Download file to see previous pages...
In March 2003 the manager of Dunken Donuts in Yonkers, New York posted a sign inviting customers to complain if they heard employees seeking other than English behind the counter. 1 day later he removed his sign because the complaints were that he was being discriminative. The interesting thing about the case is that the manager spoke Spanish as his first language but always spoke English at work. He felt that there were good reasons to speak English only at work and those reasons related to bonding of employees in a team atmosphere. He feels that when a language other than English is spoken, it causes poor attitudes and people do not get along as well (Rodriquez, 2005).
On the other hand, in another case, the manager of an insurance company was consistently angry about Tony who liked to speak Cantonese to his Chinese co-workers. The manager believes that employees should only speak English while on the job. Eventually the company did put together an English speaking only rule and Tony left the company. Tony felt that the English only rule violated antidiscrimination laws. Certainly by leaving the company, the company has lost the diversity of information that Tony may have had (Thornton, 2004).
However, the Supreme Court declared that employers could, in fact, enforce English only rules in the workplace. Many people find this a boon for working conditions but it is difficult to see it one way. While many think it is positive for the work place, there are just as many that believe that having language diversity is as important as cultural diversity, knowledge diversity and more. For example when Tony lost his job, he got a job recruiting Cantonese speaking Engineers and Scientist (Thornton, 2004).
Interestingly enough, though the Supreme Court supported the use of English only rules, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act states that it is discriminatory unless there is a business necessity. As there is confusion in the law, so there is also confusion
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
This is a positive and strong enabler, because a female who do not want to undergo circumcision have a legal protection. But this may increase illegal unsafe performance conduct by unqualified people which can be more harmful.
Long term studies conducted to measure the
government machinery, especially policemen are trying to enforce the Sharia Laws, perhaps against the wishes of the people and this could adversely affect opinion of the free world of belief that Indonesian government believes in human rights and its just enforcement in this
There are no current laws in the United States that either endorse or discourage the use of English as the only spoken language. Since there are no legal restrictions, the Company may pursue this rule, especially a
Malaysia, like other countries in Category 2 (South Korea, UAE, India and China), has a dynamic and relatively affordable system. There are also openings for scholarships and other forms of financial assistance. The buoyancy and stability of
owing nexus among humans – between the king and his vassals, between spouses between each other, between parents and their children, siblings among themselves- brothers and sisters, acquaintances among themselves and so on.
Under South Korean tenets, the males have the upper
He wears a white shirt embroidered with geometric symbols of Ghede. He seizes a bottle of rum which he takes a drink of and swishes it in his mouth and then spews it all over the room, he does this a second time and then a third time he takes a
niform Crime Report) records shows that African Americans are disproportionately involved in crime; for example arrest rates record shows that 39% of violent crime reported, and 31% of property crimes are said to be committed by African Americans. However, this records shows
The sub-constructs of the Purnell model that have been used in relation to health practitioners are perceptions of practitioners, folk practitioners and gender and health care Religious practices.
In 2009, the Malaysian