the idea that underdeveloped nations will not have the sophistication to regulate....
8 Pages (2000 words) Term Paper

Global Inequality

s the result, such countries are able to access the capital on a global level, and in other words, capital is not restricted to the national level, resulting in greater opportunities for the improvement of living standards.... The paper "Global Inequality" presents detailed information, that for few decades, rapid advancement is observed in the process of globalization that has modified and affected the lives of millions of people in developed, as well as, developing countries....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Trade and Globalization and Gains of Free Trade

This essay "Trade and globalization and Gains of Free Trade" claims that the various inter-governmental organizations are not as much effectual, and international businesses and entities continue to define stipulations.... hellip; Conclusively, it is imperative to note that while it is a fact that globalization and its agents are diluting the traditional roles of various National Governments across the world, the roles and gains with free trade is enormous through the agents of globalization and governments as 'intermediaries'....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

The United States and Consequences of Globalization

The policy makers have to come up with policies that promote globalization in all the countries, which is a great challenge2.... Thus, the essay critically explains the challenges faced by the United States as a result of globalization. United States always plays As the rate of globalization goes high in the United States, the developing countries also look forward to get them same effects of globalization.... Thus, to ensure that other countries develop, they have to incorporate all the aspects of globalization....
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment

Globalization in Business

The purpose for global changes is to promote globalization through government and originations sharing of common financial interests in business.... The two power blocks will promote business for the involved countries.... globalization of business is the change in a business from a company associated with a single country to one that operates in multiple… The impact of globalization on business can be placed into two broad categories: market globalization and production globalization....
5 Pages (1250 words) Assignment

A New Approach to the Environment and Nutrition

The paper "A New Approach to the Environment and Nutrition" describes that particular movement has a litany of different strengths, the underlying weakness, some might even go as far as to say the Achilles' heel, of the slow food movement, is the exorbitantly high cost.... hellip; Another key shortcoming of the slow food movement that must tangentially be discussed is one that few other analysts or critics have had the courage to approach....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us