Free

Philosophy - Assignment Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
In §34 of the Second Treatise, Locke claims that “God gave the world to men in common,” but he also claims that God gave the world “to the use of the industrious and rational?” Why do the rational and industrious have more of a claim to the natural resources nature…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.8% of users find it useful
Philosophy Assignment
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Philosophy"

Philosophy Multiple Choices: According to Locke, the earth as it is given to men in common is inherently: a) Useful and of great value
2. For Locke, what are the two things of which human beings have ownership merely by virtue of being born?
a) Individual possession.
b) Knowledge.
3. If the earth is originally given to human beings in common, what must a person mix with the natural resources provided by nature in order to make them his/her own private property?
One should mix knowledge and industry to make his/her property.
4. Circle the answer that is NOT one of Locke’s natural limitations of private ownership:
c) Only those chosen by God can lay claim to private property.
5. True or False: According to Locke, money undermines natural limitations of private property because it does not spoil.
True
6. According to Locke, who enjoys the greater comforts of life? Is it:
b) A day laborer in England?
7. In §34 of the Second Treatise, Locke claims that “God gave the world to men in common,” but he also claims that God gave the world “to the use of the industrious and rational?” Why do the rational and industrious have more of a claim to the natural resources nature provides? (Hint, this is the theme of §32-35). This question is worth 4 points.
The rational and industrious make improvements which is important in resource acquisition. Those who are more industrious get more of the natural resources. They in turn use the labor of the less industrious to amass property. In the long run, the more industrious work less and have all the money while the less industrious labour for those who have already acquired resources (Logan etal,32-35).
Work Cited
Logan, Robert and Adams, Clarence (Ed). Utopia. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 1995. Print. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Philosophy Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words”, n.d.)
Philosophy Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1591201-philosophy-assignment
(Philosophy Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 Words)
Philosophy Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 Words. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1591201-philosophy-assignment.
“Philosophy Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1591201-philosophy-assignment.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Philosophy Assignment

Philosophy

... The soul of a collectivist Roak’s in his speech illustrates that if a person fails to listen to his colleagues or his kinsmen, then he is not ready to listen to his speech. He contrasts current leadership style and form of ruling to initial forms of leadership such as the napoleon. If a person is given an opportunity as a leader, such a person should exercise his authority in a way that all members of the society feel satisfied. Roak’s illustration is that, if one person can be satisfied with how leaders exercise their duties then this effect should be applied in ruling bigger margin of population (Lieberman, Richter and Rank). Taking into account leaders like peter who only believed that one’s somebody makes a mistake he should... The soul...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment

Philosophy

...? full Philosophy 11/6/13 Questions: In Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion Cleanthes offers an argument for God’s existence that has come to be known as the “Argument from Design.” Recreate this argument, being sure to identify the form it takes and the type of premises it utilizes. This argument is structured around an analogy. Identify what is being compared in this analogy and explain why Cleanthes believes he is justified in this comparison (Hint: Support Cleanthes position by pointing to some relevantly similar characteristics between the two analogues). Philo offers a rebuttal to Cleanthes argument that is based on the analogical structure of Cleanthes’ argument. What is this rebuttal (Note: You need not...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment

Philosophy

.... Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill’s ethical philosophies seem to be in direct contradiction to one another, so the generic statement that they have opposing ethical theories is true. However, some of the things they say seem to parallel one another in that the same self-value is recognized though Kant says it is autonomous and comes from within and Mill seems to think it okay to take advantage of others to some degree in order to derive physical pleasure over pain. Kant was a believer in the “freedom of will” or what we call free will as it pertains to the individual. He also believed that we don’t morally sacrifice our conscience or what is “good” about us just to meet some expedient need. Mill seems to make the...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment

Philosophy

... Philosophy Definition: Natural evil is one of the two kinds of evil according to Hicks which is characterized by pain and suffering in terms of different aspects such as physical and mental. It lacks the element of will or decision making by the person involved (Hick 106). Human or moral evil is equated to the degree of wickedness due to the fact that it is the kind of evil that is willed and chosen by the person himself (p. 105-106). This is a resultant of the presence of human freedom (p. 104). Soul building according to Hick is the improvement of the human person because he defined the concept as the ‘courage to face suffering’ which is fundamental in the achievement of a good human character (p. 104-105). A person or human... Philosophy...
2 Pages(500 words)Assignment

Philosophy

...Philosophy Ashley is a 23 year old white female who is currently in a relationship with another young female. When I asked her if gay people should be allowed to marry, she answered with a yes, saying that to uphold equality in America anybody should be allowed to marry whoever they wanted to. I then asked if married gay men and women should be given full civil rights. Again, she answered yes, stating that if they were allowed to marry then they should get all of the benefits of marriage. I asked her if being gay is something that can be fixed or if it was something that just happened with people. She responded with, “Being gay isn’t like trying on a pair of jeans, deciding you don’t like them, and then putting them back...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment

Philosophy

...Epistemology meant the study of knowledge and justified belief. Plainly, it meant how we learn things. One of the prominent philosophers that made “how is knowledge possible” is Immanuel Kant who held that experience perfects knowledge. Kant’s philosophical trajectory is aimed towards the resolution of the empirical (Locke and Hume) and rationalist approaches. For him, there is necessarily no contradiction between the two. The empiricist proposes that knowledge only comes from experience (and feeling with Locke) while the rationalists asserts that reason is already an innate attribute and is already previously present (Descartes with this Cartesian proof). For Kant, experience perfects knowledge and argued that experience... meant the...
5 Pages(1250 words)Assignment

Philosophy

...The Cartesian cycle: analysis of Loeb’s solution The Cartesian Cycle Cartesian cycle is allegedly a circular way of reasoning thatRene Descartes uses to show how whatever he alludes as “distinctly and clearly” is true. Rene puts it that distinct and clear perception is like a guarantor of truth. This is because the Almighty God, who is perceived as not a deceiver, would not permit Descartes to mistake that which he distinctly and clearly perceives. This argument heavily relies on earlier proof that Descartes had about the existence of the Almighty God. However, this proof cannot be perceived as containing an error according to Descartes unless he perceives that his distinct and clear perception of his steps of reasoning provide... Cartesian...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment

Philosophy

...Full According to St. Anselm, God exists even though no one really can prove His existence by presenting Him as a tangible being, because the very thought of His being proves He exists. If a man can conceive of a thought, that is considered existent even though it cannot be seen. For how can a man think about something that does not exist? Therefore, God who has been a subject of debate for generations past; exists. The problem with this argument is that, it may be logical but it confronts the scientific requirements of proving a discourse to be true. 2. Thomas Aquinas argues that things can be created so this determines the existence or non-existence of something. For instance, the existence of computers is a result of the work... According...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment

Philosophy

...Philosophy Questions Question One: Dissatisfaction of Humans and Socrates: Through this ment, the lives of a high being, is far much more satisfying than the life of a being that is low. This is the reason why Mill is denoting that it is better to become a human being who is dissatisfied, when compared to a satisfied pig. Mill denotes that a human being is a superior being, when compared to a pig (Hamilton, 73). Furthermore, Mill denotes that Socrates was a wise human being, and hence he is superior, when compared to a fool (Hamilton, 73). Through this statement, we are able to know that it is unethical to become a fool, and their satisfaction, cannot be equated to the dissatisfaction of a wise person. Through this...
2 Pages(500 words)Assignment

Philosophy

...Philosophy (A No rent-control proposals are regulations welcomed by landlords, and all regulations welcomed by landlords are measures that allow a free hand in raising rents. Therefore, some rent-control proposals are measures that allow a free hand in raising rents. Standard form syllogism: No rent-control proposals are regulations welcomed by landlords All regulations welcomed by landlords are measures that allow a free hand in raising rents some rent-control proposals are measures that allow a free hand in raising rents Mood and figures EAI-4 Major term- Rent control proposals Minor term- free hand in raising rent. Middle term- Regulations welcomed by landlord 2) No illegal aliens are people who have a right to...
4 Pages(1000 words)Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Assignment on topic Philosophy Assignment for FREE!

Contact Us