StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Keystone Pipeline Project - Research Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
The keystone project consists of a pipeline system for transporting tar and sands oil from the northern U.S and parts of southern Canada to refineries in Texas. Already, two phases of the keystone pipeline system are in operation while the third phase of the pipeline running from Oklahoma to the Texas refineries is under construction. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.8% of users find it useful
The Keystone Pipeline Project
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Keystone Pipeline Project"

? The Keystone Pipeline Project The keystone project consists of a pipeline system for transporting tar and sands oilfrom the northern U.S and parts of southern Canada to refineries in Texas. Already, two phases of the keystone pipeline system are in operation while the third phase of the pipeline running from Oklahoma to the Texas refineries is under construction. The fourth phase of the Keystone pipeline project is in the process of awaiting approval from the United States government. Upon successful completion, the Keystone project will be composed of phases one and two which will consist of the completed pipeline while phases three and four will be made up of the expanded coast project. Apart from the above phases, there is the fourth controversial phase, dubbed the Keystone XL pipeline project which is supposed to start at Hardisty, an oil distribution center in Alberta and extend from there to Nebraska, Steele city. The fully operational pipeline system will have a huge capacity, able to transport 590,000 barrels daily of tar and sands oil from Canada to refineries in Texas in the mid-west. Phase one of the project was finished in 2010, while phase two was completed in February in the year 2011. The proposed XL portion of the keystone project comprises of phases 3 and 4 and has face many lawsuits from the refineries as well as environmentalists who and members of the US congress. President Obama in January 2012 rejected the application on Keystone XL following ongoing protest on the project by stakeholders fearing for a negative impact of the project on the environmentally sensitive nature of Nebraska’s Sand Hills region. The originally intended route for XL was changed by TransCanada; in an effort the company claimed was aimed at minimizing any harmful outcomes the project could have on water, land and other natural resources along its originally intended route. The new route was consecutively approved by the Governor for Nebraska State and endorsed by president Obama. Assessment of the project by the state department of bureau proposed a number of alterations to the original plans for keystone XL, but the report of the assessment neither endorsed nor rejected the project (Ruchti, 2010). Meanwhile, activists have continuously urged president Obama to reject the project, counting on his track record of acknowledging the impact of climate change on humanity. The activists classify the project as among the biggest challenges world faces today. Objections to projects of huge magnitude are always necessary (Ruchti, 2010) Case against Implementation of Keystone Pipeline Project White House officials and numerous other state departmental staff have continuously insisted that a ruling by the Obama administration on the keystone XL will be entirely based upon environmental, security and economic factors. Activists have been using the project to test the president’s commitment towards environmental protection efforts, and while the intended economic benefits are huge, the projects negative impact on the environment pits environmental conservation efforts versus economic gains (Roode & Ruchti, 2010). White house officials have stated that the project is neither a component of the country’s policy on climate, nor a means for bargaining on trade issues with other countries, especially Canada as the case on Keystone in this case Canada (Kadrmas, 2009). (i). Negative impact of keystone pipeline on the environment Research suggests that the Keystone Pipeline Project’s negative impact on the environment and climate especially along the proposed route far out weight the intended economic benefits that might be derived from the project (Kadrmas, 2009). Profits gained from investment in the pipeline system might be immediate and worth the cause, but the long term degradation of the environment will negatively influence every aspect of the lives of Americans living along the pipeline, from current to future generations. The project is harmful to the ecosystem and the individuals living along the proposed route. Its implementation will do more harm than good to the economy and environment. Economic gain should not outweigh the harmful effects of environmental degradation. This type of projects should have the best of interest of the environment first before implementation (Roode & Ruchti, 2010). The reasons against the implementation of Keystone XL pipeline include oil spills that occur regularly along oil pipelines. The impact of the spills is devastating to the environment and reversing the damage is often near impossible, especially where lives are lost or property destroyed (Roode & Ruchti, 2010). The pipeline project will also not create so many jobs, with analysts capping it at 35 jobs maximum, as a result of the intended automation of the pipeline system (Kadrmas, 2009). Potential fires on the pipeline will also render the lands adjacent to the pipeline a hazardous zone to live in while the gases released to the atmosphere imply that smoke and fires will be common, toxic and detrimental to human health and welfare. Families will have to be evacuated from the land s adjacent to the pipeline. This displacement will have to include compensation measures by TransCanada to the displaced families. Compensation measures have time and again proved not to be sufficient enough to justify displacement of the affected families from their ancestral land. Reviews on the XL project have done little to encompass economics and the environmental degradation the project poses (Ruchti, 2010). The reviews focus mainly on the economic impact of the project, leaving the reviews shallow and limited in scope and measure. This reasoning on the economic potential of the project is wrong as the project will have an impact on almost all aspect of the US economy, including health and environment (Roode & Ruchti, 2010). The analysis done on the reviews is narrow and only intended to hide the environmental degradation risk the project poses. The tar sands in Alberta contain carbon quantities double of what oil contains. According to research, a minimal fraction of the carbon is recoverable (Roode & Ruchti, 2010). Once TransCanada starts to exploit the sand oils, more and more extraction will take place; basically due to the ever inquisitive nature of man and his sense of drive in getting to develop better ways of extracting the carbon and making the process become commercially viable. The draft reviews have gone to the extent of acknowledging the fact that the sand oils present a fuel that is of poor quality and hugely destructive to the environment (Kadrmas, 2009). Tar sands contain toxic and harmful chemical composition. Global warning continues to rise every day as toxic gas emissions such as carbon dioxide continue to harm the environments (Kadrmas, 2009). Arguments for the Keystone project insist that the impact of the project on the ecosystem should be of little concern to policy makers. Some advocate for stronger trade and economic relations with respect to the project’s intended effect on the economy wholly ignoring the risk it poses to the environment. If the XL project finally gets approval from the government, the Canadian firm, TransCanada will get a permit to build a pipeline across America for carrying toxic sands oil. (ii). Case against the Economy The reviews on the pipeline by the state department only vouch for Keystone XL because the oils from tar sands will have a ready market to sell. This in itself is not in the best of national interest (Ruchti, 2010). Trade and economy measured against and compared to the future well-being of the environment becomes a complicated issue (Roode & Ruchti, 2010). While preservation of the environment is in itself a means preservation of human life, protagonists for the project insist that human life cannot be sustained without resources like energy to fuel industries that produce goods and services, whether needs or wants, for consumption by humans (Ruchti, 2010). Trade and economy should seamlessly work towards preservation of the natural environment, avoiding destruction and depletion of resources, at least for the sake of sustaining the environment. The Keystone’s project support results from the fact that job opportunities need to be created. Policies aimed at creation of structures that govern and ensure stronger regulation of the operations of multinational firms should be put in place (Kadrmas, 2009). Projects similar to Keystone will always come up and therefore the solution lies in ensuring that environmental degradation is avoided at all cost. This will ensure that for example, Keystone XL is implemented successfully with the goodwill of the government, the citizens and all other stakeholders involved. Current calls for stronger regulations with reference to the Keystone pipeline project are insincere, and only work to ensure the implementation of Keystone XL project while disguising concern for the environment in the form of calls for regulation (Roode & Ruchti, 2010). Regulatory frameworks rarely work and are often abused by firms, especially rich multinationals, whose main goals and objectives are profit maximization at whatever cost that maybe realized (Roode &Ruchti, 2010). Some individuals argue that not building the pipeline will only result in the tar sands being shipped to overseas refineries. While this is true, it could also lead to a great reduction of environmental destruction. Since the poor quality of oil is not justified to be sold in the American markets, exporting the sands oils to be manufactured abroad and the final product sold in the foreign markets will ensure that the substandard product does not enter into the American market. This will also ensure reduced greenhouse emissions on the atmosphere, contributing greatly to a worldwide reduction in global warming (Ruchti, 2010). Most of the problems inflicting the Keystone XL project however seem to be self-inflicted. Many residents who were affected by the pipeline say that land agents for TransCanada are intransigent and quickly threaten those that opt to resist eviction taking advantage of the fact that claiming the land for construction of the pipeline is court approved (Ruchti, 2010). TransCanada and indeed many multinational firms have time and again proved to be dishonest and only offer evictees as little money as possible for compensating purposes, instead opting to make as much savings as possible (Roode & Ruchti, 2010). The firms ignore the plight of the landowners as well as the attachment the land owners have for their land, for the simple fact that land owners do not form groups to bargain on their behalf for the compensation. TransCanada has time and again refused to engage in dialogue and accommodate suggestions regarding the location of pump stations as well as housing units for the oil workers. Most land owners do not freely consent to their land being taken over by firms such as TransCanada. The landowners only sign the land transfer documents knowing full well that refusal to do so will result to forceful eviction (Ruchti, 2010). TransCanada itself explains that it embraces a policy of handsomely rewarding the land owners. Talking to the landowner’s one gets the understanding that the firm only forcefully takes over peoples land, where need be, through the taking advantage of court approved transaction system (Kadrmas, 2009). Industrialization and pollution go hand in hand. In a fast growing economy like India, the high speed of industrialization comes at a cost (Roode & Ruchti, 2010). This is in the form of 70,000-120,000 death cases as well as 20 million asthma related illness every year, here in this in the form of new infections, largely due to air pollution and toxic gas emissions from power and energy industry onto the environment (Ruchti, 2010). With the case of the toxic sand oils being extracted and transported to refineries, the future health of American’s looks dim if this project is to be implemented without following due process in the creation of checks and balances to regulate safe extraction and processing of the sand oils. Safety of the environment as well as humans should be the number one priority. Debate on the Keystone project has led to the argument of whether or not climate change and energy poverty can be tackled with simultaneously (Kadrmas, 2009). Global warming continues to cause negative changes in the climate, with reports indicating that the Arctic is becoming more and more like the earth’s southern regions. Global warming might become the world’s biggest worry in due time if projects like keystone are implemented without care on the environment being emphasized on. The greater goal of industrialization comes at the price of destruction on the environment. The question on the subject is whether profit realization supersedes destruction of the environment (Kadrmas, 2009). Just nearly two years after the nuclear incident in Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan, reports by the Union of Concerned scientists in the US suggest that one in every six US nuclear power plants experience safety breaches yearly (Roode & Ruchti, 2010). This, according to the report, is caused mostly by the weak structures and laws that are in existence that fail to provide for oversight on the operations of such plants. The same weak oversight structures exist in all the major industries such as energy (Roode & Ruchti, 2010). These weak structures caused by lack of adequate policies are the cause for concern on whether firms like TransCanada will have the nation’s interest at heart for the environment and apply best practices in processing the oil or whether safety concerns are not amongst their concerns. The government of the state of Alberta explains that the Keystone project involves more than just environmental concerns. The government goes further to advocate for implementation of the project, saying the grater goal should be implementing a balance between clean technology, minimizing energy poverty and creation of as many job opportunities as possible (Roode & Ruchti, 2010). While the concerns of the Albertan government are genuine, the greater concern with regard to Keystone should be the health implications of a toxic polluted ecosystem and the preservation of the environment for the future generations to come (Roode & Ruchti, 2010). Conclusion The project itself is worthwhile and of great economic implications. Jobs will be created as well as energy. If the Obama administration approves implementation of the keystone pipeline project, the resultant effect of job creation and economic gain aside, there will also be a tremendous increase in greenhouse emissions on the atmosphere. Pollution of land, air and water will be one of the major implications of the project. Because of its magnitude, the world climate will be affected by this single pipeline project in terms of global warming (Roode & Ruchti, 2010). The government should instead resolve on how clean energy can be produced and recycled since appetite for oil will always exist if not increase with the ever growing population. Structures to check operations of such plants should be put in place and reviewed regularly before projects such as Keystone pipeline are implemented. Compensation for land should be concerned with satisfactorily paying land owners the equivalent of the value of their land and additional costs of eviction (Roode & Ruchti, 2010). The concern for the environment should be the top priority for projects such as Keystone since reversing the effects of environmental degradation is nearly impossible. Economic gain and development is essential for humanity, but then again it cannot come at the cost of destruction of the ecosystem (Roode & Ruchti, 2010). Similar projects to Keystone continue to be implemented worldwide without due precaution and inclusion of concerns by environmentalist and other stakeholders. References Kadrmas, L. (2009). Crude oil pipe pipeline feasibility study Bakken to Keystone pipeline system. Bismarck, N.D.: North Dakota Industrial Commission. Roode, T. J., & Ruchti, G. F. (2010). Pipelines 2010 climbing new peaks to infrastructure reliability : renew, rehab, and reinvest : proceedings of the Pipelines 2010 Conference : August 28-September 1, 2010, Keystone, Colorado. Reston, Va.: American Society of Civil Engineers. Ruchti, G. (2010). Pipelines 2010 climbing new peaks to infrastructure reliability--renew, rehab, and reinvest : proceedings of the 2010 Pipeline Division Specialty Congress, August 28-September 1, 2010, Keystone Colorado. Reston, Va.: American Society of Civil Engineers. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“The Keystone Pipeline Project Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/business/1478514-the-keystone-pipeline-project
(The Keystone Pipeline Project Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 Words)
https://studentshare.org/business/1478514-the-keystone-pipeline-project.
“The Keystone Pipeline Project Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/business/1478514-the-keystone-pipeline-project.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Keystone Pipeline Project

Vetoing of Jobs in America

According to the Oil Information Service, it is a time when fuel and gas prices are rising at an alarming rate, it is critical for the government to analyze the possible effect of the keystone pipeline to the gas prices.... The TransCanada pipeline project intended to connect Canadian crude oil sources to American states has four phases (Lee and Polson 1).... The expedition of the TransCanada pipeline project has the potential of opening up job opportunities for the American people....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Keystone Pipeline Controversy on US Perspectives

Since 2010 when The Keystone Pipeline Project first comes out, it has received lawsuits and criticism from oil refineries, environmentalist, and some members of the United States Congress (Dutta 159).... However, The Keystone Pipeline Project received multiple responses from the politicians and other stakeholders of the United States as well as Canada.... the keystone pipeline is a pipeline system operated by a Canada company TransCanada.... Although the application of TransCanada building the keystone pipeline from Canada to the U....
6 Pages (1500 words) Admission/Application Essay

Keystone XL Pipeline Analysis

The fourth and final phase of the keystone pipeline system is referred to as the Keystone XL Pipeline.... While the first three phases of the keystone pipeline have has supporters at all levels of government and in the business sector, the Keystone XL segment has been met with protest and controversy almost from the first moment is was proposed.... Before the advent of the keystone pipeline system, the greatest threat to the Ogallala Aquifer was over pumping....
12 Pages (3000 words) Research Paper

Keystone Pipeline: Pros and Cons

the keystone pipeline is expected to move As many hopes have already been built on it, this $7 billion energy infrastructure project is expected to have a wide spread and a tremendous effect on the population both ways if it is approved by the government.... the keystone pipeline will be designed to carry one of the world's dirtiest and highly contaminant fuel, tar sands oil.... s the protestors and activists tried to force the government to take an action against this controversial project, the Canadian government was making continuous attempts to pursue the American legislators to move frontward with the Keystone XL pipeline project....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Keystone Pipeline Issue on U.S. Economic and Environmental perspectives

From an ecological perspective, the article says that The Keystone Pipeline Project has been under re-examination from September 2008, and the State department's ecological review was finished in august 2011.... Canada declared that the seven billion dollar keystone pipeline project would become certified for construction from Alberta to Houston.... The primal issue addressed by the article is… If the keystone pipeline is constructed, refineries from the United States will convert Canadian crude oil into gasoline and other fuels....
2 Pages (500 words) Annotated Bibliography

Keystone XL Pipeline Project

eystone XL pipeline project when complete would transport crude oil from Hardisty to US markets mainly the Midwest and Gulf coast.... eystone XL pipeline project poses a high risk to the neighboring community because the potential of spillage is huge.... TransCanada made the first announcement to construct the keystone XL pipeline in 2005.... In 2008, TransCanada made an application to the US department… In the year 2011, the department stated it required additional time to collect the necessary information about the project citing the impacts it would have on the Sand It was mainly to ensure that the project implementation would be in the best interest of the nation....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Opinion on Keystone Pipeline Project

Opinion on Keystone Pipeline project The Keystone Pipeline Project is a noble idea that will bring many benefits to the region.... Therefore, The Keystone Pipeline Project will be of importance upon its completion.... Hence, keystone pipeline project aims at… Besides, it will promote economic growth in the region since the oil is one of the sources of energy, which investors require putting up plants (Figueiredo and Brent 8).... Hence, keystone pipeline project aims at bringing goodies by creating employment for the locals and the whole nation and increasing energy independence....
2 Pages (500 words) Term Paper

Controversies in Keystone Pipeline Project

he problem herein is a case with The Keystone Pipeline Project, which was mainly constructed to create an economic stimulus of more than $ 7 million, and more than 200, 000 jobs to the youths....  This study "Controversies in keystone pipeline project" focuses upon identifying and exploring the economic issue of whether this project will actually result in stimulation for the economy besides creating jobs for both the countries.... hellip;  keystone pipeline project is one of the leading collaborative efforts between Canada and US wherein both the countries are involved in the establishment of an oil pipeline between the two countries....
18 Pages (4500 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us