StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Restraint of Trade Covenants in Contracts - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The essay "Restraint of Trade Covenants in Contracts" focuses on the critical analysis of the major issues in the restraint of trade covenants in contracts. A contract or a covenant in restraint of trade is an undertaking whereby one party agrees to restrict his freedom to trade…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96% of users find it useful
Restraint of Trade Covenants in Contracts
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Restraint of Trade Covenants in Contracts"

?The question deals with the issue of restraint of trade covenants in contracts. A contract or a covenant in restraint of trade is an undertaking whereby one party agrees to restrict his freedom to trade or his freedom to conduct his profession or business in a particular locality for a specified period of time.1 Whilst the courts have generally honored the freedom of parties to contract, in the case of the abovementioned covenants they have felt the need to impose judicial control. The reasoning behind this interference was best explained by Lord Reid in the case of Schroeder Music v Macaulay (1974) 1 WLR 308 as follows: “The public interest requires in the interest of both the public and the individual that everyone should be free so far as practicable to earn a livelihood and to give to the public the fruits of their particular abilities” All contracts or covenants for the restraint of trade are prima facie void. This however is the general rule with the courts being willing to enforce the same in certain situations. This was laid down in the case of Nordenfelt v Maxim Nordenfelt( (1894) AC 535 by Lord Macnaughten who stated that “The public have an interest in every person’s carrying on his trade freely; so has the individual. All interference with the individual liberty of action in trading, and all restraints of trade themselves, if there is nothing more, are contrary to public policy and therefore void. That is the general rule. But there are exceptions; restraints of trade and interference with individual liberty of action may be justified by the special circumstances of a particular case. It is a sufficient justification, and indeed the only justification, if the restraint is reasonable- reasonable, that is, in reference to the interests of the parties concerned and reasonable in reference to the interests of the public, so framed and so guarded as to afford adequate protection to the party in whose favour it is imposed, while, at the same time is in no way injurious to the public...” It is in this light therefore that Dr. Smith’s contract of employment needs to viewed. Prima facie section 10 of her employment contract is void and her bosses at BUPA will not be able to rely on it. If however, they can prove that they fall within one of the exceptions that the court has laid down they will be able to successfully rely on the said action and prevent Dr. Smith from starting her new job. For Dr. Smith’s bosses to succeed it is not enough that they show that the clause is reasonable between the parties. They must also prove that the clause is reasonable in the public interest. It is noteworthy that The burden of showing that a covenant is in the interests of the parties lies with the employer. The onus of proving that it is contrary to the public interest lies with the employee: Kores Manufacturing Company Limited v Kolok Manufacturing Company Limited [1959] (CA) Ch D 109.2 We will look at the first aspect in detail over the next few paragraphs. In deciding whether or not the section 10 of the employment contract in question is reasonable between the parties the courts will look at (a) whether the clause protects a legitimate interest of the employer and (b) is whether or not the clause is reasonable in terms of subject matter, locality and duration. When looking at whether a restraint of trade clause protects the legitimate interest of the employer the court has looked to see if the employer has “ some proprietary right, whether in the nature of a trade connection or in the nature of trade secrets for the protection of which such a restraint is…reasonably necessary”.3 The courts have further said however that an employer is not entitled to protect himself against the use of the “personal skill and knowledge” acquired by the employee in the course of the employer’s business. Such skills belong to the employee and he is free to exploit them in the market place.4 In the Dr. Smith’s case the BUPA bosses will succeed in their action if they are able to show that they would lose all their patients if Dr. Smith moves to Sunderland General Hospital. In the case of Strange v Mann it was held that a list of clients must be protected if the employer is to continue business. The above-mentioned case of Herbert Morris v Saxelby however held that it is not enough to show that the employee had contact with clients. It must also be shown that he was in a position to influence those clients so that upon leaving he will be a threat to the employer’s business. As Dr. Smith will be moving into a more specialized area of medicine it is unlikely that her former employers will be able to prove that restraining her from working at the new hospital results in protecting a legitimate interest of theirs. Even if the BUPA bosses succeed in proving the above they will have to further prove that section 10 of the employment contract is reasonable in terms of subject matter, locality and time (Nordenfelt v Maxim Nordenfelt). An employer is not allowed to restrain an employee from carrying on a business which is different from that in which he was employed. Whilst Dr. Smith will be working in a more specialized area at the Sunderland General Hospital, she will still be working in the area of medicine. However, section 17 seems to be unnecessarily wide as it prevents Dr. Smith from working for any medical practice or hospital of any kind for five years and within a twenty-mile radius of the City of Sunderland. The restriction from working in any medical practice will be most probably viewed unfavorably by the courts. The clause however does not seem to be unreasonable as to time since it limits her from working for only five years. It does not as was said in Herbert Morris “ force her to begin life afresh, as it were, and deprive him of the means of supporting himself and his family”. The section however does seem to be unreasonable as to the area it covers. IN the case of Mason v Provident Clothing and Supply Co5 a clause which prevented an employee from working in a similar business within 25 miles of London was held to be unreasonable. This case however was decided nearly 100 years ago and it remains to be seen if the courts would take the same view now given the advancement in transportation infrastructure and technology. As mentioned above it is not only enough to show that the clause in question was reasonable between the parties. It also needs to be shown that it satisfies the test of being reasonable when viewed in terms of public policy. The onus of proving that the clause is contrary to public policy is on Dr. Smith but she should be warned that “the courts are extremely reluctant to conclude that an agreement which is reasonable between the parties is unenforceable because it is contrary to the interests of the public, especially in the case of contracts of employment”. This does not however mean that the courts have never decided against restraint of trade covenants on the grounds of public policy. IN the case of Fitch V Dewes6 the court decided in favour of a senior solicitor when he imposed a covenant on a junior solicitor that barred him from establishing himself as a solicitor for a period of 3 years for a 7 mile radius. The court upheld the agreement as valid on the basis that it was in the interest of the public to encourage senior solicitors to train juniors by affording this protection to them as they would be otherwise reluctant to train juniors, which in turn would be injurious to the interest of the public. As Dr. Smith will obviously be seeing a larger number of patients at the new hospital AND have the freedom of conducting experimental research it would be against public policy to prevent her from doing so. This is further accentuated by the fact that we are told that she is one of the leading authorities in her field. The advancement in her career and experimental research would clearly benefit the public and therefore restrainment of the same by BUPA would be against public policy. It can be concluded therefore that BUPA will find it difficult to rely on s.10 of Dr. Smith’s contract to seek an injunction and damages against her. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“CONTRACT LAW Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1420343-contract-law
(CONTRACT LAW Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1420343-contract-law.
“CONTRACT LAW Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1420343-contract-law.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Restraint of Trade Covenants in Contracts

The Doctrine of Privity of Contract and the Impact of the Contracts Act 1999

Essay question – restraint of trade – employees and sale of business.... restraint of trade clauses in contracts of employment are intended by employers to safeguard against competition from former employees.... 1 When a business is sold or transferred to another party, an existing restraint of trade agreement impacting an employee survives the transfer of the business.... 2 Like employment covenants for the restraint of trade13a covenant for the restraint of trade under an agreement for the sale of a business will be generally upheld when the restraint of trade covenant is reasonable....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Restrictive covenants: a comparative jurisdiction perspective

The object of this essay is to examine the current legal viewpoints on the legality and enforceability of the different kinds of restrictive covenants in labor law, and see the differences the jurisdictions of Texas and Maryland have held on the matter vis--vis that of Massachusetts.... The object of this essay is to examine the current legal viewpoints on the legality and enforceability of the different kinds of restrictive covenants in labor law, and see the differences the jurisdictions of Texas and Maryland have held on the matter vis--vis that of Massachusetts....
15 Pages (3750 words) Essay

The Law Relating to Appurtenant Rights over Freehold Land

The paper "The Law Relating to Appurtenant Rights over Freehold Land" states that the law relating to appurtenant rights over freehold lands, such as easements, covenants, rent charges and profit a Prendre includes a much wider in-depth knowledge involving various entities and sub-entities.... Personal property attached to real estate by a tenant for the purpose of his or her business is classified as a trade, or chattel, fixture and remains personal property....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Protecting Trade Secrets

common form of restrictive covenant is termed a restraint of trade, which is generally described in common [Lecturer] Details] 21 October 2008 Protecting Trade Secrets: Employee Restraints of Trade When deciding to accept a positionwith a company, regardless of size or stature of that specific company, there may well be restrictive covenants imposed upon the employee by the company concerned.... A common form of restrictive covenant is termed a restraint of trade, which is generally described in common law as ‘contractual restrictions on freedom to conduct business” ("restraint of trade....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Fair Balance between the Economic Interests of the Employer and the Public Interest

Thus, in order to build a strong association between the employees and the employers, employment contracts are generally made.... Moreover, the essay will determine whether there exists any effective way of providing balance along with identifying the law relating to restrictive covenants and public policy issues.... The paper "Fair Balance between the Economic Interests of the Employer and the Public Interest" states that the restrictive covenant provisions help employers to remove unfair trade practices and policies of various employees to gain a significant advantage in the market....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Land Use Controls

The author states that the conveyance to Simon assigned the benefit of all covenants to him.... Last year, John sold Plot B to Paul and Paul covenanted to indemnify John for any breaches of covenants.... In the paper 'Land Use Controls' the author provides the case of Matthew who retained Plot A for himself and sold Plot B to John, who covenanted to use Plot B for residential purposes, and ensure that the dividing wall remains in good condition....
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study

Contracts or Covenants for the Restraint of Trade

The paper "Contracts or Covenants for the Restraint of Trade" analyzes that the question deals with the issue of Restraint of Trade Covenants in Contracts.... A contract or a covenant in restraint of trade is an undertaking whereby one party agrees to restrict trade freedom.... All contracts or covenants for the restraint of trade are prima facie void.... All interference with the individual liberty of action in trading, and all restraints of trade themselves, if there is nothing more, are contrary to public policy and therefore void....
5 Pages (1250 words) Case Study

Sports Law in the United Kingdom

he existence of a restrictive covenant is a prima facie as being in restraint of trade.... The paper "Sports Law in the United Kingdom" discusses that the regulation of sports serves to limit the actions of players and teams and avoids breaches of contracts.... This assignment discusses sports law in relation to contracts between teams and players, the regulation of drugs in sports and the influence of the transfer window in restricting freedom of movement under EU law and its legality....
19 Pages (4750 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us