Download file to see previous pages...
However, he does not take sides with his country, the USA, in its conspiracy. Although the President releases a statement Wilson’s investigation, these are contrary to Wilson’s findings. Wilson does not accept the president’s misinterpretation of the findings. He therefore, goes ahead to publish his own account of the investigation, making it available to the public. This therefore, conflicts with Bush’s statement. Wilson was courageous and stood for the truth, not letting anything to compromise his truth. He refused to sit back and watch how the truth was being violated publicly. Therefore, he acted.
By coming out publicly to make the truth available to the people, through publishing this article, I compare Wilson to the philosopher W.D, Ross, who developed a moral system called “intuitionist,” which claims that individuals are inherently aware of their moral obligations (Plaisance 10). Therefore, when Wilson came out fearlessly and published the article, no one had forced him to do so. Deep down, he knew he had the responsibility of performing his moral duties. Ross’ philosophy also holds that a person has a responsibility of honoring their moral standards and principles (Plaisance 10). Therefore, one of Wilson’s moral values must have been truthfulness, which is why he had to honor it by publishing the article to bring out the truth. In this philosophy, Ross also believed that the moral values one must honor include fidelity, justice, not harming others, and self-improvement (Plaisance 10). The values of fidelity, justice, and not harming others coincide with Wilson’s actions. He was against Bush’s propaganda of war with Iraq, since he knew this would cause harm to the Iraqis, as well as the US soldiers, who would die in the war. Wilson upholds justice, because he did not want the USA government to accuse Iraq falsely. Finally, he shows fidelity when he investigates the case, presents truthful findings, and ensures false statements
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
This work focuses on some of the important ethics to be observed in the media sector. Media ethics is divided according to the various subdivisions of the media sector (Kieran, 2005). Each nation has specific laws and policies to guide any reporter, journalists and editors among other media personalities when passing any information to the public.
But unfortunately media is also confronting some ethical problems like sensationalism. The old way of telling the story ‘the way it is’ has become obsolete. It is vital for a news channel or a magazine to use luring techniques in order to attract customers.
As the report stresses many people especially businesses adopted this technology and established different internets sites such as MySpace, Twitter, Instagram, Facebook designed to enable users to establish a profile having information about the user. Social network sites permits people to create social networks with thousands of people.
I would then specifically focus on the issues covered in this essay where it is opined that a bias in public opinion was created by imperfect information and media's innate proclivity to file a report without complete verification of facts. I will attempt to show that scientists are open to criticism and there is no ground to assert that they retain dogmatic views which contribute to bias.
People use reason as a main tool to choose a course of action in a scale of options for a single virtue. It is through this that people decide their satisfaction and pleasure. The individual is the center of this ethics model.
Kant's stand on ethics is that reason directs the actions of a person (Patterson and Wilkins, 9).
The law is the instrument by which governments govern, while ethics is what guides the journalist in the practice of printing and broadcasting.
Ethics is a value system based on sensibility and vision as determined by human experience and reinforced by the superego.
Proving once again that this year is no better or less dangerous to be a journalist.
Every year the story seems to be the same. As repetitive and redundant as the news they bring, a number of journalists suffer the same fate regardless of their
Perhaps, this was a mere experiment or it was curiosity getting the better of them. However, this analysis looks at this as a normal budding interest of any regular journalist who wants to conclude the story. In this case, it is purely an official and not a
The professional ethics of modern lawyers, as depicted in the literature, television, and films, creates a clear distinction between specific acts and professional and personal character. The perception of lawyers in the contemporary popular culture is nuanced and complex as opposed to the older treatments.
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic MEDIA ETHICS for FREE!