Download file to see previous pages...
To start with, euthanasia denies the basic right of a human for the appropriate treatment and life and therefore, weakens the respect for it. Regardless of the type of euthanasia, whether it is passive or active, its essence lies in performing action that leads to either letting one die or to killing a person rather than offering healthcare, providing medical and emotional support, of which patients are in need. (Ebrahimi, 2012) As a result, the sanctity and respect of human life becomes devaluated and human ethics – challenged as far as people no longer question the personal capacity to make decisions concerning patients’ lives.
Furthermore, the procedure of euthanasia should be regarded as a violation of duties of medical professionals, who are aimed at saving lives, not depriving of them. According to the International Code of Medical Ethics, doctors are expected to “always bear in mind the obligation of preserving human life from the time of conception until death.” ("Twelwe reasons why," 2015) Similarly, adhering to the Hippocratic Oath specialists promise not to give “deadly medicine to anyone if asked, nor suggest such counsel…” (Yin Au, 2010) Thereof, doctors are obliged to apply efforts to prolong the life of a patient possibly long rather than choosing the easier path – euthanasia. Taking it into consideration, the right of medical specialists to be engaged in this procedure remains doubtful.
In addition, it is obvious that the legalization of euthanasia can place pressure on terminally ill and the elderly to resort to it for the sake of not being a burden for others. Facing a deadly illness or entering particular age when the end of life seems to be approaching, a person may feel like being obliged to resort to euthanasia in order not to feel guilty for creating inconveniences for the family, even though being morally opposed to and, in fact, not wanting euthanasia. (Ebrahimi, 2012) By this, patients with similar diagnosis
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Euthanasia is Greek for “happy death,” and involves the active killing of another because one's life is not worth living. The practice has been widely legalized throughout Europe, although the United States has yet to legalize it.
Euthanasia: Can It Ever Be Morally or Ethically Justifiable? This paper reflects on the Assisted Suicide bill by Lord Joffe, which has been the subject of immense controversy when it was attempted to be introduced in the House of Lords. The bill, if enacted into law, would allow terminally ill patients to seek drugs from their doctors that would end their lives.
Considering the different ideas behind these issues, this study will not only differentiate active euthanasia from passive euthanasia but also discuss advance directives concerning its double effect. Introduction Life and death are two significant parts of the life cycle.
In most cases, involuntary euthanasia is considered a crime in legal perspective and this fact has made it difficult for other categories of euthanasia to be legalized. Involuntary Euthanasia can further be classified as either active or passive involuntary. Involuntary active is where actions are taken to cause death without the consent of the patient.
Summary and Opinion on Each Article On the Moral and legal Status of Abortion - Marry Anne Warren Abortion can be defined as a deliberate action of a woman to terminate her pregnancy or to allow another person deliberately for terminating her pregnancy. Terminating a pregnancy means death of a fetus before its birth.
Although this allows us as speakers to express ourselves more effectively, it also allows for a more powerful manipulation of language. Definitions of words and concepts become stretched and bent such that they can fit into
For instance, living can be worse than dying if a person is suffering from an irreversible comma or incurable painful disease. In voluntary euthanasia, the patient expresses this choice and passes on the death action when faced by a situation
However, certain exceptions to such rules also exist around the world (Cooney & et. al., 2012). As apparent, the practice of euthanasia presents a pessimistic moral view to the care-giving obligations when treating
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Give an argument for legalizing active euthanasia and an argument against it for FREE!