Download file to see previous pages...
The scientific proof for humans is responsible for causing climate change. For example, when humans drive their cars, release carbon dioxide in the form of fossil fuel and, as a result, the chemical composition of the air is interfered. On the other hand, people are consuming more carbon dioxide than before due to activities such as gas emissions from greenhouses and industries. Thus, these cause a lot of harm to humans, animals, and plants. Some of the negative effects of climate change include harsh weather conditions like floods and extreme draught.
The other issue is that large numbers of people are dying due to change in climate. This change can cause lack of rainfall, malnutrition, temperature change, and diseases that are prone such malaria, diarrheas and dengue. The issue of equal distribution of resources is also highlighted in the chapter. It is argued that resources need to be shared justly to all the concerned parties. The Western nations have been accused of causing massive pollution to the environment because of industrialization. The issue of polluting the atmosphere is least in the African nations. It is very frightening of the negative effects that human beings have brought upon themselves, and it is too late to do anything to change the situation. In order to be saved from this man made consequences, either the advancements in technology that will save us or God will rescue us.
According to the information from this chapter, the author has a good perspective. The author raises concern about the activities of humans and their impacts on the environment. People have caused this problem, and they cannot be able to avoid the consequences. The chapter is very interesting to read. It touches on all scope of people in the whole world because; everyone feels the negative effects of global warming. Unlike in the past, global warming has now become a global concern, not only to the individual, but also to governments.
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Contemporary Moral Problems Book Report/Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 1”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/social-science/1686721-contemporary-moral-problems
(Contemporary Moral Problems Book Report/Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words - 1)
“Contemporary Moral Problems Book Report/Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words - 1”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/social-science/1686721-contemporary-moral-problems.
His interpretation of the law was demonstrated in his own Law of Accelerating Returns. One of his important claims in this principle is that "a specific paradigm provides exponential growth until the method exhausts its potential," and that, "when this happens, a paradigm shift (i.e., a fundamental change in approach) occurs, which enables exponential growth to continue (Kurzweil 2001).
It is not unlike asking what nanotechnology is and the answer would be quite complex and multidisciplinary especially if it includes the impact of such technology on our lives. The reason for this is that nanotechnology, as with other technologies that are still new, does not have the resources yet to enable its effective and safe development.
The journal article chosen is "Social Class Differences in Coronary Hearth Disease in Middle-Aged Men: Implications for Prevention". (Emberson, 2003). The study evaluated the relationship between occupational social class and major Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) deaths and all-cause mortality rates over 20 years among 5628 middle-aged British men.
Despite the critique of objective normativity, Habermas's program does not neatly fit into the postmodern relativism of his Continental counterparts such as Foucault and Derrida. Habermas's concept of communicative rationality established a theoretical stance from which to analyze the epistemological structures of society and individuals that appreciated and was sensitive to the contextualized and historicized nature of reason and rationality without giving in totally to the sort of radical relativism that his intellectual contemporaries are usually accused of.
The latter part of the essay addresses a naturalistic interpretation of Hume's reconciling project. The essay here looks in detail at the complexities of Hume's idea of freedom and asks what kind of freedom it is that he sees as sufficient for moral responsibility.
This paper will focus on the strategies used for justifying moral theories, as this is generally where the theorists go their separate ways in constructing the supreme principle of morality. As such each theory may yield different answers to the three questions raised under morality: 1) Authoritative question: Why ought I be moral 2) Substantive question: Which interest ought I to take favourable account of 3) Distributive question: Whose interest ought I to take favourable account of
The basic motive of this project is to analyze Michael Tooley’s article, “Moral Status of Cloning Humans”. He says that the idea or theory of genetic determinism is not correct, therefore, cloning to produce persons cannot be labeled intrinsically wrong. Tooley further asserts that not only is cloning not immoral, but it can help us improve our lives.
Have the governments of Afghanistan, and Iraq been harboring terrorists? This paper will discuss the debate over the morality of the War on Terrorism.
In discussing the factual questions relating to whether, or not the War on Terrorism