Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1411975-health-and-environment-questions
https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1411975-health-and-environment-questions.
The lack of people to work and maintain the environmental and economical structure will cause significant problems, as there will not be enough people working. This means that industries such as coal mining and other industrial operations will have to be suspended or short cuts might have to be make to cut down on costs and manpower, which can result in environmental damage (Avert, 2011). Developed countries have the resources and the support in order to help countries such as Botswana with the AIDS epidemic.
The first method of supporting can come from the economic funding as well as donating supplies. Many of Africa’s countries are already undeveloped and many of the people live in poverty. If they are able to afford proper medical supplies, they most likely cannot afford anything else. Funding can help alleviate financial pressure as well as make sure needed supplies reach the people. Services can also be given. Like in Botswana, many children are being orphaned and are not receiving proper care and education.
Taking these children and putting them in foster homes as well as volunteering and helping educate the problem will help make sure these displaced children learn. Lastly, the biggest component is helping with the medical aspects of HIV/AIDS. Currently, the retroviruses are untreatable and the medical costs of trying to maintain those with the disease are increasingly expensive. Many countries in Africa are unable to afford the costs of trying to research a cure and other alternative medicines for the disease.
Developed countries have the technology and the funds, which can help pay for this research, which would have longer positive value than just maintaining the status quo through medical supplies. 2. Honestly, the case of “better safe than sorry” is more situational dependent. Sometimes in radical situations, fast acting decisions must be made in order to solve the problem at hand, rather than looking that the long-term consequences. In terms of medication and thinking about Africa with the AIDS epidemic, this should not be the case.
There are many different factors that are already affecting everything from the economy to society itself. Many experimental drugs can have unpredicted side effects. Without knowing all of the facts about the medicines, it would be hard to predict whether they are effective or not. In some cases, they can even cause more damage. According to the precautionary principle, “the ends would be worth the means”. Opponents of this principle state that especially when dealing with medication, there must be a high degree of likelihood that the medication will work must be at a high percentile.
In addition, the biological causality and mechanisms undergoing must be explained and cannot be explained by a correlation. A high probability indicates scientific proof (Kopelman, Resnick, & Weed, 2004). In talking about AIDS, this irresponsibility with the precautionary principle effected people in the United States in the 1980s with the transmission of HIV. This occurred because the premise of blood disease and infections was downplayed by medical authorities resulting in many people being unnecessarily infected with the virus (Alban, 2005). 3. Global warming is a life-changing event, which is currently and will change the way in which our society works.
It has resulted as a result of human interactions with the Earth and its resources. Increased carbon emissions have caused
...Download file to see next pages Read More