Nobody downloaded yet

The U.S. Supreme Court decision on the Arizona immigration law - Research Paper Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
The constitution is charged with the responsibility of regulating and enforcing immigration and naturalization rules in the hands of the federal government. States and localities must however comply with the federal rulings on immigration. In 2010 in Arizona, the undocumented…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.3% of users find it useful
The U.S. Supreme Court decision on the Arizona immigration law
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "The U.S. Supreme Court decision on the Arizona immigration law"

Download file to see previous pages Governors across the state and lawmakers introduced many immigration bills. The law required non-citizens to carry authorization papers which gave Arizonans to sue state and localities for non compliance. The Arizona law specifically drew the greatest national attention due to its racial profiling2.
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court released an order that invalidated most sections of the Arizona immigration law. It was declared a success for Obama administration, a challenge for the constitutionality of the law. A number of issues were considered invalid and unconstitutional3. The congress specified the type of aliens to be evicted from the United States following laid down procedures. A brief by former commissioner of the United States immigration and naturalization services covers some aspects concerning alien eviction. According to him, aliens are subject to eviction if they could not be admitted at the time of entry or have had committed certain crimes. Eviction is civil and not criminal. The officials of the federal government have a voice on what credits an eviction. Aliens too have the right to seek asylum and other permit to remain in the country or leave without official eviction. Alien workers supporting their families are les likely to pose threat and are allowed to stay on humanitarian grounds. Returning an alien back to his country is also considered inappropriate regardless of whether they have committed crimes or have not met the admission requirements4.
Unlike the Arizona law on field preemption, the federal law provides guidelines for alien registration and punishment for refusal. The aliens within the state borders are kept on track by a comprehensive and strong system. The Arizona law ignored the basic rules of field preemption that nations are banned from entering an area preserved by the federal government itself. Also, ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“The U.S. Supreme Court decision on the Arizona immigration law Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1599646-the-us-supreme-court-decision-on-the-arizona-immigration-law
(The U.S. Supreme Court Decision on the Arizona Immigration Law Research Paper)
https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1599646-the-us-supreme-court-decision-on-the-arizona-immigration-law.
“The U.S. Supreme Court Decision on the Arizona Immigration Law Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1599646-the-us-supreme-court-decision-on-the-arizona-immigration-law.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The U.S. Supreme Court decision on the Arizona immigration law

Arizona Immigration Law

...of the surprising things about this controversial bill is the decision of American Supreme Court. “The Supreme Court gave a big boost to proponents of stricter state laws against illegal immigration by upholding Arizona's "business death penalty" for employers who repeatedly hire undocumented workers” (Savage). In other words, Supreme Court upheld the decision of Arizona to punish the employers who employ illegal immigrants. Even though three of the total eight members in the jury gave their verdict against the...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

U.S. Supreme Court decision

... Tax Credit for Religious Tuition.” The New York Times. The New York Times Newspaper, 4 April 2011. Web. 28 July 2011. Weiss, Debra Cassens. “Supreme Court Tosses Religious School Tax Credit Case on Standing Grounds.” ABA Journal Law News Now. ABA Journal, 4 April 2011. Web. 28 July 2011. Supreme Court Allows Tax Credit for Religious Tuition By ADAM LIPTAK Published: April 4, 2011 WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday let stand an Arizona program that aids religious schools, saying in a 5-to-4 decision that the plaintiffs had no standing to challenge it. Related in Opinion Editorial: Justice Kagan Dissents(April 10, 2011) The program itself is novel and complicated, and allowing it to go forward may be of no particular moment... for...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Immigration Law of Arizona

...will discuss the likelihood of the Supreme Court taking the case and the possible decision it may make as well as the impact of that decision. Likelihood of Supreme Court to Admit the Case The decision whether the Supreme Court should undertake the case is both constitutional and policy based. This is a case that has been very controversial with dissenting decisions from inferior courts. The Arizona immigration law does not only involve all the states of America but it is also a matter of international...
5 Pages(1250 words)Assignment

Arizona Immigration Law

... it discordant with the US Constitution; hence, it violates the country’s supreme law. Works Cited Morse A. Arizona’s Immigration Enforcement Laws. National Conference of State Legislatures. Washington. 2011. Print. Senate research. Arizona State Senate Forty-Ninth Legislature, Second Regular Session: Fact Sheet For S.B. 1070. 15th Jan. 2010.Web. 10TH Feb. 2011. s.1070pshs.doc.htm> Terry L. Jordan. The U.S. Constitution: and the fascinating facts about it. Oak Hill Publishing Company. Naperville. 2006. Print. Williams J. K. The U.S Constitution. Compass Point Books. Minneapolis. 2003. Print.... constitution, each state’s citizens are entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of citizens in the other states. Some of these privileges include employment...
7 Pages(1750 words)Research Paper

Supreme Court

...The Apocalypse of Adolescence By Yuliya Having read through the article en d "The Apocalypse of Adolescence", several conclusions came to mind. First, juveniles should almost never be given the death penalty, as this provides virtually zero learning in relation to moral guidance and the receipt of understanding as to what is right versus what is wrong. The death penalty takes their young lives and forever changes them, without the opportunity to be rehabilitated by competent sociological or psychological professionals. However, when the case is similar to the one in the article, the juvenile death penalty may be imposed, especially when the children show no regret for their actions. The problem, however, appears to lie in whether...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

2009 U.S. Supreme Court decision on Arizona V. Gant

...The 2009 US Supreme Court decision on Arizona vs. Gant The 2009 US Supreme Court decision on Arizona vs. Gant This paper looks into the 2009 US Supreme Court decision on Arizona vs. Gant. The arrest of Gant followed a warrant of arrest after authorities learnt that Grant was driving with a suspended license. However, authority officers went to the extent of searching Grant’s vehicle compartments instead of making a straight arrest. The ruling that was issued on April 21, 2009 by the US Supreme Court in Arizona vs. Gant restricts officers in security authorities to carry out searches on vehicles after the arrest of the occupant. These restrictions apply to “search incident to arrest”. This paper provides an analysis on this ruling... and the...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper

Supreme Court Winery Decision

...Supreme Court Winery Decision Question 1 According to the utilitarian ethics, a situation is morally upright if the course of action serves to the benefit of the majority. Both the Supreme Court ruling and the earlier law generate benefits to different members of the American society. However, based on the utilitarian ethics, the decision by the Supreme Court is not moral since it eradicates the utility. The utility lost in this scenario is defined by reduced tax revenue and a decline in the quality of life of the society. In this perspective, the ruling results in loss of tax used to...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Supreme Court Decision

...of the Political Science of the Teacher 14 July Doe v. of Intrusia- Supreme Court Decision As per the wisdom and informed opinion of this Court of Law, the City of Intrusia no way violated the search and seizure protections enshrined in the Fourth Amendment by intercepting the text messages of the accused Joe Doe, and these text messages are aptly admissible in this Court as valid and credible evidence. This Court has ample reasons to set aside the appeal made by the accused, Joe Doe. The Fourth Amendment in its word and spirit intends to protect “The right of the people to be secure”, in the condition that they are...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Supreme Court

...Supreme Court case of Korematsu v. U.S Complaint The complaint in this case was that Korematsuwho was an American of Japanese descent was wrongfully evicted from his location to an internment camp. He complained that this violated his constitutional rights and hence refused to move as the order requested. This led to his arrest and conviction based on disloyalty and disobedience to the country and its laws. Brief summary of the facts At the peak of World War II, President Roosevelt signed a presidential executive order 9066 which demanded that all American-Japanese people be evacuated and taken into internment camps where they would be closely monitored. The aim of this order which was...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Supreme Court

.... Americans uses federalism in governing the Americans using the state laws , federal laws, and local government laws. Federalism has changed greatly in the course of the American history these changes include, eliminating the confederation articles and giving the federal laws supremacy over the state laws (R. Dye, Zeigler and Schubert). CONCLUSION Conclusion the , the supreme court has played a great role in advancing the Americans rights and freedoms over the last six years . These includes legalizing same sex marriages which is in accordance with the bill of rights of the American constitution. REFERENCES R. Dye, Thomas, Harmon Zeigler, and Loius Schubert. Irony Of Democracy. Print.... DD Month YYYY ESSAY POLITICAL SCIENCE...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Research Paper on topic The U.S. Supreme Court decision on the Arizona immigration law for FREE!

Contact Us