Download file to see previous pages...
From all outward appearances, the 1950 Sino-Soviet alliance was impenetrable and that the two countries were engaged in a common goal to ensure that Communism was a major influence around the world. There was more than enough evidence to support this perception. Under Mao Tse-tung’s leadership, China formally aligned itself with the USSR. When the Communists in North Korea invaded the Republic of Korea, China intervened and the USSR lent military aid.1 What was perceived as an ideal and threatening partnership would not stand the test of ideological differences. This paper seeks to provide an understanding of how this seemingly ideal partnership was doomed for failure. The events leading up to, during and immediately after the second Taiwan crisis of 1958 are significant in their manifestation of just how far apart the Soviet Union and China were growing.
By the 1960s, the Sino-Soviet Alliance was practically shattered as their respective ideologies and polices were increasingly at odds. The office of the US Central Intelligence Agency reported to the US’s administrators in February 1962 that:
Sino-Soviet relations are in a critical phase just short of an acknowledged and definitive split. There is no longer much of a fundamental resolution of differences. In our view, the chances that such a split can be avoided in 1962 are no better than ever.2
There are a number of theories put forth by historians and political scientists attempting to understand the driving force splitting the union between the world’s two largest Communist states. Athwal argues that the US’ “nuclear superiority” put increasing pressures on Sino-Soviet relations and policies by first influencing China to obtain nuclear weapons and by forcing the Soviets to look to the West in a more amicable way. Moreover, both China and the Soviet Union had
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
This study is the best example of comparison the Soviet Union and the United States. It demonstrates that both countries share the same objective, which is to deter nuclear war. This objective can go above their individual differences, beliefs, and ideologies, and allow the two great powers to talk about arms control settlements which could lessen the threat of war.
This paper will give reasons that warrant Kissinger’s support for a Sino-American Alliance. While Richard Nixon was the president of the United States of America in 1969, he faced confrontation that scholars perceived as the erosion of the U.S power and credibility.
In the case of a cold war, the two conflicting nations do not come out openly to fight each other but support their allies in various wars against the enemy nations. One faction can provide military weapons whereas the other could provide armed support during warfare.
United States and Soviet Union - the two powerhouses in the recent decades. Though strangely different in ideologies ruling them over times, each posed enough threat to one another's subsistence till yesteryears. In order to understand the dialogue between the United States and Soviet Union in general or in specific, the late 1920's - which forms the context, one must first understand the events leading up to that period.
The United States is currently the world's lone superpower with the ambition and capacity to exercise global primacy (Wang ), while China is one of the most salient rising powers on the international stage (Zhang 685). Accordingly, nothing less than the security and prosperity of the Asia-Pacific region in the decades to come (Levine 92) is at stake in the often complex and multi-faceted Sino-American relations (Sino-American relations).
Under Mao Tse-tung’s leadership, China formally aligned itself with the USSR. When the Communists in North Korea invaded the Republic of Korea, China intervened and the USSR lent military aid.1 What was perceived as an ideal and threatening partnership would not stand the
te and isolated event, however, reflection over the contemporary international political situation would reveal the fact that foundation of the same was already prepared and undercurrent of political tension regarding attaining upper hand over international situation between the